Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>AnomieBOT
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Copyedit}}
 
en>Mogism
m Cleanup/Typo fixing, typo(s) fixed: 1980's → 1980s using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
The design of the deal with - it flows with the design of the blade - arduous to explain, but the deal with just feels excellent in my hand, as well as other individuals I confirmed the knife to. Each one that tried it mentioned how good the knife felt in their hand. And, if a knife feels good - that's an enormous a part of the battle when selecting a knife - any knife. The handle of the knife is of the open design, it allows filth, lint and other crud to escape, instead of build up within the deal with.<br><br>Columbia River Knife & Instruments (CRKT) is based in Tualatin, Oregon. It was founded by Paul Gilespie and Rod Bremer. Gilespie and Bremer each developed their experience within the knife manufacturing field while working for Kershaw Knives. They left Kershaw to discovered CRKT in 1994 with Pete Kershaw’s assist and greatest wishes. CRKT truly took off and assured its future with the introduction of their KISS (Hold it Tremendous Easy) knife in the 1998 Shot Show. The KISS knife, a small folder designed by Ed Halligan, was sold out within the first opening of days the Shot Present.<br><br>With the Sage 1 I had an outside concern of wilderness durability, but with the Sage 2 that worry is completely gone. The all titanium frame should final by means of even the worst abuse and then some. In reality this feels simply as strong as the Ontario RAT folder that I examined [http://www.thebestpocketknifereviews.com/spyderco-delica-4-review/ Spyderco Delica 4 Wave] last time. I choose the body lock to the liner lock in most situations. That is largely because of the fact that I'm left handed and thus the frame lock is less complicated to operate in my left hand than the liner lock.<br><br>In wrapping up, I can say that I was reasonably impressed with Kershaw’s Cryo. It’s an awesome wanting EDC which is far from the efficiency or [http://wiki.paconun.eu/index.php/Orange_Spyderco_Delica_4 function-set] of the $100+ offerings however for this worth it’[http://Indieroulette.com/index.php?title=Spyderco_Delica_4_V8-10 ll satisfy] most customers. That said, I don't assume it’s as spectacular because the Spyderco Tenacious which is about the identical price but edges out the Cryo in quite a few departments as is in general a better design for my part. That said, for those who’re available in the market for one thing a little different and a knife that stands out from the group then the Cryo won't disappoint. Keep tuned for that.<br><br>Victorinox is widely recognized for making swiss army knives. It has all the time delivered the perfect of knives. This time Victorinox came with Swiss army basic pocket knife which is mainly a compact instrument set for all campers and hikers. The classic SD pocket knife is cased in a solid-coloured housing with Victorinox emblem on one facet. This pocket knife contains all the essential Swiss army tools reminiscent of pair of mini scissors, sharp blade for reducing, a nail file with a screwdriver tip, key ring, tweezer and a toothpick. Proprietor opinions usually average at over four out of 5 stars. Many owners love this knife’s compact measurement and low weight.<br><br>Each knives are snug to carry and have a recurve of their blade to make for a little bit simpler control when whittling wood and other issues. Throughout this is a stable common knife — just not what I'm looking for. On the intense facet, the G10 without pocket clip is an amazingly light knife to pocket. Simple to stash away and forget you are carrying — that alone makes it a helpful knife for some. Simply not for me. Then again in case you just need one of the best one, decide between the Sage 1 and the Sage 2 primarily based on their looks. Each are glorious knives.<br><br>The santoku was created within the culinary culture of Japan the place the weight-reduction plan consists virtually solely of greens and fish. It's considerably marginalized within the United States by the Western food regimen. Many people who purchase santokus (chef’s included) change into disenchanted with them the moment their blade becomes chipped – which can happen in case [http://www.thebestpocketknifereviews.com/spyderco-delica-4-review/ www.thebestpocketknifereviews.com] you use it minimize by way of a whole lot of crimson meat and poultry. They have been simply not designed for our caveman-like food plan and our caveman therapy of food on the reducing board. American’s thrash by their substances while the [http://Www.malgefragt.net/mwiki/index.php?title=Spyderco_Delica_4_Orange Japanese tend] to skate by means of it.
{{underlinked|date=November 2012}}
 
In 1989 Bernard Russel Bowring gave formulas for the [[Transverse Mercator]] that are simpler to program but retain millimeter accuracy.<ref>Bowring, B. R. (1989). Survey Review, Volume '''30''' (Part 233), pp 125&ndash;133, [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/sre/1989/00000030/00000233/art00006 ''Transverse Mercator equations obtained from a spherical basis''].</ref> Bowring  rewrote the fourth order Redfearn series (after discarding small terms) in a more compact notation by replacing the spherical terms, i.e. those independent of ellipticity,  by the exact expressions used in the spherical transverse Mercator projection. There was no gain in accuracy since the elliptic terms were still truncated at the 1mm level. Such modifications were of possible use when computing resources were minimal.
 
==Notation==
<math> a </math> = radius of the equator of the chosen spheroid (e.g. 6378137 m for GRS80/WGS84)<br>
 
<math> b </math> = polar semi-axis of the spheroid<br>
 
<math> k_0 </math> = scale factor along the central meridian (e.g. 0.9996 for UTM)<br>
 
<math> \scriptstyle \phi </math> {{pad|0.3em}} = {{pad|0.3em}}latitude<br>
 
<math> \scriptstyle \omega </math>{{pad|0.3em}} = {{pad|0.3em}}difference in longitude from the central meridian, in radians, positive eastward<br>
 
<math> m </math>{{pad|em}} = {{pad|em}} meridian distance, measured on the spheroid from the equator to <math> \scriptstyle \phi</math> (see below)
 
E = distance east of the central meridian, measured on the Transverse Mercator projection
 
N = distance north of the equator, measured on the Transverse Mercator projection
<br><br>
 
: <math> \varepsilon \; = \; \frac {2r - 1}{(r - 1)^2} = \; \frac{a^2 - b^2}{b^2} \; </math>
 
where ''r'' is the reciprocal of the flattening for the chosen spheroid (for [[WGS84]], ''r''&nbsp;=&nbsp;298.257223563 exactly).<br><br><br>
 
==Convert Lat-Lon to Transverse Mercator==
<br>
: <math> c = \cos \phi \qquad  s = \sin \phi</math><br><br>
 
: <math> \nu \; = \; a \sqrt{ \frac {1 + \varepsilon}{1 + \varepsilon c^2}}</math>{{pad|4em}}(prime vertical radius of curvature)<br><br>
 
: <math> z = \frac {\varepsilon \omega^3 c^5 }{6}</math><br><br>
 
: <math> \tan \theta_2 \; = \; \frac {2sc \sin^2 (\omega/2)}{s^2 + c^2 \cos \omega} </math> <br><br><br>
 
::<math> \text{E} \; = \; k_0 \nu \left [ {\tanh}^{-1} (c \sin \omega ) + z \left ( 1 + \frac {\omega^2}{10}(36 c^2 - 29)\right ) \right ] </math><br><br>
 
::<math> \text{N} \; = \; k_0 \left [ m + \nu \theta_2 + \frac {z \nu \omega s}{4} (9 + 4 \varepsilon c^2 - 11 \omega ^2 + 20 \omega ^2 c^2)\right ] \, </math><br><br>
(Note that <math>\theta_2</math> must be in radians.)
<br><br>
 
==Transverse Mercator to Lat-Lon==
 
To convert Transverse Mercator coordinates to lat-lon, first calculate <math>\scriptstyle \phi '</math>, the footprint latitude— i.e. the latitude of the point on the central meridian that has the same N as the point to be converted; i.e. the latitude that has a meridian distance on the spheroid equal to N/<math>k_0</math>. Bowring's formulas below seem quickest, but traditional formulas will suffice. Then<br><br>
 
: <math> c_1 = \cos \phi ' \qquad s_1 = \sin \phi ' </math><br><br>
 
: <math> \nu_1 \; = \; a \sqrt{ \frac {1 + \varepsilon}{1 + \varepsilon {c_1}^2}}</math><br><br>
 
: <math> x \; = \; \frac {\text{E}}{k_0 \nu_1}</math><br><br>
 
: <math> \tan \theta_4 \; = \; \frac {\sinh x}{c_1}</math><br><br>
 
: <math> \tan \theta_5 \; = \; \tan \phi ' \cos \theta_4</math><br><br><br>
 
::<math> \phi \; = \; \left (1 + \varepsilon {c_1}^2 \right ) \left [ \theta_5 - \frac { \varepsilon }{24}x^4 \tan \phi '(9 - 10 {c_1} ^2) \right ] - \varepsilon {c_1}^2 \phi '</math><br><br>
 
::<math>\omega \; = \; \theta_4 - \frac {\varepsilon}{60} x^3 c_1 \left ( 10 - \frac {4 x^2}{{c_1}^2} + x^2 {c_1}^2 \right )</math><br><br>
 
(<math> \theta_4 </math>, <math> \theta_5 </math> and <math> \scriptstyle \phi ' </math> must of course be in radians, and <math> \scriptstyle \phi </math> and <math> \omega </math> will be.)
 
==Meridian distance==
Bowring gave formulas for meridian distance (the distance from the equator to the given latitude along a north-south line on the spheroid) that seem to be correct within 0.001 millimeter on earth-size spheroids.<ref>Bowring, B. R. (1983). Bulletin Géodésique (Journal of Geodesy), Volume '''57''', pp 374&ndash;381, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/x84x212363656500/ ''New equations for meridional distance''].</ref>  The symbol ''n'' is the same as in the Redfearn formulas<br><br>
 
: <math>n \; = \; \frac {a - b}{a + b} \; = \; \frac {1}{2r - 1}</math><br><br>
 
: <math> \tan \psi \quad = \quad \left ( \frac {r - 1}{r} \right ) \tan \phi \quad = \quad \left ( \frac {1 - n}{1 + n} \right ) \tan \phi</math><br><br>
 
: <math>p = 1 - \frac {3}{4} n \cos 2 \psi \qquad q = \frac {3}{4} n \sin 2 \psi</math><br><br><br>
 
: <math>Z = \left(1 - \frac {3}{8}n^2\right)(p + qi)^{2/3}\qquad\text{ where }\; i = \sqrt{-1}</math><br><br>
 
Discard the real part of the complex number ''Z''; subtract the real coefficient of the imaginary part of ''Z'' from <math>\psi</math> (in radians) to get <math>\theta</math>. Then<br><br>
 
: <math> \text{meridian distance} \; = \quad \frac{a \theta}{1+n}\left(1 + \frac {n^2}{8}\right)^2</math><br><br>
 
(Note that if latitude is 90 degrees, then <math> \theta = \frac {\pi}{2} </math> , which, it turns out, gives the length of a meridian quadrant to a trillionth of a meter on [[GRS 80]].)
 
<br>
For the inverse (given meridian distance, calculate latitude), calculate <math>\theta</math> using the last formula above, then<br><br>
 
: <math>p' = 1 - \frac{33}{20}n \cos 2 \theta \qquad q' = \frac{33}{20} n \sin 2 \theta</math><br><br><br>
 
: <math>Z' = \frac {5}{4}\left(1 - \frac{9}{16}n^2\right)(p' + q'i)^{8/33}</math><br><br>
 
Discard the real part of Z' and add the real coefficient of ''i'' to <math>\theta</math> to get the reduced latitude <math>\psi</math> (in radians) which converts to latitude <math> \scriptstyle \phi </math> using the equation at the top of this section.
 
==If Zero is not at the Equator==
As given above, all the formulas for the ellipsoid assume that the Northing on the Transverse Mercator projection starts from zero at the Equator, as it does in the northern-hemisphere UTM projection. People using the British National Grid, or State Plane Coordinates in the United States, have an additional step in their calculations.
 
The British National Grid sets Northing at (latitude 49 degrees North, longitude 2 degrees West) to be -100,000 meters exactly. It uses the Airy spheroid, with equatorial radius being 6377563.39603 meters and the reciprocal of the flattening being 299.3249645938 (both values being rounded); the meridian distance from the equator to 49 degrees latitude therefore calculates to 5429228.602 meters on the spheroid. Rounded scale factor at longitude 2 degrees west is 0.999601271775, so on the Transverse Mercator projection 49 degrees North is 5427063.8153 meters from the Equator.
 
So when converting lat-lon to British National Grid, use the formulas given above and subtract 5527063.815 meters from the calculated N.
 
==Example: convert lat-lon to UTM==
 
NGS [http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_mark.prl?PidBox=hv4442 says] the Washington Monument is 38 deg 53 min 22.08269 sec North, 77 deg 02 min 06.86575 sec West on NAD83; what's its UTM?
 
As with all NAD83 calculations we use the GRS80 spheroid with a = 6378137 meters exactly and r = 298.25722 2101 rounded. If we lazily take that value of r as exact we get <math> \epsilon </math> = 0.00673 94967 75479 and n = 0.00167 92203 94629. As with all UTM calculations <math>k_0</math> is 0.9996 exactly.
 
<math> \scriptstyle \nu </math> is 6386568.5027 meters at the monument's latitude<br>z is -1.43831 52572 times <math>10^{-8}</math> at the monument<br><br><math> \theta_2</math> comes out -0.00030 83836 79455 61242 radians.
 
Next get ''m'', the meridian distance from the equator to the monument:<br>
<math> \psi </math> is 38.795469019 degrees = 0.677108669 radians<br>
so p = 0.99972936 , q = 0.00122999 and the imaginary part of Z is 0.000820069 times ''i''.<br> Subtract 0.000820069 from 0.677108669 to get <math> \theta </math> = 0.676288601 radians and ''m'' is 4306233.2730 meters.
 
Plug all of that in and we get N = 4306479.5101 meters, E = -176516.8552 meters; add the latter to 500000 (the Easting value along the central meridian in all UTM zones) to get UTM Easting of 323483.1448 meters, which agrees with the NGS datasheet.
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Transverse Mercator: Bowring Series}}
[[Category:Cartographic projections]]
[[Category:Conformal mapping]]
[[Category:Geocodes]]

Revision as of 21:18, 1 December 2013

Template:Underlinked

In 1989 Bernard Russel Bowring gave formulas for the Transverse Mercator that are simpler to program but retain millimeter accuracy.[1] Bowring rewrote the fourth order Redfearn series (after discarding small terms) in a more compact notation by replacing the spherical terms, i.e. those independent of ellipticity, by the exact expressions used in the spherical transverse Mercator projection. There was no gain in accuracy since the elliptic terms were still truncated at the 1mm level. Such modifications were of possible use when computing resources were minimal.

Notation

a = radius of the equator of the chosen spheroid (e.g. 6378137 m for GRS80/WGS84)

b = polar semi-axis of the spheroid

k0 = scale factor along the central meridian (e.g. 0.9996 for UTM)

ϕ Template:Pad = Template:Padlatitude

ωTemplate:Pad = Template:Paddifference in longitude from the central meridian, in radians, positive eastward

mTemplate:Pad = Template:Pad meridian distance, measured on the spheroid from the equator to ϕ (see below)

E = distance east of the central meridian, measured on the Transverse Mercator projection

N = distance north of the equator, measured on the Transverse Mercator projection

ε=2r1(r1)2=a2b2b2

where r is the reciprocal of the flattening for the chosen spheroid (for WGS84, r = 298.257223563 exactly).


Convert Lat-Lon to Transverse Mercator


c=cosϕs=sinϕ

ν=a1+ε1+εc2Template:Pad(prime vertical radius of curvature)

z=εω3c56

tanθ2=2scsin2(ω/2)s2+c2cosω


E=k0ν[tanh1(csinω)+z(1+ω210(36c229))]

N=k0[m+νθ2+zνωs4(9+4εc211ω2+20ω2c2)]

(Note that θ2 must be in radians.)

Transverse Mercator to Lat-Lon

To convert Transverse Mercator coordinates to lat-lon, first calculate ϕ, the footprint latitude— i.e. the latitude of the point on the central meridian that has the same N as the point to be converted; i.e. the latitude that has a meridian distance on the spheroid equal to N/k0. Bowring's formulas below seem quickest, but traditional formulas will suffice. Then

c1=cosϕs1=sinϕ

ν1=a1+ε1+εc12

x=Ek0ν1

tanθ4=sinhxc1

tanθ5=tanϕcosθ4


ϕ=(1+εc12)[θ5ε24x4tanϕ(910c12)]εc12ϕ

ω=θ4ε60x3c1(104x2c12+x2c12)

(θ4, θ5 and ϕ must of course be in radians, and ϕ and ω will be.)

Meridian distance

Bowring gave formulas for meridian distance (the distance from the equator to the given latitude along a north-south line on the spheroid) that seem to be correct within 0.001 millimeter on earth-size spheroids.[2] The symbol n is the same as in the Redfearn formulas

n=aba+b=12r1

tanψ=(r1r)tanϕ=(1n1+n)tanϕ

p=134ncos2ψq=34nsin2ψ


Z=(138n2)(p+qi)2/3 where i=1

Discard the real part of the complex number Z; subtract the real coefficient of the imaginary part of Z from ψ (in radians) to get θ. Then

meridian distance=aθ1+n(1+n28)2

(Note that if latitude is 90 degrees, then θ=π2 , which, it turns out, gives the length of a meridian quadrant to a trillionth of a meter on GRS 80.)


For the inverse (given meridian distance, calculate latitude), calculate θ using the last formula above, then

p=13320ncos2θq=3320nsin2θ


Z=54(1916n2)(p+qi)8/33

Discard the real part of Z' and add the real coefficient of i to θ to get the reduced latitude ψ (in radians) which converts to latitude ϕ using the equation at the top of this section.

If Zero is not at the Equator

As given above, all the formulas for the ellipsoid assume that the Northing on the Transverse Mercator projection starts from zero at the Equator, as it does in the northern-hemisphere UTM projection. People using the British National Grid, or State Plane Coordinates in the United States, have an additional step in their calculations.

The British National Grid sets Northing at (latitude 49 degrees North, longitude 2 degrees West) to be -100,000 meters exactly. It uses the Airy spheroid, with equatorial radius being 6377563.39603 meters and the reciprocal of the flattening being 299.3249645938 (both values being rounded); the meridian distance from the equator to 49 degrees latitude therefore calculates to 5429228.602 meters on the spheroid. Rounded scale factor at longitude 2 degrees west is 0.999601271775, so on the Transverse Mercator projection 49 degrees North is 5427063.8153 meters from the Equator.

So when converting lat-lon to British National Grid, use the formulas given above and subtract 5527063.815 meters from the calculated N.

Example: convert lat-lon to UTM

NGS says the Washington Monument is 38 deg 53 min 22.08269 sec North, 77 deg 02 min 06.86575 sec West on NAD83; what's its UTM?

As with all NAD83 calculations we use the GRS80 spheroid with a = 6378137 meters exactly and r = 298.25722 2101 rounded. If we lazily take that value of r as exact we get ϵ = 0.00673 94967 75479 and n = 0.00167 92203 94629. As with all UTM calculations k0 is 0.9996 exactly.

ν is 6386568.5027 meters at the monument's latitude
z is -1.43831 52572 times 108 at the monument

θ2 comes out -0.00030 83836 79455 61242 radians.

Next get m, the meridian distance from the equator to the monument:
ψ is 38.795469019 degrees = 0.677108669 radians
so p = 0.99972936 , q = 0.00122999 and the imaginary part of Z is 0.000820069 times i.
Subtract 0.000820069 from 0.677108669 to get θ = 0.676288601 radians and m is 4306233.2730 meters.

Plug all of that in and we get N = 4306479.5101 meters, E = -176516.8552 meters; add the latter to 500000 (the Easting value along the central meridian in all UTM zones) to get UTM Easting of 323483.1448 meters, which agrees with the NGS datasheet.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Bowring, B. R. (1989). Survey Review, Volume 30 (Part 233), pp 125–133, Transverse Mercator equations obtained from a spherical basis.
  2. Bowring, B. R. (1983). Bulletin Géodésique (Journal of Geodesy), Volume 57, pp 374–381, New equations for meridional distance.