Legendre–Clebsch condition: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Helpful Pixie Bot
m ISBNs (Build KG)
 
en>Yobot
m References: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes - Replaced endash with hyphen in sortkey per WP:MCSTJR using AWB (9100)
Line 1: Line 1:
Got nothing to tell about myself I think.<br>I enjoy of finally being a member of this community.<br>I just hope I am useful in some way here.<br><br>Look into my weblog; [http://adults-chat-rooms.com/mature_webcam.php mature webcam live mature webcam mature webcam chat webcam mature sex mature webcam]
When an [[electromagnetic wave]] travels through a medium in which it gets absorbed (this is called an "[[opacity (optics)|opaque]]" or "[[attenuation constant|attenuating]]" medium), it undergoes [[exponential decay]] as described by the [[Beer–Lambert law]]. However, there are many possible ways to characterize the wave and how quickly it is absorbed. This article describes the mathematical relationships among:
*[[Absorption coefficient]],
*[[Penetration depth]] and [[Skin depth]],
*[[Propagation constant]], [[attenuation constant]], [[phase constant]], and complex [[wavenumber]],
*[[Complex refractive index]] and extinction coefficient,
*[[Dielectric constant|Complex dielectric constant]],
*[[Alternating current|AC]] [[Electrical conductivity|conductivity]].
Note that in many of these cases there are multiple, conflicting definitions and conventions in common use. This article is not necessarily comprehensive or universal.
 
== Background: Unattenuated wave ==
{{main|Electromagnetic wave equation}}
 
A electromagnetic wave propagating in the +''z''-direction is conventionally described by the equation:
<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)})</math>
where
:'''E'''<sub>0</sub> is a vector in the ''x''-''y'' plane, with the units of an electric field (the vector is in general a [[complex vector]], to allow for all possible polarizations and phases),
:<math>\omega</math> is the [[angular frequency]] of the wave,
:''k'' is the [[angular wavenumber]] of the wave,
:Re indicates [[real part]].
:''e'' is [[e (mathematical constant)|Euler's number]]; see the article [[Complex exponential]] for information about how ''e'' is raised to complex exponents.
 
The [[wavelength]] is, by definition,
:<math> \lambda = \frac{2\pi}{k}</math> .
For a given frequency, the wavelength of an electromagnetic wave is affected by the material in which it is propagating. The ''vacuum'' wavelength (the wavelength that a wave of this frequency would have if it were propagating in vacuum) is
:<math> \lambda_0 = \frac{2\pi c}{\omega}</math>
(''c'' is the [[speed of light|speed of light in vacuum]]). In the absence of attenuation, the [[index of refraction]] (also called [[refractive index]]) is the ratio of these two wavelengths, i.e.,
:<math>n = \frac{\lambda_0}{\lambda} = \frac{ck}{\omega}</math>.
 
The [[intensity (physics)|intensity]] of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, time-averaged over many oscillations of the wave, which amounts to:
:<math> I(z) \propto |\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)}|^2 = |\mathbf{E}_0|^2 </math>.
Note that this intensity is independent of the location ''z'', a sign that ''this'' wave is not attenuating with distance. We define ''I''<sub>0</sub> to equal this constant intensity:
:<math> I(z) = I_0 \propto |\mathbf{E}_0|^2</math>.
 
=== Complex conjugate ambiguity ===
 
Because
:<math> \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)}) = \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0^* e^{-i(k z - \omega t)}),</math>
either expression can be used interchangeably. Generally, physicists and chemists use the convention on the left (with <math>e^{-i\omega t}</math>), while electrical engineers use the convention on the right (with <math>e^{+i\omega t}</math>, for example see [[electrical impedance]]). The distinction is irrelevant for an unattenuated wave, but becomes relevant in some cases below. For example, there are two definitions of [[refractive index|complex refractive index]], one with a positive imaginary part and one with a negative imaginary part, derived from the two different conventions.<ref name=refractiveindexconjugate>For the definition of complex refractive index with a positive imaginary part, see [http://books.google.com/books?id=K9YJ950kBDsC&pg=PA6 ''Optical Properties of Solids'', by Mark Fox, p. 6]. For the definition of complex refractive index with a negative imaginary part, see [http://books.google.com/books?id=qFl1mSZTtIcC&pg=PA588 ''Handbook of infrared optical materials'', by Paul Klocek, p. 588].</ref> The two definitions are [[complex conjugate]]s of each other.
 
== Absorption coefficient ==
{{main|Absorption coefficient|Beer-Lambert law}}
 
One way to incorporate attenuation into the mathematical description of the wave is via an '''[[absorption coefficient]]''':<ref name="Griffiths9.4.3">Griffiths, section 9.4.3.</ref>
:<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = e^{-\alpha_{abs} z / 2} \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)})</math>
where <math>\alpha_{abs}</math> is the absorption coefficient. The intensity in this case satisfies:
:<math>I(z) \propto |e^{-\alpha_{abs} z/2}\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)}|^2 = |\mathbf{E}_0|^2 e^{-\alpha_{abs} z}</math>
i.e.,
:<math>I(z) = I_0 e^{-\alpha_{abs} z}</math>
 
The absorption coefficient, in turn, is simply related to several other quantities:
*'''Attenuation coefficient''' is essentially (but not quite always) synonymous with absorption coefficient; see [[attenuation coefficient]] for details.
*'''Molar absorption coefficient''' or '''Molar extinction coefficient''', also called '''molar absorptivity''', is the absorption coefficient divided by molarity (and usually multiplied by ln(10), i.e., decadic); see [[Beer-Lambert law]] and [[molar absorptivity]] for details.
*'''Mass attenuation coefficient''', also called '''mass extinction coefficient''', is the absorption coefficient divided by density; see [[mass attenuation coefficient]] for details.
*'''Absorption cross section''' and '''scattering cross section''' are both quantitatively related to the absorption coefficient (or attenuation coefficient); see [[absorption cross section]] and [[scattering cross section]] for details.
*The absorption coefficient is also sometimes called '''opacity'''; see [[opacity (optics)]].
 
== Penetration depth, skin depth ==
{{main|Penetration depth|Skin depth}}
 
A very similar approach uses the '''[[penetration depth]]''':<ref>[http://www.iupac.org/goldbook/D01605.pdf IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology]</ref>
:<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = e^{-z / (2 \delta_{pen})} \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)})</math>
:<math>I(z) = I_0 e^{-z/\delta_{pen}}</math>
where <math>\delta_{pen}</math> is the penetration depth.
 
The '''[[skin depth]]''' <math>\delta_{skin}</math> is defined so that the wave satisfies:<ref name="Griffiths9.4.1">Griffiths, section 9.4.1.</ref><ref name="Jackson5.18A">Jackson, Section 5.18A</ref>
:<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = e^{-z / \delta_{skin} } \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(k z - \omega t)})</math>
:<math>I(z) = I_0 e^{-2z/\delta_{skin}}</math>
where <math>\delta_{skin}</math> is the skin depth.
 
Physically, the penetration depth is the distance which the wave can travel before its ''intensity'' reduces by a factor of <math>1/e \approx 0.37</math>. The skin depth is the distance which the wave can travel before its ''amplitude'' reduces by that same factor.
 
The absorption coefficient is related to the penetration depth and skin depth by
 
:<math>\alpha_{abs} = 1/\delta_{pen} = 2/\delta_{skin}</math>
 
== Complex wavenumber, propagation constant ==
{{main|Propagation constant}}
 
Another way to incorporate attenuation is to use essentially the original expression:
:<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(\tilde{k} z - \omega t)})</math>
but with a '''complex [[wavenumber]]''' (as indicated by writing it as <math>\tilde{k}</math> instead of ''k'').<ref name="Griffiths9.4.1"/><ref name="Jackson7.5B">Jackson, Section 7.5.B</ref> Then the intensity of the wave satisfies:
:<math> I(z) \propto |\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(\tilde{k} z - \omega t)}|^2</math>
i.e.,
:<math>I(z) = I_0 e^{-2z \mathrm{Im}(\tilde{k})}</math>
Therefore, comparing this to the absorption coefficient approach,<ref name="Griffiths9.4.3"/>
:<math> \mathrm{Im}(\tilde{k}) = \alpha_{abs}/2 </math>, &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\mathrm{Re}(\tilde{k}) = k</math>
(''k'' is the standard (real) [[angular wavenumber]], as used in any of the previous formulations.) In accordance with the [[#Complex conjugate ambiguity|ambiguity noted above]], some authors use the complex conjugate definition, <math> \mathrm{Im}(\tilde{k}) = -\alpha_{abs}/2.</math><ref name=Lifante35>[http://books.google.com/books?id=Uq924mcshMkC&pg=PA35''Integrated Photonics: Fundamentals'', by Ginés Lifante, p.35]</ref>
 
A closely related approach, especially common in the theory of [[transmission line]]s, uses the '''[[propagation constant]]''':<ref>[http://www.atis.org/glossary/definition.aspx?id=2371 "Propagation constant", in ATIS Telecom Glossary 2007]</ref><ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=AzLYk1qaaz8C&pg=PA93 ''Advances in imaging and electron physics, Volume 92'', by P. W. Hawkes and B. Kazan, p.93]</ref>
:<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{-\gamma z + i \omega t})</math>
:<math>I(z) = I_0 e^{-2z \mathrm{Re}(\gamma)}</math>
where <math>\gamma</math> is the propagation constant.
 
Comparing the two equations, the propagation constant and complex wavenumber are related by:
:<math>\gamma^* = -i\tilde{k}</math>
(where the * denotes [[complex conjugation]]), or more specifically:
:<math>\mathrm{Re}(\gamma) = \mathrm{Im}(\tilde{k}) = \alpha_{abs}/2</math>
(This quantity is also called the '''[[attenuation constant]]''',<ref name=Lifante35/><ref name=Sivanagaraju132/> sometimes denoted <math>\alpha</math>.)
:<math>\mathrm{Im}(\gamma) = \mathrm{Re}(\tilde{k}) = k</math>
(This quantity is also called the '''[[phase constant]]''', sometimes denoted <math>\beta</math>.)<ref name=Sivanagaraju132>[http://books.google.com/books?id=KpY1hpKKwdQC&pg=PA132 ''Electric Power Transmission and Distribution'', by S. Sivanagaraju, p.132]</ref>
 
Unfortunately, the notation is not always consistent. For example, <math>\tilde{k}</math> is sometimes called "propagation constant" instead of <math>\gamma</math>, which swaps the real and imaginary parts.<ref>See, for example, [http://www.rp-photonics.com/propagation_constant.html Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology]</ref>
 
== Complex refractive index, extinction coefficient ==
{{main|Refractive index}}
 
Recall that in nonattenuating media, the [[refractive index]] and wavenumber are related by:
:<math>n = \frac{ck}{\omega}</math>
A '''complex refractive index''' can therefore be defined in terms of the complex wavenumber defined above:
:<math>\tilde{n} = \frac{c\tilde{k}}{\omega}</math>.
In other words, the wave is required to satisfy
:<math> \mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathrm{Re} (\mathbf{E}_0 e^{i\omega((\tilde{n} z/c) - t)})</math>.
Comparing to the preceding section, we have
:<math>\mathrm{Re}(\tilde{n}) = \frac{ck}{\omega}</math>, and <math>\mathrm{Im}(\tilde{n}) = \frac{c \alpha_{abs}}{2\omega}=\frac{\lambda_0 \alpha_{abs}}{4\pi}</math>.
The real part of <math>\tilde{n}</math> is often (ambiguously) called simply the ''refractive index''. The imaginary part is called the '''[[Optical extinction coefficient|extinction coefficient]]'''.
 
In accordance with the [[#Complex conjugate ambiguity|ambiguity noted above]], some authors use the complex conjugate definition, where the (still positive) extinction coefficient is ''minus'' the imaginary part of <math>\tilde{n}</math>.<ref name=refractiveindexconjugate/><ref>Pankove, pp. 87-89</ref>
 
== Complex permittivity ==
{{main|Complex permittivity}}
 
In nonattenuating media, the [[permittivity]] and [[refractive index]] are related by:
:<math>n = c \sqrt{\mu \epsilon}</math> ([[SI]]), &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>n = \sqrt{\mu \epsilon}</math> ([[Gaussian units|cgs]])
where <math>\mu</math> is the [[magnetic permeability|permeability]] and <math>\epsilon</math> is the [[permittivity]]. In attenuating media, the same relation is used, but the permittivity is allowed to be a complex number, called '''[[complex permittivity]]''':<ref name="Griffiths9.4.3"/>
:<math>\tilde{n} = c \sqrt{\mu \tilde{\epsilon}}</math> ([[SI]]), &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\tilde{n} = \sqrt{\mu \tilde{\epsilon}}</math> ([[Gaussian units|cgs]]).
Squaring both sides and using the results of the previous section gives:<ref name="Jackson7.5B"/>
:<math>\mathrm{Re}(\tilde{\epsilon}/\epsilon_0) = \frac{c^2}{(\omega^2)(\mu/\mu_0)}(k^2-\frac{\alpha_{abs}^2}{4})</math>
:<math>\mathrm{Im}(\tilde{\epsilon}/\epsilon_0) = \frac{c^2}{(\omega^2)(\mu/\mu_0)}(k\alpha_{abs})</math>
(this is in SI; in cgs, drop the <math>\epsilon_0</math> and <math>\mu_0</math>).
 
This approach is also called the '''complex dielectric constant'''; the [[dielectric constant]] is synonymous with <math>\epsilon/\epsilon_0</math> in SI, or simply <math>\epsilon</math> in cgs.
 
== AC conductivity ==
{{main|Electrical conductivity}}
 
Another way to incorporate attenuation is through the conductivity, as follows.<ref name="Jackson7.5C">Jackson, section 7.5C</ref>
 
One of the equations governing electromagnetic wave propagation is the [[Ampere's law|Maxwell-Ampere law]]:
:<math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{d\mathbf{D}}{dt}</math> (SI) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \frac{4\pi}{c} \mathbf{J} + \frac{1}{c}\frac{d\mathbf{D}}{dt}</math> (cgs)
where '''D''' is the [[Electric displacement field|displacement field]]. Plugging in [[Ohm's law]] and the definition of (real) [[permittivity]]
:<math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \sigma \mathbf{E} + \epsilon \frac{d\mathbf{E}}{dt}</math> (SI) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \frac{4\pi \sigma}{c} \mathbf{E} + \frac{\epsilon}{c}\frac{d\mathbf{E}}{dt}</math> (cgs)
where <math>\sigma</math> is the (real, but frequency-dependent) conductivity, called '''[[alternating current|AC]] conductivity'''. With sinusoidal time dependence on all quantities, i.e. <math>\mathbf{H} = \mathrm{Re}(\mathbf{H}_0 e^{-i\omega t})</math> and <math>\mathbf{E} = \mathrm{Re}(\mathbf{E}_0 e^{-i\omega t})</math>, the result is
:<math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H}_0 = -i\omega\mathbf{E}_0(\epsilon + i\frac{\sigma}{\omega})</math> (SI) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H}_0 = \frac{-i\omega}{c} \mathbf{E}_0(\epsilon + i\frac{4\pi \sigma}{\omega})</math> (cgs)
If the current '''J''' was not included explicitly (through Ohm's law), but only implicitly (through a complex permittivity), the quantity in parentheses would be simply the complex permittivity. Therefore,
:<math>\tilde{\epsilon} = \epsilon + i \frac{\sigma}{\omega}</math> (SI) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\tilde{\epsilon} = \epsilon + i\frac{4\pi \sigma}{\omega}</math> (cgs).
Comparing to the previous section, the AC conductivity satisfies
:<math>\sigma = \frac{k\alpha_{abs}}{\omega\mu}</math> (SI) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\sigma = \frac{k\alpha_{abs}c^2}{4\pi\omega\mu}</math> (cgs).
 
== References and footnotes ==
*{{cite book | author=Jackson, John David | authorlink = J. D. Jackson | title=Classical Electrodynamics | edition=3rd ed. | location=New York | publisher=Wiley | year=1999 | isbn=0-471-30932-X}}
*{{cite book | author=Griffiths, David J. | authorlink=David Griffiths (physicist) | title=Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd ed.) | publisher=Prentice Hall | year=1998 | isbn=0-13-805326-X}}
* J. I. Pankove, ''Optical Processes in Semiconductors'', Dover Publications Inc. New York (1971).
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Electromagnetic radiation]]
[[Category:Scattering, absorption and radiative transfer (optics)]]
[[Category:Optics]]

Revision as of 21:58, 20 April 2013

When an electromagnetic wave travels through a medium in which it gets absorbed (this is called an "opaque" or "attenuating" medium), it undergoes exponential decay as described by the Beer–Lambert law. However, there are many possible ways to characterize the wave and how quickly it is absorbed. This article describes the mathematical relationships among:

Note that in many of these cases there are multiple, conflicting definitions and conventions in common use. This article is not necessarily comprehensive or universal.

Background: Unattenuated wave

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

A electromagnetic wave propagating in the +z-direction is conventionally described by the equation: 𝐄(z,t)=Re(𝐄0ei(kzωt)) where

E0 is a vector in the x-y plane, with the units of an electric field (the vector is in general a complex vector, to allow for all possible polarizations and phases),
ω is the angular frequency of the wave,
k is the angular wavenumber of the wave,
Re indicates real part.
e is Euler's number; see the article Complex exponential for information about how e is raised to complex exponents.

The wavelength is, by definition,

λ=2πk .

For a given frequency, the wavelength of an electromagnetic wave is affected by the material in which it is propagating. The vacuum wavelength (the wavelength that a wave of this frequency would have if it were propagating in vacuum) is

λ0=2πcω

(c is the speed of light in vacuum). In the absence of attenuation, the index of refraction (also called refractive index) is the ratio of these two wavelengths, i.e.,

n=λ0λ=ckω.

The intensity of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, time-averaged over many oscillations of the wave, which amounts to:

I(z)|𝐄0ei(kzωt)|2=|𝐄0|2.

Note that this intensity is independent of the location z, a sign that this wave is not attenuating with distance. We define I0 to equal this constant intensity:

I(z)=I0|𝐄0|2.

Complex conjugate ambiguity

Because

Re(𝐄0ei(kzωt))=Re(𝐄0ei(kzωt)),

either expression can be used interchangeably. Generally, physicists and chemists use the convention on the left (with eiωt), while electrical engineers use the convention on the right (with e+iωt, for example see electrical impedance). The distinction is irrelevant for an unattenuated wave, but becomes relevant in some cases below. For example, there are two definitions of complex refractive index, one with a positive imaginary part and one with a negative imaginary part, derived from the two different conventions.[1] The two definitions are complex conjugates of each other.

Absorption coefficient

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

One way to incorporate attenuation into the mathematical description of the wave is via an absorption coefficient:[2]

𝐄(z,t)=eαabsz/2Re(𝐄0ei(kzωt))

where αabs is the absorption coefficient. The intensity in this case satisfies:

I(z)|eαabsz/2𝐄0ei(kzωt)|2=|𝐄0|2eαabsz

i.e.,

I(z)=I0eαabsz

The absorption coefficient, in turn, is simply related to several other quantities:

  • Attenuation coefficient is essentially (but not quite always) synonymous with absorption coefficient; see attenuation coefficient for details.
  • Molar absorption coefficient or Molar extinction coefficient, also called molar absorptivity, is the absorption coefficient divided by molarity (and usually multiplied by ln(10), i.e., decadic); see Beer-Lambert law and molar absorptivity for details.
  • Mass attenuation coefficient, also called mass extinction coefficient, is the absorption coefficient divided by density; see mass attenuation coefficient for details.
  • Absorption cross section and scattering cross section are both quantitatively related to the absorption coefficient (or attenuation coefficient); see absorption cross section and scattering cross section for details.
  • The absorption coefficient is also sometimes called opacity; see opacity (optics).

Penetration depth, skin depth

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

A very similar approach uses the penetration depth:[3]

𝐄(z,t)=ez/(2δpen)Re(𝐄0ei(kzωt))
I(z)=I0ez/δpen

where δpen is the penetration depth.

The skin depth δskin is defined so that the wave satisfies:[4][5]

𝐄(z,t)=ez/δskinRe(𝐄0ei(kzωt))
I(z)=I0e2z/δskin

where δskin is the skin depth.

Physically, the penetration depth is the distance which the wave can travel before its intensity reduces by a factor of 1/e0.37. The skin depth is the distance which the wave can travel before its amplitude reduces by that same factor.

The absorption coefficient is related to the penetration depth and skin depth by

αabs=1/δpen=2/δskin

Complex wavenumber, propagation constant

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

Another way to incorporate attenuation is to use essentially the original expression:

𝐄(z,t)=Re(𝐄0ei(k~zωt))

but with a complex wavenumber (as indicated by writing it as k~ instead of k).[4][6] Then the intensity of the wave satisfies:

I(z)|𝐄0ei(k~zωt)|2

i.e.,

I(z)=I0e2zIm(k~)

Therefore, comparing this to the absorption coefficient approach,[2]

Im(k~)=αabs/2,     Re(k~)=k

(k is the standard (real) angular wavenumber, as used in any of the previous formulations.) In accordance with the ambiguity noted above, some authors use the complex conjugate definition, Im(k~)=αabs/2.[7]

A closely related approach, especially common in the theory of transmission lines, uses the propagation constant:[8][9]

𝐄(z,t)=Re(𝐄0eγz+iωt)
I(z)=I0e2zRe(γ)

where γ is the propagation constant.

Comparing the two equations, the propagation constant and complex wavenumber are related by:

γ=ik~

(where the * denotes complex conjugation), or more specifically:

Re(γ)=Im(k~)=αabs/2

(This quantity is also called the attenuation constant,[7][10] sometimes denoted α.)

Im(γ)=Re(k~)=k

(This quantity is also called the phase constant, sometimes denoted β.)[10]

Unfortunately, the notation is not always consistent. For example, k~ is sometimes called "propagation constant" instead of γ, which swaps the real and imaginary parts.[11]

Complex refractive index, extinction coefficient

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

Recall that in nonattenuating media, the refractive index and wavenumber are related by:

n=ckω

A complex refractive index can therefore be defined in terms of the complex wavenumber defined above:

n~=ck~ω.

In other words, the wave is required to satisfy

𝐄(z,t)=Re(𝐄0eiω((n~z/c)t)).

Comparing to the preceding section, we have

Re(n~)=ckω, and Im(n~)=cαabs2ω=λ0αabs4π.

The real part of n~ is often (ambiguously) called simply the refractive index. The imaginary part is called the extinction coefficient.

In accordance with the ambiguity noted above, some authors use the complex conjugate definition, where the (still positive) extinction coefficient is minus the imaginary part of n~.[1][12]

Complex permittivity

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

In nonattenuating media, the permittivity and refractive index are related by:

n=cμϵ (SI),     n=μϵ (cgs)

where μ is the permeability and ϵ is the permittivity. In attenuating media, the same relation is used, but the permittivity is allowed to be a complex number, called complex permittivity:[2]

n~=cμϵ~ (SI),     n~=μϵ~ (cgs).

Squaring both sides and using the results of the previous section gives:[6]

Re(ϵ~/ϵ0)=c2(ω2)(μ/μ0)(k2αabs24)
Im(ϵ~/ϵ0)=c2(ω2)(μ/μ0)(kαabs)

(this is in SI; in cgs, drop the ϵ0 and μ0).

This approach is also called the complex dielectric constant; the dielectric constant is synonymous with ϵ/ϵ0 in SI, or simply ϵ in cgs.

AC conductivity

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

Another way to incorporate attenuation is through the conductivity, as follows.[13]

One of the equations governing electromagnetic wave propagation is the Maxwell-Ampere law:

×𝐇=𝐉+d𝐃dt (SI)     ×𝐇=4πc𝐉+1cd𝐃dt (cgs)

where D is the displacement field. Plugging in Ohm's law and the definition of (real) permittivity

×𝐇=σ𝐄+ϵd𝐄dt (SI)     ×𝐇=4πσc𝐄+ϵcd𝐄dt (cgs)

where σ is the (real, but frequency-dependent) conductivity, called AC conductivity. With sinusoidal time dependence on all quantities, i.e. 𝐇=Re(𝐇0eiωt) and 𝐄=Re(𝐄0eiωt), the result is

×𝐇0=iω𝐄0(ϵ+iσω) (SI)     ×𝐇0=iωc𝐄0(ϵ+i4πσω) (cgs)

If the current J was not included explicitly (through Ohm's law), but only implicitly (through a complex permittivity), the quantity in parentheses would be simply the complex permittivity. Therefore,

ϵ~=ϵ+iσω (SI)     ϵ~=ϵ+i4πσω (cgs).

Comparing to the previous section, the AC conductivity satisfies

σ=kαabsωμ (SI)     σ=kαabsc24πωμ (cgs).

References and footnotes

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • J. I. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors, Dover Publications Inc. New York (1971).

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 1.0 1.1 For the definition of complex refractive index with a positive imaginary part, see Optical Properties of Solids, by Mark Fox, p. 6. For the definition of complex refractive index with a negative imaginary part, see Handbook of infrared optical materials, by Paul Klocek, p. 588.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Griffiths, section 9.4.3.
  3. IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology
  4. 4.0 4.1 Griffiths, section 9.4.1.
  5. Jackson, Section 5.18A
  6. 6.0 6.1 Jackson, Section 7.5.B
  7. 7.0 7.1 Integrated Photonics: Fundamentals, by Ginés Lifante, p.35
  8. "Propagation constant", in ATIS Telecom Glossary 2007
  9. Advances in imaging and electron physics, Volume 92, by P. W. Hawkes and B. Kazan, p.93
  10. 10.0 10.1 Electric Power Transmission and Distribution, by S. Sivanagaraju, p.132
  11. See, for example, Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology
  12. Pankove, pp. 87-89
  13. Jackson, section 7.5C