Tangent measure: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Citation bot 1
m [Pu373]Add: jstor, doi. Tweak: pages. Formatted dashes.
 
en>ChrisGualtieri
m General Fixes, added orphan tag using AWB
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Andera is what you can contact her but she never really favored that name. One of the very very best issues in the world for him is performing ballet and he'll be starting something else along with it. Office supervising is where her main income arrives from are psychics real ([http://help.ksu.edu.sa/node/65129 http://help.ksu.edu.sa]) but she's already utilized for an additional one. Her family members lives [http://jplusfn.gaplus.kr/xe/qna/78647 spirit messages] in Ohio.<br><br>My web site; [http://www.herandkingscounty.com/content/information-and-facts-you-must-know-about-hobbies are psychics real]
'''Céa's lemma''' is a [[lemma (mathematics)|lemma]] in [[mathematics]]. It is an important tool for proving error estimates for the [[finite element method]] applied to [[elliptic operator|elliptic]] [[partial differential equation]]s.
 
==Lemma statement==
Let <math>V</math> be a [[real number|real]] [[Hilbert space]] with the [[norm (mathematics)|norm]] <math>\|\cdot\|.</math> Let <math>a:V\times V\to \mathbb R</math> be a [[bilinear form]] with the  properties
 
* <math>|a(v, w)| \le \gamma \|v\|\,\|w\|</math> for some constant <math>\gamma>0</math>  and all <math>v, w </math> in <math>V</math> ([[continuous function|continuity]])
 
* <math>a(v, v) \ge \alpha \|v\|^2</math> for some constant <math>\alpha>0</math> and all <math>v</math> in <math>V</math> ([[coercive bilinear form|coercivity]] or <math>V</math>-ellipticity).
 
Let <math>L:V\to \mathbb R</math> be a [[bounded linear operator]]. Consider the problem of finding an element <math>u</math> in <math>V</math> such that
 
: <math>a(u, v)=L(v)\,</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V.\,</math>
 
Consider the same problem on a finite-dimensional subspace <math>V_h</math> of <math>V,</math> so, <math>u_h</math> in <math>V_h</math> satisfies
 
: <math>a(u_h, v)=L(v)\,</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h.\,</math>
 
By the [[Lax–Milgram theorem]], each of these problems has exactly one solution. '''Céa's lemma''' states that
 
: <math>\|u-u_h\|\le \frac{\gamma}{\alpha}\|u-v\|</math>  for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h.</math>
 
That is to say, the subspace solution <math>u_h</math> is "the best" approximation of  <math>u</math> in <math>V_h,</math> [[up to]] the constant <math>\gamma/\alpha.</math>
 
The proof is straightforward
: <math>\alpha\|u-u_h\|^2 \le a(u-u_h,u-u_h) = a(u-u_h,u-v) + a(u-u_h,v - u_h) = a(u-u_h,u-v)
  \le \gamma\|u-u_h\|\|u-v\|</math>  for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h.</math>
We used the <math>a</math>-orthogonality of <math>u-u_h</math> and <math>V_h</math>
: <math>a(u-u_h,v) = 0, \ \forall \ v</math> in <math>V_h</math>
which follows directly from <math>V_h \subset V</math>
: <math>a(u, v) = L(v) = a(u_h, v)</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h</math>.
 
'''Note:''' Céa's lemma holds on [[complex number|complex]] Hilbert spaces also, one then uses a  [[sesquilinear form]] <math>a(\cdot, \cdot)</math> instead of a bilinear one. The coercivity assumption then becomes <math>|a(v, v)| \ge \alpha \|v\|^2</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V</math> (notice the absolute value sign around <math>a(v, v)</math>).
 
==Error estimate in the energy norm==
[[File:Cea lemma illust.svg|right|thumb|The subspace solution <math>u_h</math> is the projection of <math>u</math> onto the subspace <math>V_h</math> in respect to the inner product <math>a(\cdot, \cdot)</math>.]]
In many applications, the bilinear form <math>a:V\times V\to \mathbb R</math> is symmetric, so
 
: <math>a(v, w) =a(w, v)\, </math> for all <math>v, w </math> in <math>V.</math>
 
This, together with the above properties of this form, implies that  <math>a(\cdot, \cdot)</math> is an [[inner product]] on <math>V.</math> The resulting norm
 
: <math>\|v\|_a=\sqrt{a(v, v)}</math>
 
is called the '''[[energy norm]]''', since it corresponds to a [[energy (physics)|physical energy]] in many problems. This norm is equivalent to the original norm <math>\|\cdot\|.</math> 
 
Using the <math>a</math>-orthogonality of <math>u-u_h</math> and <math>V_h</math> and the [[Cauchy–Schwarz inequality]]
: <math>\|u-u_h\|_a^2 = a(u-u_h,u-u_h) = a(u-u_h,u-v) \le \|u-u_h\|_a \cdot \|u-v\|_a</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h</math>.
 
Hence, in the energy norm, the inequality in Céa's lemma becomes
 
: <math>\|u-u_h\|_a\le \|u-v\|_a</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h</math>
 
(notice that the constant <math>\gamma/\alpha</math> on the right-hand side is no longer present).
 
This states that the subspace solution <math>u_h</math> is the best approximation to the full-space solution <math>u</math> in respect to the energy norm. Geometrically, this means that <math>u_h</math> is the [[projection (linear algebra)|projection]] of the solution <math>u</math> onto the subspace <math>V_h</math> in respect to the inner product <math>a(\cdot, \cdot)</math> (see the picture on the right).
 
Using this result, one can also derive a sharper estimate in the norm <math>\| \cdot \|</math>. Since
: <math>\alpha \|u-u_h\|^2 \le a(u-u_h,u-u_h) = \|u-u_h\|_a^2 \le \|u - v\|_a^2 \le \gamma \|u-v\|^2</math>  for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h</math>,
it follows that
: <math>\|u-u_h\| \le \sqrt{\frac{\gamma}{\alpha}} \|u-v\|</math>  for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h</math>.
 
==An application of Céa's lemma==
We will apply Céa's lemma to estimate the error of calculating the solution to an [[elliptic partial differential equation|elliptic differential equation]] by the [[finite element method]].  
 
[[File:String illust.svg|right|thumb|A string with fixed endpoints under the influence of a force pointing down.]]
Consider the problem of finding a function <math>u:[a, b]\to \mathbb R</math> satisfying the conditions
:<math>\begin{cases}
-u''=f \mbox { in } [a, b]  \\
u(a)=u(b)=0 
\end{cases}
</math>
where <math>f:[a, b]\to \mathbb R</math> is a given [[continuous function]].
 
Physically, the solution <math>u</math> to this two-point [[boundary value problem]] represents the shape taken by a [[rope|string]] under the influence of a force such that at every point <math>x</math>  between <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> the [[force density]] is <math>f(x)\mathbf{e}</math> (where  <math>\mathbf{e}</math> is a [[unit vector]] pointing vertically, while the endpoints of the string are on a horizontal line, see the picture on the right). For example, that force may be the [[gravity]], when <math>f</math> is a constant function (since the gravitational force is the same at all points).  
 
Let the Hilbert space <math>V</math> be the [[Sobolev space]] <math>H^1_0(a, b),</math> which is the space of all [[square integrable function]]s <math>v</math> defined on <math>[a, b]</math> that have a [[weak derivative]] on <math>[a, b]</math> with <math>v'</math> also being square integrable, and <math>v</math> satisfies the conditions <math>v(a)=v(b)=0.</math> The inner product on this space is
 
: <math>(v, w)=\int_a^b\! v'(x) w'(x)\,dx</math> for all <math>v</math> and <math>w</math> in <math>V.\ </math>
 
After multiplying the original boundary value problem by <math>v</math> in this space and performing an [[integration by parts]], one obtains the equivalent problem
 
: <math>a(u, v)=L(v)\,</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V,</math>
 
with
 
: <math>a(u, v)=\int_a^b\! u'(x) v'(x)\,dx</math>
 
(here the bilinear form is given by the same expression as the inner product, this is not always the case), and
 
:<math>L(v) = \int_a^b\! f(x) v(x) \, dx.</math>
 
It can be shown that the bilinear form <math>a(\cdot, \cdot)</math> and the operator <math>L</math> satisfy the assumptions of Céa's lemma.
 
[[File:Finite element method 1D illustration2.svg|right|thumb|A function in <math>V_h</math> (in red), and the typical collection of basis functions in <math>V_h</math> (in blue).]]
In order to determine a finite-dimensional subspace <math>V_h</math> of <math>V,</math> consider a [[partition of an interval|partition]]
 
:<math>a=x_0< x_1 < \cdots < x_{n-1} < x_n = b</math>
 
of the interval <math>[a, b],</math> and let <math>V_h</math> be the space of all continuous functions that are [[affine function|affine]] on each subinterval in the partition (such functions are called [[piecewise-linear function|piecewise-linear]]). In addition, assume that any function in <math>V_h</math> takes the value 0 at the endpoints of <math>[a, b].</math> It follows that <math>V_h</math> is a vector subspace of <math>V</math> whose dimension is <math>n-1</math> (the number of points in the partition that are not endpoints).
 
Let <math>u_h</math> be the solution to the subspace problem
 
: <math>a(u_h, v)=L(v)\,</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h,</math>
 
so one can think of <math>u_h</math> as of a piecewise-linear approximation to the exact solution <math>u.</math> By Céa's lemma, there exists a constant <math>C>0</math> dependent only on the bilinear form <math>a(\cdot, \cdot),</math> such that
 
: <math>\|u-u_h\|\le C \|u-v\|</math> for all <math>v</math> in <math>V_h.\ </math>
 
To explicitly calculate the error between <math>u</math> and <math>u_h,</math> consider the function <math>\pi u</math> in <math>V_h</math> that has the same values as <math>u</math> at the nodes of the partition (so <math>\pi u</math> is obtained by linear interpolation on each interval <math>[x_i, x_{i+1}]</math> from the values of <math>u</math> at interval's endpoints). It can be shown using [[Taylor's theorem]] that there exists a constant <math>K</math> that depends only on the endpoints <math>a</math> and <math>b,</math> such that
 
: <math>|u'(x)-(\pi u)'(x)|\le K h \|u''\|_{L^2(a, b)}</math>
 
for all <math>x</math> in <math>[a, b],</math> where <math>h</math> is the largest length of the subintervals <math>[x_i, x_{i+1}]</math> in the partition, and the norm on the right-hand side is the [[Lp space|L<sup>2</sup> norm]].  
 
This inequality then yields an estimate for the error
 
: <math>\|u-\pi u\|.\,</math>
 
Then, by substituting <math>v=\pi u</math> in Céa's lemma it follows that
 
: <math>\|u-u_h\|\le C h \|u''\|_{L^2(a, b)}, </math>
 
where <math>C</math> is a different constant from the above (it depends only on the bilinear form, which implicitly depends on the interval <math>[a, b]</math>).
 
This result is of a fundamental importance, as it states that the finite element method can be used to approximately calculate the solution of our problem, and that the error in the computed solution decreases proportionately to the partition size <math>h.</math>  Céa's lemma can be applied along the same lines to derive error estimates for finite element problems in higher dimensions (here the domain of <math>u</math> was in one dimension), and while using higher order [[polynomial]]s for the subspace <math>V_h.</math>
 
==References==
 
*{{cite book
| last      = Céa
| first      = Jean
| title      = Approximation variationnelle des problèmes aux limites
| type      = PhD thesis
| series    = Annales de l'institut Fourier 14
| volume    = 2
| pages      = 345–444
| year      = 1964
| url        = http://archive.numdam.org/article/AIF_1964__14_2_345_0.pdf
| format    = PDF
| accessdate = 2010-11-27
}} (Original work from J. Céa)
 
*{{cite book
| last      = Johnson
| first      = Claes
| title      = Numerical solution of partial differential equations by the finite element method
| publisher  = Cambridge University Press
| date      = 1987
| pages      =
| isbn      = 0-521-34514-6
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last      = Monk
| first      = Peter
| title      = Finite element methods for Maxwell's equations
| publisher  = Oxford University Press
| date      = 2003
| pages      =
| isbn      = 0-19-850888-3
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last      = Roos
| first      = H.-G.
| coauthors  = Stynes, M.; Tobiska, L.
| title      = Numerical methods for singularly perturbed differential equations: convection-diffusion and flow problems
| publisher  = Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag
| date      = 1996
| pages      =
| isbn      = 3-540-60718-8
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last      = Eriksson
| first      = K.
| coauthors  = Estep, D.; Hansbo, P.; Johnson, C.
| title      = Computational differential equations
| publisher  = Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press
| date      = 1996
| pages      =
| isbn      = 0-521-56738-6
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last      = Zeidler
| first      = Eberhard
| title      = Applied functional analysis: applications to mathematical physics
| publisher  = New York: Springer-Verlag
| date      = 1995
| pages      =
| isbn      = 0-387-94442-7
}}
 
* {{cite book | last=Brenner | first=Susanne C. | authorlink = Susanne Brenner | coauthors=L. Ridgeway Scott | title=The mathematical theory of finite element methods | year=2002 | edition=2nd edition | isbn=0-387-95451-1 | oclc=48892839}}
* {{cite book | last=Ciarlet | first=Philippe G. | title=The finite element method for elliptic problems | year=2002 | edition=(SIAM Classics reprint) | isbn=0-89871-514-8 | oclc=48892573}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ceas lemma}}
[[Category:Numerical differential equations]]
[[Category:Hilbert space]]
[[Category:Lemmas]]

Latest revision as of 03:50, 24 October 2013

Céa's lemma is a lemma in mathematics. It is an important tool for proving error estimates for the finite element method applied to elliptic partial differential equations.

Lemma statement

Let V be a real Hilbert space with the norm . Let a:V×V be a bilinear form with the properties

Let L:V be a bounded linear operator. Consider the problem of finding an element u in V such that

a(u,v)=L(v) for all v in V.

Consider the same problem on a finite-dimensional subspace Vh of V, so, uh in Vh satisfies

a(uh,v)=L(v) for all v in Vh.

By the Lax–Milgram theorem, each of these problems has exactly one solution. Céa's lemma states that

uuhγαuv for all v in Vh.

That is to say, the subspace solution uh is "the best" approximation of u in Vh, up to the constant γ/α.

The proof is straightforward

αuuh2a(uuh,uuh)=a(uuh,uv)+a(uuh,vuh)=a(uuh,uv)γuuhuv for all v in Vh.

We used the a-orthogonality of uuh and Vh

a(uuh,v)=0,  v in Vh

which follows directly from VhV

a(u,v)=L(v)=a(uh,v) for all v in Vh.

Note: Céa's lemma holds on complex Hilbert spaces also, one then uses a sesquilinear form a(,) instead of a bilinear one. The coercivity assumption then becomes |a(v,v)|αv2 for all v in V (notice the absolute value sign around a(v,v)).

Error estimate in the energy norm

The subspace solution uh is the projection of u onto the subspace Vh in respect to the inner product a(,).

In many applications, the bilinear form a:V×V is symmetric, so

a(v,w)=a(w,v) for all v,w in V.

This, together with the above properties of this form, implies that a(,) is an inner product on V. The resulting norm

va=a(v,v)

is called the energy norm, since it corresponds to a physical energy in many problems. This norm is equivalent to the original norm .

Using the a-orthogonality of uuh and Vh and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality

uuha2=a(uuh,uuh)=a(uuh,uv)uuhauva for all v in Vh.

Hence, in the energy norm, the inequality in Céa's lemma becomes

uuhauva for all v in Vh

(notice that the constant γ/α on the right-hand side is no longer present).

This states that the subspace solution uh is the best approximation to the full-space solution u in respect to the energy norm. Geometrically, this means that uh is the projection of the solution u onto the subspace Vh in respect to the inner product a(,) (see the picture on the right).

Using this result, one can also derive a sharper estimate in the norm . Since

αuuh2a(uuh,uuh)=uuha2uva2γuv2 for all v in Vh,

it follows that

uuhγαuv for all v in Vh.

An application of Céa's lemma

We will apply Céa's lemma to estimate the error of calculating the solution to an elliptic differential equation by the finite element method.

A string with fixed endpoints under the influence of a force pointing down.

Consider the problem of finding a function u:[a,b] satisfying the conditions

{u=f in [a,b]u(a)=u(b)=0

where f:[a,b] is a given continuous function.

Physically, the solution u to this two-point boundary value problem represents the shape taken by a string under the influence of a force such that at every point x between a and b the force density is f(x)𝐞 (where 𝐞 is a unit vector pointing vertically, while the endpoints of the string are on a horizontal line, see the picture on the right). For example, that force may be the gravity, when f is a constant function (since the gravitational force is the same at all points).

Let the Hilbert space V be the Sobolev space H01(a,b), which is the space of all square integrable functions v defined on [a,b] that have a weak derivative on [a,b] with v also being square integrable, and v satisfies the conditions v(a)=v(b)=0. The inner product on this space is

(v,w)=abv(x)w(x)dx for all v and w in V. 

After multiplying the original boundary value problem by v in this space and performing an integration by parts, one obtains the equivalent problem

a(u,v)=L(v) for all v in V,

with

a(u,v)=abu(x)v(x)dx

(here the bilinear form is given by the same expression as the inner product, this is not always the case), and

L(v)=abf(x)v(x)dx.

It can be shown that the bilinear form a(,) and the operator L satisfy the assumptions of Céa's lemma.

A function in Vh (in red), and the typical collection of basis functions in Vh (in blue).

In order to determine a finite-dimensional subspace Vh of V, consider a partition

a=x0<x1<<xn1<xn=b

of the interval [a,b], and let Vh be the space of all continuous functions that are affine on each subinterval in the partition (such functions are called piecewise-linear). In addition, assume that any function in Vh takes the value 0 at the endpoints of [a,b]. It follows that Vh is a vector subspace of V whose dimension is n1 (the number of points in the partition that are not endpoints).

Let uh be the solution to the subspace problem

a(uh,v)=L(v) for all v in Vh,

so one can think of uh as of a piecewise-linear approximation to the exact solution u. By Céa's lemma, there exists a constant C>0 dependent only on the bilinear form a(,), such that

uuhCuv for all v in Vh. 

To explicitly calculate the error between u and uh, consider the function πu in Vh that has the same values as u at the nodes of the partition (so πu is obtained by linear interpolation on each interval [xi,xi+1] from the values of u at interval's endpoints). It can be shown using Taylor's theorem that there exists a constant K that depends only on the endpoints a and b, such that

|u(x)(πu)(x)|KhuL2(a,b)

for all x in [a,b], where h is the largest length of the subintervals [xi,xi+1] in the partition, and the norm on the right-hand side is the L2 norm.

This inequality then yields an estimate for the error

uπu.

Then, by substituting v=πu in Céa's lemma it follows that

uuhChuL2(a,b),

where C is a different constant from the above (it depends only on the bilinear form, which implicitly depends on the interval [a,b]).

This result is of a fundamental importance, as it states that the finite element method can be used to approximately calculate the solution of our problem, and that the error in the computed solution decreases proportionately to the partition size h. Céa's lemma can be applied along the same lines to derive error estimates for finite element problems in higher dimensions (here the domain of u was in one dimension), and while using higher order polynomials for the subspace Vh.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 (Original work from J. Céa)
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534