Trigonometry in Galois fields: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Chris the speller
m Example: Typo fixing, use degree symbol, not masculine ordinal indicator or superscripted "o", replaced: 30<sup>o</sup> → 30° using AWB (7852)
 
en>Yobot
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (9075)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi there, I am Andrew Berryhill. The favorite pastime for him and his children is to perform lacross and he would by no means give it up. Her family members life in Ohio. Distributing manufacturing is exactly where my main income arrives from and it's some thing I truly enjoy.<br><br>Also visit my blog online psychic - [http://isaworld.pe.kr/?document_srl=392088 http://isaworld.pe.kr/?document_srl=392088] -
The '''[[expander graph|expander]] mixing lemma''' states that, for any two [[subsets]] <math>S, T</math> of a d-regular [[expander graph]] <math>G</math>, the number of edges between <math>S</math> and <math>T</math> is approximately what you would expect in a [[random graph|random]] ''d''-[[regular graph]], i.e. <math>d \cdot|S| \cdot |T| / n</math>.  
 
==Statement==
Let <math>G = (V, E)</math> be a d-regular graph with normalized second-largest eigenvalue <math>\lambda</math> (in absolute value) of the adjacency matrix. Then for any two subsets <math>S, T \subseteq V</math>, let <math>E(S, T)</math> denote the number of edges between S and T.
If the two sets are not disjoint, edges in their intersection are counted twice, that is,
<math>E(S,T)=2|E(G[S\cap T])| + E(S\setminus T,T) + E(S,T\setminus S)</math>.
We have
 
:<math>\left|E(S, T) - \frac{d\cdot |S| \cdot |T|}{n}\right| \leq d \lambda  \sqrt{|S| \cdot |T|}\,.</math>
 
For a proof, see references.
 
==Converse==
Recently, Bilu and [[Nati Linial|Linial]] showed that the converse holds as well: if a graph satisfies the conclusion of the expander mixing lemma, that is, for any two subsets <math>S, T \subseteq V</math>,
 
:<math>|E(S, T) - \frac{d \cdot |S| \cdot |T|}{n}| \leq d \lambda \sqrt{|S| \cdot |T|}</math>
 
then its second-largest eigenvalue is <math>O(d \lambda\cdot (1+\log(1/\lambda)))</math>.
 
==References==
*Notes proving the expander mixing lemma. [http://www.tcs.tifr.res.in/~prahladh/teaching/05spring/lectures/lec2.pdf]
*Expander mixing lemma converse. [http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~nati/PAPERS/raman_lift.pdf]
 
{{comp-sci-theory-stub}}
 
[[Category:Theoretical computer science]]
[[Category:Graph theory]]
[[Category:Lemmas]]

Revision as of 18:53, 11 April 2013

The expander mixing lemma states that, for any two subsets S,T of a d-regular expander graph G, the number of edges between S and T is approximately what you would expect in a random d-regular graph, i.e. d|S||T|/n.

Statement

Let G=(V,E) be a d-regular graph with normalized second-largest eigenvalue λ (in absolute value) of the adjacency matrix. Then for any two subsets S,TV, let E(S,T) denote the number of edges between S and T. If the two sets are not disjoint, edges in their intersection are counted twice, that is, E(S,T)=2|E(G[ST])|+E(ST,T)+E(S,TS). We have

|E(S,T)d|S||T|n|dλ|S||T|.

For a proof, see references.

Converse

Recently, Bilu and Linial showed that the converse holds as well: if a graph satisfies the conclusion of the expander mixing lemma, that is, for any two subsets S,TV,

|E(S,T)d|S||T|n|dλ|S||T|

then its second-largest eigenvalue is O(dλ(1+log(1/λ))).

References

  • Notes proving the expander mixing lemma. [1]
  • Expander mixing lemma converse. [2]

Template:Comp-sci-theory-stub