Trigonometry in Galois fields: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
en>Chris the speller m →Example: Typo fixing, use degree symbol, not masculine ordinal indicator or superscripted "o", replaced: 30<sup>o</sup> → 30° using AWB (7852) |
en>Yobot m WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (9075) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''[[expander graph|expander]] mixing lemma''' states that, for any two [[subsets]] <math>S, T</math> of a d-regular [[expander graph]] <math>G</math>, the number of edges between <math>S</math> and <math>T</math> is approximately what you would expect in a [[random graph|random]] ''d''-[[regular graph]], i.e. <math>d \cdot|S| \cdot |T| / n</math>. | |||
==Statement== | |||
Let <math>G = (V, E)</math> be a d-regular graph with normalized second-largest eigenvalue <math>\lambda</math> (in absolute value) of the adjacency matrix. Then for any two subsets <math>S, T \subseteq V</math>, let <math>E(S, T)</math> denote the number of edges between S and T. | |||
If the two sets are not disjoint, edges in their intersection are counted twice, that is, | |||
<math>E(S,T)=2|E(G[S\cap T])| + E(S\setminus T,T) + E(S,T\setminus S)</math>. | |||
We have | |||
:<math>\left|E(S, T) - \frac{d\cdot |S| \cdot |T|}{n}\right| \leq d \lambda \sqrt{|S| \cdot |T|}\,.</math> | |||
For a proof, see references. | |||
==Converse== | |||
Recently, Bilu and [[Nati Linial|Linial]] showed that the converse holds as well: if a graph satisfies the conclusion of the expander mixing lemma, that is, for any two subsets <math>S, T \subseteq V</math>, | |||
:<math>|E(S, T) - \frac{d \cdot |S| \cdot |T|}{n}| \leq d \lambda \sqrt{|S| \cdot |T|}</math> | |||
then its second-largest eigenvalue is <math>O(d \lambda\cdot (1+\log(1/\lambda)))</math>. | |||
==References== | |||
*Notes proving the expander mixing lemma. [http://www.tcs.tifr.res.in/~prahladh/teaching/05spring/lectures/lec2.pdf] | |||
*Expander mixing lemma converse. [http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~nati/PAPERS/raman_lift.pdf] | |||
{{comp-sci-theory-stub}} | |||
[[Category:Theoretical computer science]] | |||
[[Category:Graph theory]] | |||
[[Category:Lemmas]] | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 11 April 2013
The expander mixing lemma states that, for any two subsets of a d-regular expander graph , the number of edges between and is approximately what you would expect in a random d-regular graph, i.e. .
Statement
Let be a d-regular graph with normalized second-largest eigenvalue (in absolute value) of the adjacency matrix. Then for any two subsets , let denote the number of edges between S and T. If the two sets are not disjoint, edges in their intersection are counted twice, that is, . We have
For a proof, see references.
Converse
Recently, Bilu and Linial showed that the converse holds as well: if a graph satisfies the conclusion of the expander mixing lemma, that is, for any two subsets ,
then its second-largest eigenvalue is .