<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=95.245.129.0%2F24</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=95.245.129.0%2F24"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/95.245.129.0/24"/>
	<updated>2026-08-08T21:04:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Trudinger%27s_theorem&amp;diff=11392</id>
		<title>Trudinger&#039;s theorem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Trudinger%27s_theorem&amp;diff=11392"/>
		<updated>2013-12-24T14:43:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;95.245.129.202: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[particle physics]], &#039;&#039;&#039;split supersymmetry&#039;&#039;&#039; is a recent proposal for physics beyond the [[Standard Model]].  It was proposed separately in three papers.  The first by James Wells in June 2003 in a more modest form that mildly relaxed the assumption about [[naturalness (physics)|naturalness]] in the Higgs potential.  In May 2004 [[Nima Arkani-Hamed]] and [[Savas Dimopoulos]] argued that naturalness in the [[Higgs mechanism|Higgs]] sector may not be an accurate guide to propose new physics beyond the Standard Model and argued that supersymmetry may be realized in a different fashion that preserved [[gauge coupling unification]] and has a [[dark matter]] candidate. In June 2004 [[Gian Francesco Giudice|Gian Giudice]] and Andrea Romanino argued from a general point of view that if one wants gauge coupling unification and a dark matter candidate, that split supersymmetry is one amongst a few theories that exists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new light (~TeV) particles in Split Supersymmetry (beyond the Standard Models particles) are&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Field&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Spin&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;[[Gauge Charge]]s&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Name&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{g}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(8,1)_{0}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[gaugino|gluino]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{W}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,3)_{0}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[gaugino|wino]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,1)_{0}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[gaugino|bino]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{H}_u&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,2)_{\frac{1}{2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[higgsino]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{H}_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,2)_{-\frac{1}{2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[higgsino]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lagrangian for Split Supersymmetry is constrained from the existence of high energy supersymmetry.  There are five couplings in Split Supersymmetry: the Higgs quartic coupling and four Yukawa couplings between the Higgsinos, Higgs and gauginos.  The couplings are set by one parameter, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tan \beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, at the scale where the supersymmetric scalars decouple.   Beneath the supersymmetry breaking scale, these five couplings evolve through the [[renormalization group equation]] down to the TeV scale.   At a future [[Linear collider]], these couplings could be measured at the 1% level and then renormalization group evolved up to high energies to show that the theory is supersymmetric at an exceedingly high scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Long Lived Gluinos ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The striking feature of split supersymmetry is that the [[gluino]] becomes a quasi-stable particle with a lifetime that could be up to 100 seconds long.   A gluino that lived longer than this would disrupt [[Big Bang nucleosynthesis]] or would have been observed as an additional source of cosmic gamma rays.  The gluino  is long lived because it can only decay into a [[squark]] and a [[quark]] and because the squarks are so heavy and these decays are highly suppressed. Thus the [[Particle decay|decay]] rate of the gluino can roughly be estimated, in [[natural units]], as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{{m_g}^5\over {m_{sq}}^4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the [[gluino]] [[rest mass]] and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{sq}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the [[squark]] rest mass. For [[gluino]] mass of the order of 1 [[TeV]], the cosmological bound mentioned above sets an upper bound of about &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;10^9&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; [[GeV]] on [[squark]]s masses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The potentially long lifetime of the gluino leads to different collider signatures at the [[Tevatron]] and the [[Large Hadron Collider]]. There are three ways to see these particles:&lt;br /&gt;
* Measuring the ratio of momentum to energy or velocity in tracking chambers ( dE/dx in the inner tracking chamber or p/v in the outer muon tracking chamber)&lt;br /&gt;
* Looking for excess singlet jet events that arise from initial or final state radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
* Looking for gluinos that have come to rest inside the detector and later decay. Such an event may occur if the gluino [[hadronize]] to form an exotic [[hadron]] which [[strong interaction|strongly interacts]] with a [[nucleon]] in the detector to create an exotic charged [[hadron]]. The latter will decelerate by [[electromagnetic interaction]] inside the detector and will eventually stop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and drawbacks==&lt;br /&gt;
Split supersymmetry allows [[Grand unification theory|gauge coupling unification]] as supersymmetry does, because the particles which have masses way beyond the [[TeV]] scale play no major role in the unification. These particles are the [[gravitino]] - which has a small coupling (of order of the [[gravitation]]al interaction) to the other particles, and the scalar partners to the standard model fermions - namely, [[squark]]s and [[slepton]]s. The latter move the [[beta-function]]s of all gauge couplings together, and do not influence their unification, because in the [[grand unification theory]] they form a full [[SU(5)]] [[multiplet]], just like a complete [[Generation (particle physics)|generation]] of particles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Split supersymmetry also solves the [[Gravitino#Gravitino cosmological problem|gravitino cosmological problem]], because the [[gravitino]] mass is much higher than [[TeV]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The upper bounds on [[proton decay]] rate can also be satisfied because the [[squark]]s are very heavy as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, unlike conventional [[supersymmetry]], split supersymmetry does not solve the [[hierarchy problem]] which has been a primary motivation for proposals for new physics beyond the [[Standard Model]] since 1979. One proposal is that the [[hierarchy problem]] is &amp;quot;solved&amp;quot; by assuming [[fine-tuning]] due to [[Anthropic principle|anthropic reasons]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{pov|date=January 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial attitude of some of the high energy physics community towards split supersymmetry was illustrated by a parody called [[supersplit supersymmetry]].  Often when a new notion in physics is proposed there is a knee-jerk backlash.  When naturalness in the Higgs sector was initially proposed as a motivation for new physics, the notion was not taken seriously.  After the supersymmetric Standard Model was proposed, [[Sheldon Glashow]] quipped that &#039;half of the particles have already been discovered.&#039;  After 25 years, the notion of naturalness had become so ingrained in the community that proposing a theory that did not use naturalness as the primary motivation was ridiculed.    Split supersymmetry makes predictions that are distinct from both the [[Standard Model]] and the [[Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model]] and the ultimate nature of the naturalness in the Higgs sector will hopefully be determined at future colliders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the original proponents of naturalness no longer believe that it should be an exclusive constraint on new physics.  [[Kenneth G. Wilson|Kenneth Wilson]] originally advocated for it, but has recently called it one of his biggest mistakes during his career.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}}  [[Steven Weinberg]] relaxed the notion of naturalness in the cosmological constant and argued for an environmental explanation for it in 1987.  [[Leonard Susskind]], who initially proposed [[technicolor (physics)|technicolor]],  is a firm advocate of the notion of a landscape and non-naturalness.  [[Savas Dimopoulos]], who initially proposed the supersymmetric Standard Model, proposed split supersymmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0306127 Implications of Supersymmetry Breaking with a Little Hierarchy between Gauginos and Scalars] by James D. Wells&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405159 Supersymmetric Unification Without Low Energy Supersymmetry And Signatures for Fine-Tuning at the LHC] by Nima Arkani-Hamed and Savas Dimopoulos&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0406088 Split Supersymmetry] by [[Gian Francesco Giudice|G.F. Giudice]] and A. Romanino&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://xstructure.inr.ac.ru/x-bin/auththeme3.py?level=1&amp;amp;index1=267164&amp;amp;skip=0 Authority Articles on Split supersymmetry]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Supersymmetry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:String theory]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>95.245.129.202</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>