<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=80.121.86.210</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=80.121.86.210"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/80.121.86.210"/>
	<updated>2026-08-24T14:08:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Commutation_theorem&amp;diff=22508</id>
		<title>Commutation theorem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Commutation_theorem&amp;diff=22508"/>
		<updated>2013-07-28T22:00:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;80.121.86.210: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{context|date=October 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Focus recovery from a defocused image is an ill-posed problem since it loses the component of high frequency. Most of the methods for focus recovery are based on depth estimation theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Most depth recovery methods are simply based on camera focus and defocus. Among those approaches, they usually fall in a depth discontinuity problem.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Linear canonical transform]] (LCT) gives a scalable kernel to fit many famous optical effects. Using LCTs to approximate an optical system for imaging and inverting this system, theoretically permits recovery of a defocused image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Depth of field and perceptual focus==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Larger aperture.PNG|Effective DOF interval.|frame|The object is put at the different positions whereas causes to effective focus.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In photography, [[depth of field]] (DOF) means an effective focal length. It is usually used for stressing an object and deemphasizing the background (and/or the foreground). The important measure  related to DOF is the lens [[aperture]]. Decreasing the diameter of aperture increases focus and lowers resolution and vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Huygens-Fresnel principle and DOF==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Huygens-Fresnel field.PNG|frame|The observation points at two different fields]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Huygens-Fresnel principle]] describes [[diffraction]] of wave propagation between two fields. It belongs to [[Fourier optics]] rather than  [[geometric optics]].The disturbance of diffraction depends on two circumstance parameters, the size of aperture and the interfield distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider a source field and a destination field, field 1 and field 0, respectively. P&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(x&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,y&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is the position in the source field, P&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(x&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,y&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is the position in the destination field. The Huygens-Fresnel principle gives the diffraction formula for two fields U(x&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,y&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), U(x&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,y&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) as following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bold U(x_0,y_0) = \frac{1}{j\lambda}\int\!\int \bold U(x_1,y_1) \frac{e^{jkr_{01}}}{r_{01}}\cos\theta dx_1 dy_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where θ denotes the angle between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r_{01}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Replace cosθ by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{r_{01}}{z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r_{01}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[(x_0-x_1)^2+(y_0-y_1)^2+z^2]^{1/2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bold U(x_0,y_0) = \frac{1}{j\lambda z}\int\!\int \bold U(x_1,y_1) \frac{\exp(jkz[1+(\frac{x_0-x_1}{z})^2+(\frac{y_0-y_1}{z})^2]^{1/2})}{1+(\frac{x_0-x_1}{z})^2+(\frac{y_0-y_1}{z})^2}dx_1 dy_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The further distance &#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039; or the smaller aperture &#039;&#039;(x&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,y&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039; causes a greater diffraction.  A larger DOF can lead to a more effective focused wave distribution. This seems to be a conflict. Here are the notations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Diffraction&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** In a real imaging environment, the depths of objects comparing to the aperture are usually not enough to lead to serious diffraction.&lt;br /&gt;
** However, a long enough depth of the object can truly blurs the image.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Effective Focus&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Small aperture, small blurring radius, few wave information.&lt;br /&gt;
** Loses details in comparing to a large aperture.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, diffraction explains a micro behavior whereas DOF shows a macro behavior. Both of them are related to aperture size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Linear canonical transform==&lt;br /&gt;
As the meaning of “canonical”, the [[linear canonical transform]] (LCT) is a scalable transform that connects to lots of important kernels such as the [[Fresnel]] transform, [[Fraunhofer]] transform and the [[fractional Fourier transform]]. It can be easily controlled by its four parameters, &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;b&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039; (3 degrees of freedom). The definition:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Imaging system.PNG|frame|A general imaging system with two free space propagation and one thin lens passing]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L_M(f(u))=\int L_M(u,u&#039;)f(u&#039;)du&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L_M(u,u&#039;)=\begin{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
                 \sqrt\frac{1}{b}e^{-j\pi/4}e^{[j\pi(\frac {d}{b}u^2)-2\frac{1}{b}uu&#039;+\frac{a}{b}u&#039;^2]}, &amp;amp;\mbox{if } b\ne 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
                 \sqrt{d}e^{\frac{j}{2}cdu^2}\delta(u&#039;-du) ,&amp;amp;\mbox{if } b=0&lt;br /&gt;
                 \end{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider a general imaging system with object distance &#039;&#039;z&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;, [[focal length]] of the [[thin lens]] &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; and an imaging distance &#039;&#039;z&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;. The effect of the propagation in freespace acts as nearly a [[chirp]] [[convolution]], that is, the formula of diffraction. Besides, the effect of the propagation in thin lens acts as a chirp multiplication. The parameters are all simplified as [[paraxial approximation]]s while meeting the freespace propagation. It does not consider  aperture size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the properties of the LCT, it is possible to obtain those 4 parameters for this optical system as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\begin{bmatrix}&lt;br /&gt;
        1-\frac{z_1}{f} \quad &amp;amp;\lambda z_0-\frac{\lambda z_0 z_1}{f}+\lambda z_1 \\&lt;br /&gt;
        -\frac{1}{\lambda f} \quad &amp;amp;1-\frac{z_0}{f}&lt;br /&gt;
       \end{bmatrix}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the values of &#039;&#039;z&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;z&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; are known, the LCT can simulate any optical system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
* M. Haldun Ozaktas, [[Zeev zalevsky|Zeev Zalevsky]] and M. Alper Kutay, “The fractional Fourier transform with applications in optics and signal processing,” JOHN WILEY &amp;amp; SONS, LTD, New York, 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
* M. Sorel and J. Flusser, “Space-variant restoration of images degraded by camera motion blur,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 17, pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;105–116, Feb. 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
* Jos. Schneider Optische Werke GmbH, “The way a zoom lens works,” Feb. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.schneiderkreuznach.com/knowhow/zoom_e.htm. [Accessed: Mar. 9 2008].&lt;br /&gt;
* B. Barshan, M. Alper Kutay and H. M. Ozaktas, “Optimal filtering with linear ca-nonical transformations,” Optics Communications, vol. 135, pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;32–36, Feb. 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Optics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Image processing]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>80.121.86.210</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>