<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=78.146.15.0%2F24</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=78.146.15.0%2F24"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/78.146.15.0/24"/>
	<updated>2026-07-10T14:35:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Isodynamic_point&amp;diff=13811</id>
		<title>Isodynamic point</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Isodynamic_point&amp;diff=13811"/>
		<updated>2013-03-26T20:00:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;78.146.15.4: /* Distance ratios */ clearer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Goursat]]&#039;s lemma&#039;&#039;&#039; is an [[algebra]]ic [[theorem]] about [[subgroup]]s of the [[Direct product of groups|direct product]] of two [[Group (mathematics)|groups]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be stated as follows.&lt;br /&gt;
:Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be groups, and let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be a subgroup of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G\times G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; such that the two [[projection (mathematics)|projections]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_1: H\rightarrow G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_2: H\rightarrow G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are [[surjective]] (i.e., &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a [[subdirect product]] of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the kernel of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the [[Kernel (algebra)|kernel]] of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. One can identify &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a [[normal subgroup]] of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a normal subgroup of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then the image of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G/N\times G&#039;/N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the [[graph of a function|graph]] of an [[isomorphism]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G/N\approx G&#039;/N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An immediate consequence of this is that the subdirect product of two groups can be described as a [[Direct product of groups#Fiber products|fiber product]] and vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proof of Goursat&#039;s lemma ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proceeding with the [[Mathematical proof|proof]], &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown to be normal in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G \times \{e&#039;\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\{e\} \times G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, respectively.  It is in this sense that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be identified as normal in &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;&#039;, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a [[homomorphism]], its kernel &#039;&#039;N&#039;&#039; is normal in &#039;&#039;H&#039;&#039;. Moreover, given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, there exists &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h=(g,g&#039;) \in H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is surjective.  Therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_1(N)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is normal in &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;, viz:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;gp_1(N)=p_1(h)p_1(N)=p_1(hN)=p_1(Nh)=p_1(N)g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
It follows that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is normal in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G \times \{e&#039;\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; since&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(g,e&#039;)N = (g,e&#039;)(p_1(N) \times \{e&#039;\}) = gp_1(N) \times \{e&#039;\} = p_1(N)g \times \{e&#039;\} = (p_1(N) \times \{e&#039;\})(g,e&#039;)=N(g,e&#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proof that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is normal in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\{e\} \times G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; proceeds in a similar manner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the identification of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G \times \{e&#039;\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G/N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;gN&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(G \times \{e&#039;\})/N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(g,e&#039;)N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Similarly, we can write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&#039;/N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&#039;N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&#039; \in G&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On to the proof. Consider the map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H \rightarrow G/N \times G&#039;/N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(g,g&#039;) \mapsto (gN, g&#039;N&#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The image of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under this map is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\{(gN,g&#039;N&#039;) | (g,g&#039;) \in H \}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  This [[Relation (mathematics)|relation]] is the graph of a [[well-defined]] function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G/N \rightarrow G&#039;/N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; provided &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;gN=N \Rightarrow g&#039;N&#039;=N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, essentially an application of the [[vertical line test]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;gN=N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (more properly, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(g,e&#039;)N=N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(g,e&#039;) \in N \subset H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Thus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(e,g&#039;) = (g,g&#039;)(g^{-1},e&#039;) \in H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, whence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(e,g&#039;) \in N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, that is, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&#039;N&#039;=N&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Note that by symmetry, it is immediately clear that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&#039;N&#039;=N&#039; \Rightarrow gN=N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, i.e., this function also passes the [[horizontal line test]], and is therefore [[injective function|one-to-one]].  The fact that this function is a surjective group homomorphism follows directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ken Ribet|Kenneth A. Ribet]] (Autumn 1976), &amp;quot;[[Galois]] [[Group action|Action]] on Division Points of [[Abelian Variety|Abelian Varieties]] with Real Multiplications&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;[[American Journal of Mathematics]]&#039;&#039;, Vol. 98, No. 3, 751–804.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lemmas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles containing proofs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>78.146.15.4</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>