<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=75.69.67.121</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=75.69.67.121"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/75.69.67.121"/>
	<updated>2026-09-03T10:56:32Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Eddy_break-up_model_for_combustion&amp;diff=28309</id>
		<title>Eddy break-up model for combustion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Eddy_break-up_model_for_combustion&amp;diff=28309"/>
		<updated>2014-02-01T10:38:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;75.69.67.121: It is an awkward sentence, I am not completely sure this would be the best way to change it, I may have my science wrong, but look at 3rd to last sentence of first paragraph.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In mathematics, &#039;&#039;&#039;Kostant&#039;s convexity theorem&#039;&#039;&#039;, introduced by {{harvs|txt|first=Bertram|last=Kostant|year=1973|authorlink=Bertram Kostant}},  states that the projection of every [[coadjoint orbit]] of a connected [[compact Lie group]] into the dual of a [[Cartan subalgebra]] is a [[convex set]]. It is a special case of a more general result for [[symmetric space]]s. Kostant&#039;s theorem is a generalization of a result of {{harvtxt|Schur|1923}}, {{harvtxt|Horn|1954}} and {{harvtxt|Thompson|1972}} for hermitian matrices. They proved that the projection onto the diagonal matrices of the space of all &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; by &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; complex self-adjoint matrices with given eigenvalues Λ = (λ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, ..., λ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is the convex polytope with vertices all permutations of the coordinates of Λ.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kostant used this to generalize the [[Golden–Thompson inequality]] to all compact groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Compact Lie groups==&lt;br /&gt;
Let &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; be a connected compact Lie group with [[maximal torus]] &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; and [[Weyl group]] &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039; = &#039;&#039;N&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;)/&#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;. Let their Lie algebras be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Let &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039; be the orthogonal projection of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; onto &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some Ad-invariant inner product on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then for &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) is the convex polytope with vertices &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) where &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039; runs over the Weyl group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symmetric spaces==&lt;br /&gt;
Let &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039; be a compact Lie group and σ an involution with &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; a compact subgroup fixed by σ and containing the [[identity component]] of the fixed point subgroup of σ. Thus &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;/&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; is a [[symmetric space]] of compact type. Let  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{g}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be their Lie algebras and let σ also denote the corresponding involution of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{g}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the −1 eigenspace of σ and let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be a maximal Abelian subspace. Let &#039;&#039;Q&#039;&#039; be the orthogonal projection of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; onto &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)-invariant inner product on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then for &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &#039;&#039;Q&#039;&#039;(Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) is the convex polytope with vertices the &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) where &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039; runs over the [[restricted Weyl group]] (the normalizer of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; modulo its centralizer).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case of a compact Lie group is the special case where &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039; = &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; × &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; is embedded diagonally and σ is the automorphism of &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039; interchanging the two factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proof for a compact Lie group==&lt;br /&gt;
Kostant&#039;s proof for symmetric spaces is given in {{harvtxt|Helgason|1984}}. There is an elementary proof just for compact Lie groups using similar ideas, due to {{harvtxt|Wildberger|1993}}: it is based on a generalization of the [[Jacobi eigenvalue algorithm]] to compact Lie groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; be a connected compact Lie group with maximal torus &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;. For each positive root α there is a homomorphism of SU(2) into &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;. A simple calculation with 2 by 2 matrices shows that if  &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039; is in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039; varies in this image of SU(2), then &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(Ad(&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;) traces a straight line between &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;) and its reflection in the root α.  In particular the component in the α root space—its &amp;quot;α off-diagonal coordinate&amp;quot;—can be sent to 0. In performing this latter operation, the distance from &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;) to &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(Ad(&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;) is bounded above by size of the α off-diagonal coordinate of &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;. Let &#039;&#039;m&#039;&#039; be the number of positive roots, half the dimension of &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;/&#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;. Starting from an arbitrary &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; take the largest off-diagonal coordinate and send it to zero to get &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Continue in this way, to get a sequence (&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Then&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\displaystyle{\|P^\perp(Y_{n+1})\|^2\le \left({m-1\over m}\right)\|P^\perp(Y_n)\|^2.}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;⊥&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) tends to 0 and &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\displaystyle{\|P(Y_{n+1}-Y_n)\|\le \|P^\perp(Y_n)\|.}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a Cauchy sequence, so  tends to &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Since &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) ⊕ &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;⊥&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; tends to &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;. On the other hand &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; lies on the line segment joining &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;+1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and its reflection in the root α. Thus &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; lies in the Weyl group polytope defined by &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;+1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. These convex polytopes are thus increasing as &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; increases and hence &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;) lies in the polytope for &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;. This can be repeated for each &#039;&#039;Z&#039;&#039; in the &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;-orbit of &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;. The limit is necessarily in the Weyl group orbit of &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; and hence &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) is contained in the convex polytope defined by &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To prove the opposite inclusion, take &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; to be a point in the positive Weyl chamber. Then all the other points &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039; in the convex hull of &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) can be obtained by a series of paths in that intersection moving along the negative of a simple root. (This matches a familiar picture from representation theory: if by duality &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; corresponds to a dominant weight λ, the other weights in the Weyl group polytope defined by λ are those appearing in the irreducible representation of &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; with highest weight λ. An argument with lowering operators shows that each such weight is linked by a chain to λ obtained by successively subtracting simple roots from λ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See:&lt;br /&gt;
*{{harvnb|Humphreys|1997}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{harvnb|Duistermaat|Kolk|2000}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) Each part of the path from &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039; can be obtained by the process described above for the copies of SU(2) corresponding to simple roots, so the whole convex polytope lies in &#039;&#039;P&#039;&#039;(Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other proofs==&lt;br /&gt;
{{harvtxt|Heckman|1982}} gave another proof of the convexity theorem for compact Lie groups, also presented in {{harvtxt|Hilgert|Hofmann|Lawson|1989}}. For compact groups, {{harvtxt|Atiyah|1982}} and {{harvtxt|Guillemin|Sternberg|1982}} showed that if &#039;&#039;M&#039;&#039; is a [[symplectic manifold]] with a Hamiltonian action of a torus &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; with Lie algebra &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then the image of the moment map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\displaystyle{M\rightarrow\mathfrak{t}^*}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is a convex polytope with vertices in the image of the fixed point set of &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; (the image is a finite set). Taking for &#039;&#039;M&#039;&#039; a coadjoint orbit of &#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}^*&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the moment map for &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; is the composition &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\displaystyle{M\rightarrow\mathfrak{k}^*\rightarrow \mathfrak{t}^*.}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Ad-invariant inner product to identify &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}^*&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the map becomes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\displaystyle{\mathrm{Ad}(K)\cdot X \rightarrow \mathfrak{t},}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the restriction of the orthogonal projection. Taking &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the fixed points of &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; in the orbit Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; are just the orbit under the Weyl group, &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;). So the convexity properties of the moment map imply that the image is the convex polytope with these vertices. {{harvtxt|Ziegler|1992}} gave a simplified direct version of the proof using moment maps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{harvtxt|Duistermaat|1983}} showed that a generalization of the convexity properties of the moment map could be used to treat the more general case of symmetric spaces. Let τ be a smooth involution of &#039;&#039;M&#039;&#039; which takes the symplectic form ω to −ω and such that &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; ∘ τ = τ ∘ &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Then &#039;&#039;M&#039;&#039; and the fixed point set of τ (assumed to be non-empty) have the same image under the moment map. To apply this, let &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; = exp &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, a torus in &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;. If &#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039; is in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as before the moment map yields the projection map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\displaystyle{\mathrm{Ad}(G)\cdot X \rightarrow \mathfrak{a}.}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let τ be the map τ(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;) =  − σ(&#039;&#039;Y&#039;&#039;). The map above has the same image as that of the fixed point set of τ, i.e. Ad(&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;. Its image is the convex polytope with vertices the image of the fixed point set of &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; on Ad(&#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;)⋅&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;, i.e. the points &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;(&#039;&#039;X&#039;&#039;) for &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039; = N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;)/C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Atiyah|first= M. F. |authorlink=Michael Francis Atiyah|title=Convexity and commuting Hamiltonians|journal= Bull. London Math. Soc.|volume= 14|year=1982|pages= 1–15}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Duistermaat|first= J. J.|title=Convexity and tightness for restrictions of Hamiltonian functions to fixed point sets of an antisymplectic involution|journal=Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.|volume= 275|year= 1983|pages= 417–429|url=http://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1983-275-01/S0002-9947-1983-0678361-2/home.html}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|title=Lie groups|publisher=Springer|year= 2000|isbn=3540152938|first=J.J.|last=Duistermaat|first2=A.|last2=Kolk|series=Universitext}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Guillemin|first= V.|last2= Sternberg|first2= S.|title=Convexity properties of the moment mapping|journal= Invent. Math.|volume= 67|year=1982|pages= 491–513}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|first=Sigurdur|last=Helgason|authorlink=Sigurdur Helgason (mathematician)|title=Groups and Geometric Analysis: Integral Geometry, Invariant Differential Operators, and Spherical Functions|year=1984|publisher=Academic Press|ISBN= 0-12-338301-3|pages=473–476}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Hilgert|first= Joachim|last2= Hofmann|first2= Karl Heinrich|last3= Lawson|first3= Jimmie D. |title=Lie groups, convex cones, and semigroups|series= Oxford Mathematical Monographs|publisher=Oxford University Press|year= 1989|isbn= 0-19-853569-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Heckman|first= G. J.|title= Projections of orbits and asymptotic behavior of multiplicities for compact connected Lie groups|journal= Invent. Math.|volume= 67|year=1982|pages= 333–356}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Horn|first= Alfred|title=Doubly stochastic matrices and the diagonal of a rotation matrix|journal=Amer. J. Math.|volume= 76|year=1954|pages= 620–630}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|first=James E.|last= Humphreys|title=Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory|publisher=Springer|edition=2nd|&lt;br /&gt;
year=1997|series=Graduate texts in mathematics|volume=9|isbn=3540900535}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Citation | last1=Kostant | first1=Bertram | title=On convexity, the Weyl group and the Iwasawa decomposition | url= http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASENS_1973_4_6_4_413_0 | id={{MR|0364552}} | year=1973 | journal=Annales Scientifiques de l&#039;École Normale Supérieure. Quatrième Série | issn=0012-9593 | volume=6 | pages=413–455}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|first=I.|last= Schur|title= Uber eine Klasse von Mittelbildungen mit Anwendungen auf der Determinanten Theorie|journal= Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Mathematischen Gesellschaft|volume= 22| year=1923|pages= 9–20}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Thompson|first=Colin J.|title=Inequalities and partial orders on matrix spaces|journal= Indiana Univ. Math. J.|volume= 21|year=1972|pages= 469–480|url=http://www.iumj.indiana.edu/docs/21037/21037.asp}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Wildberger|first= N. J.|title=Diagonalization in compact Lie algebras and a new proof of a theorem of Kostant|journal=Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.|volume= 119 |year=1993|pages= 649–655}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Ziegler|first= François|title=&lt;br /&gt;
On the Kostant convexity theorem|journal=Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.|volume= 115|year=1992|pages= 1111–1113}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lie groups]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lie algebras]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homogeneous spaces]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>75.69.67.121</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>