<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=60.241.0.0%2F16</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=60.241.0.0%2F16"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/60.241.0.0/16"/>
	<updated>2026-09-07T16:48:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Imagery_intelligence&amp;diff=224852</id>
		<title>Imagery intelligence</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Imagery_intelligence&amp;diff=224852"/>
		<updated>2014-11-18T08:19:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;60.241.37.16: typo fixed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I might also choose to encourage you to consult with a physician before beginning any weight loss program. She or he will provide we a fair high thought on a advantageous objective for you.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;When we have a quite score of twenty to 25 you happen to be observed to be of usual weight. Anything through 25 is overweight and more than thirty is overweight. Under 20 is considered to be harmful furthermore, considering you&#039;re considered to be scrawny--that is, unhealthy light-weight. You possibly absence electricity plus are in need of muscle.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The creation of the [http://safedietplans.com/calories-burned-walking calories burned] greatly modified the means which clinicians implement and read bodyweight because a signifies for condition protection plus forecast. While not a great measurement, being more affordable and non-invasive in comparison to normal techniques, it will provide a very fairly good sign of the body fat structure of the individual.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lot of persons are effortlessly only not as apt to spot on bodyweight because others, nevertheless they are not unhealthy by any signifies. Asian people normally drop into this class more usually than many other races. So for anybody who is Asian, or when we understand which you are an &amp;quot;ectomorph&amp;quot; body style, the calories burned walking calculator may state you&#039;re inside the 20 to 25 range when you are really overweight (you&#039;ve furthermore considerably extra fat tissue, not sufficient lean muscle). Similarly, it might let you understand which we merely are &amp;quot;scrawny&amp;quot; whenever really, pound for pound, you are quite strong.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Weight reduction supplements have a variety of elements to reduce fat. Some supplements focus on increasing a person&#039;s stamina level. Other supplements target fat burning and improved metabolism.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The calories burned walking calculator is a fantastic system to apply to be a guide to flag people whom is at risk for problems associated to their general system composition. It&#039;s really a far better alternate in comparison to to basically look into bodyweight when searching to pinpoint somebody&#039;s over-all health or his or her dangers for long-term problems. It happens to be important to take directly into consideration different components whenever determining another person&#039;s probability for illnesses, nonetheless it&#039;s a great establishing stage along with a fair depiction of someone&#039;s general health standing.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fat burners are a dietary pill or medicine or supplement depending found on the product in question. The fat burners are designed to increase the power level to do several points, in the event you are dieting plus feel a deficiency of power they will drive up a energy levels to let we to keep dieting and not feel overly tired. They equally artificially stimulate the metabolism plus body temperature is increased creating you sweat plus become thirsty. This might assist we lose fat should you just always lower the calorie intake below the maintenance level.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>60.241.37.16</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Trichotomy_(mathematics)&amp;diff=4386</id>
		<title>Trichotomy (mathematics)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Trichotomy_(mathematics)&amp;diff=4386"/>
		<updated>2013-12-31T00:13:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;60.241.193.225: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[set theory]], a &#039;&#039;&#039;regular cardinal&#039;&#039;&#039; is a  [[cardinal number]] that is equal to its own [[cofinality]]. So, crudely speaking, a regular cardinal is one which cannot be broken into a smaller collection of smaller parts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the axiom of choice holds (so that any cardinal number can be well-ordered), an infinite cardinal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular if and only if it cannot be expressed as the cardinal sum of a set of cardinality less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the elements of which are cardinals less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. (The situation is slightly more complicated in contexts where the [[axiom of choice]] might fail; in that case not all cardinals are necessarily the cardinalities of [[well-ordered]] sets. In that case, the above definition is restricted to well-orderable cardinals only.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An infinite ordinal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular [[if and only if]] it is a [[limit ordinal]] which is not the limit of a set of smaller ordinals which set has [[order type]] less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A regular ordinal is always an [[initial ordinal]], though some initial ordinals are not regular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infinite well-ordered cardinals which are not regular are called &#039;&#039;&#039;singular cardinals&#039;&#039;&#039;. Finite cardinal numbers are typically not called regular or singular.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ordinals less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are finite. A finite sequence of finite ordinals always has a finite maximum, so &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; cannot be the limit of any sequence of type less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; whose elements are ordinals less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is therefore a regular ordinal. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ([[aleph-null]]) is a regular cardinal because its initial ordinal, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is regular. It can also be seen directly to be regular, as the cardinal sum of a finite number of finite cardinal numbers is itself finite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the [[successor ordinal|next ordinal number]] greater than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. It is singular, since it is not a limit ordinal. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the next limit ordinal after &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. It can be written as the limit of the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and so on. This sequence has order type &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the limit of a sequence of type less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; whose elements are ordinals less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, therefore it is singular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the [[successor cardinal|next cardinal number]] greater than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so the cardinals less than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are [[countable set|countable]] (finite or denumerable). Assuming the axiom of choice, the union of a countable set of countable sets is itself countable. So &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; cannot be written as the sum of a countable set of countable cardinal numbers, and is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the next cardinal number after the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and so on. Its initial ordinal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the limit of the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and so on, which has order type &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is singular, and so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Assuming the axiom of choice, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the first infinite cardinal which is singular (the first infinite &#039;&#039;ordinal&#039;&#039; which is singular is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega+1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Proving the existence of singular cardinals requires the [[axiom schema of replacement|axiom of replacement]], and in fact the inability to prove the existence of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in [[Zermelo set theory]] is what led [[Adolf Abraham Halevi Fraenkel|Fraenkel]] to postulate this axiom.{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Properties ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uncountable [[limit cardinal]]s that are also regular are known as weakly [[inaccessible cardinals]].  They cannot be proved to exist within ZFC, though their existence is not known to be inconsistent with ZFC. Their existence is sometimes taken as an additional axiom.  Inaccessible cardinals are necessarily [[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed point]]s of the [[aleph number|aleph function]], though not all fixed points are regular.  For instance, the first fixed point is the limit of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_0, \aleph_{\aleph_0}, \aleph_{\aleph_{\aleph_0}}, ...&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and is therefore singular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the [[axiom of choice]] holds, then every [[successor cardinal]] is regular.  Thus the regularity or singularity of most aleph numbers can be checked depending on whether the cardinal is a successor cardinal or a limit cardinal.  Some cardinal numbers cannot be proven to be equal to any particular aleph, for instance the [[cardinality of the continuum]], whose value in ZFC may be any uncountable cardinal of uncountable cofinality (see [[Easton&#039;s theorem]]). The [[continuum hypothesis]] postulates that the cardinality of the continuum is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without the axiom of choice, there would be cardinal numbers which were not well-orderable. Moreover, the cardinal sum of an arbitrary collection could not be defined. Therefore only the [[aleph number]]s can meaningfully be called regular or singular cardinals. Furthermore, a successor aleph need not be regular. For instance, the union of a countable set of countable sets need not be countable. It is consistent with [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory|ZF]] that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the limit of a countable sequence of countable ordinals as well as the set of real numbers is countable union of countable sets. Furthermore, it is consistent with ZF that every aleph bigger than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\aleph_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is singular (a result proved by [[Moti Gitik]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Inaccessible cardinal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
* {{aut|[[Herbert Enderton|Herbert B. Enderton]]}}, &#039;&#039;Elements of Set Theory&#039;&#039;, ISBN 0-12-238440-7&lt;br /&gt;
* {{aut|[[Kenneth Kunen]]}}, &#039;&#039;Set Theory, An Introduction to Independence Proofs&#039;&#039;, ISBN 0-444-85401-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ordinal numbers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cardinal numbers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>60.241.193.225</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>