<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=117.202.0.0%2F16</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=117.202.0.0%2F16"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.202.0.0/16"/>
	<updated>2026-07-12T17:02:51Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Benjamin_Graham_formula&amp;diff=251007</id>
		<title>Benjamin Graham formula</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Benjamin_Graham_formula&amp;diff=251007"/>
		<updated>2014-11-17T20:36:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;117.202.22.73: Spam&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Friends contact her Felicidad and her husband doesn&#039;t like it at all. Playing crochet is a factor that I&#039;m totally addicted to. I presently reside in Alabama. His working day occupation is a financial officer but he ideas on altering it.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Here is my site [http://srgame.Co.kr/qna/12373 extended car warranty]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>117.202.22.73</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Process_function&amp;diff=12146</id>
		<title>Process function</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Process_function&amp;diff=12146"/>
		<updated>2014-01-26T13:35:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;117.202.91.202: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[electronics]], the &#039;&#039;&#039;Miller effect&#039;&#039;&#039; accounts for the increase in the equivalent input [[capacitance]] of an inverting voltage [[amplifier]] due to amplification of the effect of capacitance between the input and output terminals. The virtually increased input capacitance due to the Miller effect is given by&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{M}=C (1+A_v)\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-A_v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gain of the amplifier and C is the feedback capacitance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the term &#039;&#039;Miller effect&#039;&#039; normally refers to capacitance, any impedance connected between the input and another node exhibiting gain can modify the amplifier input impedance via this effect. These properties of the Miller effect are generalized in the [[Miller theorem]].  The Miller capacitance due to [[parasitic capacitance]] between the output and input of active devices like [[transistor]]s and [[vacuum tubes]] is a major factor limiting their [[gain]] at high frequencies.  Miller capacitance was identified in 1920 in [[triode]] [[vacuum tube]]s by [[John Milton Miller]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Miller effect was named after [[John Milton Miller]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John M. Miller, &amp;quot;Dependence of the input impedance of a three-electrode vacuum tube upon the load in the plate circuit,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Scientific Papers of the Bureau of Standards&#039;&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
vol.15, no. 351, pages 367-385 (1920).  Available on-line at:  http://web.mit.edu/klund/www/papers/jmiller.pdf  .&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Miller published his work in 1920, he was working on [[vacuum tube]] triodes; however, the same theory applies to more modern devices such as bipolar and MOS [[transistors]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Derivation ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Impedance Multiplier.png|300px|thumb|An ideal voltage inverting amplifier with an impedance connecting output to input.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider an ideal inverting voltage [[amplifier]] of gain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-A_v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with an [[Electrical impedance|impedance]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected between its input and output nodes. The output voltage is therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_o = -A_v V_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Assuming that the amplifier input draws no current, all of the input current flows through &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is therefore given by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I_i = \frac{V_i - V_o}{Z} = \frac{V_i (1 + A_v)}{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input impedance of the circuit is &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Z_{in} = \frac{V_i}{I_i} = \frac{Z}{1+A_v}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Z represents a capacitor with impedance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Z = \frac{1}{s C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the resulting input impedance is &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Z_{in} = \frac{1}{s C_{M}} \quad \mathrm{where} \quad C_{M}=C (1+A_v).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus the effective or &#039;&#039;&#039;Miller capacitance&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is the physical &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039; multiplied by the factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1+A_v)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;ref name=Spencer&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book &lt;br /&gt;
|author=R.R. Spencer and M.S. Ghausi&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Introduction to electronic circuit design.&lt;br /&gt;
|year= 2003&lt;br /&gt;
|page=533 &lt;br /&gt;
|publisher=Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, Inc. &lt;br /&gt;
|location=Upper Saddle River NJ &lt;br /&gt;
|isbn=0-201-36183-3&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://worldcat.org/isbn/0-201-36183-3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Effects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most amplifiers are inverting (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as defined above is positive), the effective capacitance at their inputs is increased due to the Miller effect. This can reduce the bandwidth of the amplifier, restricting its range of operation to lower frequencies. The tiny junction and stray capacitances between the base and collector terminals of a [[Darlington transistor]], for example, may be drastically increased by the Miller effects due to its high gain, lowering the high frequency response of the device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also important to note that the Miller capacitance is the capacitance seen looking into the input.  If looking for all of the [[RC time constant]]s (poles) it is important to include as well the capacitance seen by the output.  The capacitance on the output is often neglected since it sees &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{C}({1+1/A_v})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and amplifier outputs are typically low impedance.  However if the amplifier has a high impedance output, such as if a gain stage is also the output stage, then this RC can have a [[open-circuit time constant method|significant impact]] on the performance of the amplifier.  This is when [[pole splitting]] techniques are used.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Miller effect may also be exploited to synthesize larger capacitors from smaller ones. One such example is in the stabilization of [[negative feedback amplifier|feedback amplifiers]], where the required capacitance may be too large to practically include in the circuit. This may be particularly important in the design of [[integrated circuits]], where capacitors can consume significant area, increasing costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mitigation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Miller effect may be undesired in many cases, and approaches may be sought to lower its impact. Several such techniques are used in the design of amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A current buffer stage may be added at the output to lower the gain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the input and output terminals of the amplifier (though not necessarily the overall gain). For example, a [[common base]] may be used as a current buffer at the output of a [[common emitter]] stage, forming a [[cascode]]. This will typically reduce the Miller effect and increase the bandwidth of the amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, a voltage buffer may be used before the amplifier input, reducing the effective source impedance seen by the input terminals. This lowers the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;RC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; time constant of the circuit and typically increases the bandwidth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Impact on frequency response ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image: Miller Effect Illustration 1.png|thumbnail|250px|Figure 2: Amplifier with feedback capacitor &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2A shows an example of Figure 1 where the impedance coupling the input to the output is the coupling capacitor &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;. A [[Thévenin&#039;s theorem|Thévenin voltage]] source &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; drives the circuit with Thévenin resistance &#039;&#039;R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;. The output impedance of the amplifier is considered low enough that the relationship &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is presumed to hold.  At the output &#039;&#039;Z&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; serves as the load. (The load is irrelevant to this discussion: it just provides a path for the current to leave the circuit.) In Figure 2A, the coupling capacitor delivers a current jω&#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;minus;&amp;amp;nbsp;&#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) to the output node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2B shows a circuit electrically identical to Figure 2A using Miller&#039;s theorem. The coupling capacitor is replaced on the input side of the circuit by the Miller capacitance &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;, which draws the same current from the driver as the coupling capacitor in Figure 2A. Therefore, the driver sees exactly the same loading in both circuits. On the output side, a capacitor &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Mo&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;(1&amp;amp;nbsp;+&amp;amp;nbsp;1/&#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; draws the same current from the output as does the coupling capacitor in Figure 2A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order that the Miller capacitance draw the same current in Figure 2B as the coupling capacitor in Figure 2A, the Miller transformation is used to relate &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;. In this example, this transformation is equivalent to setting the currents equal, that is&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\  j\omega C_C (V _i - V _O ) = j \omega C_M V _i, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, rearranging this equation&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; C_M = C_C \left( 1 - \frac { V _o} { V _i} \right )  = C_C (1 + A_v). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This result is the same as &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; of the &#039;&#039;Derivation Section&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The present example with &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; frequency independent shows the implications of the Miller effect, and therefore of  &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;, upon the frequency response of this circuit, and is typical of the impact of the Miller effect (see, for example, [[common source]]). If &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; = 0 F, the output voltage of the circuit is simply &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; v&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;, independent of frequency. However, when &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is not zero, Figure 2B shows the large Miller capacitance appears at the input of the circuit. The voltage output of the circuit now becomes &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V _o =- A_v V _i = A_v \frac { V _A} {1+j \omega C_M R_A}, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and rolls off with frequency once frequency is high enough that ω &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; ≥ 1. It is a [[low-pass filter]]. In analog amplifiers this curtailment of frequency response is a major implication of the Miller effect. In this example, the frequency ω&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3dB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; such that ω&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3dB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; = 1 marks the end of the low-frequency response region and sets the [[Bandwidth (signal processing)|bandwidth]] or [[cutoff frequency]] of the amplifier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to notice that the effect of &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; upon the amplifier bandwidth is greatly reduced for low impedance drivers (&#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is small if &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is small). Consequently, one way to minimize the Miller effect upon bandwidth is to use a low-impedance driver, for example, by interposing a [[voltage follower]] stage between the driver and the amplifier, which reduces the apparent driver impedance seen by the amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output voltage of this simple circuit is always &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; v&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;. However, real amplifiers have output resistance. If the amplifier output resistance is included in the analysis, the output voltage exhibits a more complex frequency response and the impact of the frequency-dependent current source on the output side must be taken into account.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See article on [[pole splitting]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ordinarily these effects show up only at frequencies much higher than the [[roll-off]] due to the Miller capacitance, so the analysis presented here is adequate to determine the useful frequency range of an amplifier dominated by the Miller effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Miller approximation===&lt;br /&gt;
This example also assumes &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is frequency independent, but more generally there is  frequency dependence of the amplifier contained implicitly in &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;. Such frequency dependence of &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; also makes the Miller capacitance frequency dependent, so interpretation of &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; as a capacitance becomes more difficult. However, ordinarily any frequency dependence of &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; arises only at frequencies much higher than the roll-off with frequency caused by the Miller effect, so for frequencies up to the Miller-effect roll-off of the gain, &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is accurately approximated by its low-frequency value. Determination of &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; using &#039;&#039;A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; at low frequencies is the so-called &#039;&#039;&#039;Miller approximation&#039;&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;ref name=Spencer/&amp;gt; With the Miller approximation, &#039;&#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; becomes frequency independent, and its interpretation as a capacitance at low frequencies is secure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Miller theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electrical engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electronic design]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Analog circuits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>117.202.91.202</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Backpropagation&amp;diff=8276</id>
		<title>Backpropagation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Backpropagation&amp;diff=8276"/>
		<updated>2014-01-15T10:21:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;117.202.64.20: /* Derivation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{thermodynamics|cTopic=[[Thermodynamic system|Systems]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
In [[fluid mechanics]] and [[thermodynamics]], a &#039;&#039;&#039;control volume&#039;&#039;&#039; is a mathematical abstraction employed in the process of creating [[mathematical model]]s of physical processes. In an [[inertial frame of reference]], it is a volume fixed in space or moving with constant velocity through which the [[fluid]] ([[gas]] or [[liquid]]) flows. The surface enclosing the control volume is referred to as the &#039;&#039;&#039;control surface&#039;&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;G.J. Van Wylen and R.E. Sonntag (1985), &#039;&#039;Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics&#039;&#039;, Section 2.1 (3rd edition), John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc., New York ISBN 0-471-82933-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At [[steady state]], a control volume can be thought of as an arbitrary volume in which the mass of the fluid remains constant. As fluid moves through the control volume, the mass entering the control volume is equal to the mass leaving the control volume.  At [[steady state]], and in the absence of work and heat transfer, the energy within the control volume remains constant.  It is analogous to the classical mechanics concept of the [[free body diagram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
Typically, to understand how a given [[physical law]] applies to the system under consideration, one first begins by considering how it applies to a small, control volume, or &amp;quot;representative volume&amp;quot;.  There is nothing special about a particular control volume, it simply represents a small part of the system to which physical laws can be easily applied. This gives rise to what is termed a volumetric, or volume-wise formulation of the mathematical model.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can then argue that since the [[physical law]]s behave in a certain way on a particular control volume, they behave the same way on all such volumes, since that particular control volume was not special in any way.  In this way, the corresponding point-wise formulation of the [[mathematical model]] can be developed so it can describe the physical behaviour of an entire (and maybe more complex) system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[fluid mechanics]] the [[Conservation laws|conservation equations]] (for instance, the [[Navier-Stokes equations]]) are in integral form. They therefore apply on volumes. Finding forms of the equation that are &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;independent&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; of the control volumes allows simplification of the integral signs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substantive derivative ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Material derivative}}&lt;br /&gt;
Computations in [[fluid mechanics]] often require that the regular time [[Derivative|derivation]] operator &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d/dt\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
is replaced by the [[substantive derivative]] operator&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D/Dt&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
This can be seen as follows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider a bug that is moving through a volume where there is some [[scalar field|scalar]], &lt;br /&gt;
e.g. [[pressure]], that varies with time and position: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p=p(t,x,y,z)\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the bug during the time interval from &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
to &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t+dt\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
moves from &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
to &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x+dx, y+dy, z+dz),\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
then the bug experiences a change &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dp\;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the scalar value,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dp = \frac{\partial p}{\partial t}dt &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial x}dx &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial y}dy &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z}dz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(the [[total derivative|total differential]]). If the bug is moving with velocity &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf v = (v_x, v_y, v_z),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
the change in position is &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf vdt = (v_xdt, v_ydt, v_zdt),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
and we may write&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\begin{alignat}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
dp &amp;amp; &lt;br /&gt;
= \frac{\partial p}{\partial t}dt &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial x}v_xdt &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial y}v_ydt &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z}v_zdt \\ &amp;amp;&lt;br /&gt;
= \left(&lt;br /&gt;
\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}&lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial x}v_x &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial y}v_y &lt;br /&gt;
+ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z}v_z&lt;br /&gt;
\right)dt \\ &amp;amp;&lt;br /&gt;
= \left(&lt;br /&gt;
\frac{\partial p}{\partial t} &lt;br /&gt;
+ \mathbf v\cdot\nabla p&lt;br /&gt;
\right)dt. \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\nabla p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the [[gradient]] of the scalar field &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;.  If the bug is just a fluid particle moving with the fluid&#039;s velocity field, the same formula applies, but now the velocity vector is that of the fluid.&lt;br /&gt;
The last parenthesized expression is the substantive derivative of the scalar pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
Since the pressure p in this computation is an arbitrary scalar field, we may abstract it and write the substantive derivative operator as&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{D}{Dt} = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \mathbf v\cdot\nabla.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Navier-Stokes equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Substantive derivative]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fluid mechanics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*James R. Welty, Charles E. Wicks, Robert E. Wilson &amp;amp; Gregory Rorrer &#039;&#039;Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer&#039;&#039; ISBN 0-471-38149-7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notes===&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://s6.aeromech.usyd.edu.au/aero/cvanalysis/integral_approach.pdf Integral Approach to the Control Volume analysis of Fluid Flow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fluid mechanics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Thermodynamics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>117.202.64.20</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Constrained_conditional_model&amp;diff=267127</id>
		<title>Constrained conditional model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Constrained_conditional_model&amp;diff=267127"/>
		<updated>2012-06-20T05:25:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;117.202.133.122: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Considering that 1964, Buffalo Tools has been a leader in the Hardware Business. With the5 Piece Hunting Knife Set, skinning compact to medium game has in no way been easier. This set also contains a hassle-free, lightweight sheath with a belt hook to securely hold all of the knives. There is a total assortment of 4 Knives integrated in this set plus one particular sheath.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Irrespective of whether you are seeking for Hunting knives for your initially hunt, your dream hunt of a lifetime, or are searching for Survival knives you can bet your life on when you are in a situation where your survival is vital we have the knives you want. We are confident that as you shop our web site you will be pleased with the brands, high quality, selection and costs you uncover. For extended hunting trips or when you are heading to extreme remote regions, often wear a paracord survival belt. In an emergency circumstance, it may perhaps save yourCarbon Steel – Carbon steel is identified for its sharpness and ease of sharpening, creating it a great material for hunting blades. Due to its tendency to rust, carbon steel blades need to be very carefully cleaned just after use. Most effective Kitchen Sharpener&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If you are skinning a deer you do not want a survival knife ! you will need a knife that is well balanced and comfy to hold, quick to sharpen, holds a fantastic edge and is light to carry. There&#039;s something macho about wielding a massive, imposing knife like the ones carried by the title characters in the movies Crocodile Dundee and Rambo.  If you have any kind of concerns regarding where and the best ways to make use of [http://www.thebestpocketknifereviews.com/bear-grylls-ultimate-pro-survival-knife-review/ Www.thebestpocketknifereviews.Com], you could contact us at the site. But knives with massive blades truly have no sensible use for hunters. They make fairly fantastic substitutes for hatchets or machetes but are not beneficial for skinning game or other prevalent hunting tasks. For safety&#039;s sake, the manage of a hunting knife also must have a finger cease, contour or other guard at the junction of the deal with and blade that stops the user&#039;s hand from sliding forward on the blade. Wusthof Asian Knife Sharpener&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whilst light for its size, the Griptilian does indeed take up considerable true estate in pocket or purse. None of our testers, evaluating for each day carry, could justify the added ounces and inches of the Griptilian, particularly as compared to all of our svelte award winners. As a backup hunting knife, or to reside in a glove box for really occasional use, the Griptilian is a bit high-priced. Furthermore, despite the fact that both blade styles technically feature a Saber Grind, the Buck 110′s Saber Grind is hollow ground which tends to make a really sharp edge whereas the Boker Folding Lockback&#039;s Saber Grind is flat with [http://esuri.my/marketplace/author/esstamps/ produces] a significantly less sharp, but substantially stronger, edge. Fury Tactical Armada NATO Fighter Razor Edge Fixed Blade Knife 7-1/four inches AUS8, fixed-blade knife $ four.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You are going to also note the slim handle that custom knifemaker, Matt Diskin, put on his Diskin Hunter. The manage style is classic Diskin—slimmer, however absolutely secure in the hand. The textured G-ten scales have a wide edge bevel for a super-comfortable grip. To appreciate it, you are going to definitely will need to wrap your hand about it—which you will very easily be capable to do, even with gloves on. Beach grilling with the Griptillian. This tester appreciated the complete-size profile of the Griptillian. Shes working with the (quickly to be) reviewed Yeti 45L as her table. We narrowed a massive field to eight of the finest pocket knives available. We evaluated the characteristics and most suitable usage to assistance you pick the knife for you. Victorinox Classic SD Swiss Army Knife Why do you have to have a knife sharpener?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>117.202.133.122</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>