Gliese 570

In predicate logic, generalization (also universal generalization, GEN) is a valid inference rule. It states that if $⊢P(x)$ has been derived, then $⊢\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)$ can be derived.

Generalization with hypotheses

The full generalization rule allows for hypotheses to the left of the turnstile, but with restrictions. Assume Γ is a set of formulas, φ a formula, and $\mathrm{\Gamma }⊢\phi (y)$ has been derived. The generalization rule states that $\mathrm{\Gamma }⊢\mathrm{\forall }x\phi (x)$ can be derived if y is not mentioned in Γ and x does not occur in φ.

These restrictions are necessary for soundness. Without the first restriction, one could conclude $\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)$ from the hypothesis $P(y)$. Without the second restriction, one could make the following deduction:

1. $\mathrm{\exists }z\mathrm{\exists }w(z=w)$ (Hypothesis)
2. $\mathrm{\exists }w(y=w)$ (Existential instantiation)
3. $y=x$ (Existential instantiation)
4. $\mathrm{\forall }x(x=x)$ (Faulty universal generalization)

This purports to show that $\mathrm{\exists }z\mathrm{\exists }w(z=w)⊢\mathrm{\forall }x(x=x),$ which is an unsound deduction.

Example of a proof

Prove: $\mathrm{\forall }x(P(x)\to Q(x))\to (\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)\to \mathrm{\forall }xQ(x))$.

Proof:

Number	Formula	Justification
1	$\mathrm{\forall }x(P(x)\to Q(x))$	Hypothesis
2	$\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)$	Hypothesis
3	$(\mathrm{\forall }x(P(x)\to Q(x)))\to (P(y)\to Q(y)))$	Universal instantiation
4	$P(y)\to Q(y)$	From (1) and (3) by Modus ponens
5	$(\mathrm{\forall }xP(x))\to P(y)$	Universal instantiation
6	$P(y)$	From (2) and (5) by Modus ponens
7	$Q(y)$	From (6) and (4) by Modus ponens
8	$\mathrm{\forall }xQ(x)$	From (7) by Generalization
9	$\mathrm{\forall }x(P(x)\to Q(x)),\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)⊢\mathrm{\forall }xQ(x)$	Summary of (1) through (8)
10	$\mathrm{\forall }x(P(x)\to Q(x))⊢\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)\to \mathrm{\forall }xQ(x)$	From (9) by Deduction theorem
11	$⊢\mathrm{\forall }x(P(x)\to Q(x))\to (\mathrm{\forall }xP(x)\to \mathrm{\forall }xQ(x))$	From (10) by Deduction theorem

In this proof, Universal generalization was used in step 8. The Deduction theorem was applicable in steps 10 and 11 because the formulas being moved have no free variables.

See also

• First-order logic
• Hasty generalization
• Universal instantiation

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.