Hyperoperation

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 19:26, 21 January 2014 by en>Monkbot (Fix CS1 deprecated date parameter errors)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Reinforced solids cube.jpg
Figure 1: Small cube of a material with reinforcing bars. The cube is cracked and the material above the crack is removed to show the reinforcement that crosses the crack.

In solid mechanics, a reinforced solid is a brittle material that is reinforced by ductile bars or fibres. A common application is reinforced concrete. When the concrete cracks the tensile force in a crack is not carried any more by the concrete but by the steel reinforcing bars only. The reinforced concrete will continue to carry the load provided that sufficient reinforcement is present. A typical design problem is to find the smallest amount of reinforcement that can carry the stresses on a small cube (Fig. 1). This can be formulated as an optimization problem.

Optimization problem

The reinforcement is directed in the x, y and z direction. The reinforcement ratio is defined in a cross-section of a reinforcing bar as the reinforcement area Ar over the total area A, which is the brittle material area plus the reinforcement area.

ρx = Arx / Ax
ρy = Ary / Ay
ρz = Arz / Az

In case of reinforced concrete the reinforcement ratios usually are between 0.1% and 2%. The yield stress of the reinforcement is denoted by fy. The stress tensor of the brittle material is

[σxxρxfyσxyσxzσxyσyyρyfyσyzσxzσyzσzzρzfy].

This can be interpreted as the stress tensor of the composite material minus the stresses carried by the reinforcement at yielding. This formulation is accurate for reinforcement ratio's smaller than 5%. It is assumed that the brittle material has no tensile strength. (In case of reinforced concrete this assumption is necessary because the concrete has small shrinkage cracks.) Therefore, the principal stresses of the brittle material need to be compression. The principal stresses of a stress tensor are its eigenvalues.

The optimization problem is formulated as follows. Minimize ρx + ρy + ρz subject to all eigenvalues of the brittle material stress tensor are less than or equal to zero (negative-semidefinite).

Solution

The solution to this problem can be presented in a form most suitable for hand calculations.[1][2] It can be presented in graphical form.[3] It can also be presented in a form most suitable for computer implementation.[4][5] In this article the latter method is shown.

There are 12 possible reinforcement solutions to this problem, which are shown in the table below. Every row contains a possible solution. The first column contains the number of a solution. The second column gives conditions for which a solution is valid. Columns 3, 4 and 5 give the formulas for calculating the reinforcement ratios.

Condition ρx fy ρy fy ρz fy
1 I1 ≤ 0, I2 ≥ 0, I3 ≤ 0 0 0 0
2 σyyσzzσyz2 > 0
I1(σyyσzzσyz2)I3 ≤ 0
I2(σyyσzzσyz2)I3(σyy+σzz) ≥ 0
I3σyyσzzσyz2 0 0
3 σxxσzzσxz2 > 0
I1(σxxσzzσxz2)I3 ≤ 0
I2(σxxσzzσxz2)I3(σxx+σzz) ≥ 0
0 I3σxxσzzσxz2 0
4 σxxσyyσxy2 > 0
I1(σxxσyyσxy2)I3 ≤ 0
I2(σxxσyyσxy2)I3(σxx+σyy) ≥ 0
0 0 I3σxxσyyσxy2
5 σxx<0 0 σyyσxy2σxx+|σyzσxzσxyσxx| σzzσxz2σxx+|σyzσxzσxyσxx|
6 σyy<0 σxxσxy2σyy+|σxzσyzσxyσyy| 0 σzzσyz2σyy+|σxzσyzσxyσyy|
7 σzz<0 σxxσxz2σzz+|σxyσyzσxzσzz| σyyσyz2σzz+|σxyσxzσyzσzz| 0
8 σyz+σxz+σxy ≥ 0
σxzσxy+σyzσxy+σyzσxz ≥ 0
σxx+σxz+σxy σyy+σyz+σxy σzz+σyz+σxz
9 σyzσxz+σxy ≥ 0
σxzσxyσyzσxy+σyzσxz ≥ 0
σxxσxz+σxy σyyσyz+σxy σzzσyzσxz
10 σyzσxzσxy ≥ 0
σxzσxyσyzσxyσyzσxz ≥ 0
σxxσxzσxy σyy+σyzσxy σzz+σyzσxz
11 σyz+σxzσxy ≥ 0
σxzσxy+σyzσxyσyzσxz ≥ 0
σxx+σxzσxy σyyσyzσxy σzzσyz+σxz
12 σxyσxzσyz<0 σxxσxzσxyσyz σyyσyzσxyσxz σzzσyzσxzσxy

I1, I2 and I3 are the stress invariants of the composite material stress tensor. Additional constraints are ρx ≥ 0, ρy ≥ 0, ρz ≥ 0.

The algorithm for obtaining the right solution is simple. Compute the reinforcement ratios of each possible solution that fulfills the conditions. Further ignore solutions with a reinforcement ratio less than zero. Compute the values of ρx + ρy + ρz and select the solution for which this value is smallest. The principal stresses in the brittle material can be computed as the eigenvalues of the brittle material stress tensor, for example by Jacobi's method.

The formulas can be simply checked by substituting the reinforcement ratios in the brittle material stress tensor and calculating the invariants. The first invariant needs to be less than or equal to zero. The second invariant needs to be greater than or equal to zero. These provide the conditions in column 2. For solution 2 to 12, the third invariant needs to be zero.[3]

Examples

The table below shows computed reinforcement ratios for 10 stress tensors. The applied reinforcement yield stress is fy = 500 N/mm². In the table σm is the computed brittle material stress.

σxx σyy σzz σyz σxz σxy ρx ρy ρz σm
1 1 N/mm² 2 N/mm² 3 N/mm² -4 N/mm² 3 N/mm² -1 N/mm² 1.00% 1.40% 2.00% -10.65 N/mm²
2 -5 2 3 4 3 1 0.00 1.36 1.88 -10.31
3 -5 -6 3 4 3 1 0.00 0.00 1.69 -10.15
4 -5 -6 -6 4 3 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10.44
5 1 2 3 -4 -3 -1 0.60 1.00 2.00 -10.58
6 1 -2 3 -4 3 2 0.50 0.13 1.80 -10.17
7 1 2 3 4 2 -1 0.40 1.00 1.80 -9.36
8 2 -2 5 2 -4 6 2.40 0.40 1.40 -15.21
9 -3 -7 0 2 -4 6 0.89 0.00 0.57 -14.76
10 3 0 10 0 5 0 1.60 0.00 3.00 -10.00

Extension

The above solution can be very useful to design reinforcement, however, it has some practical limitations. The following aspects can be included too if the problem is solved using convex optimization.

  • Multiple stress tensors in one point due to multiple loads on the structure instead of only one stress tensor,
  • A constraint imposed to crack widths at the surface of the structure,
  • Shear stress in the crack (aggregate interlock),
  • Reinforcement in other directions than x, y and z,
  • The whole structure instead of one small material cube in turn.

See also

References

  1. Andreasen B.S., Nielsen M.P., Armiering af beton I det tredimesionale tilfælde, Bygningsstatiske meddelelser, Vol. 5 (1985), No. 2-3, pp. 25-79 (in Danish).
  2. Nielsen M.P., Hoang L.C., Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity, third edition, CRC Press, 2011.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Foster S.J., Marti P., Mojsilovic N., Design of Reinforced Concrete Solids Using Stress Analysis, ACI Structural Journal, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 758-764.
  4. Hoogenboom P.C.J., De Boer A., "Computation of reinforcement for solid concrete", Heron, Vol. 53 (2008), No. 4. pp. 247-271.
  5. Hoogenboom P.C.J., De Boer A., "Computation of optimal concrete reinforcement in three dimensions", Proceedings of EURO-C 2010, Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures, pp. 639-646, Editors Bicanic et al. Publisher CRC Press, London.