Wozencraft ensemble

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 19:40, 13 September 2011 by en>CitationCleanerBot (References: Various citation & identifier cleanup, plus AWB genfixes. Report problems and suggestions at User talk:CitationCleanerBot)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In coding theory, the Zyablov bound, is a lower bound on the rate R and relative distance δ of the concatenated codes.

Statement of the bound

Let R be the rate of the outer code Cout and δ be the relative distance, then the rate of the concatenated codes satisfies the following bound.

(max\limits 0r(1Hq(δ+ε)))r(1δHq1(1r)ε)

where r is the rate of the inner code Cin.

Description

Let Cout be the outer code, Cin be the inner code.

Consider Cout meets the Singleton bound with rate of R, i.e. Cout has relative distance δ > 1R. In order for CoutCin to be an asymptotically good code, Cin also needs to be an asymptotically good code which means, Cin needs to have rate r > 0 and relative distance δin > 0.

Suppose Cin meets the Gilbert-Varshamov bound with rate of r and thus with relative distance δinHq1(1r)ε,ε > 0, then CoutCin has rate of rR and δ=(1R)(Hq1(1r)ε).

Expressing R as a function of δ,r,: R=(1δH1(1r)ε)

Then optimizing over the choice of r, we get that rate of the Concatenated error correction code satisfies,

max\limits 0r1Hq(δ+ε)r(1δHq1(1r)ε)

This lower bound is called Zyablov bound (the bound of r < 1Hq(δ+ε) is necessary to ensure that R > 0). See Figure 2 for a plot of this bound.

Note that the Zyablov bound implies that for every δ > 0, there exists a (concatenated) code with rate R > 0.

Remarks

We can construct a code that achieves the Zyablov bound in polynomial time. In particular, we can construct explicit asymptotically good code (over some alphabets) in polynomial time.

Linear Codes will help us complete the proof of the above statement since linear codes have polynomial representation. Let Cout be an [N,K]Q Reed-Solomon error correction code where N=Q1(evaluation points being 𝔽Q* with Q=qk, then k=θ(logN).

We need to construct the Inner code that lies on Gilbert-Varshamov bound. This can be done in two ways

  1. To perform an exhaustive search on all generator matrices until the required property is satisfied for Cin. This is because Varshamovs bound states that there exists a linear code that lies on Gilbert-Varshamon bound which will take qO(kn) time.Using k=rn we get qO(kn)=qO(k2)=NO(logN), which is upper bounded by nNO(lognN), a quasi-polynomial time bound.
  1. To construct Cin in qO(n) time and use (nN)O(1) time overall. This

can be achieved by using the method of conditional expectation on the proof that random linear code lies on the bound with high probability.

Thus we can construct a code that achieves the Zyablov bound in polynomial time.

See also

References and External Links

Template:CCSDS