Minimalist grammar

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, more specifically group theory, the three subgroups lemma is a result concerning commutators. It is a consequence of the Hall–Witt identity.

Notation

In that which follows, the following notation will be employed:

  • If H and K are subgroups of a group G, the commutator of H and K will be denoted by [H,K]; if L is a third subgroup, the convention that [H,K,L] = [[H,K],L] will be followed.
  • If x and y are elements of a group G, the conjugate of x by y will be denoted by .
  • If H is a subgroup of a group G, then the centralizer of H in G will be denoted by CG(H).

Statement

Let X, Y and Z be subgroups of a group G, and assume

and

Then .[1]

More generally, if , then if and , then .[2]

Proof and the Hall–Witt identity

Hall–Witt identity

If , then

Proof of the Three subgroups lemma

Let , , and . Then , and by the Hall–Witt identity above, it follows that and so . Therefore, for all and . Since these elements generate , we conclude that and hence .

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  1. Isaacs, Lemma 8.27, p. 111
  2. Isaacs, Corollary 8.28, p. 111