Anchor (climbing)

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 17:00, 5 November 2013 by en>RA0808 (Reverted addition of dubious unsourced content (HG))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reduction of order is a technique in mathematics for solving second-order linear ordinary differential equations. It is employed when one solution y1(x) is known and a second linearly independent solution y2(x) is desired. The method also applies to n-th order equations. In this case the ansatz will yield a (n-1)-th order equation for v.

Second-order linear ordinary differential equations

An Example

Consider the general homogeneous second-order linear constant coefficient ODE

ay(x)+by(x)+cy(x)=0,

where a,b,c are real non-zero coefficients, Furthermore, assume that the associated characteristic equation

aλ2+bλ+c=0

has repeated roots (i.e. the discriminant, b24ac, vanishes). Thus we have

λ1=λ2=b2a.

Thus our one solution to the ODE is

y1(x)=eb2ax.

To find a second solution we take as a guess

y2(x)=v(x)y1(x)

where v(x) is an unknown function to be determined. Since y2(x) must satisfy the original ODE, we substitute it back in to get

a(vy1+2vy1+vy1)+b(vy1+vy1)+cvy1=0.

Rearranging this equation in terms of the derivatives of v(x) we get

(ay1)v+(2ay1+by1)v+(ay1+by1+cy1)v=0.

Since we know that y1(x) is a solution to the original problem, the coefficient of the last term is equal to zero. Furthermore, substituting y1(x) into the second term's coefficient yields (for that coefficient)

2a(b2aeb2ax)+beb2ax=(b+b)eb2ax=0.

Therefore we are left with

ay1v=0.

Since a is assumed non-zero and y1(x) is an exponential function and thus never equal to zero we simply have

v=0.

This can be integrated twice to yield

v(x)=c1x+c2

where c1,c2 are constants of integration. We now can write our second solution as

y2(x)=(c1x+c2)y1(x)=c1xy1(x)+c2y1(x).

Since the second term in y2(x) is a scalar multiple of the first solution (and thus linearly dependent) we can drop that term, yielding a final solution of

y2(x)=xy1(x)=xeb2ax.

Finally, we can prove that the second solution y2(x) found via this method is linearly independent of the first solution by calculating the Wronskian

W(y1,y2)(x)=|y1xy1y1y1+xy1|=y1(y1+xy1)xy1y1=y12+xy1y1xy1y1=y12=ebax0.

Thus y2(x) is the second linearly independent solution we were looking for.

General method

Given the general non-homogeneous linear differential equation

y+p(t)y+q(t)y=r(t)

and a single solution y1(t) of the homogeneous equation [r(t)=0], let us try a solution of the full non-homogeneous equation in the form:

y2=v(t)y1(t)

where v(t) is an arbitrary function. Thus

y2=v(t)y1(t)+v(t)y1(t)

and

y2=v(t)y1(t)+2v(t)y1(t)+v(t)y1(t).

If these are substituted for y, y, and y in the differential equation, then

y1(t)v+(2y1(t)+p(t)y1(t))v+(y1(t)+p(t)y1(t)+q(t)y1(t))v=r(t).

Since y1(t) is a solution of the original homogeneous differential equation, y1(t)+p(t)y1(t)+q(t)y1(t)=0, so we can reduce to

y1(t)v+(2y1(t)+p(t)y1(t))v=r(t)

which is a first-order differential equation for v(t) (reduction of order). Divide by y1(t), obtaining

v+(2y1(t)y1(t)+p(t))v=r(t)y1(t).

Integrating factor: μ(t)=e(2y1(t)y1(t)+p(t))dt=y12(t)ep(t)dt.

Multiplying the differential equation with the integrating factor μ(t), the equation for v(t) can be reduced to

ddt(v(t)y12(t)ep(t)dt)=y1(t)r(t)ep(t)dt.

After integrating the last equation, v(t) is found, containing one constant of integration. Then, integrate v(t) to find the full solution of the original non-homogeneous second-order equation, exhibiting two constants of integration as it should:

y2(t)=v(t)y1(t).

See also

References