P²-irreducible
In category theory, if C is a category and is a set-valued functor, the category of elements of F (also denoted by ∫CF) is the category defined as follows:
A more concise way to state this is that the category of elements of F is the comma category , where is a one-point set. The category of elements of F comes with a natural projection that sends an object (A,a) to A, and an arrow to its underlying arrow in C.
The category of elements of a presheaf
Somewhat confusingly in some texts (e.g. Mac Lane, Moerdijk), the category of elements for a presheaf is defined differently. If is a presheaf, the category of elements of P (again denoted by , or, to make the distinction to the above definition clear, ∫C P) is the category defined as follows:
As one sees, the direction of the arrows is reversed. One can, once again, state this definition in a more concise manner: the category just defined is nothing but . Consequentially, in the spirit of adding a "co" in front of the name for a construction to denote its opposite, one should rather call this category the category of coelements of P.
For C small, this construction can be extended into a functor ∫C from to , the category of small categories. In fact, using the Yoneda lemma one can show that ∫CP , where is the Yoneda embedding. This isomorphism is natural in P and thus the functor ∫C is naturally isomorphic to .
References
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 - 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534