Default logic: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Gmelli
m Syntax of default logic: more portable mathTeX \frac expression
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A lagging computer is really annoying and is quite a headache. Almost each person whom utilizes a computer faces this issue several time or the alternative. If your computer moreover suffers from the same issue, we will find it hard to continue functioning because usual. In such a condition, the thought, "what must I do to create my PC run faster?" is recurring plus infuriating. There's a solution, nonetheless!<br><br>Install an anti-virus software. If you absolutely have which on we computer then carry out a full system scan. If it finds any viruses on the computer, delete those. Viruses invade the computer and make it slower. To protect the computer from different viruses, it is actually greater to keep the anti-virus software running when we utilize the internet. We could equally fix the safety settings of your web browser. It might block unknown plus dangerous websites and block off any spyware or malware striving to get into your computer.<br><br>So what if you look for when you compare registry cleaners. Many of the registry products available now, have very synonymous qualities. The main ones which we should be searching for are these.<br><br>Check the Windows taskbar, that is on the lower right hand corner of the computer screen. This taskbar consist of programs you have running in the background. If you have too many of them, they may take a computer's resources.<br><br>There are a great deal of [http://bestregistrycleanerfix.com/tune-up-utilities tuneup utilities] s. Which one is the best is not simple to be determined. But when you wish To stand out one among the multitude we must take into consideration certain items. These are features, scanning speed time, total mistakes detected, total errors repaired, tech help, Boot time performance and price. According to these items Top Registry Cleaner for 2010 is RegCure.<br><br>The most probable cause of the trouble is the system problem - Registry Errors! That is the reason why persons that already have more than 2 G RAM on their computers are still regularly bothered by the problem.<br><br>By restoring the state of your system to an earlier date, error 1721 might not appear inside Windows 7, Vista plus XP. There is a tool called System Restore that you have to use inside this process.<br><br>A system and registry cleaner is downloaded from the web. It's convenient to use and the task does not take long. All it does is scan and then whenever it finds mistakes, it might fix and clean those mistakes. An error free registry can protect the computer from mistakes plus give we a slow PC fix.
'''Stephen D. Unwin'''  is a [[physicist]] and author best known for his book, ''The Probability of God''.  Unwin is a graduate of [[Imperial College London]] and received his doctorate in theoretical physics from the [[University of Manchester]] for his research in the field of [[quantum gravity]]. Formerly the technical attaché to the [[United States Department of Energy]] for the British government, he is president of his own consulting firm, specializing in risk management for various [[Fortune 100]] clients.
 
In his book, Unwin argues that [[Bayes' theorem|a mathematical equation]] developed by [[Thomas Bayes]] can be used to calculate the [[probability]] that God exists. He does not make the claim that application of this method produces an absolute probability on which everyone would agree, but that it provides a systematic way of ordering one's ideas, weights of belief, and uncertainties in order to determine their implications regarding the probability that God exists.
 
Unwin employs Bayesian probabilities, a statistical method devised by Reverend Thomas Bayes. He begins with a 50 percent probability that God exists (arguing that 50–50 represents "maximum ignorance"), then applies a modified Bayesian theorem:
 
:<math>P_{\mathrm{after}} = \frac{P_{\mathrm{before}} \times D}{P_{\mathrm{before}} \times D + 1 - P_{\mathrm{before}}} </math>
 
In this model, the probability of God's existence after the evidence is considered is a function of the probability before times D ("Divine Indicator Scale"): 10 indicates the evidence is 10 times as likely to be produced if God exists, 2 is two times as likely if God exists, 1 is neutral, 0.5 is moderately more likely if God does not exist, and 0.1 is much more likely if God does not exist. Unwin offers the following figures for six lines of evidence: recognition of goodness (D = 10), existence of moral evil (D = 0.5), existence of natural evil (D = 0.1), intranatural miracles (prayers) (D = 2), extranatural miracles (resurrection) (D = 1), and religious experiences (D = 2).  
 
Plugging these figures into the above formula (in sequence, where the P<small>after</small>-figure for the first computation is used for the P<small>before</small>-figure in the second computation, and so on for all six Ds), Unwin concludes: "The probability that God exists is 67%."  But then he notes that "this number has a subjective element since it reflects my assessment of the evidence."  Unwin's comment refers to his estimates of the various "D" values used to obtain his estimate, whose values would be disputed by many.
 
==External links==
* [http://www.stephenunwin.com/ Unwin's website, including links to many media interviews and reviews]
 
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]]. -->
| NAME              = Unwin, Stephen D
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = British mathematician
| DATE OF BIRTH    =
| PLACE OF BIRTH    =
| DATE OF DEATH    =
| PLACE OF DEATH    =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Unwin, Stephen D}}
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
[[Category:British mathematicians]]
[[Category:Living people]]

Latest revision as of 16:50, 7 March 2013

Stephen D. Unwin is a physicist and author best known for his book, The Probability of God. Unwin is a graduate of Imperial College London and received his doctorate in theoretical physics from the University of Manchester for his research in the field of quantum gravity. Formerly the technical attaché to the United States Department of Energy for the British government, he is president of his own consulting firm, specializing in risk management for various Fortune 100 clients.

In his book, Unwin argues that a mathematical equation developed by Thomas Bayes can be used to calculate the probability that God exists. He does not make the claim that application of this method produces an absolute probability on which everyone would agree, but that it provides a systematic way of ordering one's ideas, weights of belief, and uncertainties in order to determine their implications regarding the probability that God exists.

Unwin employs Bayesian probabilities, a statistical method devised by Reverend Thomas Bayes. He begins with a 50 percent probability that God exists (arguing that 50–50 represents "maximum ignorance"), then applies a modified Bayesian theorem:

Pafter=Pbefore×DPbefore×D+1Pbefore

In this model, the probability of God's existence after the evidence is considered is a function of the probability before times D ("Divine Indicator Scale"): 10 indicates the evidence is 10 times as likely to be produced if God exists, 2 is two times as likely if God exists, 1 is neutral, 0.5 is moderately more likely if God does not exist, and 0.1 is much more likely if God does not exist. Unwin offers the following figures for six lines of evidence: recognition of goodness (D = 10), existence of moral evil (D = 0.5), existence of natural evil (D = 0.1), intranatural miracles (prayers) (D = 2), extranatural miracles (resurrection) (D = 1), and religious experiences (D = 2).

Plugging these figures into the above formula (in sequence, where the Pafter-figure for the first computation is used for the Pbefore-figure in the second computation, and so on for all six Ds), Unwin concludes: "The probability that God exists is 67%." But then he notes that "this number has a subjective element since it reflects my assessment of the evidence." Unwin's comment refers to his estimates of the various "D" values used to obtain his estimate, whose values would be disputed by many.

External links

Template:Persondata