Deming regression: Difference between revisions
en>Duoduoduo citation for alternative form |
en>A. Parrot m Undid revision 578742713 by 81.147.145.156 (talk) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{for|other radicals|radical of a ring}} | |||
In [[commutative ring]] theory, a branch of [[mathematics]], the '''radical of an ideal''' ''I'' is an [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]] such that an element ''x'' is in the radical if some power of ''x'' is in ''I''. A '''radical ideal''' (or '''semiprime ideal''') is an ideal that is its own radical (this can be phrased as being a [[Fixed point (mathematics)|fixed point]] of an operation on ideals called 'radicalization'). The radical of a [[primary ideal]] is prime. | |||
Radical ideals defined here are generalized to noncommutative rings in the [[Semiprime ring]] article. | |||
==Definition== | |||
The '''radical''' of an ideal ''I'' in a [[commutative ring]] ''R'', denoted by Rad(''I'') or <math>\sqrt{I}</math>, is defined as | |||
:<math>\sqrt{I}=\{r\in R|r^n\in I\ \hbox{for some positive integer}\ n\}.</math> | |||
Intuitively, one can think of the radical of ''I'' as obtained by taking all the possible roots of elements of ''I''. Equivalently, the radical of ''I'' is the pre-image of the ideal of nilpotent elements (called [[nilradical of a ring|nilradical]]) in <math>R/I</math>.<ref>A direct proof can be give as follows: | |||
Let ''a'' and ''b'' be in the radical of an ideal ''I''. Then, for some positive integers ''m'' and ''n'', ''a''<sup>''n''</sup> and ''b''<sup>''m''</sup> are in ''I''. We will show that ''a'' + ''b'' is in the radical of ''I''. Use the [[binomial theorem]] to expand (''a''+''b'')<sup>''n''+''m''−1</sup> (with commutativity assumed): | |||
:<math>(a+b)^{n+m-1}=\sum_{i=0}^{n+m-1}{n+m-1\choose i}a^ib^{n+m-1-i}.</math> | |||
For each ''i'', exactly one of the following conditions will hold: | |||
*''i'' ≥ ''n'' | |||
*''n'' + ''m'' − 1 − ''i'' ≥ ''m''. | |||
This says that in each expression ''a''<sup>''i''</sup>''b''<sup>''n''+''m''− 1 − ''i''</sup>, either the exponent of ''a'' will be large enough to make this power of ''a'' be in ''I'', or the exponent of ''b'' will be large enough to make this power of ''b'' be in ''I''. Since the product of an element in ''I'' with an element in ''R'' is in ''I'' (as ''I'' is an ideal), this product expression will be in ''I'', and then (''a''+''b'')<sup>''n''+''m''−1</sup> is in ''I'', therefore ''a''+''b'' is in the radical of ''I''. | |||
To finish checking that the radical is an ideal, we take an element ''a'' in the radical, with ''a''<sup>''n''</sup> in ''I'' and an arbitrary element ''r''∈''R''. Then, (''ra'')<sup>''n''</sup> = ''r''<sup>''n''</sup>''a''<sup>''n''</sup> is in ''I'', so ''ra'' is in the radical. Thus the radical is an ideal.</ref> The latter shows <math>\sqrt{I}</math> is an ideal itself, containing ''I''. | |||
If the radical of ''I'' is finitely generated, then some power of <math>\sqrt{I}</math> is contained in ''I''.<ref>{{harvnb|Atiyah–MacDonald|1969|loc=Proposition 7.14}}</ref> In particular, If ''I'' and ''J'' are ideals of a noetherian ring, then ''I'' and ''J'' have the same radical if and only if ''I'' contains some power of ''J'' and ''J'' contains some power of ''I''. | |||
If an ideal ''I'' coincides with its own radical, then ''I'' is called a ''radical ideal'' or ''[[semiprime ideal]]''. | |||
==Examples== | |||
Consider the ring '''Z''' of [[integer]]s. | |||
# The radical of the ideal 4'''Z''' of integer multiples of 4 is 2'''Z'''. | |||
# The radical of 5'''Z''' is 5'''Z'''. | |||
# The radical of 12'''Z''' is 6'''Z'''. | |||
# In general, the radical of ''m'''''Z''' is ''r'''''Z''', where ''r'' is the product of all prime factors of ''m'' (see [[radical of an integer]]). In fact, this generalizes to an arbitrary ideal; see the properties section. | |||
The radical of a [[primary ideal]] is prime. If the radical of an ideal ''I'' is maximal, then ''I'' is primary.<ref>{{harvnb|Atiyah–MacDonald|1969|loc=Proposition 4.2}}</ref> | |||
If ''I'' is an ideal, <math>\sqrt{I^n} = \sqrt{I}</math>. A prime ideal is a radical ideal. So <math>\sqrt{P^n} = P</math> for any prime ideal ''P''. | |||
Let ''I'', ''J'' be ideals of a ring ''R''. If <math>\sqrt{I}, \sqrt{J}</math> are [[Ideal (ring theory)#Types of ideals|comaximal]], then <math>I, J</math> are comaximal.<ref>Proof: <math>R = \sqrt{\sqrt{I} + \sqrt{J} } = \sqrt{I + J}</math> implies <math>I + J = R</math>.</ref> | |||
Let ''M'' be a finitely generated module over a noetherian ring ''R''. Then | |||
:<math>\sqrt{\operatorname{ann}_R(M)} = \bigcap_{\mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{supp}M} \mathfrak{p} = \bigcap_{\mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{ass}M} \mathfrak{p}</math><ref>{{harvnb|Lang|2002|loc=Ch X, Proposition 2.10}}</ref> | |||
where <math>\operatorname{supp}M</math> is the [[support of a module|support]] of ''M'' and <math>\operatorname{ass}M</math> is the set of [[associated prime]]s of ''M''. | |||
==Properties== | |||
This section will continue the convention that ''I'' is an ideal of a commutative ring ''R'': | |||
*It is always true that Rad(Rad(''I''))=Rad(''I''). Moreover, Rad(''I'') is the smallest radical ideal containing ''I''. | |||
*Rad(''I'') is the intersection of all the prime ideals of ''R'' that contain ''I''. On one hand, every prime ideal is radical, and so this intersection contains Rad(''I''). Suppose ''r'' is an element of ''R'' which is not in Rad(''I''), and let ''S'' be the set {''r<sup>n</sup>''|''n'' is a nonnegative integer}. By the definition of Rad(''I''), ''S'' must be disjoint from ''I''. ''S'' is also [[multiplicatively closed subset|multiplicatively closed]]. Thus, by a variant of [[Krull's theorem]], there exists a prime ideal ''P'' that contains ''I'' and is still disjoint from ''S''. (see [[prime ideal]].) Since ''P'' contains ''I'', but not ''r'', this shows that ''r'' is not in the intersection of prime ideals containing ''I''. This finishes the proof. The statement may be strengthened a bit: the radical of ''I'' is the intersection of all prime ideals of ''R'' that are [[Minimal prime (commutative algebra)|minimal]] among those containing ''I''. | |||
*Specializing the last point, the nilradical (the set of all nilpotent elements) is equal to the intersection of all prime ideals of ''R''. | |||
*An ideal ''I'' in a ring ''R'' is radical if and only if the [[quotient ring]] ''R/I'' is [[reduced ring|reduced]]. | |||
*The radical of a homogeneous ideal is homogeneous. | |||
==Applications== | |||
The primary motivation in studying ''radicals'' is the celebrated ''[[Hilbert's Nullstellensatz]]'' in [[commutative algebra]]. An easily understood version of this theorem states that for an [[algebraically closed field]] ''k'', and for any finitely generated polynomial ideal ''J'' in the ''n'' indeterminates <math>x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n</math> over the field ''k'', one has | |||
:<math>\operatorname{I}(\operatorname{V}(J)) = \operatorname{Rad} (J)\,</math> | |||
where | |||
:<math> \operatorname{V}(J) = \{x \in k^n \ |\ f(x)=0 \mbox{ for all } f\in J\}</math> | |||
and | |||
:<math> \operatorname{I}(S) = \{f \in k[x_1,x_2,\ldots x_n] \ |\ f(x)=0 \mbox{ for all } x\in S \}.</math> | |||
Another way of putting it: The composition <math>\operatorname{I}(\operatorname{V}(-))=\operatorname{Rad}(-)\,</math> on the set of ideals of a ring is in fact a [[closure operator]]. From the definition of the radical, it is clear that taking the radical is an [[idempotent]] operation. | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Jacobson radical]] | |||
* [[Nilradical of a ring]] | |||
== Notes == | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
== References == | |||
*[[Michael Atiyah|M. Atiyah]], [[Ian G. Macdonald|I.G. Macdonald]], ''Introduction to Commutative Algebra'', [[Addison–Wesley]], 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5 | |||
* [[David Eisenbud|Eisenbud, David]], ''Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry'', Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995, ISBN 0-387-94268-8. | |||
* {{Lang Algebra|edition=3r}} | |||
[[Category:Ideals]] |
Revision as of 22:09, 25 October 2013
28 year-old Painting Investments Worker Truman from Regina, usually spends time with pastimes for instance interior design, property developers in new launch ec Singapore and writing. Last month just traveled to City of the Renaissance. In commutative ring theory, a branch of mathematics, the radical of an ideal I is an ideal such that an element x is in the radical if some power of x is in I. A radical ideal (or semiprime ideal) is an ideal that is its own radical (this can be phrased as being a fixed point of an operation on ideals called 'radicalization'). The radical of a primary ideal is prime.
Radical ideals defined here are generalized to noncommutative rings in the Semiprime ring article.
Definition
The radical of an ideal I in a commutative ring R, denoted by Rad(I) or , is defined as
Intuitively, one can think of the radical of I as obtained by taking all the possible roots of elements of I. Equivalently, the radical of I is the pre-image of the ideal of nilpotent elements (called nilradical) in .[1] The latter shows is an ideal itself, containing I.
If the radical of I is finitely generated, then some power of is contained in I.[2] In particular, If I and J are ideals of a noetherian ring, then I and J have the same radical if and only if I contains some power of J and J contains some power of I.
If an ideal I coincides with its own radical, then I is called a radical ideal or semiprime ideal.
Examples
Consider the ring Z of integers.
- The radical of the ideal 4Z of integer multiples of 4 is 2Z.
- The radical of 5Z is 5Z.
- The radical of 12Z is 6Z.
- In general, the radical of mZ is rZ, where r is the product of all prime factors of m (see radical of an integer). In fact, this generalizes to an arbitrary ideal; see the properties section.
The radical of a primary ideal is prime. If the radical of an ideal I is maximal, then I is primary.[3]
If I is an ideal, . A prime ideal is a radical ideal. So for any prime ideal P.
Let I, J be ideals of a ring R. If are comaximal, then are comaximal.[4]
Let M be a finitely generated module over a noetherian ring R. Then
where is the support of M and is the set of associated primes of M.
Properties
This section will continue the convention that I is an ideal of a commutative ring R:
- It is always true that Rad(Rad(I))=Rad(I). Moreover, Rad(I) is the smallest radical ideal containing I.
- Rad(I) is the intersection of all the prime ideals of R that contain I. On one hand, every prime ideal is radical, and so this intersection contains Rad(I). Suppose r is an element of R which is not in Rad(I), and let S be the set {rn|n is a nonnegative integer}. By the definition of Rad(I), S must be disjoint from I. S is also multiplicatively closed. Thus, by a variant of Krull's theorem, there exists a prime ideal P that contains I and is still disjoint from S. (see prime ideal.) Since P contains I, but not r, this shows that r is not in the intersection of prime ideals containing I. This finishes the proof. The statement may be strengthened a bit: the radical of I is the intersection of all prime ideals of R that are minimal among those containing I.
- Specializing the last point, the nilradical (the set of all nilpotent elements) is equal to the intersection of all prime ideals of R.
- An ideal I in a ring R is radical if and only if the quotient ring R/I is reduced.
- The radical of a homogeneous ideal is homogeneous.
Applications
The primary motivation in studying radicals is the celebrated Hilbert's Nullstellensatz in commutative algebra. An easily understood version of this theorem states that for an algebraically closed field k, and for any finitely generated polynomial ideal J in the n indeterminates over the field k, one has
where
and
Another way of putting it: The composition on the set of ideals of a ring is in fact a closure operator. From the definition of the radical, it is clear that taking the radical is an idempotent operation.
See also
Notes
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
References
- M. Atiyah, I.G. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison–Wesley, 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5
- Eisenbud, David, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995, ISBN 0-387-94268-8.
- Template:Lang Algebra
- ↑ A direct proof can be give as follows:
Let a and b be in the radical of an ideal I. Then, for some positive integers m and n, an and bm are in I. We will show that a + b is in the radical of I. Use the binomial theorem to expand (a+b)n+m−1 (with commutativity assumed):
For each i, exactly one of the following conditions will hold:
- i ≥ n
- n + m − 1 − i ≥ m.
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Proof: implies .
- ↑ Template:Harvnb