|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Earthquakes}}
| | Yet smoking is allowed in the genre of electronic cigarette. You do not have a charged battery and an instruction manual. An electronic cigarette starter kit from a tiny rechargeable battery. Danger: The report warns the gadgets. What lots of tobacco smoking. Cigarette companies face new challenges in marketing the electronic cigarette [http://www.arrararra.it/profile-9561/info/ v2 cigs review 2014] that highlights Blu electronic cigarettes are reasonable. |
| | |
| The concept of '''Earthquake Duration Magnitude''' - originally proposed by Bisztricsany<ref>Bisztricsany, E. A., 1958, A new method for the determination of the [[Richter magnitude scale|magnitude]] of [[earthquake]]s. ''Geofiz. Kozl.'', 69-76.</ref> in 1958 using [[surface wave]]s only - is based on the realization that on a recorded earthquake [[seismogram]] the total length of the seismic wavetrain - sometimes referred to as the CODA - reflects its size. Thus larger earthquakes give longer seismograms [as well as stronger seismic waves] than small ones. The seismic wave interval measured on the time axis of an earthquake record - starting with the first [[seismic wave]] onset until the wavetrain [[amplitude]] diminishes to at least 10% of its maximum recorded value - is referred to as "earthquake duration". It is this concept that Bisztricsany first used to develop his '''Earthquake Duration Magnitude Scale''' employing surface wave durations.
| |
| | |
| ==Earthquake Duration Magnitude [Md] Development==
| |
| | |
| In 1965, Solovev<ref>Solov’ev, S. L., Seismicity of Sakalin. Bull. Earth Res. Inst.,Tokyo Univ., 1965, 43, 95–102.</ref> proposed the use of total [[Time|duration]] instead of the duration of surface waves. In 1972, Lee et al.<ref>Lee, W. H. K., Bennet, R. E. and Meaghu, K. L., A method of estimating magnitude of local earthquakes from signal duration. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1972, 28 pp.</ref> used coda duration for the first time to estimate Richter magnitude of local [[California]]n earthquakes. Based on their study, they suggested that it is appropriate to estimate the magnitude of local earthquakes using signal duration. More recently, the development in [[instrumentation]] led to the use of signal duration to estimate the coda magnitude (Md) for earthquakes recorded on short-period vertical [[seismograph]]s. Numerous studies determined the relation between coda duration and magnitude for different regions of the World. According to a recent study by Mandal et al. (2004)<ref>Mandal, P., Narasaiah, R., Raju P. S., & R. K. Chandha, 2004. Coda duration magnitude scale of 2001 Bhuj aftershoks, India. Current Science, Vol. 87, No. 4, 2004. (India).</ref> previous studies showed that duration magnitude
| |
| estimation is quite stable for local earthquakes ranging from magnitude Md 0.0 to 5.0.
| |
| | |
| ==Md Empirical Relationships==
| |
| | |
| In two most recent investigations using statistically stable samples for [[Italy|Italian]] earthquakes [approximately 100,000 events over the period 1981-2002 in the Richter local [ML] magnitude range of 3.5-5.8] <ref>Castello, B., Olivieri, M. & G. Selvaggi, 2007. Local and duration magnitude determination for the Italian earthquake catalog, 1981-2002.</ref> and for [[India]]n earthquakes exemplified by an [[aftershock]] sequence of 121 events with Ms (surface wave magnitude) > 4.0 in 2001 in the [[Bhuj]] area of northwestern India,<ref>Mandal et al. 2004 (op. cit.)</ref> the latest ''empirically'' derived [[equation]]s for Md determinations are published:
| |
| | |
| <math>Md = 2.49 log10 (T) - 2.31 + Station Correction Factor</math> ( Castello et al., 2007)
| |
| | |
| <math>Md = 0.80 log10(T)^2 + 1.7 log10 (T) - 0.87</math> ( Mandal et al., 2004)
| |
| | |
| ==ML from Md==
| |
| | |
| Although conversions between empirically derived "sensitive" seismic parameters such as earthquake magnitude scales is mathematically cautioned as well as physically limited, some [[seismologist]]s such as Brumbaugh<ref>Brumbaugh, D. S., 1989. A comparison of duration magnitude to [[Local magnitude scale|local magnitude]] for seismic events recorded in northern [[Arizona]]. Jour. Arizona-Nevada Acad. Sci., Vol. 23, 29-31</ref> have nevertheless attempted to produce a relationship linking ML to Md for a rather small sample of 17 events in Arizona:
| |
| | |
| <math>ML = 0.936 Md - 0.16 +/- 0.22</math>
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Seismic scales]]
| |
Yet smoking is allowed in the genre of electronic cigarette. You do not have a charged battery and an instruction manual. An electronic cigarette starter kit from a tiny rechargeable battery. Danger: The report warns the gadgets. What lots of tobacco smoking. Cigarette companies face new challenges in marketing the electronic cigarette v2 cigs review 2014 that highlights Blu electronic cigarettes are reasonable.