|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| In [[abstract algebra]], a '''valuation ring''' is an [[integral domain]] ''D'' such that for every element ''x'' of its [[field of fractions]] ''F'', at least one of ''x'' or ''x''<sup> −1</sup> belongs to ''D''.
| | Hello and welcome. My title is Figures Wunder. I am a meter reader but I strategy on changing it. One of the issues he enjoys most is ice skating but he is having difficulties to discover time for it. Puerto Rico is exactly where he and his wife reside.<br><br>My weblog - [http://www.buzzbit.net/blog/225852 http://www.buzzbit.net/] |
| | |
| Given a [[field (mathematics)|field]] ''F'', if ''D'' is a [[subring]] of ''F'' such that either ''x'' or ''x''<sup> −1</sup> belongs to
| |
| ''D'' for every nonzero ''x'' in ''F'', then ''D'' is said to be '''a valuation ring for the field ''F''''' or a '''place''' of ''F''. Since ''F'' in this case is indeed the field of fractions of ''D'', a valuation ring for a field is a valuation ring. Another way to characterize the valuation rings of a field ''F'' is that valuation rings ''D'' of ''F'' have ''F'' as their field of fractions, and their [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]]s are [[totally ordered]] by inclusion; or equivalently their [[principal ideal]]s are totally ordered by inclusion. In particular, every valuation ring is a [[local ring]].
| |
| | |
| The valuation rings of a field are the maximal elements of the set of the local subrings in the field partially ordered by '''dominance''' or '''refinement''',<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshone|1977|loc=Theorem I.6.1A}}</ref> where
| |
| :<math>(A,\mathfrak{m}_A)</math> dominates <math>(B,\mathfrak{m}_B)</math> if <math>A \supset B</math> and <math>\mathfrak{m}_A \cap B = \mathfrak{m}_B</math>.<ref>Efrat (2006) p.55</ref>
| |
| Every local ring in a field ''K'' is dominated by some valuation ring of ''K''.
| |
| | |
| An integral domain whose localization at any prime ideal is a valuation ring is called a [[Prüfer domain]].
| |
| | |
| == Examples ==
| |
| | |
| * Any field is a valuation ring.
| |
| | |
| * '''Z'''<sub>(''p'')</sub>, the [[localization of a ring|localization]] of the integers '''Z''' at the prime ideal (''p''), consisting of ratios where the numerator is any integer and the denominator is not divisible by ''p''. The field of fractions is the field of rational numbers '''Q'''.
| |
| | |
| * The ring of [[meromorphic function]]s on the entire [[complex plane]] which have a [[Maclaurin series]] ([[Taylor series]] expansion at zero) is a valuation ring. The field of fractions are the functions meromorphic on the whole plane. If ''f'' does not have a Maclaurin series then 1/''f'' does.
| |
| | |
| * Any ring of [[p-adic integer]]s '''Z'''<sub>''p''</sup> for a given prime ''p'' is a [[local ring]], with field of fractions the ''p''-adic numbers '''Q'''<sub>p</sub>. The [[algebraic closure]] '''Z'''<sub>''p''</sub><sup>cl</sup> of the ''p''-adic integers is also a local ring, with field of fractions '''Q'''<sub>''p''</sub><sup>cl</sup>. Both '''Z'''<sub>''p''</sup> and '''Z'''<sub>''p''</sub><sup>cl</sup> are valuation rings.
| |
| | |
| * Let '''k''' be an [[ordered field]]. An element of '''k''' is called finite if it lies between two integers ''n''<''x''<''m''; otherwise it is called infinite. The set ''D'' of finite elements of '''k''' is a valuation ring. The set of elements ''x'' such that ''x'' ∈ ''D'' and ''x''<sup>−1</sup>∉''D'' is the set of [[infinitesimal]] elements; and an element ''x'' such that ''x''∉''D'' and ''x''<sup>−1</sup>∈''D'' is called infinite.
| |
| | |
| * The ring '''F''' of finite elements of a [[hyperreal number|hyperreal field]] *'''R''' (an ordered field containing the real numbers) is a valuation ring of *'''R'''. '''F''' consists of all hyperreal numbers differing from a standard real by an infinitesimal amount, which is equivalent to saying a hyperreal number ''x'' such that −''n'' < ''x'' < ''n'' for some standard integer ''n''. The [[residue field]], finite hyperreal numbers modulo the ideal of infinitesimal hyperreal numbers, is isomorphic to the real numbers.
| |
| | |
| == Definitions ==
| |
| There are several equivalent definitions of valuation ring (see below for the characterization in terms of dominance). For a subring ''D'' of its [[field of fractions]] ''K'' the following are equivalent:
| |
| # For every nonzero ''x'' in ''K'', either ''x'' in ''D'' or ''x''<sup>−1</sup> in ''D''.
| |
| # The ideals of ''D'' are [[totally ordered]] by inclusion.
| |
| # The principal ideals of ''D'' are [[totally ordered]] by inclusion (i.e., the elements in ''D'' are totally ordered by [[divisibility (ring theory)|divisibility]].)
| |
| # There is a [[totally ordered group|totally ordered]] [[abelian group]] Γ (called the '''value group''') and a surjective group homomorphism (called the '''[[valuation (algebra)|valuation]]''') ν:''K''<sup>×</sup> → Γ with ''D'' = { ''x'' in ''K''<sup>×</sup> : ν(''x'') ≥ 0 } ∪ {0}
| |
| | |
| The equivalence of the first three definitions follows easily. A theorem of {{harv|Krull|1939}} states that any ring satisfying the first three conditions satisfies the fourth: take Γ to be the quotient ''K''<sup>×</sup>/''D''<sup>×</sup> of the [[unit group]] of ''K'' by the unit group of ''D'', and take ν to be the natural projection. We can turn Γ into a [[ordered group|totally ordered group]] by declaring the residue classes of elements of D as "positive".<ref>More precisely, Γ is totally ordered by defining <math> [x] \geq [y] </math> [[if and only if]] <math> x y^{ - 1 } \in D</math> where [x] and [y] are equivalence classes in Γ. cf. Efrat (2006) p.39</ref>
| |
| | |
| Even further, given any totally ordered abelian group Γ, there is a valuation ring D with value group Γ (see a section below).
| |
| | |
| From the fact that the ideals of a valuation ring are totally ordered, one can conclude that a valuation ring is a local domain, and that every finitely generated ideal of a valuation ring is principal (i.e., a valuation ring is a [[Bézout domain]]). In fact, it is a theorem of Krull that an integral domain is a valuation ring if and only if it is a local Bézout domain.<ref>{{harvnb|Cohn|1968|loc=Proposition 1.5}}</ref> It also follows from this that a valuation ring is Noetherian if and only if it is a [[principal ideal domain]]. In this case, it is either a field or it has exactly one non-zero maximal ideal; such a valuation ring is called a [[discrete valuation ring]]. (By convention, a field is not a discrete valuation ring.)
| |
| | |
| A value group is called ''discrete'' if it is isomorphic to the additive group of the integers, and a valuation ring has a discrete valuation group if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring.<ref name=Efr43>Efrat (2006) p.43</ref>
| |
| | |
| Very rarely, ''valuation ring'' may refer to a ring that satisfies the second or third condition but is not necessarily a domain. A more common term for this type of ring is "'''[[serial module|uniserial ring]]'''".
| |
| | |
| == Construction ==
| |
| For a given totally ordered abelian group Γ and a residue [[field (mathematics)|field]] ''k'', define ''K'' = ''k''((Γ)) to be the [[ring of formal power series]] whose powers come from Γ, that is, the elements of ''K'' are functions from Γ to ''k'' such that the [[support (mathematics)|support]] (the elements of Γ where the function value is not the zero of ''k'') of each function is a [[well-ordered]] subset of ''G''. Addition is pointwise, and multiplication is the [[Cauchy product]] or convolution, that is the natural operation when viewing the functions as power series:
| |
| :<math> \sum_{g \in G} f(g) x^g</math> with <math>x^g \cdot x^h = x^{g+h}.</math>
| |
| | |
| The valuation ν(''f'') for ''f'' in ''K'' is defined to be the least element of the support of ''f'', that is the least element ''g'' of Γ such that ''f''(''g'') is nonzero. The ''f'' with ν(''f'')≥0 (along with 0 in ''K''), form a subring ''D'' of ''K'' that is a valuation ring with value group Γ, valuation ν, and residue field ''k''. This construction is detailed in {{harv|Fuchs|Salce|2001|pp=66–67}}, and follows a construction of {{harv|Krull|1939}} which uses quotients of polynomials instead of power series.
| |
| | |
| == Dominance and integral closure ==
| |
| The [[unit (ring theory)|unit]]s, or invertible elements, of a valuation ring are the elements ''x'' such that ''x''<sup> −1</sub> is also a member of D. The other elements of ''D'', called nonunits, do not have an inverse, and they form an ideal ''M''. This ideal is maximal among the (totally ordered) ideals of D. Since ''M'' is a [[maximal ideal]], the [[quotient ring]] ''D''/''M'' is a field, called the '''residue field''' of ''D''.
| |
| | |
| In general, we say a local ring <math>(S,\mathfrak{m}_S)</math> dominates a local ring <math>(R,\mathfrak{m}_R)</math> if <math>S \supset R</math> and <math>\mathfrak{m}_S \cap R = \mathfrak{m}_R</math>; in other words, the inclusion <math>R \subset S</math> is a [[local ring homomorphism]]. Every local ring <math>(A, \mathfrak{p})</math> in a field ''K'' is dominated by some valuation ring of ''K''. Indeed, the set consisting of all subrings ''R'' of ''K'' containing ''A'' and <math>1 \not\in \mathfrak{p}R</math> is nonempty and is inductive; thus, has a maximal element <math>R</math> by Zorn's lemma. We claim ''R'' is a valuation ring. ''R'' is a local ring with maximal ideal containing <math>\mathfrak{p}R</math> by maximality. Again by maximality it is also integrally closed. Now, if <math>x \not\in R</math>, then, by maximality, <math>\mathfrak{p}R[x] = R[x]</math> and thus we can write:
| |
| :<math>1 = r_0 + r_1 x + \cdots + r_n x^n, \quad r_i \in \mathfrak{p}R</math>.
| |
| Since <math>1 - r_0</math> is a unit element, this implies that <math>x^{-1}</math> is integral over ''R''; thus is in ''R''. This proves ''R'' is a valuation ring. (''R'' dominates ''A'' since its maximal ideal contains <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> by construction.)
| |
| | |
| A local ring ''R'' in a field ''K'' is a valuation ring if and only if it is a maximal element of the set of all local rings contained in ''K'' partially ordered by dominance. This easily follows from the above.<ref>Proof: if ''R'' is a maximal element, then it is dominated by a valuation ring; thus, it itself must be a valuation ring. Conversely, let ''R'' be a valuation ring and ''S'' a local ring that dominates ''R'' but not ''R''. There is ''x'' that is in ''S'' but not in ''R''. Then <math>x^{-1}</math> is in ''R'' and in fact in the maximal ideal of ''R''. But then <math>x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{m}_S</math>, which is absurd. Hence, there cannot be such ''S''.</ref>
| |
| | |
| Let ''A'' be a subring of a field ''K'' and <math>f: A \to k</math> a ring homomorphism into an [[algebraically closed field]] ''k''. Then ''f'' extends to a ring homomorphism <math>g: D \to k</math>, ''D'' some valuation ring of ''K'' containing ''A''. (Proof: Let <math>g: R \to k</math> be a maximal extension, which clearly exists by Zorn's lemma. By maximality, ''R'' is a local ring with maximal ideal containing the kernel of ''f''. If ''S'' is a local ring dominating ''R'', then ''S'' is algebraic over ''R''; if not, <math>S</math> contains a polynomial ring <math>R[x]</math> to which ''g'' extends, a contradiction to maximality. It follows <math>S/\mathfrak{m}_S</math> is an algebraic field extension of <math>R/\mathfrak{m}_R</math>. Thus, <math>S \to S/\mathfrak{m}_S \hookrightarrow k</math> extends ''g''; hence, ''S'' = ''R''.)
| |
| | |
| If a subring ''R'' of a field ''K'' contains a valuation ring ''D'' of ''K'', then, by checking Definition 1, ''R'' is also a valuation ring of ''K''. In particular, ''R'' is local and its maximal ideal contracts to some prime ideal of ''D'', say, <math>\mathfrak{p}</math>. Then <math>R = D_\mathfrak{p}</math> since <math>R</math> dominates <math>D_\mathfrak{p}</math>, which is a valuation ring since the ideals are totally ordered. This observation is subsumed to the following:<ref>{{harvnb|Zariski−Samuel|loc=Ch. VI, Theorem 3}}</ref> there is a bijective correspondence <math>\mathfrak{p} \mapsto D_\mathfrak{p}, \operatorname{Spec}(D) \to</math> the set of all subrings of ''K'' containing ''D''. In particular, ''D'' is integrally closed,<ref name=Efr38>Efrat (2006) p.38</ref><ref>To see more directly that valuation rings are integrally closed, suppose that ''x''<sup>''n''</sup> + ''a''<sub>1</sub>''x''<sup>''n'' − 1</sup> + ... + ''a''<sub>0</sub> = 0. Then dividing by
| |
| ''x''<sup>''n''−1</sup> gives us ''x'' = − ''a''<sub>1</sub> − ... − ''a''<sub>0</sub>''x''<sup> − ''n'' + 1</sup>. If ''x'' were not in ''D'', then ''x<sup> -1</sup>'' would be in ''D'' and this would express ''x'' as a finite sum of elements in ''D'', so that ''x'' would be in ''D'', a contradiction.
| |
| </ref> and the [[Krull dimension]] of ''D'' is the [[cardinality]] of proper subrings of ''K'' containing ''D''.
| |
| | |
| In fact, the [[integral closure]] of an integral domain ''A'' in the field of fractions ''K'' of ''A'' is the intersection of all valuation rings of ''K'' containing ''A''.<ref>{{harvnb|Matsumura|1986|loc=Theorem 10.4}}</ref> Indeed, the integral closure is contained in the intersection since the valuation rings are integrally closed. Conversely, let ''x'' be in ''K'' but not integral over ''A''. Since the ideal <math>x^{-1} A[x^{-1}]</math> is not <math>A[x^{-1}]</math>,<ref>In general, <math>x^{-1}</math> is integral over ''A'' if and only if <math>xA[x] = A[x].</math></ref> it is contained in a maximal ideal <math>\mathfrak{p}</math>. Then there is a valuation ring ''R'' that dominates the localization of <math>A[x^{-1}]</math> at <math>\mathfrak{p}</math>. Since <math>x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{m}_R</math>, <math>x \not\in R</math>.
| |
| | |
| The dominance is used in algebraic geometry. Let ''X'' be an algebraic variety over a field ''k''. Then we say a valuation ring ''R'' in <math>k(X)</math> has "center ''x'' on ''X''" if <math>R</math> dominates the local ring <math>\mathcal{O}_{x, X}</math> of the structure sheaf at ''x''.<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch II. Exercise 4.5}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Ideals in valuations rings ==
| |
| We may describe the ideals in the valuation ring by means of its value group.
| |
| | |
| Let Γ be a [[totally ordered abelian group]]. A subset Δ of Γ is called a ''segment'' if it is nonempty and, for any α in Δ, any element between -α and α is also in Δ (end points included). A subgroup of Γ is called an ''isolated subgroup'' if it is a segment and is a proper subgroup.
| |
| | |
| Let ''D'' be a valuation ring with valuation ''v'' and value group Γ. For any subset ''A'' of ''D'', we let <math>\Gamma_A</math> be the complement of the union of <math>v(A - 0)</math> and <math>-v(A - 0)</math> in <math>\Gamma</math>. If ''I'' is a proper ideal, then <math>\Gamma_I</math> is a segment of <math>\Gamma</math>. In fact, the mapping <math>I \mapsto \Gamma_I</math> defines an inclusion-reversing bijection between the set of proper ideals of ''D'' and the set of segments of <math>\Gamma</math>.<ref>{{harvnb|Zariski−Samuel|loc=Ch. VI, Theorem 15}}</ref> Under this correspondence, the nonzero prime ideals of ''D'' correspond bijectively to the isolated subgroups of Γ.
| |
| | |
| Example: The ring of ''p''-adic integers <math>\mathbb Z_p</math> is a valuation ring with value group <math>\mathbb Z</math>. The zero subgroup of <math>\mathbb Z</math> corresponds to the unique maximal ideal <math>(p) \subset \mathbb Z_p</math> and the whole group to the zero ideal. The maximal ideal is the only isolated subgroup of <math>\mathbb Z</math>.
| |
| | |
| The set of isolated subgroups is totally ordered by inclusion. The '''height''' or '''rank''' ''r''(Γ) of Γ is defined to be the [[cardinality]] of the set of isolated subgroups of Γ. Since the nonzero prime ideals are totally ordered and they correspond to isolated subgroups of Γ, the height of Γ is equal to the [[Krull dimension]] of the valuation ring ''D'' associated with Γ.
| |
| | |
| The most important special case is height one, which is equivalent to Γ being a subgroup of the real numbers under addition (or equivalently, of the positive real numbers under multiplication.) A valuation ring with a valuation of height one has a corresponding [[absolute value (algebra)|absolute value]] defining an [[ultrametric]] [[place (mathematics)|place]]. A special case of this are the [[discrete valuation ring]]s mentioned earlier.
| |
| | |
| The '''rational rank''' ''rr(Γ)'' is defined as the rank of the value group as an abelian group
| |
| :<math>\mathrm{dim}_\mathbf{Q}(\Gamma \otimes_\mathbf{Z} \mathbf{Q})</math>.
| |
| | |
| ==Places==
| |
| The reference to this section is Zariski–Samuel.
| |
| | |
| A ''[[place (mathematics)|place]]'' of a field ''K'' is a ring homomorphism ''p'' from a valuation ring ''D'' of ''K'' to some field such that, for any <math>x \not\in D</math>, <math>p(1/x) = 0</math>. The image of a place is a field called the '''residue field''' of ''p''. For example, the canonical map <math>D \to D/\mathfrak{m}_D</math> is a place.
| |
| | |
| Example: Let ''A'' be a [[Dedekind domain]] and <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> a prime ideal. Then the canonical map <math>A_{\mathfrak{p}} \to k(\mathfrak{p})</math> is a place.
| |
| | |
| We say a place ''p'' ''specializes to'' a place ''p<nowiki>'</nowiki>'', denoted by <math>p \rightsquigarrow p'</math>, if the valuation ring of ''p'' contains the valuation ring of ''p<nowiki>'</nowiki>''. In algebraic geometry, we say a prime ideal <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> specializes to <math>\mathfrak{p}'</math> if <math>\mathfrak{p} \subset \mathfrak{p}'</math>. The two notions coincide: <math>p \rightsquigarrow p'</math> if and only if a prime ideal corresponding to ''p'' specializes to a prime ideal corresponding to ''p<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' in some valuation ring (recall that if <math>D \supset D'</math> are valuation rings of the same field, then ''D'' corresponds to a prime ideal of <math>D'</math>.)
| |
| | |
| It can be shown: if <math>p \rightsquigarrow p'</math>, then <math>p' = q \circ p|_{D'}</math> for some place ''q'' of the residue field <math>k(p)</math> of ''p''. (Observe <math>p(D')</math> is a valuation ring of <math>k(p)</math> and let ''q'' be the corresponding place; the rest is mechanical.) If ''D'' is a valuation ring of ''p'', then its Krull dimension is the cardinarity of the specializations other than ''p'' to ''p''. Thus, for any place ''p'' with valuation ring ''D'' of a field ''K'' over a field ''k'', we have:
| |
| :<math> \operatorname{tr.deg}_k k(p) + \dim D \le \operatorname{tr.deg}_k K</math>.
| |
| | |
| If ''p'' is a place and ''A'' is a subring of the valuation ring of ''p'', then <math>\operatorname{ker}(p) \cap A</math> is called the ''center'' of ''p'' in ''A''.
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| * [[Nicolas Bourbaki]], ''Commutative Algebra'', Addison-Wesley, 1972
| |
| * {{citation
| |
| |author=Cohn, P. M.
| |
| |title=Bezout rings and their subrings
| |
| |url=http://www.lohar.com/researchpdf/bezout_rings_and_their_subrings.pdf
| |
| |journal=Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
| |
| |volume=64
| |
| |year=1968
| |
| |pages=251–264
| |
| |mr=0222065 (36 #5117) | zbl=0157.08401 | issn=0008-1981}}
| |
| * {{citation | last=Efrat | first=Ido | title=Valuations, orderings, and Milnor ''K''-theory | series=Mathematical Surveys and Monographs | volume=124 | location=Providence, RI | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | year=2006 | isbn=0-8218-4041-X | zbl=1103.12002 }}
| |
| * {{Citation | last1=Fuchs | first1=László | last2=Salce | first2=Luigi | title=Modules over non-Noetherian domains | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | location=Providence, R.I. | series=Mathematical Surveys and Monographs | isbn=978-0-8218-1963-0 | mr=1794715 | year=2001 | volume=84 | zbl=0973.13001 }}
| |
| * {{Citation | last1=Krull | first1=Wolfgang | author1-link=Wolfgang Krull | title=Beiträge zur Arithmetik kommutativer Integritätsbereiche. VI. Der allgemeine Diskriminantensatz. Unverzweigte Ringerweiterungen | doi=10.1007/BF01580269 | mr=1545800 | zbl=0020.34003 | year=1939 | journal=[[Mathematische Zeitschrift]] | issn=0025-5874 | volume=45 | issue=1 | pages=1–19}}
| |
| * {{Hartshorne AG}}
| |
| * {{citation | first=Hideyuki | last=Matsumura | title=Commutative ring theory | others=Translated from the Japanese by [[Miles Reid]] | edition=Second edition | series=Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics | volume=8 | zbl=0666.13002 | year=1989 | isbn=0-521-36764-6 }}
| |
| *{{Citation | last1=Zariski | first1=Oscar | author1-link=Oscar Zariski | last2=Samuel | first2=Pierre | author2-link=Pierre Samuel | title=Commutative algebra. Vol. II | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | isbn=978-0-387-90171-8 | id={{MathSciNet | id = 0389876}} | year=1975}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Field theory]]
| |
| [[Category:Commutative algebra]]
| |
| [[Category:Ring theory]]
| |
| [[Category:Localization (mathematics)]]
| |
| | |
| [[fr:Valuation#Anneau de valuation]]
| |