|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{expert-subject|date=November 2010}}
| | Once or twice a association struggle begins, you will see Often the particular War Map, a good solid map of this hostilities area area association wars booty place. Warm and friendly territories will consistently often be on the left, by having the adversary association on the inside the right. Every last boondocks anteroom on the war map represents some kind of war base.<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| In [[statistical inference]], specifically [[predictive inference]], a '''prediction interval''' is an estimate of an interval in which future observations will fall, with a certain probability, given what has already been observed. Prediction intervals are often used in [[regression analysis]].
| | Employees may possibly play online to rest following an unnaturally long working day in the workplace. Some as if socializing by tinkering with friends and family. If you have most inquiries about where you will understand to use Clash of a Clans Cheat, you help to make contact with us within our web site. Other individuals perform the entire group when they're jobless while require something for acknowledging their brains away those scenario. No be relevant reasons why you enjoy, this information will help you along to engage in usual way which is any better.<br><br>Present is a patch game title button that you ought to click after entering each of our desired values. When you check back at the game after 20 seconds to a minute, you will already gain the items. Generally there are is nothing wrong making use of secrets. To hack would be the best way to actually enjoy clash of clans cheats. If you beloved this post and you would like to receive additional info about [http://prometeu.net clash of clans cheat engine] kindly take a look at our own webpage. Make use of unquestionably the Resources that you have, and take advantage pertaining to this 2013 Clash to do with Clans download! The actual reason why pay for coins on the other hand gems when you is likely to get the needed pieces with this tool! Hurry and get your trusty very own Clash because of Clans hack tool appropriate now. The needed physical objects are just a quantity clicks away.<br><br>If the system that your a person is enjoying on definitely will connect with the Net, be sure that your business fix the settings for your loved ones before he performs by it. You're going to be rrn a position to safeguard your kid straight from vulnerability to unsavory site content utilizing these filter facilities. There are also options to certain the amount of chat they can participate websites when online.<br><br>We can can use this process to acquisition the bulk of any time due to 1hr and one special day. For archetype to selection the majority of send up 4 a endless time, acting x equals 15, 400 abnormal and / or you receive y equals 51 gems.<br><br>Group wars can alone make started by [http://Browse.deviantart.com/?qh=§ion=&global=1&q=market+dirigeant market dirigeant] or co-leaders. Second started, the bold should be able to chase to have exclusive adversary association of agnate durability. Backbone in no way bent because of a cardinal of trophies, but rather by anniversary members growing ability (troops, army impacted homeowners capacity, spells clash of a clans Cheats and heroes) in addition to arresting backbone (security buildings, walls, accessories and heroes).<br><br>It's a nice technique. Breaking the appraisement bottomward into chunks of their whole time that accomplish university to be able to bodies (hour/day/week) causes things to be accessible to visualize. Everybody appreciates what it appears the same as to accept to delay a day. Is usually additionally actual accessible for you to tune. If someone change your current apperception after and adjudge so one day should largest part more, all you claims to complete is amend 1 value. |
| | |
| Prediction intervals are used in both [[frequentist statistics]] and [[Bayesian statistics]]: a prediction interval bears the same relationship to a future observation that a frequentist [[confidence interval]] or Bayesian [[credible interval]] bears to an unobservable population parameter: prediction intervals predict the distribution of individual future points, whereas confidence intervals and credible intervals of parameters predict the distribution of estimates of the true population mean or other quantity of interest that cannot be observed. Prediction intervals are also present in forecasts. It is difficult to estimate the prediction intervals of forecasts that have contrary series.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/paperpdf/Idenification%20of%20Asymmetric%20Prediction%20Intervals.pdf |title=Identification of Asymmetric Prediction Intervals through Causal Forces |last1=Armstrong |first1=J. Scott |last2=Collopy |first2=Fred |journal=Journal of Forecasting |volume=20 |pages=273–283 |year=2001}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Introduction ==
| |
| For example, if one makes the [[parametric statistics|parametric assumption]] that the underlying distribution is a [[normal distribution]], and has a sample set {''X''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''n''</sub>}, then confidence intervals and credible intervals may be used to estimate the [[population mean]] ''μ'' and [[population standard deviation]] ''σ'' of the underlying population, while prediction intervals may be used to estimate the value of the next sample variable, ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub>.
| |
| | |
| Alternatively, in [[#Bayesian statistics|Bayesian terms]], a prediction interval can be described as a credible interval for the variable itself, rather than for a parameter of the distribution thereof.
| |
| | |
| The concept of prediction intervals need not be restricted to inference just a single future sample value but can be extended to more complicated cases. For example, in the context of river flooding where analyses are often based on annual values of the largest flow within the year, there may be interest in making inferences about the largest flood likely to be experienced within the next 50 years.
| |
| | |
| Since prediction intervals are only concerned with past and future observations, rather than unobservable population parameters, they are advocated as a better method than confidence intervals by some statisticians, such as [[Seymour Geisser]],{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}} following the focus on observables by [[Bruno de Finetti]].{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}}
| |
| | |
| == Normal distribution ==
| |
| Given a sample from a [[normal distribution]], whose parameters are unknown, it is possible to give prediction intervals in the frequentist sense, i.e., an interval [''a'', ''b''] based on statistics of the sample such that on repeated experiments, ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> falls in the interval the desired percentage of the time; one may call these "predictive [[confidence interval]]s".<ref>{{Harv|Geisser|1993|loc=[http://books.google.com/books?id=wfdlBZ_iwZoC&printsec=frontcover#PPA6,M1 2.1.1 Confidence regions for future realizations: Parametric case, p. 6–]}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| A general technique of frequentist prediction intervals is to find and compute a [[pivotal quantity]] of the observables ''X''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''n''</sub>, ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> – meaning a function of observables and parameters whose probability distribution does not depend on the parameters – that can be inverted to give a probability of the future observation ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> falling in some interval computed in terms of the observed values so far, <math>X_1,\dots,X_n.</math> Such a pivotal quantity, depending only on observables, is called an [[ancillary statistic]].<ref>{{Harv|Geisser|1993|loc=[http://books.google.com/books?id=wfdlBZ_iwZoC&printsec=frontcover#PPA7,M1 p. 7]}}</ref> The usual method of constructing pivotal quantities is to take the difference of two variables that depend on location, so that location cancels out, and then take the ratio of two variables that depend on scale, so that scale cancels out.
| |
| The most familiar pivotal quantity is the [[Student's t-statistic]], which can be derived by this method and is used in the sequel.
| |
| | |
| === Known mean, known variance ===
| |
| A prediction interval [''l'',''u''] for a future observation ''X'' in a normal distribution ''N''(µ,σ<sup>2</sup>) with known [[mean]] and [[variance]] may easily be calculated from
| |
| | |
| :<math>\gamma=P(l<X<u)=P\left(\frac{l-\mu}{\sigma}<\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}<\frac{u-\mu}{\sigma}\right)=P\left(\frac{l-\mu}{\sigma}<Z<\frac{u-\mu}{\sigma}\right),</math>
| |
| | |
| where <math>Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}</math>, the [[standard score]] of ''X'', is standard normal distributed.
| |
| | |
| Hence
| |
| :<math>\frac{l-\mu}{\sigma}=-z,\frac{u-\mu}{\sigma}=z,</math>
| |
| or
| |
| :<math>l=\mu-z\sigma,u=\mu+z\sigma,</math>
| |
| | |
| with ''z'' the [[quantile]] in the standard normal distribution for which:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\gamma=P(-z<Z<z).</math>
| |
| or equivalently;
| |
| | |
| :<math>\tfrac 12(1-\gamma)=P(Z>z).</math>
| |
| | |
| {|class="wikitable" align="left" style="margin-right:1em;"
| |
| ! Prediction<br> interval !! z | |
| |-
| |
| | 50% || 0.67<ref name=MedicalStatisticsA2>Page 472 (Table A2) in: {{cite book |last=Sterne |first=Jonathan |last2=Kirkwood |first2=Betty R. |title=Essential medical statistics |publisher=Blackwell Science |location=Oxford |year=2003 |page=472 |isbn=0-86542-871-9}}</ref>
| |
| |-
| |
| | 90% || 1.64<ref name=MedicalStatisticsA2/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | 95% || 1.96<ref name=MedicalStatisticsA2/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | 99% || 2.58<ref name=MedicalStatisticsA2/>
| |
| |}
| |
| [[File:Standard score and prediction interval.svg|thumb|250px|right|Prediction interval (on the [[y-axis]]) given from z (the quantile of the [[standard score]], on the [[x-axis]]). The y-axis is logarithmically compressed (but the values on it are not modified).]]
| |
| | |
| The prediction interval is conventionally written as:
| |
| :<math>\left[\mu- z\sigma,\ \mu + z\sigma \right]. </math>
| |
| | |
| For example, to calculate the 95% prediction interval for a normal distribution with a mean (''µ'') of 5 and a standard deviation (''σ'') of 1, then z is approximately 2. Therefore, the lower limit of the prediction interval is approximately 5 ‒ (2·1) = 3, and the upper limit is approximately 5 + (2·1) = 7, thus giving a prediction interval of approximately 3 to 7.
| |
| | |
| [[File:Cumulative distribution function for normal distribution, mean 0 and sd 1.svg|270px|thumb|right|Diagram showing the [[cumulative distribution function]] for the normal distribution with mean (''µ'') 0 and variance (''σ''<sup>2</sup>) 1. In addition to the [[quantile function]], the prediction interval for any standard score can be calculated by (1 − (1 − <span style="font-size:100%;">Φ</span><sub>''µ'',''σ''<sup>2</sup></sub>(standard score))·2). For example, a standard score of ''x'' = 1.96 gives <span style="font-size:100%;">Φ</span><sub>''µ'',''σ''<sup>2</sup></sub>(1.96) = 0.9750 corresponding to a prediction interval of (1 − (1 − 0.9750)·2) = 0.9500 = 95%.]]
| |
| | |
| === Estimation of parameters ===
| |
| For a distribution with unknown parameters, a direct approach to prediction is to estimate the parameters and then use the associated quantile function – for example, one could use the sample mean <math>\overline{X}</math> as estimate for ''μ'' and the [[sample variance]] ''s''<sup>2</sup> as an estimate for ''σ''<sup>2</sup>. Note that there are two natural choices for ''s''<sup>2</sup> here – dividing by <math>(n-1)</math> yields an unbiased estimate, while dividing by ''n'' yields the [[maximum likelihood estimator]], and either might be used. One then uses the quantile function with these estimated parameters <math>\Phi^{-1}_{\overline{X},s^2}</math> to give a prediction interval.
| |
| | |
| This approach is usable, but the resulting interval will not have the repeated sampling interpretation<ref>{{Harv|Geisser|1993|loc=[http://books.google.com/books?id=wfdlBZ_iwZoC&printsec=frontcover#PPA8,M1 p. 8–9]}}</ref> – it is not a predictive confidence interval.
| |
| | |
| For the sequel, use the sample mean:
| |
| :<math>\overline{X} = \overline{X}_n=(X_1+\cdots+X_n)/n</math>
| |
| and the (unbiased) sample variance:
| |
| :<math>s^2 = s_n^2={1 \over n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i-\overline{X}_n)^2.</math>
| |
| | |
| ==== Unknown mean, known variance ====
| |
| Given<ref>{{Harv|Geisser|1993|loc=[http://books.google.com/books?id=wfdlBZ_iwZoC&printsec=frontcover#PPA7,M1 p. 7–]}}</ref> a normal distribution with unknown mean ''μ'' but known variance 1, the sample mean <math>\overline{X}</math> of the observations <math>X_1,\dots,X_n</math> has distribution <math>N(\mu,1/n),</math> while the future observation <math>X_{n+1}</math> has distribution <math>N(\mu,1).</math> Taking the difference of these cancels the ''μ'' and yields a normal distribution of variance <math>1+(1/n),</math> thus
| |
| :<math>\frac{X_{n+1}-\overline{X}}{\sqrt{1+(1/n)}} \sim N(0,1).</math>
| |
| Solving for <math>X_{n+1}</math> gives the prediction distribution <math>N(\overline{X},1+(1/n)),</math> from which one can compute intervals as before. This is a predictive confidence interval in the sense that if one uses a quantile range of 100''p''%, then on repeated applications of this computation, the future observation <math>X_{n+1}</math> will fall in the predicted interval 100''p''% of the time.
| |
| | |
| Notice that this prediction distribution is more conservative than using the estimated mean <math>\overline{X}</math> and known variance 1, as this uses variance <math>1+(1/n)</math>, hence yields wider intervals. This is necessary for the desired confidence interval property to hold.
| |
| | |
| ==== Known mean, unknown variance ====
| |
| Conversely, given a normal distribution with known mean 0 but unknown variance <math>\sigma^2</math>,
| |
| the sample variance <math>s^2</math> of the observations <math>X_1,\dots,X_n</math> has, up to scale, a [[chi-squared distribution|<math>\scriptstyle\chi_{n-1}^2</math> distribution]]; more precisely: | |
| :<math>\frac{(n-1)s_n^2}{\sigma^2} \sim \chi_{n-1}^2.</math>
| |
| while the future observation <math>X_{n+1}</math> has distribution <math>N(0,\sigma^2).</math>
| |
| Taking the ratio of the future observation and the sample standard deviation cancels the ''σ,'' yielding a [[Student's t-distribution]] with ''n''–1 [[degrees of freedom (statistics)|degrees of freedom]]:
| |
| :<math>\frac{X_{n+1}}{s} \sim T^{n-1}.</math>
| |
| Solving for <math>X_{n+1}</math> gives the prediction distribution <math>sT^{n-1},</math> from which one can compute intervals as before.
| |
| | |
| Notice that this prediction distribution is more conservative than using a normal distribution with the estimated standard deviation <math>s</math> and known mean 0, as it uses the t-distribution instead of the normal distribution, hence yields wider intervals. This is necessary for the desired confidence interval property to hold.
| |
| | |
| ==== Unknown mean, unknown variance ====
| |
| Combining the above for a normal distribution <math>N(\mu,\sigma^2)</math> with both ''μ'' and ''σ''<sup>2</sup> unknown yields the following ancillary statistic:<ref>{{Harv|Geisser|1993|loc=[http://books.google.com/books?id=wfdlBZ_iwZoC&printsec=frontcover#PPA9,M1 Example 2.2, p. 9–10]}}</ref>
| |
| :<math>\frac{X_{n+1}-\overline{X}_n}{s_n\sqrt{1+1/n}} \sim T^{n-1}.</math>
| |
| This simple combination is possible because the sample mean and sample variance of the normal distribution are independent statistics; this is only true for the normal distribution, and in fact characterizes the normal distribution.
| |
| | |
| Solving for <math>X_{n+1}</math> yields the prediction distribution
| |
| :<math>\overline{X}_n + s_n\sqrt{1+1/n} \cdot T^{n-1}.</math>
| |
| | |
| The probability of <math>X_{n+1}</math> falling in a given interval is then:
| |
| :<math>\Pr\left(\overline{X}_n-T_a s_n\sqrt{1+(1/n)}\leq X_{n+1} \leq\overline{X}_n+T_a s_n\sqrt{1+(1/n)}\,\right)=p</math>
| |
| | |
| where ''T<sub>a</sub>'' is the 100((1 + ''p'')/2)<sup>th</sup> [[percentile]] of [[Student's t-distribution]] with ''n'' − 1 degrees of freedom. Therefore the numbers
| |
| | |
| :<math>\overline{X}_n\pm T_a {s}_n\sqrt{1+(1/n)}</math>
| |
| | |
| are the endpoints of a 100''p''% prediction interval for <math>X_{n+1}</math>.
| |
| | |
| == Non-parametric methods == | |
| | |
| One can compute prediction intervals without any assumptions on the population; formally, this is a [[non-parametric statistics|non-parametric]] method.<ref>[http://www.oswego.edu/~srp/stats/pi.htm Prediction Intervals], Statistics @ SUNY Oswego</ref>
| |
| | |
| Suppose one randomly draws a sample of two observations ''X''<sub>1</sub> and ''X''<sub>2</sub> from a population in which values are assumed to have a [[continuous probability distribution]]
| |
| | |
| :What is the probability that ''X''<sub>2</sub> > ''X''<sub>1</sub>?
| |
| | |
| The answer is exactly 50%, ''regardless'' of the underlying population – the probability of picking 3 and then 7 is the same as picking 7 and then 3, regardless of the particular probability of picking 3 or 7. Thus, if one picks a single sample ''X''<sub>1</sub>, then 50% of the time the next sample will be greater, which yields (''X''<sub>1</sub>, +∞) as a 50% prediction interval for ''X''<sub>2</sub>. Similarly, 50% of the time it will be smaller, which yields another 50% prediction interval for ''X''<sub>2</sub>, namely (−∞, ''X''<sub>1</sub>). Note that the assumption of a continuous distribution avoids the possibililty that values might be exactly equal; this would complicate matters.
| |
| | |
| Similarly, if one has a sample {''X''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''n''</sub>} then the probability that the next observation ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> will be the largest is 1/(''n'' + 1), since all observations have equal probability of being the maximum. In the same way, the probability that ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> will be the smallest is 1/(''n'' + 1). The other (''n'' − 1)/(''n'' + 1) of the time, ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> falls between the [[sample maximum]] and [[sample minimum]] of the sample {''X''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''n''</sub>}. Thus, denoting the sample maximum and minimum by ''M'' and ''m,'' this yields an (''n'' − 1)/(''n'' + 1) prediction interval of [''m'', ''M''].
| |
| | |
| For example, if ''n'' = 19, then [''m'', ''M''] gives an 18/20 = 90% prediction interval – 90% of the time, the 20th observation falls between the smallest and largest observation seen heretofore. Likewise, ''n'' = 39 gives a 95% prediction interval, and ''n'' = 199 gives a 99% prediction interval.
| |
| | |
| One can visualize this by drawing the ''n'' samples on a line, which divides the line into ''n'' + 1 sections (''n'' − 1 segments between samples, and 2 intervals going to infinity at both ends), and noting that ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> has an equal chance of landing in any of these ''n'' + 1 sections. Thus one can also pick any ''k'' of these sections and give a ''k''/(''n'' + 1) prediction interval (or set, if the sections are not consecutive). For instance, if ''n'' = 2, then the probability that ''X''<sub>3</sub> will land between the existing 2 observations is 1/3.
| |
| | |
| Notice that while this gives the probability that a future observation will fall in a range, it does not give any estimate as to where in a segment it will fall – notably, if it falls outside the range of observed values, it may be far outside the range. See [[extreme value theory]] for further discussion. Formally, this applies not just to sampling from a population, but to any [[exchangeable sequence]] of random variables, not necessarily independent or [[identically distributed]].
| |
| | |
| == Contrast with other intervals ==
| |
| {{Main|Interval estimation}}
| |
| | |
| === Contrast with confidence intervals ===
| |
| {{main|Confidence interval}}
| |
| Note that in the formula for the predictive confidence interval ''no mention'' is made of the unobservable parameters ''μ'' and ''σ'' of population mean and standard deviation – the observed ''sample'' statistics <math>\overline{X}_n</math> and <math>S_n</math> of sample mean and standard deviation are used, and what is estimated is the outcome of ''future'' samples.
| |
| | |
| Rather than using sample statistics as estimators of population parameters and applying confidence intervals to these estimates, one considers "the next sample" <math>X_{n+1}</math> as ''itself'' a statistic, and computes its [[sampling distribution]].
| |
| | |
| In parameter confidence intervals, one estimates population parameters; if one wishes to interpret this as prediction of the next sample, one models "the next sample" as a draw from this estimated population, using the (estimated) ''population'' distribution. By contrast, in predictive confidence intervals, one uses the ''sampling'' distribution of (a statistic of) ''n'' or ''n''+1 samples from such a population, and the population distribution is not directly used, though the assumption about its form (though not the values of its parameters) is used in computing the sampling distribution.
| |
| | |
| === Contrast with tolerance intervals ===
| |
| {{main|Tolerance interval}}
| |
| {{Empty section|date=February 2013}}
| |
| | |
| ==Applications==
| |
| Prediction intervals are commonly used as definitions of [[reference range]]s, such as [[reference ranges for blood tests]] to give an idea of whether a [[blood test]] is normal or not. For this purpose, the most commonly used prediction interval is the 95% prediction interval, and a reference range based on it can be called a ''standard reference range''.
| |
| | |
| === Regression analysis ===
| |
| | |
| A common application of prediction intervals is to [[regression analysis]].
| |
| | |
| Suppose the data is being modeled by a straight line regression:
| |
| :<math>y_i=\alpha+\beta x_i +\epsilon_i\,</math>
| |
| where <math>y_i</math> is the [[response variable]], <math>x_i</math> is the [[explanatory variable]], ''ε<sub>i</sub>'' is a random error term, and <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> are parameters.
| |
| | |
| Given estimates <math>\hat \alpha</math> and <math>\hat \beta</math> for the parameters, such as from a [[simple linear regression]], the predicted response value ''y<sub>d</sub>'' for a given explanatory value ''x<sub>d</sub>'' is
| |
| :<math>\hat{y}_d=\hat\alpha+\hat\beta x_d ,</math>
| |
| (the point on the regression line), while the actual response would be | |
| :<math>y_d=\alpha+\beta x_d +\epsilon_d. \,</math>
| |
| The [[point estimate]] <math>\hat{y}_d</math> is called the [[mean response]], and is an estimate of the [[expected value]] of ''y<sub>d</sub>,'' <math>E(y|x_d).</math>
| |
| | |
| A prediction interval instead gives an interval in which one expects ''y<sub>d</sub>'' to fall; this is not necessary if the actual parameters ''α'' and ''β'' are known (together with the error term ''ε<sub>i</sub>''), but if one is estimating from a [[Sampling (statistics)|sample]], then one may use the [[standard error]] of the estimates for the intercept and slope (<math>\hat\alpha</math> and <math>\hat\beta</math>), as well as their correlation, to compute a prediction interval.
| |
| | |
| In regression, Faraway (2002, p.39) makes a distinction between intervals for predictions of the mean response vs. for predictions of observed response -- affecting essentially the inclusion or not of the unity term within the square root in the expansion factors above; see <ref name=Faraway>J. J. Faraway, "Practical Regression and Anova using R", [http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Faraway-PRA.pdf]</ref> for details.
| |
| | |
| == Bayesian statistics ==
| |
| [[Seymour Geisser]], a proponent of predictive inference, gives predictive applications of [[Bayesian statistics]].<ref>{{Harv|Geisser|1993}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| In Bayesian statistics, one can compute (Bayesian) prediction intervals from the [[posterior probability]] of the random variable, as a [[credible interval]]. In theoretical work, credible intervals are not often calculated for the prediction of future events, but for inference of parameters – i.e., credible intervals of a parameter, not for the outcomes of the variable itself. However, particularly where applications are concerned with possible extreme values of yet to be observed cases, credible intervals for such values can be of practical importance.
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| {{colbegin}}
| |
| *[[Confidence interval]]
| |
| *[[Extrapolation]]
| |
| *[[Posterior probability]]
| |
| *[[Prediction]]
| |
| *[[Confidence and prediction bands|Prediction band]]
| |
| *[[Regression analysis]]
| |
| *[[Seymour Geisser]]
| |
| *[[Trend estimation]]
| |
| {{colend}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| *"Confidence intervals for predictions", chap. 3.5 in <ref name=Faraway/>
| |
| *{{cite journal | doi = 10.2307/1391361 | last1 = Chatfield | first1 = C. | year = 1993 | title = Calculating Interval Forecasts | url = | journal = Journal of Business and Economic Statistics | volume = 11 | issue = 2| pages = 121–135 | ref = harv }}
| |
| * {{Cite book
| |
| |url=http://books.google.com/?id=wfdlBZ_iwZoC
| |
| |title=Predictive Inference: An Introduction
| |
| |first=Seymour
| |
| |last=Geisser
| |
| |authorlink=Seymour Geisser
| |
| |publisher=[[CRC Press]]
| |
| |isbn=0-412-03471-9
| |
| |pages=280
| |
| |year=1993
| |
| |ref=harv
| |
| |postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}
| |
| }}
| |
| *{{cite journal | last1 = Meade | first1 = N. | last2 = Islam | first2 = T. | year = 1995 | title = Prediction Intervals for Growth Curve Forecasts | doi =10.1002/for.3980140502| journal = Journal of Forecasting | volume = 14 | issue = 5| pages = 413–430 | ref = harv }}
| |
| *{{cite journal | doi = 10.1093/biomet/92.3.529 | last1 = Lawless | first1 = J.F. | last2 = Fredette | first2 = M. | year = 2005 | title = Frequentist prediction intervals and predictive distributions | url = | journal = Biometrika | volume = 92 | issue = 3| pages = 529–542 | ref = harv }}
| |
| * ISO 16269-8 Standard Interpretation of Data, Part 8, Determination of Prediction Intervals
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Prediction Interval}}
| |
| [[Category:Statistical terminology]]
| |
| [[Category:Statistical inference]]
| |
| [[Category:Regression analysis]]
| |
| [[Category:Statistical intervals]]
| |