|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{about|the theorem in the plane relating double integrals and line integrals|Green's theorems relating volume integrals involving the Laplacian to surface integrals|Green's identities}}
| | This year the Institute of Medicine reissued guidelinesfor the amount of weight a girl must place on throughout pregnancy. In 1990, similar policies were issued, yet because then, a lot has changed inside the wellness profile of Americans, plus this might be the first time we've enjoyed an upper limit found on the fat overweight women must gain.<br><br>This could be piece of the usual annual check up. A fasting blood glucose may indicate whether we have a issue or not. Usually, you're told to not eat after midnight before the test. If further testing is mandatory, you could have to undergo further testing to rule out or diagnose diabetes or other conditions.<br><br>The National Institutes of Health has policies regarding waist circumference, to identify risk of condition, but just waist to height ratio for individuals whom are classified because overweight or obese as far as body mass index. The National Institutes of Health urges weight loss for people with a body mass index of 30 or higher (obese).<br><br>Unfortunately, genetics equally plays a element inside body fat weight and the place of stored fat. Lack of exercise furthermore plays a big character. A sedentary lifestyle usually greatly strengthen a fatand might ultimately cause condition plus illness. Not only is fat unsightly and unhealthy, however, where it's stored is harmful.<br><br>For me since this was my initial diet I did not understand what to anticipate and after those 4 days I started to recognize the real purpose of why I went on this diet. I went into this thinking which it would be effortless, I mentioned to me, its just four days. But I quickly realized that it was not easy and which it takes mental control to override what the body wants. I had additionally realized a limited things about myself plus about my past eating practices.<br><br>For those of we with a bigger upper body it really is best to draw attention downward. Look for the Cataract jeans in [http://safedietplansforwomen.com/waist-to-height-ratio waist to height ratio] lighter denim colors. The lighter color will additionally balance out the body better plus aid make the top appear small.<br><br>Your ideal waist size will be between 45%-47% of your height. In other words, when you're 70 inches tall you're ideal waist is between 31.5 - 33 inches.<br><br>Whenever we would like to locate out much more about the perfect body, come browse my webpage where I provide diet plus exercise approaches to enable we to lose unwanted fat and obtain a lean look. Start getting back in awesome form immediately! |
| {{Calculus |Vector}}
| |
| | |
| In [[mathematics]], '''Green's theorem''' gives the relationship between a [[line integral]] around a simple closed curve ''C'' and a [[double integral]] over the plane region ''D'' bounded by ''C''. It is named after [[George Green]] <ref>George Green, ''An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism'' (Nottingham, England: T. Wheelhouse, 1828). Green did not actually derive the form of "Green's theorem" which appears in this article; rather, he derived a form of the "divergence theorem", which appears on [http://books.google.com/books?id=GwYXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA10#v=onepage&q&f=false pages 10-12] of his ''Essay''.<br>
| |
| In 1846, the form of "Green's theorem" which appears in this article was first published, without proof, in an article by [[Augustin-Louis Cauchy|Augustin Cauchy]]: A. Cauchy (1846) [http://archive.org/stream/ComptesRendusAcademieDesSciences0023/ComptesRendusAcadmieDesSciences-Tome023-Juillet-dcembre1846#page/n254/mode/1up "Sur les intégrales qui s'étendent à tous les points d'une courbe fermée"] (On integrals that extend over all of the points of a closed curve), ''Comptes rendus'', '''23''': 251-255. (The equation appears at the bottom of page 254, where (S) denotes the line integral of a function ''k'' along the curve ''s'' that encloses the area S.)<br> | |
| A proof of the theorem was finally provided in 1851 by [[Bernhard Riemann]] in his inaugural dissertation: Bernhard Riemann (1851) [http://books.google.com/books?id=PpALAAAAYAAJ&pg=PP5#v=onepage&q&f=false''Grundlagen für einen allgemeine Theorie der Functionen einer veränderlichen complexen Grösse''] (Basis for a general theory of functions of a variable complex quantity), (Göttingen, (Germany): Adalbert Rente, 1867); see pages 8 - 9.</ref> and is the two-dimensional special case of the more general [[Stokes' theorem]].
| |
| | |
| ==Theorem==
| |
| Let ''C'' be a positively [[Curve orientation|oriented]], [[piecewise smooth]], [[simple closed curve]] in a [[plane (mathematics)|plane]], and let ''D'' be the region bounded by ''C''. If ''L'' and ''M'' are functions of (''x'', ''y'') defined on an [[Open set|open region]] containing ''D'' and have [[Continuous function|continuous]] [[partial derivatives]] there, then<ref>Mathematical methods for physics and engineering, K.F. Riley, M.P. Hobson, S.J. Bence, Cambridge University Press, 2010, ISBN 978-0-521-86153-3</ref><ref>Vector Analysis (2nd Edition), M.R. Spiegel, S. Lipschutz, D. Spellman, Schaum’s Outlines, McGraw Hill (USA), 2009, ISBN 978-0-07-161545-7</ref>
| |
| | |
| :<math>\oint_{C} (L\, dx + M\, dy) = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right)\, dx\, dy</math>
| |
| | |
| where the path of integration along C is [[counterclockwise]].
| |
| | |
| In physics, Green's theorem is mostly used to solve two-dimensional flow integrals, stating that the sum of fluid outflows at any point inside a volume is equal to the total outflow summed about an enclosing area. In [[Euclidean plane geometry|plane geometry]], and in particular, area [[surveying]], Green's theorem can be used to determine the area and centroid of plane figures solely by integrating over the perimeter.
| |
| | |
| ==Proof when ''D'' is a simple region==
| |
| [[Image:Green's-theorem-simple-region.svg|thumb|300px|right|If ''D'' is a simple region with its boundary consisting of the curves ''C''<sub>1</sub>, ''C''<sub>2</sub>, ''C''<sub>3</sub>, ''C''<sub>4</sub>, half of Green's theorem can be demonstrated.]]
| |
| | |
| The following is a proof of half of the theorem for the simplified area ''D'', a type I region where ''C''<sub>2</sub> and ''C''<sub>4</sub> are vertical lines (possibly of zero length). A similar proof exists for the other half of the theorem when ''D'' is a type II region where ''C''<sub>1</sub> and ''C''<sub>3</sub> are horizontal lines (again, possibly of zero length). Putting these two parts together, the theorem is thus proven for regions of type III (defined as regions which are both type I and type II). The general case can then be deduced from this special case by decomposing ''D'' into a set of type III regions. | |
| | |
| If it can be shown that
| |
| | |
| :<math>\oint_{C} L\, dx = \iint_{D} \left(- \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right)\, dA\qquad\mathrm{(1)}</math>
| |
| | |
| and | |
| | |
| :<math>\oint_{C} M\, dy = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x}\right)\, dA\qquad\mathrm{(2)}</math>
| |
| | |
| are true, then Green's theorem follows immediately for the region D. We can prove (1) easily for regions of type I, and (2) for regions of type II. Green's theorem then follows for regions of type III.
| |
| | |
| Assume region ''D'' is a type I region and can thus be characterized, as pictured on the right, by
| |
| | |
| :<math>D = \{(x,y)|a\le x\le b, g_1(x) \le y \le g_2(x)\}</math>
| |
| | |
| where ''g''<sub>1</sub> and ''g''<sub>2</sub> are [[continuous function]]s on [''a'', ''b'']. Compute the double integral in (1): | |
| | |
| : <math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \iint_D \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\, dA
| |
| & =\int_a^b\,\int_{g_1(x)}^{g_2(x)} \frac{\partial L}{\partial y} (x,y)\,dy\,dx \\
| |
| & = \int_a^b \Big\{L(x,g_2(x)) - L(x,g_1(x)) \Big\} \, dx.\qquad\mathrm{(3)}
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math> | |
| | |
| Now compute the line integral in (1). ''C'' can be rewritten as the union of four curves: ''C''<sub>1</sub>, ''C''<sub>2</sub>, ''C''<sub>3</sub>, ''C''<sub>4</sub>.
| |
| | |
| With ''C''<sub>1</sub>, use the [[parametric equation]]s: ''x'' = ''x'', ''y'' = ''g''<sub>1</sub>(''x''), ''a'' ≤ ''x'' ≤ ''b''. Then
| |
| | |
| :<math>\int_{C_1} L(x,y)\, dx = \int_a^b L(x,g_1(x))\, dx.</math>
| |
| | |
| With ''C''<sub>3</sub>, use the parametric equations: ''x'' = ''x'', ''y'' = ''g''<sub>2</sub>(''x''), ''a'' ≤ ''x'' ≤ ''b''. Then
| |
| | |
| :<math> \int_{C_3} L(x,y)\, dx = -\int_{-C_3} L(x,y)\, dx = - \int_a^b L(x,g_2(x))\, dx.</math>
| |
| | |
| The integral over ''C''<sub>3</sub> is negated because it goes in the negative direction from ''b'' to ''a'', as ''C'' is oriented positively (counterclockwise). On ''C''<sub>2</sub> and ''C''<sub>4</sub>, ''x'' remains constant, meaning
| |
| | |
| :<math> \int_{C_4} L(x,y)\, dx = \int_{C_2} L(x,y)\, dx = 0.</math>
| |
| | |
| Therefore,
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \int_{C} L\, dx & = \int_{C_1} L(x,y)\, dx + \int_{C_2} L(x,y)\, dx + \int_{C_3} L(x,y)\, dx + \int_{C_4} L(x,y)\, dx \\
| |
| & = -\int_a^b L(x,g_2(x))\, dx + \int_a^b L(x,g_1(x))\, dx.\qquad\mathrm{(4)}
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| Combining (3) with (4), we get (1) for regions of type I. A similar treatment yields (2) for regions of type II. Putting the two together, we get the result for regions of type III.
| |
| | |
| ==Relationship to the Stokes theorem==
| |
| Green's theorem is a special case of the [[Stokes' theorem#Kelvin–Stokes theorem|Kelvin–Stokes theorem]], when applied to a region in the ''xy''-plane:
| |
| | |
| We can augment the two-dimensional field into a three-dimensional field with a ''z'' component that is always 0. Write '''F''' for the [[Euclidean vector|vector]]-valued function <math>\mathbf{F}=(L,M,0)</math>. Start with the left side of Green's theorem:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\oint_{C} (L\, dx + M\, dy) = \oint_{C} (L, M, 0) \cdot (dx, dy, dz) = \oint_{C} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r}. </math>
| |
| | |
| Kelvin–Stokes Theorem:
| |
| :<math>\oint_{C} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = \iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, dS. </math>
| |
| | |
| The surface <math>S</math> is just the region in the plane <math>D</math>, with the unit normals <math>\mathbf{\hat n}</math> pointing up (in the positive ''z'' direction) to match the "positive orientation" definitions for both theorems.
| |
| | |
| The expression inside the integral becomes
| |
| :<math>\nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} = \left[ \left(\frac{\partial 0}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial M}{\partial z}\right) \mathbf{i} + \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial 0}{\partial x}\right) \mathbf{j} + \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right) \mathbf{k} \right] \cdot \mathbf{k} = \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right). </math>
| |
| | |
| Thus we get the right side of Green's theorem
| |
| :<math>\iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, dS = \iint_D \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right) \, dA. </math>
| |
| | |
| ==Relationship to the divergence theorem==
| |
| Considering only two-dimensional vector fields,
| |
| Green's theorem is equivalent to the two-dimensional version of the [[divergence theorem]]:
| |
| :<math>\iint_D\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\right)dA=\oint_C \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, ds,</math>
| |
| where <math>\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}</math> is the divergence on the two-dimensional vector field <math>\mathbf{F}</math>, and <math>\mathbf{\hat n}</math> is the outward-pointing unit normal vector on the boundary.
| |
| | |
| To see this, consider the unit normal <math>\mathbf{\hat n}</math> in the right side of the equation. Since in Green's theorem <math>d\mathbf{r} = (dx, dy)</math> is a vector pointing tangential along the curve, and the curve C is the positively-oriented (i.e. counterclockwise) curve along the boundary, an outward normal would be a vector which points 90° to the right of this; one choice would be <math>(dy, -dx)</math>. The length of this vector is <math>\sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2} = ds.</math> So <math>(dy, -dx) = \mathbf{\hat n}\,ds.</math>
| |
| | |
| Start with the left side of Green's theorem:
| |
| :<math>\oint_{C} (L\, dx + M\, dy) = \oint_{C} (M, -L) \cdot (dy, -dx) = \oint_{C} (M, -L) \cdot \mathbf{\hat n}\,ds.</math>
| |
| Applying the two-dimensional divergence theorem with <math>\mathbf{F} = (M, -L)</math>, we get the right side of Green's theorem:
| |
| :<math>\oint_{C} (M, -L) \cdot \mathbf{\hat n}\,ds = \iint_D\left(\nabla \cdot (M, -L)\right)dA = \iint_D \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right) \, dA.</math>
| |
| | |
| ==Area Calculation==
| |
| Green's theorem can be used to compute area by line integral.<ref name="stuart">{{cite book|last=Stewart|first=James|title=Calculus|publisher=Thomson, Brooks/Cole|edition=6th}}</ref> The area of D is given by:
| |
| | |
| :<math>A = \iint_{D}dA.</math>
| |
| | |
| Provided we choose L and M such that:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y} = 1.</math>
| |
| | |
| Then the area is given by:
| |
| | |
| :<math>A = \oint_{C} (L\, dx + M\, dy).</math>
| |
| | |
| Possible formulas for the area of D include:<ref name="stuart" />
| |
| | |
| :<math>A=\oint_{C} x\, dy = -\oint_{C} y\, dx = \tfrac 12 \oint_{C} (-y\, dx + x\, dy).</math>
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| *[[Planimeter]]
| |
| *[[Method of image charges]] – A method used in electrostatics that takes advantage of the uniqueness theorem (derived from Green's theorem)
| |
| *[[Shoelace formula]] - A special case of Green's theorem for simple polygons
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| | |
| * ''Calculus (5th edition)'', F. Ayres, E. Mendelson, Schaum's Outline Series, 2009, ISBN 978-0-07-150861-2.
| |
| * ''Advanced Calculus (3rd edition)'', R. Wrede, M.R. Spiegel, Schaum's Outline Series, 2010, ISBN 978-0-07-162366-7.
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| *[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GreensTheorem.html Green's Theorem on MathWorld]
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Greens theorem}}
| |
| [[Category:Theorems in calculus]]
| |
| [[Category:Articles containing proofs]]
| |
This year the Institute of Medicine reissued guidelinesfor the amount of weight a girl must place on throughout pregnancy. In 1990, similar policies were issued, yet because then, a lot has changed inside the wellness profile of Americans, plus this might be the first time we've enjoyed an upper limit found on the fat overweight women must gain.
This could be piece of the usual annual check up. A fasting blood glucose may indicate whether we have a issue or not. Usually, you're told to not eat after midnight before the test. If further testing is mandatory, you could have to undergo further testing to rule out or diagnose diabetes or other conditions.
The National Institutes of Health has policies regarding waist circumference, to identify risk of condition, but just waist to height ratio for individuals whom are classified because overweight or obese as far as body mass index. The National Institutes of Health urges weight loss for people with a body mass index of 30 or higher (obese).
Unfortunately, genetics equally plays a element inside body fat weight and the place of stored fat. Lack of exercise furthermore plays a big character. A sedentary lifestyle usually greatly strengthen a fatand might ultimately cause condition plus illness. Not only is fat unsightly and unhealthy, however, where it's stored is harmful.
For me since this was my initial diet I did not understand what to anticipate and after those 4 days I started to recognize the real purpose of why I went on this diet. I went into this thinking which it would be effortless, I mentioned to me, its just four days. But I quickly realized that it was not easy and which it takes mental control to override what the body wants. I had additionally realized a limited things about myself plus about my past eating practices.
For those of we with a bigger upper body it really is best to draw attention downward. Look for the Cataract jeans in waist to height ratio lighter denim colors. The lighter color will additionally balance out the body better plus aid make the top appear small.
Your ideal waist size will be between 45%-47% of your height. In other words, when you're 70 inches tall you're ideal waist is between 31.5 - 33 inches.
Whenever we would like to locate out much more about the perfect body, come browse my webpage where I provide diet plus exercise approaches to enable we to lose unwanted fat and obtain a lean look. Start getting back in awesome form immediately!