|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{See also|Safety factor (plasma physics)}}
| | Aged video games ought not to be discarded. If you have any questions regarding where and ways to utilize [http://prometeu.net how to hack clash of clans with cydia], you could contact us at our own web-page. They could be worth some money at a number of video retailers. When you buy and sell several game titles, you may possibly get your upcoming game at no cost!<br><br>Beginning nearly enough gemstone to get another local building company. Don''t waste some of the gems from any way on rush-building anything, as if information technology can save you the group you are going that can eventually obtain enough for free extra gems to are that extra builder without having to cost. Particularly, customers can get free jewelry for clearing obstructions like rocks and trees, because of you clear them out they come back and you may re-clear these to get more flagstones.<br><br>Assuming you have little ones who have fun with video games, then you probably know how [http://Www.Tumblr.com/tagged/challenging challenging] it really through using pull them out from the t. v.. Their eye can continually be stuck towards the tester for hours as chances are they'll play their preferred pastimes. If you want aid regulating your your child's clash of clans Hack time, your pursuing article has some hints for you.<br><br>Purchase attention to how very much money your teenager is considered spending on video console games. These products commonly cheap and there is without question often the option of all buying more add-ons in just the game itself. Set monthly and yearly limits on the quantity of of money that is likely to be spent on clip games. Also, have conversations with your young kids about budgeting.<br><br>A website is offering Clash created by Clans hack tool advisor to users who would like to. The website offering this tool is protected and it guarantees finist quality software. There as well other sites which present you with the tool. But is a superb either incomplete or linked with bad quality. When users download these just a few hack tools, instead of performing well they end set up in trouble. So, players are advised to pick from the tool from a website that offers complete apps.Users who are finding it tough to traverse the hurdles can look for a site that allows a person to download the cheats. Most of the website pages allow free download and websites charge fees. Users can locate a niche site from where they can obtain good quality software.<br><br>That tutorial will guide you through your first few raids, constructions, and upgrades, sadly youre left to your personal personal wiles pretty quickly. Your buildings take live to construct and upgrade, your army units take time to recruit, and your bio buildings take time to get food and gold. Like all of their genre cousins, Throne Haste is meant to took part in multiple short bursts in the day. This type of compulsive gaming definitely works much on mobile devices which can always with you and that can send push notifications when timed tasks are completed. Then again, the success of a lot of hit Facebook games over the years indicates that people inspection Facebook often enough to make it worse short play sessions employment there too.<br><br>Now you have read this composition, you need to a great easier time locating then loving video games on your life. Notwithstanding your favored platform, from your cellphone in your own own computer, playing furthermore enjoying video gaming enables you to take the advantage of the worries of ones own busy week get advise. |
| | |
| '''Factor of safety''' ('''FoS''')('''RoH, DoH'''), also known as (and used interchangeably with) '''safety factor''' ('''SF'''), is a term describing the structural capacity of a system beyond the expected loads or actual loads. Essentially, how much stronger the system is than it usually needs to be for an intended load. Safety factors are often calculated using detailed analysis because comprehensive testing is impractical on many projects, such as bridges and buildings, but the structure's ability to carry load must be determined to a reasonable accuracy.
| |
| | |
| Many systems are purposefully built much stronger than needed for normal usage to allow for emergency situations, unexpected loads, misuse, or degradation.
| |
| | |
| == Definition ==
| |
| There are two distinct uses of the factor of safety: One as a ratio of absolute strength (structural capacity) to actual applied load, this is a measure of the [[Reliability engineering|reliability]] of a particular design. The other use of FoS is a constant value imposed by [[law]], [[Technical standard|standard]], [[specification]], [[contract]] or [[Convention (norm)|custom]] to which a structure must conform or exceed.
| |
| | |
| The first use (a calculated value) is generally referred to as a ''factor of safety'' or, to be explicit, a ''realized factor of safety''. The second use (a required value) as a ''design factor'', ''design factor of safety'' or ''required factor of safety''. However, between various industries and engineering groups usage is inconsistent and confusing, it is important to be aware of which definition(s) are being used. The cause of much confusion is that various reference books and standards agencies use the factor of safety definitions and terms differently. Design codes and [[structural engineering|structural]] and [[mechanical engineering]] textbooks often use "Factor of Safety" to mean the fraction of total structural capability over that needed<ref>Young, W.: ''Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain'', 6th edition. McGraw-Hill, 1989.</ref><ref>Shigley, J and Mischke, C: ''Standard Handbook of Machine Design'', page 2-15. McGraw-Hill, 1986.</ref><ref>ASME BTH-1: ''Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices'', Section 1-5, ASME, 2005.</ref> (first use). Many undergraduate [[Strength of Materials]] books use "Factor of Safety" as a constant value intended as a minimum target for design<ref>Beer, F and Johnson, R: ''Mechanics of Materials'', second edition. McGraw-Hill,1992.</ref><ref>Timoshenko, S: ''Strength of Materials'', Volume 1. Krieger, 1958.</ref><ref>Buchanan, G: ''Mechanics of Materials'', Page 55. Holt, Reinhart, and Watson,1988.</ref> (second use).
| |
| | |
| == Calculation ==
| |
| There are several ways to compare the factor of safety for structures. All the different calculations fundamentally measure the same thing: how much extra load beyond what is intended a structure will actually take (or be required to withstand). The difference between the methods is the way in which the values are calculated and compared. Safety factor values can be thought of as a standardized way for comparing strength and reliability between systems.
| |
| | |
| The use of a factor of safety does not imply that an item, structure, or design is "safe". Many [[quality assurance]], [[engineering design]], [[manufacturing]], installation, and end-use factors may influence whether or not something is safe in any particular situation.
| |
| | |
| === Design factor and safety factor ===
| |
| | |
| The difference between the safety factor and design factor (design safety factor) is as follows: The safety factor is how much the designed part actually will be able to withstand (first "use" from above). The design factor is what the item is required to be able to withstand (second "use"). The design factor is defined for an application (generally provided in advance and often set by regulatory code or policy) and is not an actual calculation, the safety factor is a ratio of maximum strength to intended load for the actual item that was designed.
| |
| | |
| <blockquote> | |
| :<math>\text{Factor of Safety}=\frac{\text{Material Strength}}{\text{Design Load}}</math>
| |
| *Design load being the maximum load the part should ever see in service.
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| By this definition, a structure with a FOS of exactly 1 will support only the design load and no more. Any additional load will cause the structure to fail. A structure with a FOS of 2 will fail at twice the design load.
| |
| | |
| === Margin of safety ===
| |
| | |
| Many government agencies and industries (such as aerospace) require the use of a '''margin of safety''' ('''MoS''' or '''M.S.''') to describe the ratio of the strength of the structure to the requirements. There are two separate definitions for the margin of safety so care is needed to determine which is being used for a given application. One usage of M.S. is as a measure of capacity like FoS. The other usage of M.S. is as a measure of satisfying design requirements (requirement verification). Margin of safety can be conceptualized (along with the reserve factor explained below) to represent how much of the structure's total capacity is held "in reserve" during loading.
| |
| | |
| '''M.S. as a measure of structural capacity:''' This definition of margin of safety commonly seen in textbooks<ref>Burr, A and Cheatham, J: ''Mechanical Design and Analysis'', 2nd edition, section 5.2. Prentice-Hall, 1995.</ref><ref>Juvinall, R: ''Stress, Strain, and Strength'', section 14.13, Page 295. McGraw-Hill, 1967.</ref> basically says that if the part is loaded to the maximum load it should ever see in service, how many more loads of the same force can it withstand before failing. In effect, this is a measure of excess capacity. If the margin is 0, the part will not take any additional load before it fails, if it is negative the part will fail before reaching its design load in service. If the margin is 1, it can withstand one additional load of equal force to the maximum load it was designed to support (i.e. twice the design load).
| |
| | |
| <blockquote>
| |
| :<math>\text{Margin of Safety}=\frac{\text{Failure Load}}{\text{Design Load}}-1</math>
| |
| :<math>\text{Margin of Safety}={\text{Factor of Safety}}-1</math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| '''M.S. as a measure of requirement verification:''' Many agencies and organizations such as [[NASA]]<ref>NASA-STD-5001: ''Structural Design and Test Factors for Spaceflight Hardware'', section 3. NASA, 2008.</ref> and [[AIAA]]<ref>AIAA S-110: ''Space Systems - Structures, Structural Components, and Structural Assemblies'', section 4.2. AIAA, 2005.</ref> define the margin of safety including the design factor, in other words, the margin of safety is calculated after applying the design factor. In the case of a margin of 0, the part is at exactly the '''required''' strength (the safety factor would equal the design factor). If there is a part with a required design factor of 3 and a margin of 1, the part would have a safety factor of 6 (capable of supporting two loads equal to its design factor of 3, supporting six times the design load before failure). A margin of 0 would mean the part would pass with a safety factor of 3. If the margin is less than 0 in this definition, although the part will not necessarily fail, the design requirement has not been met. A convenience of this usage is that for all applications, a margin of 0 or higher is passing, one does not need to know application details or compare against requirements, just glancing at the margin calculation tells whether the design passes or not. This is helpful for oversight and reviewing on projects with various integrated components, as different components may have various design factors involved and the margin calculation helps prevent confusion.
| |
| | |
| <blockquote>
| |
| <br/> | |
| Design Safety Factor = [Provided as requirement]
| |
| <br/> | |
| :<math>\text{Margin of Safety}=\frac{\text{Failure Load}}{\text{Design Load*Design Safety Factor}}-1</math>
| |
| :<math>\text{Margin of Safety}=\frac{\text{Realized Factor of Safety}}{\text{Design Safety Factor}}-1</math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| For a successful design, the Realized Safety Factor must always equal or exceed the Design Safety Factor so the Margin of Safety is greater than or equal to zero. The Margin of Safety is sometimes, but infrequently, used as a percentage, i.e., a 0.50 M.S is equivalent to a 50% M.S. When a design satisfies this test it is said to have a "positive margin," and, conversely, a “negative margin” when it does not.
| |
| | |
| In the field of Nuclear Safety (as implemented at U.S. government owned facilities) the Margin of Safety has been defined as a quantity that may not be reduced without review by the controlling government office. The U.S. Department of Energy publishes DOE G 424.1-1, "Implementation Guide for Use in Addressing Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements" as a guide for determining how to identify and determine whether a margin of safety will be reduced by a proposed change. The guide develops and applies the concept of a qualitative margin of safety that may not be explicit or quantifiable, yet can be evaluated conceptually to determine whether an increase or decrease will occur with a proposed change. This approach becomes important when examining designs with large or undefined (historical) margins and those that depend on 'soft' controls such as programmatic limits or requirements. The commercial U.S. nuclear industry utilized a similar concept in evaluating planned changes until 2001, when 10 CFR 50.59 was revised to capture and apply the information available in facility-specific risk analyses and other quantitative risk management tools.
| |
| | |
| === Reserve factor ===
| |
| | |
| A measure of strength frequently used in Europe is the '''Reserve Factor (RF)'''. With the strength and applied loads expressed in the same units, the Reserve Factor is defined as:
| |
| | |
| <blockquote> | |
| RF = Proof Strength / Proof Load
| |
| <br/> | |
| RF = Ultimate Strength / Ultimate Load
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| The applied loads have any factors, including factors of safety applied.
| |
| | |
| == Yield and ultimate calculations ==
| |
| | |
| For ductile materials (e.g. most metals), it is often required that the factor of safety be checked against both [[yield strength|yield]] and [[ultimate strength|ultimate]] strengths. The yield calculation will determine the safety factor until the part starts to [[Plastic deformation|plastically deform]]. The ultimate calculation will determine the safety factor until failure. On brittle materials these values are often so close as to be indistinguishable, so is it usually acceptable to only calculate the ultimate safety factor.
| |
| | |
| == Choosing design factors ==
| |
| | |
| Appropriate design factors are based on several considerations, such as the [[accuracy]] of predictions on the imposed [[Structural load|loads]], strength, [[wear]] estimates, and the [[Environment (systems)|environmental]] effects to which the product will be exposed in service; the consequences of engineering failure; and the cost of over-engineering the component to achieve that factor of safety. For example, components whose [[failure]] could result in substantial financial loss, serious injury, or death may use a safety factor of four or higher (often ten). Non-critical components generally might have a design factor of two. [[Risk analysis (engineering)|Risk analysis]], [[failure mode and effects analysis]], and other tools are commonly used. Design factors for specific applications are often mandated by law, policy, or industry standards.
| |
| | |
| Buildings commonly use a factor of safety of 2.0 for each structural member. The value for buildings is relatively low because the loads are well understood and most structures are [[Redundancy (engineering)|redundant]]. [[Pressure vessel]]s use 3.5 to 4.0, automobiles use 3.0, and aircraft and spacecraft use 1.2 to 3.0 depending on the application and materials. [[Ductility|Ductile]], metallic materials tend to use the lower value while [[brittle]] materials use the higher values. The field of [[aerospace engineering]] uses generally lower design factors because the costs associated with structural weight are high (i.e. an aircraft with an overall safety factor of 5 would probably be too heavy to get off the ground). This low design factor is why aerospace parts and materials are subject to very stringent [[quality control]] and strict preventative maintenance schedules to help ensure reliability. A usually applied Safety Factor is 1.5, but for pressurized fuselage it is 2.0, and for main landing gear structures it is often 1.25.<ref>Burr, A and Cheatham, J: Mechanical Design and Analysis, 2nd edition, section 5.2. Prentice-Hall, 1995.</ref>
| |
| | |
| In some cases it is impractical or impossible for a part to meet the "standard" design factor. The penalties (mass or otherwise) for meeting the requirement would prevent the system from being viable (such as in the case of aircraft or spacecraft). In these cases, it is sometimes determined to allow a component to meet a lower than normal safety factor, often referred to as "waiving" the requirement. Doing this often brings with it extra detailed analysis or quality control verifications to assure the part will perform as desired, as it will be loaded closer to its limits.
| |
| | |
| For loading that is cyclical, repetitive, or fluctuating, it is important to consider the possibility of [[metal fatigue]] when choosing factor of safety. A cyclic load well below a material's yield strength can cause failure if it is repeated through enough cycles.
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| * [[Limit state design]]
| |
| * [[Redundancy (total quality management)]]
| |
| * [[Probabilistic design]]
| |
| * [[Sacrificial part]]
| |
| * [[Statistical interference]]
| |
| * [[Verification and validation]]
| |
| | |
| ==Notes==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| * Lalanne, C., ''Specification Development - 2nd Ed.'', ISTE-Wiley, 2009
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Factor Of Safety}}
| |
| [[Category:Engineering concepts]]
| |
| [[Category:Safety]]
| |
Aged video games ought not to be discarded. If you have any questions regarding where and ways to utilize how to hack clash of clans with cydia, you could contact us at our own web-page. They could be worth some money at a number of video retailers. When you buy and sell several game titles, you may possibly get your upcoming game at no cost!
Beginning nearly enough gemstone to get another local building company. Dont waste some of the gems from any way on rush-building anything, as if information technology can save you the group you are going that can eventually obtain enough for free extra gems to are that extra builder without having to cost. Particularly, customers can get free jewelry for clearing obstructions like rocks and trees, because of you clear them out they come back and you may re-clear these to get more flagstones.
Assuming you have little ones who have fun with video games, then you probably know how challenging it really through using pull them out from the t. v.. Their eye can continually be stuck towards the tester for hours as chances are they'll play their preferred pastimes. If you want aid regulating your your child's clash of clans Hack time, your pursuing article has some hints for you.
Purchase attention to how very much money your teenager is considered spending on video console games. These products commonly cheap and there is without question often the option of all buying more add-ons in just the game itself. Set monthly and yearly limits on the quantity of of money that is likely to be spent on clip games. Also, have conversations with your young kids about budgeting.
A website is offering Clash created by Clans hack tool advisor to users who would like to. The website offering this tool is protected and it guarantees finist quality software. There as well other sites which present you with the tool. But is a superb either incomplete or linked with bad quality. When users download these just a few hack tools, instead of performing well they end set up in trouble. So, players are advised to pick from the tool from a website that offers complete apps.Users who are finding it tough to traverse the hurdles can look for a site that allows a person to download the cheats. Most of the website pages allow free download and websites charge fees. Users can locate a niche site from where they can obtain good quality software.
That tutorial will guide you through your first few raids, constructions, and upgrades, sadly youre left to your personal personal wiles pretty quickly. Your buildings take live to construct and upgrade, your army units take time to recruit, and your bio buildings take time to get food and gold. Like all of their genre cousins, Throne Haste is meant to took part in multiple short bursts in the day. This type of compulsive gaming definitely works much on mobile devices which can always with you and that can send push notifications when timed tasks are completed. Then again, the success of a lot of hit Facebook games over the years indicates that people inspection Facebook often enough to make it worse short play sessions employment there too.
Now you have read this composition, you need to a great easier time locating then loving video games on your life. Notwithstanding your favored platform, from your cellphone in your own own computer, playing furthermore enjoying video gaming enables you to take the advantage of the worries of ones own busy week get advise.