Superimposed code: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>ArnoldReinhold
+pix
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A chefs knife is standard tool made use of in food preparation. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=Stainless+steel&gs_l=news Stainless steel] is the most common form knife on the market these days and you will see two various types of construction. If the blade is 1 thickness, then it is a stamped knife, but if there is any variance in thickness, generally seen at the connection to the deal with (known as a bolster), then it is a forged knife.  Weight and balance play crucial roles in the usability of a knife. Curl the rest of your finger about the blade loosely and lift the knife.<br><br>Frequently, people today do not spend a lot focus towards kitchen knives and consider it among little accessories, whereas a kitchen knife is a typical and pretty useful tool. Moreover, the blade of the knife is really hygienic and there are zero possibilities of bacteria's and metal odour left in your chopped stuff.  To get on line, you need to make a transaction, and the ordered set will be delivered to you inside a working week. The Victorinox Forschner chef's knife cuts like butter! Nice set of knives!<br><br>Chef Deagon says about chefs and tongs, We do everything with a pair of tongs in our hands.The most versatile tongs are made of stainless steel and have a strong spring to create the efficient push that opens the tong when necessary.  A paring knife is a common objective knife that is made use of for compact intricate operate like peeling vegetables, slicing modest fruits, coring, and making garnishesA paring knife commonly ranges in size from 3 inches to five Japanese Chef Knives California inches. Chef Deagon recommends Cuisinart®. Good knife.<br><br>And he also got a small additional nicely-recognized personally this year, thanks to a starring role in the very first season of Anthony Bourdain's food show "The Mind of a Chef." Causes for Concern in 2013: The biggest challenge for any emperor-chef is to retain high excellent at areas spread Japanese Chef Knives Jck all through the world. A good knife in the kitchen is a fantastic tool, a firm manage and a sharp edge. I'm a 50 some thing mom who gave it a try.<br><br>Although the price tag may not very accurately reflect the high quality of a Victorinox knife as you click on a couple of of the selections take a excellent appear at the customer testimonials. While the colorful design might seem to be gimmicky, it really has a extremely ingenious goal - every single colour designates a distinctive type of knife so when you go to grab one particular you won't have to fumble for the 1 you require. The Ex set is out there in quite a few colors to match or stand out against your kitchen's colour scheme.<br><br>A James Beard-nominated chef who did not get the chance to show much of something on Leading Chef. AGE: 42 HOMETOWN: Ohio - At the moment resides in West Bloomfield, MI PROFESSION: Chef de Cuisine, The Lark CULINARY EDUCATION: BS In Engineering, University of Michigan Favored RECIPE: Spiced Spring cucumbers with dill Extra here. If you loved this short article and you would love to receive details with regards to Japanese Chef Knives Tojiro ([http://www.thebestkitchenknivesreviews.com/best-japanese-knives-chef-models-review/ click through the following article]) generously visit our web site. In the lengthy run a excellent higher-carbon knife will be worth the added expense.
{{More footnotes|date=August 2012}}
In [[control theory]] the '''Youla–Kučera parametrization''' (also simply known as '''Youla [[parametrization]]''') is a formula that describes all possible stabilizing feedback controllers for a given plant P, as function of a single parameter Q.
 
==Details==
The YK parametrization is a general result. It is a fundamental result of control theory and launched an entirely new area of research and found application, among others, in optimal and robust control.<ref>V. Kučera. A Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers. 18th IFAC World Congress. Italy, Milan, 2011.[http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/prost/proceedings/ifac11-proceedings/data/html/papers/1148.pdf]</ref>
 
For ease of understanding and as suggested by Kučera it is best described for three increasingly general kinds of plant.
 
===Stable SISO Plant===
 
Let <math>P(s)</math> be a transfer function of a stable [[Single-input single-output system]] (SISO) system. Further, let Ω be a set of stable and proper functions of ''s''. Then, the set of all proper stabilizing controllers for the plant <math>P(s)</math> can be defined as
 
<math>\left\{ \frac{Q(s)}{1 - P(s)Q(s)}, Q(s)\subset \Omega \right\}</math>,
 
where <math>Q(s)</math> is an arbitrary proper and stable function of ''s''. It can be said, that <math>Q(s)</math> parametrizes all stabilizing controllers for the plant <math>P(s)</math>.
 
===General SISO Plant===
 
Consider a general plant with a transfer function <math>P(s)</math>. Further, the transfer function can be factorized as
 
<math>P(s)=\frac{N(s)}{M(s)}</math>, where M(s), N(s) are stable and proper functions of ''s''.
 
Now, solve the [[Bézout's identity]] of the form
 
'''<math> \mathbf{N(s)X(s)} + \mathbf{M(s)Y(s)} = \mathbf{1} </math>''',
 
where the variables to be found (X(s), Y(s)) must be also proper and stable.
 
After proper and stable X, Y were found, we can define one stabilizing controller that is of the form <math>C(s)=\frac{X(s)}{Y(s)}</math>. After we have one stabilizing controller at hand, we can define all stabilizing controllers using a parameter Q(s) that is proper and stable. The set of all stabilizing controllers is defined as
 
<math>\left\{ \frac{X(s)+M(s)Q(s)}{Y(s) - N(s)Q(s)}, Q(s)\subset \Omega \right\}</math>,
 
===General MIMO plant===
 
In a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system, consider a transfer matrix <math>\mathbf{P(s)}</math>. It can be factorized using right coprime factors <math>\mathbf{P(s)=N(s)D^{-1}(s)}</math> or left factors <math>\mathbf{P(s)=\tilde{D}^{-1}(s)\tilde{N}(s)}</math>. The factors must be proper, stable and doubly coprime, which ensures that the system '''P'''(s) is controllable and observable. This can be written by Bézout identity of the form
 
<math>
\left[ \begin{matrix}
  \mathbf{X} & \mathbf{Y}  \\
  -\mathbf{\tilde{N}} & {\mathbf{\tilde{D}}}  \\
\end{matrix} \right]\left[ \begin{matrix}
  \mathbf{D} & -\mathbf{\tilde{Y}}  \\
  \mathbf{N} & {\mathbf{\tilde{X}}} \\
\end{matrix} \right]=\left[ \begin{matrix}
  \mathbf{I} & 0 \\
  0 & \mathbf{I} \\
\end{matrix} \right]
</math>.
 
After finding <math>\mathbf{X, Y, \tilde{X}, \tilde{Y}}</math> that are stable and proper, we can define the set of all stabilizing controllers '''H(s)''' using left or right factor, provided having negative feedback.
 
<math>
\begin{align}
  & \mathbf{H(s)}={{\left( \mathbf{X}-\mathbf{K\tilde{N}} \right)}^{-1}}\left( \mathbf{Y}-\mathbf{K\tilde{D}} \right) \\
  & =\left( \mathbf{\tilde{Y}}+\mathbf{DK} \right){{\left( \mathbf{\tilde{X}}-\mathbf{NK} \right)}^{-1}}  
\end{align}
 
</math>
 
where '''K(s)''' is an arbitrary stable and proper parameter.  
<!-- Please correct the form of this page, I am still learning wiki formatting -->
<!--
Let <math>P(s)</math> be the transfer function of the plant and let <math>K_0(s)</math> be a stabilizing controller. Let their right coprime factorizations be:
:<math>P = N M^{-1}</math>
:<math>K_0 = U V^{-1}</math>
then '''all''' stabilizing controllers can be written as
:<math>K = (U+M Q) (V+N Q)^{-1}</math>
where Q is stable and proper.<ref>[http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/cellier/Lect/NMC/Lect_nmc_index.html Cellier: Lecture Notes on Numerical Methods for control, Ch. 24]</ref>
-->
 
The engineering significance of the YK formula is that if one wants to find a stabilizing controller that meets some additional criterion, one can adjust Q such that the desired criterion is met.
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
*D. C. Youla, H. A. Jabri, J. J. Bongiorno: Modern Wiener-Hopf design of optimal controllers: part II, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., AC-21 (1976) pp319–338
*V. Kučera: Stability of discrete linear feedback systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFAC. World Congress, Boston, MA, USA, (1975).
*C. A. Desoer, R.-W. Liu, J. Murray, R. Saeks. Feedback system design: the fractional representation approach to analysis and synthesis. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., AC-25 (3), (1980) pp399–412
*John Doyle, Bruce Francis, Allen Tannenbau. Feedback control theory. (1990). [http://www.gest.unipd.it/~oboe/psc/testi/dft.pdf]
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Youla-Kucera parametrization}}
[[Category:Control theory]]

Revision as of 22:45, 26 May 2013

Template:More footnotes In control theory the Youla–Kučera parametrization (also simply known as Youla parametrization) is a formula that describes all possible stabilizing feedback controllers for a given plant P, as function of a single parameter Q.

Details

The YK parametrization is a general result. It is a fundamental result of control theory and launched an entirely new area of research and found application, among others, in optimal and robust control.[1]

For ease of understanding and as suggested by Kučera it is best described for three increasingly general kinds of plant.

Stable SISO Plant

Let be a transfer function of a stable Single-input single-output system (SISO) system. Further, let Ω be a set of stable and proper functions of s. Then, the set of all proper stabilizing controllers for the plant can be defined as

,

where is an arbitrary proper and stable function of s. It can be said, that parametrizes all stabilizing controllers for the plant .

General SISO Plant

Consider a general plant with a transfer function . Further, the transfer function can be factorized as

, where M(s), N(s) are stable and proper functions of s.

Now, solve the Bézout's identity of the form

,

where the variables to be found (X(s), Y(s)) must be also proper and stable.

After proper and stable X, Y were found, we can define one stabilizing controller that is of the form . After we have one stabilizing controller at hand, we can define all stabilizing controllers using a parameter Q(s) that is proper and stable. The set of all stabilizing controllers is defined as

,

General MIMO plant

In a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system, consider a transfer matrix . It can be factorized using right coprime factors or left factors . The factors must be proper, stable and doubly coprime, which ensures that the system P(s) is controllable and observable. This can be written by Bézout identity of the form

.

After finding that are stable and proper, we can define the set of all stabilizing controllers H(s) using left or right factor, provided having negative feedback.

where K(s) is an arbitrary stable and proper parameter.

The engineering significance of the YK formula is that if one wants to find a stabilizing controller that meets some additional criterion, one can adjust Q such that the desired criterion is met.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  • D. C. Youla, H. A. Jabri, J. J. Bongiorno: Modern Wiener-Hopf design of optimal controllers: part II, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., AC-21 (1976) pp319–338
  • V. Kučera: Stability of discrete linear feedback systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFAC. World Congress, Boston, MA, USA, (1975).
  • C. A. Desoer, R.-W. Liu, J. Murray, R. Saeks. Feedback system design: the fractional representation approach to analysis and synthesis. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., AC-25 (3), (1980) pp399–412
  • John Doyle, Bruce Francis, Allen Tannenbau. Feedback control theory. (1990). [1]
  1. V. Kučera. A Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers. 18th IFAC World Congress. Italy, Milan, 2011.[2]