Procedural texture: Difference between revisions
en>Michael Hardy |
en>IndigoMertel m →Some programs for creating textures using procedural texturing: Updated the name of Allegorithmic Substance program to Allegorithmic Substance Designer |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Augmented Lagrangian methods''' are a certain class of [[algorithm]]s for solving [[Constraint (mathematics)|constrained]] [[optimization (mathematics)|optimization]] problems. They have similarities to [[penalty method]]s in that they replace a constrained optimization problem by a series of unconstrained problems; the difference is that the augmented Lagrangian method adds an additional term to the unconstrained [[objective function|objective]]. This additional term is | |||
designed to mimic a [[Lagrange multiplier]]. The augmented Lagrangian is not the same as the [[Lagrange multiplier|method of Lagrange multipliers]]. | |||
Viewed differently, the unconstrained objective is the [[Lagrange_multipliers#The_strong_Lagrangian_principle:_Lagrange_duality|Lagrangian]] of the constrained problem, with an additional penalty term (the '''augmentation'''). | |||
The method was originally known as the '''method of multipliers''', and was studied much in the 1970 and 1980s as a good alternative to penalty methods. | |||
It was first discussed by [[Magnus Hestenes]] in 1969<ref>[[Magnus Hestenes|M.R. Hestenes]], "Multiplier and gradient methods", ''Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications'', 4, 1969, pp. 303–320</ref> | |||
and by Powell in 1969<ref>M.J.D. Powell, "A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems", in ''Optimization'' ed. by R. Fletcher, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1969, pp. 283–298.</ref> | |||
The method was studied by [[R. Tyrrell Rockafellar]] in relation to [[Fenchel duality]], particularly in relation to [[proximal-point method]]s, [[regularizion|Moreau–Yosida regularization]], and [[monotone operator|maximal monotone operator]]s: These methods were used in [[structural engineering|structural optimization]]<!-- French applied mathematicians, at least one in Texas, whose names escape senile K.W. -->. The method was also studied and implemented by [[Dimitri Bertsekas]], notably in his 1982 book,<ref>Dimitri P. Bertsekas, ''Constrained optimization and Lagrange multiplier methods'', Athena Scientific, 1996 (first published 1982)</ref> and with respect to [[Bregman divergence|entropic regularization]] (which accelerate the [[rate of convergence]] for his "exponential method of multipliers"). | |||
Since the 1970s, [[sequential quadratic programming]] (SQP) and [[interior point method]]s (IPM) have had increasing attention, in part because they more easily use [[sparse matrix]] [[subroutine]]s from [[numerical linear algebra|numerical]] [[numerical software|software libraries]], and in part because IPMs have proven complexity results via the theory of [[self-concordant function]]s. The augmented Lagrangian method was rejuvenated by the optimization systems [[Galahad library|LANCELOT]] and [[AMPL]], which allowed sparse matrix techniques to be used on seemingly dense but "partially separable" problems. The method is still useful for some problems.<ref>{{harvtxt|Nocedal|Wright|2006}}, chapter 17</ref> As of around 2007, there has been a resurgence of Augmented Lagrangian methods (and [[Augmented_Lagrangian_method#Alternating_direction_method_of_multipliers|ADMM]] in particular) in fields such as [[Total variation denoising|total-variation denoising]] and [[compressed sensing]]; for example, the [http://cascais.lx.it.pt/~mafonso/salsa.html SALSA] package was proposed in 2009. | |||
A variant of the standard Augmented Lagrangian method that uses partial updates (similar to the [[Gauss-Seidel method]] for solving linear equations) is known as the '''[[Augmented_Lagrangian_method#Alternating_direction_method_of_multipliers|alternating direction method of multipliers]]''' or '''ADMM'''. | |||
== General method == | |||
Let us say we are solving the following constrained problem: | |||
:<math> \min f(\bold x) </math> | |||
subject to | |||
:<math> c_i(\bold x) = 0 ~\forall i \in I. </math> | |||
This problem can be solved as a series of unconstrained minimization problems. For reference, we first list the [[penalty method]] approach: | |||
:<math> \min \Phi_k (\bold x) = f (\bold x) + \mu_k ~ \sum_{i\in I} ~ c_i(\bold x)^2 </math> | |||
The penalty method solves this problem, then at the next iteration it re-solves the problem | |||
using a larger value of <math>\mu_k</math> (and using the old solution as the initial guess or "warm-start"). | |||
The augmented Lagrangian method uses the following unconstrained objective: | |||
:<math> \min \Phi_k (\bold x) = f (\bold x) + \frac{\mu_k}{2} ~ \sum_{i\in I} ~ c_i(\bold x)^2 - \sum_{i\in I} ~ \lambda_i c_i(\bold x)</math> | |||
and after each iteration, in addition to updating <math>\mu_k</math>, the variable <math>\lambda</math> is also updated according to the rule | |||
:<math>\lambda_i \leftarrow \lambda_i - \mu_k c_i(\bold{x}_k) </math> | |||
where <math>\bold{x}_k</math> is the solution to the unconstrained problem at the ''k''th step, i.e. <math>\bold{x}_k=\text{argmin} \Phi_k(\bold x) </math> | |||
The variable <math>\lambda</math> is an estimate of the [[Lagrange multiplier]], and the accuracy of this estimate improves at every step. The major advantage of the method is that unlike the [[penalty method]], it is not necessary to take <math>\mu \rightarrow \infty</math> in order to solve the original constrained problem. Instead, because of the presence of the Lagrange multiplier term, <math>\mu</math> can stay much smaller. | |||
The method can be extended to handle inequality constraints. For a discussion of practical improvements, see.<ref>{{harvtxt|Nocedal|Wright|2006}}, chapter 17</ref> | |||
== Comparison with penalty methods == | |||
From,<ref>{{harvtxt|Nocedal|Wright|2006}}, chapter 17</ref> it is suggested that the augmented Lagrangian method is generally preferred to the quadratic penalty method | |||
since there is little extra computational cost and the parameter <math>\mu</math> need not go to infinity, thus avoiding ill-conditioning. | |||
== Alternating direction method of multipliers == | |||
The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is a variant of the augmented Lagrangian scheme that uses partial updates for the dual variables. This method is often applied to solve problems such as | |||
<math> \min_x f(x) + g(x). </math> | |||
This is equivalent to the constrained problem | |||
<math> \min_{x,y} f(x) + g(y), \quad \text{subject to}\quad x = y. </math> | |||
Though this change may seem trivial, the problem can now be attacked using methods of constrained optimization (in particular, the augmented Lagrangian method), and the objective function is separable in ''x'' and ''y''. The dual update requires solving a proximity function in ''x'' and ''y'' at the same time; the ADMM technique allows this problem to be solved approximately by first solving for ''x'' with ''y'' fixed, and then solving for ''y'' with ''x'' fixed. Rather than iterate until convergence (like the [[Jacobi method]]), the algorithm proceeds directly to updating the dual variable and then repeating the process. This is not equivalent to the exact minimization, but surprisingly, it can still be shown that this method converges to the right answer (under some assumptions). Because of this approximation, the algorithm is distinct from the pure augmented Lagrangian method. | |||
The ADMM can be viewed as an application of the [[Douglas-Rachford splitting algorithm]], and the Douglas-Rachford algorithm is in turn an instance of the [[Proximal point algorithm]]; details can be found here.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/BF01581204|noedit}}</ref> There are several modern software packages that solve [[Basis pursuit]] and variants and use the ADMM; such packages include [http://yall1.blogs.rice.edu/ YALL1] (2009), [http://www.lx.it.pt/~mtf/SpaRSA/ SpaRSA] (2009) and [http://cascais.lx.it.pt/~mafonso/salsa.html SALSA] (2009). | |||
== Software == | |||
Some well-known software packages that use the augmented Lagrangian method are <!-- [[MINOS (optimization software)|MINOS]], --> [[Galahad library|LANCELOT]]<!-- , --> and [[PENOPT|PENNON]]. | |||
The software [[MINOS (optimization software)|MINOS]] also uses an augmented Lagrangian method for some types of problems. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Penalty method]]s | |||
* [[Barrier method (mathematics)|Barrier method]] | |||
* [[Barrier function]] | |||
* [[Lagrange multiplier]] | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
* {{Citation | last1=Nocedal | first1=Jorge | last2=Wright | first2=Stephen J. | title=Numerical Optimization | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | edition=2nd | isbn=978-0-387-30303-1 | year=2006}} | |||
{{optimization algorithms|convex}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Augmented Lagrangian Method}} | |||
[[Category:Optimization algorithms and methods]] |
Revision as of 17:26, 18 January 2014
Augmented Lagrangian methods are a certain class of algorithms for solving constrained optimization problems. They have similarities to penalty methods in that they replace a constrained optimization problem by a series of unconstrained problems; the difference is that the augmented Lagrangian method adds an additional term to the unconstrained objective. This additional term is designed to mimic a Lagrange multiplier. The augmented Lagrangian is not the same as the method of Lagrange multipliers.
Viewed differently, the unconstrained objective is the Lagrangian of the constrained problem, with an additional penalty term (the augmentation).
The method was originally known as the method of multipliers, and was studied much in the 1970 and 1980s as a good alternative to penalty methods. It was first discussed by Magnus Hestenes in 1969[1] and by Powell in 1969[2] The method was studied by R. Tyrrell Rockafellar in relation to Fenchel duality, particularly in relation to proximal-point methods, Moreau–Yosida regularization, and maximal monotone operators: These methods were used in structural optimization. The method was also studied and implemented by Dimitri Bertsekas, notably in his 1982 book,[3] and with respect to entropic regularization (which accelerate the rate of convergence for his "exponential method of multipliers").
Since the 1970s, sequential quadratic programming (SQP) and interior point methods (IPM) have had increasing attention, in part because they more easily use sparse matrix subroutines from numerical software libraries, and in part because IPMs have proven complexity results via the theory of self-concordant functions. The augmented Lagrangian method was rejuvenated by the optimization systems LANCELOT and AMPL, which allowed sparse matrix techniques to be used on seemingly dense but "partially separable" problems. The method is still useful for some problems.[4] As of around 2007, there has been a resurgence of Augmented Lagrangian methods (and ADMM in particular) in fields such as total-variation denoising and compressed sensing; for example, the SALSA package was proposed in 2009.
A variant of the standard Augmented Lagrangian method that uses partial updates (similar to the Gauss-Seidel method for solving linear equations) is known as the alternating direction method of multipliers or ADMM.
General method
Let us say we are solving the following constrained problem:
subject to
This problem can be solved as a series of unconstrained minimization problems. For reference, we first list the penalty method approach:
The penalty method solves this problem, then at the next iteration it re-solves the problem using a larger value of (and using the old solution as the initial guess or "warm-start").
The augmented Lagrangian method uses the following unconstrained objective:
and after each iteration, in addition to updating , the variable is also updated according to the rule
where is the solution to the unconstrained problem at the kth step, i.e.
The variable is an estimate of the Lagrange multiplier, and the accuracy of this estimate improves at every step. The major advantage of the method is that unlike the penalty method, it is not necessary to take in order to solve the original constrained problem. Instead, because of the presence of the Lagrange multiplier term, can stay much smaller.
The method can be extended to handle inequality constraints. For a discussion of practical improvements, see.[5]
Comparison with penalty methods
From,[6] it is suggested that the augmented Lagrangian method is generally preferred to the quadratic penalty method since there is little extra computational cost and the parameter need not go to infinity, thus avoiding ill-conditioning.
Alternating direction method of multipliers
The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is a variant of the augmented Lagrangian scheme that uses partial updates for the dual variables. This method is often applied to solve problems such as
This is equivalent to the constrained problem
Though this change may seem trivial, the problem can now be attacked using methods of constrained optimization (in particular, the augmented Lagrangian method), and the objective function is separable in x and y. The dual update requires solving a proximity function in x and y at the same time; the ADMM technique allows this problem to be solved approximately by first solving for x with y fixed, and then solving for y with x fixed. Rather than iterate until convergence (like the Jacobi method), the algorithm proceeds directly to updating the dual variable and then repeating the process. This is not equivalent to the exact minimization, but surprisingly, it can still be shown that this method converges to the right answer (under some assumptions). Because of this approximation, the algorithm is distinct from the pure augmented Lagrangian method.
The ADMM can be viewed as an application of the Douglas-Rachford splitting algorithm, and the Douglas-Rachford algorithm is in turn an instance of the Proximal point algorithm; details can be found here.[7] There are several modern software packages that solve Basis pursuit and variants and use the ADMM; such packages include YALL1 (2009), SpaRSA (2009) and SALSA (2009).
Software
Some well-known software packages that use the augmented Lagrangian method are LANCELOT and PENNON. The software MINOS also uses an augmented Lagrangian method for some types of problems.
See also
References
- ↑ M.R. Hestenes, "Multiplier and gradient methods", Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 4, 1969, pp. 303–320
- ↑ M.J.D. Powell, "A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems", in Optimization ed. by R. Fletcher, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1969, pp. 283–298.
- ↑ Dimitri P. Bertsekas, Constrained optimization and Lagrange multiplier methods, Athena Scientific, 1996 (first published 1982)
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt, chapter 17
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt, chapter 17
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt, chapter 17
- ↑ Template:Cite doi
Bibliography
- Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.
Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.
In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.
Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region
Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.
15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.
To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010