Lyman-alpha emitter: Difference between revisions
en>Jawshoeaw m →Importance in Cosmology: spell check anyone? |
→Properties: corrected is to in |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[commutative algebra]], an element ''b'' of a [[commutative ring]] ''B'' is said to be '''integral over''' ''A'', a [[subring]] of ''B'', if there is an ''n'' ≥ 1 and <math>a_j \in A</math> such that | |||
:<math>b^n + a_{n-1} b^{n-1} + \cdots + a_1 b + a_0 = 0.</math> | |||
That is to say, ''b'' is a root of a [[monic polynomial]] over ''A''.<ref>The above equation is sometimes called an integral equation and ''b'' is said to be integrally dependent on ''A'' (as opposed to [[algebraic dependent]].)</ref> If every element of ''B'' is integral over ''A'', then it is said that ''B'' is '''integral over''' ''A'', or equivalently ''B'' is an '''integral extension''' of ''A''. | |||
If ''A'', ''B'' are fields, then the notions of "integral over" and of an "integral extension" are precisely "algebraic over" and "[[algebraic extension]]s" in [[field theory (mathematics)|field theory]] (since the root of any polynomial is the root of a monic polynomial). The special case of greatest interest in [[number theory]] is that of complex numbers integral over '''Z'''; in this context, they are usually called [[algebraic integer]]s (e.g., <math>\sqrt{2}</math>). The algebraic integers in a [[Field extension|finite extension field]] ''k'' of the [[rational number|rationals]] '''Q''' form a subring of ''k'', called the [[ring of integers]] of ''k'', a central object in [[algebraic number theory]]. | |||
The set of elements of ''B'' that are integral over ''A'' is called the '''integral closure''' of ''A'' in ''B''. It is a subring of ''B'' containing ''A''. | |||
In this article, the term ''[[Ring (mathematics)|ring]]'' will be understood to mean ''commutative ring'' with a unity. | |||
==Examples== | |||
*Integers are the only elements of '''Q''' that are integral over '''Z'''. In other words, '''Z''' is the integral closure of '''Z''' in '''Q'''. | |||
*[[Gaussian integer]]s, complex numbers of the form <math>a + b \sqrt{-1}, a, b \in \mathbf{Z}</math>, are integral over '''Z'''. <math>\mathbf{Z}[\sqrt{-1}]</math> is then the integral closure of '''Z''' in <math>\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-1})</math>. | |||
*The integral closure of '''Z''' in <math>\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{5})</math> consists of elements of form <math>(a + b \sqrt{5})/2</math>; the last two are examples of [[quadratic integer]]s. | |||
*Let ζ be a [[root of unity]]. Then the integral closure of '''Z''' in the [[cyclotomic field]] '''Q'''(ζ) is '''Z'''[ζ].<ref>{{harvnb|Milne|ANT|loc=Theorem 6.4}}</ref> | |||
*The integral closure of '''Z''' in the field of complex numbers '''C''' is called the ''ring of [[algebraic integer]]s''. | |||
*If <math>\overline{k}</math> is an algebraic closure of a field ''k'', then <math>\overline{k}[x_1, \dots, x_n]</math> is integral over <math>k[x_1, \dots, x_n].</math> | |||
*Let a [[finite group]] ''G'' act on a ring ''A''. Then ''A'' is integral over ''A<sup>G</sup>'' the set of elements fixed by ''G''. see [[Ring (mathematics)#Ring of invariants|ring of invariants]]. | |||
*The roots of unity and [[nilpotent element]]s in any ring are integral over '''Z'''. | |||
*Let ''R'' be a ring and ''u'' a unit in a ring containing ''R''. Then<ref>Kaplansky, 1.2. Exercise 4.</ref> | |||
#''u''<sup>−1</sup> is integral over ''R'' if and only if ''u''<sup>−1</sup> ∈ ''R''[''u'']. | |||
#<math>R[u] \cap R[u^{-1}]</math> is integral over ''R''. | |||
*The integral closure of '''C'''<nowiki>[[</nowiki>''x''<nowiki>]]</nowiki> in a finite extension of '''C'''((''x'')) is of the form <math>\mathbf{C}[[x^{1/n}]]</math> (cf. [[Puiseux series]]){{citation needed|date=October 2012}} | |||
*The integral closure of the [[homogeneous coordinate ring]] of a normal [[projective variety]] ''X'' is the [[ring of sections]]<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch. II, Excercise 5.14}}</ref> | |||
::<math>\bigoplus\nolimits_{n \ge 0} \operatorname{H}^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(n)).</math> | |||
== Equivalent definitions == | |||
{{see also|Integrally closed domain}} | |||
Let ''B'' be a ring, and let ''A'' be a subring of ''B''. Given an element ''b'' in ''B'', the following conditions are equivalent: | |||
:*(i) ''b'' is integral over ''A''; | |||
:*(ii) the subring ''A''[''b''] of ''B'' generated by ''A'' and ''b'' is a [[Finitely generated module|finitely generated ''A''-module]]; | |||
:*(iii) there exists a subring ''C'' of ''B'' containing ''A''[''b''] and which is a finitely-generated ''A''-module; | |||
:*(iv) there exists a finitely generated ''A''-submodule ''M'' of ''B'' with ''bM'' ⊂ ''M'' and the [[Annihilator (ring theory)|annihilator]] of ''M'' in ''B'' is zero. | |||
The usual proof of this uses the following variant of the [[Cayley–Hamilton theorem]] on [[determinant]]s (or simply [[Cramer's rule]].) | |||
:'''Theorem''' Let ''u'' be an [[endomorphism]] of an ''A''-module ''M'' generated by ''n'' elements and ''I'' an ideal of ''A'' such that <math>u(M) \subset IM</math>. Then there is a relation: | |||
:: <math>u^n + a_1 u^{n-1} + \cdots + a_{n-1} u + a_n = 0, a_i \in I^i.</math> | |||
This theorem (with ''I'' = ''A'' and ''u'' multiplication by ''b'') gives (iv) ⇒ (i) and the rest is easy. Coincidentally, [[Nakayama's lemma]] is also an immediate consequence of this theorem. | |||
It follows from the above that the set of elements of ''B'' that are integral over ''A'' forms a subring of ''B'' containing ''A''. (Indeed, if ''x'', ''y'' are elements of ''B'' that are integral over ''A'', then <math>x + y, xy, -x</math> are integral over ''A'' since they stabilize <math>A[x]A[y]</math>, which is a finitely generated module over ''A'' and is annihilated only by zero.) It is called the '''integral closure''' of ''A'' in ''B''. <ref>The proof is due to Dedekind (Milne, ANT). Alternatively, one can use symmetric polynomials to show integral elements form a ring. (loc cit.)</ref> If ''A'' happens to be the integral closure of ''A'' in ''B'', then ''A'' is said to be '''integrally closed''' in ''B''. If ''B'' is the [[total ring of fractions]] of ''A'' (e.g., the field of fractions when ''A'' is an integral domain), then one sometimes drops qualification "in B" and simply says "integral closure" and "[[integrally closed domain|integrally closed]]."<ref>Chapter 2 of [[#Reference-idHS2006|Huneke and Swanson 2006]]</ref> Let ''A'' be an integral domain with the field of fractions ''K'' and ''A' '' the integral closure of ''A'' in an algebraic field extension ''L'' of ''K''. Then the field of fractions of ''A' '' is ''L''. In particular, ''A' '' is an [[integrally closed domain]]. | |||
Similarly, "integrality" is transitive. Let ''C'' be a ring containing ''B'' and ''c'' in ''C''. If ''c'' is integral over ''B'' and ''B'' integral over ''A'', then ''c'' is integral over ''A''. In particular, if ''C'' is itself integral over ''B'' and ''B'' is integral over ''A'', then ''C'' is also integral over ''A''. | |||
Note that (iii) implies that if ''B'' is integral over ''A'', then ''B'' is a union (equivalently an [[inductive limit]]) of subrings that are finitely generated ''A''-modules. | |||
If ''A'' is [[Noetherian ring|noetherian]], (iii) can be weakened to: | |||
:(iii) bis There exists a finitely generated ''A''-submodule of ''B'' that contains ''A''[''b'']. | |||
Finally, the assumption that ''A'' be a subring of ''B'' can be modified a bit. If ''f'': ''A'' → ''B'' is a [[ring homomorphism]], then one says ''f'' is '''integral''' if ''B'' is integral over ''f''(''A''). In the same way one says ''f'' is '''finite''' (''B'' finitely generated ''A''-module) or of '''finite type''' (''B'' finitely generated ''A''-algebra). In this viewpoint, one says that | |||
:''f'' is finite if and only if ''f'' is integral and of finite-type. | |||
Or more explicitly, | |||
:''B'' is a finitely generated ''A''-module if and only if ''B'' is generated as ''A''-algebra by a finite number of elements integral over ''A''. | |||
== Integral extensions == | |||
An integral extension ''A''⊆''B'' has the [[Going up and going down|going-up property]], the [[lying over]] property, and the [[Going up and going down#Lying over and incomparability|incomparability]] property ([[Cohen-Seidenberg theorems]]). Explicitly, given a chain of prime ideals <math>\mathfrak{p}_1 \subset \cdots \subset \mathfrak{p}_n</math> | |||
in ''A'' there exists a <math>\mathfrak{p}'_1 \subset \cdots \subset \mathfrak{p}'_n</math> in ''B'' with <math>\mathfrak{p}_i = \mathfrak{p}'_i \cap A</math> (going-up and lying over) and two distinct prime ideals with inclusion relation cannot contract to the same prime ideal (incomparability). In particular, the [[Krull dimension]]s of ''A'' and ''B'' are the same. Furthermore, if ''A'' is an integrally closed domain, then the going-down holds (see below). | |||
In general, the going-up implies the lying-over.<ref>{{harvnb|Kaplansky|1970|loc=Theorem 42}}</ref> Thus, in the below, we simply say the "going-up" to mean "going-up" and "lying-over". | |||
When ''A'', ''B'' are domains such that ''B'' is integral over ''A'', ''A'' is a field if and only if ''B'' is a field. As a corollary, one has: given a prime ideal <math>\mathfrak{q}</math> of ''B'', <math>\mathfrak{q}</math> is a [[maximal ideal]] of ''B'' if and only if <math>\mathfrak{q} \cap A</math> is a maximal ideal of ''A''. Another corollary: if ''L''/''K'' is an algebraic extension, then any subring of ''L'' containing ''K'' is a field. | |||
Let ''B'' be a ring that is integral over a subring ''A'' and ''k'' an algebraically closed field. If <math>f: A \to k</math> is a homomorphism, then ''f'' extends to a homomorphism ''B'' → ''k''.<ref>{{harvnb|Bourbaki|2006|loc=Ch 5, §2, Corollary 4 to Theorem 1.}}</ref> This follows from the going-up. | |||
Let <math>f: A \to B</math> be an integral extension of rings. Then the induced map | |||
:<math>f^\#: \operatorname{Spec} B \to \operatorname{Spec} A, \quad p \mapsto f^{-1}(p)</math> | |||
is a [[closed map]]; in fact, <math>f^\#(V(I)) = V(f^{-1}(I))</math> for any ideal ''I'' and <math>f^\#</math> is surjective if ''f'' is injective. This is a geometric interpretation of the going-up. | |||
If ''B'' is integral over ''A'', then <math>B \otimes_A R</math> is integral over ''R'' for any ''A''-algebra ''R''.<ref>{{harvnb|Bourbaki|2006|loc=Ch 5, §1, Proposition 5}}</ref> In particular, <math>\operatorname{Spec} (B \otimes_A R) \to \operatorname{Spec} R</math> is closed; i.e., the integral extension induces a "universally closed" map. This leads to a geometric characterization of integral extension. Namely, let ''B'' be a ring with only finitely many [[minimal prime ideal]]s (e.g., integral domain or noetherian ring). Then ''B'' is integral over a (subring) ''A'' if and only if <math>\operatorname{Spec} (B \otimes_A R) \to \operatorname{Spec} R</math> | |||
is closed for any ''A''-algebra ''R''.<ref>{{harvnb|Atiyah-MacDonald|1969|loc=Ch 5. Exercise 35}}</ref> | |||
Let ''A'' be an integrally closed domain with the field of fractions ''K'', ''L'' a finite [[normal extension]] of ''K'', ''B'' the integral closure of ''A'' in ''L''. Then the group <math>G = \operatorname{Gal}(L/K)</math> acts transitively on each fiber of <math>\operatorname{Spec} B \to \operatorname{Spec} A</math>. (Proof: Suppose <math>\mathfrak{p}_2 \ne \sigma(\mathfrak{p}_1)</math> for any <math>\sigma</math> in ''G''. Then, by [[prime avoidance]], there is an element ''x'' in <math>\mathfrak{p}_2</math> such that <math>\sigma(x) \not\in \mathfrak{p}_1</math> for any <math>\sigma</math>. ''G'' fixes the element <math>y = \prod_{\sigma} \sigma(x)</math> and thus ''y'' is [[purely inseparable]] over ''K''. Then some power <math>y^e</math> belongs to ''K''; in fact, to ''A'' since ''A'' is integrally closed. Thus, we found <math>y^e</math> is in <math>\mathfrak{p}_2 \cap A</math> but not in <math>\mathfrak{p}_1 \cap A</math>; i.e., <math>\mathfrak{p}_1 \cap A \ne \mathfrak{p}_2 \cap A</math>.) | |||
Remark: The same idea in the proof shows that if <math>L/K</math> is a purely inseparable extension (need not be normal), then <math>\operatorname{Spec} B \to \operatorname{Spec} A</math> is bijective. | |||
Let ''A'', ''K'', etc. as before but assume ''L'' is only a finite field extension of ''K''. Then | |||
:(i) <math>\operatorname{Spec} B \to \operatorname{Spec} A</math> has finite fibers. | |||
:(ii) the going-down holds between ''A'' and ''B'': given <math>\mathfrak{p}_1 \subset \cdots \subset \mathfrak{p}_n = \mathfrak{p}'_n \cap A</math>, there exists <math>\mathfrak{p}'_1 \subset \cdots \subset \mathfrak{p}'_n</math> that contracts to it. | |||
Indeed, in both statements, by enlarging ''L'', we can assume ''L'' is a normal extension. Then (i) is immediate. As for (ii), by the going-up, we can find a chain <math>\mathfrak{p}''_i</math> that contracts to <math>\mathfrak{p}'_i</math>. By transitivity, there is <math>\sigma \in G</math> such that <math>\sigma(\mathfrak{p}''_n) = \mathfrak{p}'_n</math> and then <math>\mathfrak{p}'_i = \sigma(\mathfrak{p}''_i)</math> are the desired chain. | |||
Let ''B'' be a ring and ''A'' a subring that is a noetherian integrally closed domain (i.e., <math>\operatorname{Spec} A</math> is a [[normal scheme]].) If ''B'' is integral over ''A'', then <math>\operatorname{Spec} B \to \operatorname{Spec} A</math> is [[submersion (algebra)|submersive]]; i.e., the topology of <math>\operatorname{Spec} A</math> is the [[quotient topology]].<ref>{{harvnb|Matsumura|1970|loc=Ch 2. Theorem 7}}</ref> The proof uses the notion of [[constructible set (topology)|constructible set]]s. | |||
== Integral closure == | |||
{{see also|Integral closure of an ideal}} | |||
Let ''A'' ⊂ ''B'' be rings and ''A' '' the integral closure of ''A'' in ''B''. (See above for the definition.) | |||
Integral closures behave nicely under various constructions. Specifically, for a [[multiplicatively closed subset]] ''S'' of ''A'', the [[Localization of a ring|localization]] ''S''<sup>−1</sup>''A' '' is the integral closure of ''S''<sup>−1</sup>''A'' in ''S''<sup>−1</sup>''B'', and <math>A'[t]</math> is the integral closure of <math>A[t]</math> in <math>B[t]</math>.<ref>An exercise in Atiyah–MacDonald.</ref> If <math>A_i</math> are subrings of rings <math>B_i, 1 \le i \le n</math>, then the integral closure of <math>\prod A_i</math> in <math>\prod B_i</math> is <math>\prod {A_i}'</math> where <math>{A_i}'</math> are the integral closures of <math>A_i</math> in <math>B_i</math>.<ref>{{harvnb|Bourbaki|2006|loc=Ch 5, §1, Proposition 9}}</ref> | |||
The integral closure of a local ring ''A'' in, say, ''B'', need not be local. (If this is the case, the ring is called [[Unibranch local ring|unibranch]].) This is the case for example when ''A'' is [[Henselian ring|Henselian]] and ''B'' is a field extension of the field of fractions of ''A''. | |||
If ''A'' is a subring of a field ''K'', then the integral closure of ''A'' in ''K'' is the intersection of all [[valuation ring]]s of ''K'' containing ''A''. | |||
Let ''B'' be a <math>\mathbb{N}</math>-graded subring of a <math>\mathbb{N}</math>-[[graded ring]] ''A''. Then the integral closure of ''A'' in ''B'' is a <math>\mathbb{N}</math>-graded subring of ''B''.<ref>Proof: Let <math>\phi: B \to B[t]</math> be a ring homomorphism such that <math>\phi(b_n) = b_n t^n</math> if <math>b_n</math> is homogeneous of degree ''n''. The integral closure of <math>A[t]</math> in <math>B[t]</math> is <math>A'[t]</math>, where <math>A'</math> is the integral closure of ''A'' in ''B''. If ''b'' in ''B'' is integral over ''A'', then <math>\phi(b)</math> is integral over <math>A[t]</math>; i.e., it is in <math>A'[t]</math>. That is, each coefficient <math>b_n</math> in the polynomial <math>\phi(b)</math> is in ''A<nowiki>'</nowiki>''.</ref> | |||
There is also a concept of the [[integral closure of an ideal]]. The integral closure of an ideal <math>I \subset R</math>, usually denoted by <math>\overline I</math>, is the set of all elements <math>r \in R</math> such that there exists a monic polynomial | |||
:<math>x^n + a_{1} x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_{n-1} x^1 + a_n</math> | |||
with <math>a_i \in I^i</math> with ''r'' as a root. Note this is the definition that appears, for example, in Eisenbud and is different from Bourbaki's and Atiyah–MacDonald's definition.<!--The integral closure of an ideal is easily seen to be in the [[radical of an ideal|radical]] of this ideal. dubious?--> | |||
For noetherian rings, there are alternate definitions as well. | |||
*<math>r \in \overline I</math> if there exists a <math>c \in R</math> not contained in any minimal prime, such that <math>c r^n \in I^n</math> for all <math>n \ge 1</math>. | |||
*<math> r \in \overline I</math> if in the normalized blow-up of ''I'', the pull back of ''r'' is contained in the inverse image of ''I''. The blow-up of an ideal is an operation of schemes which replaces the given ideal with a principal ideal. The normalization of a scheme is simply the scheme corresponding to the integral closure of all of its rings. | |||
The notion of integral closure of an ideal is used in some proofs of the [[Going up and going down|going-down theorem]]. | |||
== Conductor == | |||
Let ''B'' be a ring and ''A'' a subring of ''B'' such that ''B'' is integral over ''A''. Then the [[annihilator (ring theory)|annihilator]] of the ''A''-module ''B''/''A'' is called the ''conductor'' of ''A'' in ''B''. Because the notion has origin in [[algebraic number theory]], the conductor is denoted by <math>\mathfrak{f} = \mathfrak{f}(B/A)</math>. Explicitly, <math>\mathfrak{f}</math> consists of elements ''a'' in ''A'' such that <math>aB \subset A</math>. (cf. [[idealizer]] in abstract algebra.) It is the largest [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]] of ''A'' that is also an ideal of ''B''.<ref>Chapter 12 of [[#Reference-idHS2006|Huneke and Swanson 2006]]</ref> If ''S'' is a multiplicatively closed subset of ''A'', then | |||
:<math>S^{-1}\mathfrak{f}(B/A) = \mathfrak{f}(S^{-1}B/S^{-1}A)</math>. | |||
If ''B'' is a subring of the [[total ring of fractions]] of ''A'', then we may identify | |||
:<math>\ \mathfrak{f}(B/A)=\operatorname{Hom}_A(B, A)</math>. | |||
Example: Let ''k'' be a field and let <math>A = k[t^2, t^3] \subset B = k[t]</math> (i.e., ''A'' is the coordinate ring of the affine curve <math>x^2 = y^3</math>.) ''B'' is the integral closure of ''A'' in <math>k(t)</math>. The conductor of ''A'' in ''B'' is the ideal <math>(t^2, t^3) A</math>. More generally, the conductor of <math>A = k[[t^a, t^b]]</math>, ''a'', ''b'' relatively prime, is <math>(t^c, t^{c+1}, \dots) A</math> with <math>c = (a-1)(b-1)</math>.<ref>{{harvnb|Swanson|2006|loc=Example 12.2.1}}</ref> | |||
Suppose ''B'' is the integral closure of an integral domain ''A'' in the field of fractions of ''A'' such that the ''A''-module <math>B/A</math> is finitely generated. Then the conductor <math>\mathfrak{f}</math> of ''A'' is an ideal defining the [[support of a module|support of]] <math>B/A</math>; thus, ''A'' coincides with ''B'' in the complement of <math>V(\mathfrak{f})</math> in <math>\operatorname{Spec}A</math>. In particular, the set <math>\{ \mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{Spec}A | A_\mathfrak{p} \text{ is integrally closed} \}</math>, the complement of <math>V(\mathfrak{f})</math>, is an open set. | |||
== Finiteness of integral closure == | |||
An important but difficult question is on the finiteness of the integral closure of a finitely generated algebra. There are several known results. | |||
The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of the field of fractions is a Dedekind domain; in particular, a noetherian ring. This is a consequence of the [[Krull–Akizuki theorem]]. In general, the integral closure of a noetherian domain of dimension at most 2 is noetherian; Nagata gave an example of dimension 3 noetherian domain whose integral closure is not noetherian.<ref>{{harvnb|Swanson|2006|loc=Exercise 4.9}}</ref> A nicer statement is this: the integral closure of a noetherian domain is a [[Krull domain]] ([[Mori–Nagata theorem]]). Nagata also gave an example of dimension 1 noetherian local domain such that the integral closure is not finite over that domain.{{fact|date=August 2013}} | |||
Let ''A'' be a noetherian integrally closed domain with field of fractions ''K''. If ''L''/''K'' is a finite separable extension, then the integral closure <math>A'</math> of ''A'' in ''L'' is a finitely generated ''A''-module.<ref>{{harvnb|Atiyah-MacDonald|1969|loc=Ch 5. Proposition 5.17}}</ref> This is easy and standard (uses the fact that the trace defines a non-degenerate bilinear form.) | |||
Let ''A'' be a finitely generated algebra over a field ''k'' that is an integral domain with field of fractions ''K''. If ''L'' is a finite extension of ''K'', then the integral closure <math>A'</math> of ''A'' in ''L'' is a finitely generated ''A''-module and is also a finitely generated ''k''-algebra.<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch I. Theorem 3.9 A}}</ref> The result is due to Noether and can be shown using the [[Noether normalization lemma]] as follows. It is clear that it is enough to show the assertion when ''L''/''K'' is either separable or purely inseparable. The separable case is noted above; thus, assume ''L''/''K'' is purely inseparable. By the normalization lemma, ''A'' is integral over the polynomial ring <math>S = k[x_1, ..., x_d]</math>. Since ''L''/''K'' is a finite purely inseparable extension, there is a power ''q'' of a prime number such that every element of ''L'' is a ''q''-th root of an element in ''K''. Let <math>k'</math> be a finite extension of ''k'' containing all ''q''-th roots of coefficients of finitely many rational functions that generate ''L''. Then we have: <math>L \subset k'(x_1^{1/q}, ..., x_d^{1/q}).</math> The ring on the right is the field of fractions of <math>k'[x_1^{1/q}, ..., x_d^{1/q}]</math>, which is the integral closure of ''S''; thus, contains <math>A'</math>. Hence, <math>A'</math> is finite over ''S''; a fortiori, over ''A''. The result remains true if we replace ''k'' by '''Z'''. | |||
The integral closure of a complete local noetherian domain ''A'' in a finite extension of the field of fractions of ''A'' is finite over ''A''.<ref>{{harvnb|Swanson|2006|loc=Theorem 4.3.4}}</ref> More precisely, for a local noetherian ring ''R'', we have the following chains of implications:<ref>{{harvnb|Matsumura|1970|loc=Ch 12}}</ref> | |||
:(i) ''A'' complete <math>\Rightarrow</math> ''A'' is a [[Nagata ring]] | |||
:(ii) ''A'' is a Nagata domain <math>\Rightarrow</math> ''A'' [[analytically unramified]] <math>\Rightarrow</math> the integral closure of the completion <math>\widehat{A}</math> is finite over <math>\widehat{A}</math> <math>\Rightarrow</math> the integral closure of ''A'' is finite over A. | |||
==Noether's normalization lemma== | |||
{{main|Noether normalization lemma}} | |||
Noether's normalisation lemma is a theorem in [[commutative algebra]]. Given a field ''K'' and a finitely generated ''K''-algebra ''A'', the theorem says it is possible to find elements ''y''<sub>1</sub>, ''y''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''y''<sub>''m''</sub> in ''A'' that are algebraically independent over ''K'' such that ''A'' is finite (and hence integral) over ''B'' = ''K''[''y''<sub>1</sub>,..., ''y''<sub>''m''</sub>]. Thus the extension ''K'' ⊂ ''A'' can be written as a composite ''K'' ⊂ ''B'' ⊂ ''A'' where ''K'' ⊂ ''B'' is a purely transcendental extension and ''B'' ⊂ ''A'' is finite.<ref>Chapter 4 of Reid.</ref> | |||
== Notes == | |||
<references/> | |||
== References == | |||
*[[Michael Atiyah|M. Atiyah]], [[Ian G. Macdonald|I.G. Macdonald]], ''Introduction to Commutative Algebra'', [[Addison–Wesley]], 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5 | |||
*[[Nicolas Bourbaki]], ''[[Algèbre commutative]]'', 2006. | |||
* [[David Eisenbud|Eisenbud, David]], ''Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry'', Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995, ISBN 0-387-94268-8. | |||
* {{cite book | last = Kaplansky | first = Irving | title = Commutative Rings | |||
| series = Lectures in Mathematics |date=September 1974 | |||
| publisher = [[University of Chicago Press]] | isbn = 0-226-42454-5 }} | |||
*{{Hartshorne AG}} | |||
* {{citation | last1=Matsumura |first1=H |title=Commutative algebra |year=1970}} | |||
* H. Matsumura ''Commutative ring theory.'' Translated from the Japanese by M. Reid. Second edition. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 8. | |||
* [[James Milne (mathematician)|J. S. Milne]], "Algebraic number theory." available at http://www.jmilne.org/math/ | |||
* {{Citation | ref=Reference-idHS2006 | last=Huneke | first=Craig | last2=Swanson | first2=Irena | title=Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules | url=http://people.reed.edu/~iswanson/book/index.html | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | location=Cambridge, UK | series=London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series | isbn=978-0-521-68860-4 | mr=2266432 | year=2006 | volume=336 }} | |||
* [[Miles Reid|M. Reid]], ''Undergraduate Commutative Algebra'', London Mathematical Society, '''29''', Cambridge University Press, 1995. | |||
== Further reading == | |||
*Irena Swanson, [http://people.reed.edu/~iswanson/trieste.pdf Integral closures of ideals and rings] | |||
[[Category:Commutative algebra]] | |||
[[Category:Ring theory]] | |||
[[Category:Algebraic structures]] |
Revision as of 01:35, 24 January 2014
In commutative algebra, an element b of a commutative ring B is said to be integral over A, a subring of B, if there is an n ≥ 1 and such that
That is to say, b is a root of a monic polynomial over A.[1] If every element of B is integral over A, then it is said that B is integral over A, or equivalently B is an integral extension of A.
If A, B are fields, then the notions of "integral over" and of an "integral extension" are precisely "algebraic over" and "algebraic extensions" in field theory (since the root of any polynomial is the root of a monic polynomial). The special case of greatest interest in number theory is that of complex numbers integral over Z; in this context, they are usually called algebraic integers (e.g., ). The algebraic integers in a finite extension field k of the rationals Q form a subring of k, called the ring of integers of k, a central object in algebraic number theory.
The set of elements of B that are integral over A is called the integral closure of A in B. It is a subring of B containing A.
In this article, the term ring will be understood to mean commutative ring with a unity.
Examples
- Integers are the only elements of Q that are integral over Z. In other words, Z is the integral closure of Z in Q.
- Gaussian integers, complex numbers of the form , are integral over Z. is then the integral closure of Z in .
- The integral closure of Z in consists of elements of form ; the last two are examples of quadratic integers.
- Let ζ be a root of unity. Then the integral closure of Z in the cyclotomic field Q(ζ) is Z[ζ].[2]
- The integral closure of Z in the field of complex numbers C is called the ring of algebraic integers.
- If is an algebraic closure of a field k, then is integral over
- Let a finite group G act on a ring A. Then A is integral over AG the set of elements fixed by G. see ring of invariants.
- The roots of unity and nilpotent elements in any ring are integral over Z.
- Let R be a ring and u a unit in a ring containing R. Then[3]
- The integral closure of C[[x]] in a finite extension of C((x)) is of the form (cf. Puiseux series)Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.
- The integral closure of the homogeneous coordinate ring of a normal projective variety X is the ring of sections[4]
Equivalent definitions
DTZ's public sale group in Singapore auctions all forms of residential, workplace and retail properties, outlets, homes, lodges, boarding homes, industrial buildings and development websites. Auctions are at present held as soon as a month.
We will not only get you a property at a rock-backside price but also in an space that you've got longed for. You simply must chill out back after giving us the accountability. We will assure you 100% satisfaction. Since we now have been working in the Singapore actual property market for a very long time, we know the place you may get the best property at the right price. You will also be extremely benefited by choosing us, as we may even let you know about the precise time to invest in the Singapore actual property market.
The Hexacube is offering new ec launch singapore business property for sale Singapore investors want to contemplate. Residents of the realm will likely appreciate that they'll customize the business area that they wish to purchase as properly. This venture represents one of the crucial expansive buildings offered in Singapore up to now. Many investors will possible want to try how they will customise the property that they do determine to buy by means of here. This location has offered folks the prospect that they should understand extra about how this course of can work as well.
Singapore has been beckoning to traders ever since the value of properties in Singapore started sky rocketing just a few years again. Many businesses have their places of work in Singapore and prefer to own their own workplace area within the country once they decide to have a everlasting office. Rentals in Singapore in the corporate sector can make sense for some time until a business has discovered a agency footing. Finding Commercial Property Singapore takes a variety of time and effort but might be very rewarding in the long term.
is changing into a rising pattern among Singaporeans as the standard of living is increasing over time and more Singaporeans have abundance of capital to invest on properties. Investing in the personal properties in Singapore I would like to applaud you for arising with such a book which covers the secrets and techniques and tips of among the profitable Singapore property buyers. I believe many novice investors will profit quite a bit from studying and making use of some of the tips shared by the gurus." – Woo Chee Hoe Special bonus for consumers of Secrets of Singapore Property Gurus Actually, I can't consider one other resource on the market that teaches you all the points above about Singapore property at such a low value. Can you? Condominium For Sale (D09) – Yong An Park For Lease
In 12 months 2013, c ommercial retails, shoebox residences and mass market properties continued to be the celebrities of the property market. Models are snapped up in report time and at document breaking prices. Builders are having fun with overwhelming demand and patrons need more. We feel that these segments of the property market are booming is a repercussion of the property cooling measures no.6 and no. 7. With additional buyer's stamp responsibility imposed on residential properties, buyers change their focus to commercial and industrial properties. I imagine every property purchasers need their property funding to understand in value.
Let B be a ring, and let A be a subring of B. Given an element b in B, the following conditions are equivalent:
- (i) b is integral over A;
- (ii) the subring A[b] of B generated by A and b is a finitely generated A-module;
- (iii) there exists a subring C of B containing A[b] and which is a finitely-generated A-module;
- (iv) there exists a finitely generated A-submodule M of B with bM ⊂ M and the annihilator of M in B is zero.
The usual proof of this uses the following variant of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem on determinants (or simply Cramer's rule.)
- Theorem Let u be an endomorphism of an A-module M generated by n elements and I an ideal of A such that . Then there is a relation:
This theorem (with I = A and u multiplication by b) gives (iv) ⇒ (i) and the rest is easy. Coincidentally, Nakayama's lemma is also an immediate consequence of this theorem.
It follows from the above that the set of elements of B that are integral over A forms a subring of B containing A. (Indeed, if x, y are elements of B that are integral over A, then are integral over A since they stabilize , which is a finitely generated module over A and is annihilated only by zero.) It is called the integral closure of A in B. [5] If A happens to be the integral closure of A in B, then A is said to be integrally closed in B. If B is the total ring of fractions of A (e.g., the field of fractions when A is an integral domain), then one sometimes drops qualification "in B" and simply says "integral closure" and "integrally closed."[6] Let A be an integral domain with the field of fractions K and A' the integral closure of A in an algebraic field extension L of K. Then the field of fractions of A' is L. In particular, A' is an integrally closed domain.
Similarly, "integrality" is transitive. Let C be a ring containing B and c in C. If c is integral over B and B integral over A, then c is integral over A. In particular, if C is itself integral over B and B is integral over A, then C is also integral over A.
Note that (iii) implies that if B is integral over A, then B is a union (equivalently an inductive limit) of subrings that are finitely generated A-modules.
If A is noetherian, (iii) can be weakened to:
- (iii) bis There exists a finitely generated A-submodule of B that contains A[b].
Finally, the assumption that A be a subring of B can be modified a bit. If f: A → B is a ring homomorphism, then one says f is integral if B is integral over f(A). In the same way one says f is finite (B finitely generated A-module) or of finite type (B finitely generated A-algebra). In this viewpoint, one says that
- f is finite if and only if f is integral and of finite-type.
Or more explicitly,
- B is a finitely generated A-module if and only if B is generated as A-algebra by a finite number of elements integral over A.
Integral extensions
An integral extension A⊆B has the going-up property, the lying over property, and the incomparability property (Cohen-Seidenberg theorems). Explicitly, given a chain of prime ideals in A there exists a in B with (going-up and lying over) and two distinct prime ideals with inclusion relation cannot contract to the same prime ideal (incomparability). In particular, the Krull dimensions of A and B are the same. Furthermore, if A is an integrally closed domain, then the going-down holds (see below).
In general, the going-up implies the lying-over.[7] Thus, in the below, we simply say the "going-up" to mean "going-up" and "lying-over".
When A, B are domains such that B is integral over A, A is a field if and only if B is a field. As a corollary, one has: given a prime ideal of B, is a maximal ideal of B if and only if is a maximal ideal of A. Another corollary: if L/K is an algebraic extension, then any subring of L containing K is a field.
Let B be a ring that is integral over a subring A and k an algebraically closed field. If is a homomorphism, then f extends to a homomorphism B → k.[8] This follows from the going-up.
Let be an integral extension of rings. Then the induced map
is a closed map; in fact, for any ideal I and is surjective if f is injective. This is a geometric interpretation of the going-up.
If B is integral over A, then is integral over R for any A-algebra R.[9] In particular, is closed; i.e., the integral extension induces a "universally closed" map. This leads to a geometric characterization of integral extension. Namely, let B be a ring with only finitely many minimal prime ideals (e.g., integral domain or noetherian ring). Then B is integral over a (subring) A if and only if is closed for any A-algebra R.[10]
Let A be an integrally closed domain with the field of fractions K, L a finite normal extension of K, B the integral closure of A in L. Then the group acts transitively on each fiber of . (Proof: Suppose for any in G. Then, by prime avoidance, there is an element x in such that for any . G fixes the element and thus y is purely inseparable over K. Then some power belongs to K; in fact, to A since A is integrally closed. Thus, we found is in but not in ; i.e., .)
Remark: The same idea in the proof shows that if is a purely inseparable extension (need not be normal), then is bijective.
Let A, K, etc. as before but assume L is only a finite field extension of K. Then
- (i) has finite fibers.
- (ii) the going-down holds between A and B: given , there exists that contracts to it.
Indeed, in both statements, by enlarging L, we can assume L is a normal extension. Then (i) is immediate. As for (ii), by the going-up, we can find a chain that contracts to . By transitivity, there is such that and then are the desired chain.
Let B be a ring and A a subring that is a noetherian integrally closed domain (i.e., is a normal scheme.) If B is integral over A, then is submersive; i.e., the topology of is the quotient topology.[11] The proof uses the notion of constructible sets.
Integral closure
DTZ's public sale group in Singapore auctions all forms of residential, workplace and retail properties, outlets, homes, lodges, boarding homes, industrial buildings and development websites. Auctions are at present held as soon as a month.
We will not only get you a property at a rock-backside price but also in an space that you've got longed for. You simply must chill out back after giving us the accountability. We will assure you 100% satisfaction. Since we now have been working in the Singapore actual property market for a very long time, we know the place you may get the best property at the right price. You will also be extremely benefited by choosing us, as we may even let you know about the precise time to invest in the Singapore actual property market.
The Hexacube is offering new ec launch singapore business property for sale Singapore investors want to contemplate. Residents of the realm will likely appreciate that they'll customize the business area that they wish to purchase as properly. This venture represents one of the crucial expansive buildings offered in Singapore up to now. Many investors will possible want to try how they will customise the property that they do determine to buy by means of here. This location has offered folks the prospect that they should understand extra about how this course of can work as well.
Singapore has been beckoning to traders ever since the value of properties in Singapore started sky rocketing just a few years again. Many businesses have their places of work in Singapore and prefer to own their own workplace area within the country once they decide to have a everlasting office. Rentals in Singapore in the corporate sector can make sense for some time until a business has discovered a agency footing. Finding Commercial Property Singapore takes a variety of time and effort but might be very rewarding in the long term.
is changing into a rising pattern among Singaporeans as the standard of living is increasing over time and more Singaporeans have abundance of capital to invest on properties. Investing in the personal properties in Singapore I would like to applaud you for arising with such a book which covers the secrets and techniques and tips of among the profitable Singapore property buyers. I believe many novice investors will profit quite a bit from studying and making use of some of the tips shared by the gurus." – Woo Chee Hoe Special bonus for consumers of Secrets of Singapore Property Gurus Actually, I can't consider one other resource on the market that teaches you all the points above about Singapore property at such a low value. Can you? Condominium For Sale (D09) – Yong An Park For Lease
In 12 months 2013, c ommercial retails, shoebox residences and mass market properties continued to be the celebrities of the property market. Models are snapped up in report time and at document breaking prices. Builders are having fun with overwhelming demand and patrons need more. We feel that these segments of the property market are booming is a repercussion of the property cooling measures no.6 and no. 7. With additional buyer's stamp responsibility imposed on residential properties, buyers change their focus to commercial and industrial properties. I imagine every property purchasers need their property funding to understand in value.
Let A ⊂ B be rings and A' the integral closure of A in B. (See above for the definition.)
Integral closures behave nicely under various constructions. Specifically, for a multiplicatively closed subset S of A, the localization S−1A' is the integral closure of S−1A in S−1B, and is the integral closure of in .[12] If are subrings of rings , then the integral closure of in is where are the integral closures of in .[13]
The integral closure of a local ring A in, say, B, need not be local. (If this is the case, the ring is called unibranch.) This is the case for example when A is Henselian and B is a field extension of the field of fractions of A.
If A is a subring of a field K, then the integral closure of A in K is the intersection of all valuation rings of K containing A.
Let B be a -graded subring of a -graded ring A. Then the integral closure of A in B is a -graded subring of B.[14]
There is also a concept of the integral closure of an ideal. The integral closure of an ideal , usually denoted by , is the set of all elements such that there exists a monic polynomial
with with r as a root. Note this is the definition that appears, for example, in Eisenbud and is different from Bourbaki's and Atiyah–MacDonald's definition.
For noetherian rings, there are alternate definitions as well.
- if in the normalized blow-up of I, the pull back of r is contained in the inverse image of I. The blow-up of an ideal is an operation of schemes which replaces the given ideal with a principal ideal. The normalization of a scheme is simply the scheme corresponding to the integral closure of all of its rings.
The notion of integral closure of an ideal is used in some proofs of the going-down theorem.
Conductor
Let B be a ring and A a subring of B such that B is integral over A. Then the annihilator of the A-module B/A is called the conductor of A in B. Because the notion has origin in algebraic number theory, the conductor is denoted by . Explicitly, consists of elements a in A such that . (cf. idealizer in abstract algebra.) It is the largest ideal of A that is also an ideal of B.[15] If S is a multiplicatively closed subset of A, then
If B is a subring of the total ring of fractions of A, then we may identify
Example: Let k be a field and let (i.e., A is the coordinate ring of the affine curve .) B is the integral closure of A in . The conductor of A in B is the ideal . More generally, the conductor of , a, b relatively prime, is with .[16]
Suppose B is the integral closure of an integral domain A in the field of fractions of A such that the A-module is finitely generated. Then the conductor of A is an ideal defining the support of ; thus, A coincides with B in the complement of in . In particular, the set , the complement of , is an open set.
Finiteness of integral closure
An important but difficult question is on the finiteness of the integral closure of a finitely generated algebra. There are several known results.
The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of the field of fractions is a Dedekind domain; in particular, a noetherian ring. This is a consequence of the Krull–Akizuki theorem. In general, the integral closure of a noetherian domain of dimension at most 2 is noetherian; Nagata gave an example of dimension 3 noetherian domain whose integral closure is not noetherian.[17] A nicer statement is this: the integral closure of a noetherian domain is a Krull domain (Mori–Nagata theorem). Nagata also gave an example of dimension 1 noetherian local domain such that the integral closure is not finite over that domain.Template:Fact
Let A be a noetherian integrally closed domain with field of fractions K. If L/K is a finite separable extension, then the integral closure of A in L is a finitely generated A-module.[18] This is easy and standard (uses the fact that the trace defines a non-degenerate bilinear form.)
Let A be a finitely generated algebra over a field k that is an integral domain with field of fractions K. If L is a finite extension of K, then the integral closure of A in L is a finitely generated A-module and is also a finitely generated k-algebra.[19] The result is due to Noether and can be shown using the Noether normalization lemma as follows. It is clear that it is enough to show the assertion when L/K is either separable or purely inseparable. The separable case is noted above; thus, assume L/K is purely inseparable. By the normalization lemma, A is integral over the polynomial ring . Since L/K is a finite purely inseparable extension, there is a power q of a prime number such that every element of L is a q-th root of an element in K. Let be a finite extension of k containing all q-th roots of coefficients of finitely many rational functions that generate L. Then we have: The ring on the right is the field of fractions of , which is the integral closure of S; thus, contains . Hence, is finite over S; a fortiori, over A. The result remains true if we replace k by Z.
The integral closure of a complete local noetherian domain A in a finite extension of the field of fractions of A is finite over A.[20] More precisely, for a local noetherian ring R, we have the following chains of implications:[21]
- (i) A complete A is a Nagata ring
- (ii) A is a Nagata domain A analytically unramified the integral closure of the completion is finite over the integral closure of A is finite over A.
Noether's normalization lemma
Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.
Noether's normalisation lemma is a theorem in commutative algebra. Given a field K and a finitely generated K-algebra A, the theorem says it is possible to find elements y1, y2, ..., ym in A that are algebraically independent over K such that A is finite (and hence integral) over B = K[y1,..., ym]. Thus the extension K ⊂ A can be written as a composite K ⊂ B ⊂ A where K ⊂ B is a purely transcendental extension and B ⊂ A is finite.[22]
Notes
- ↑ The above equation is sometimes called an integral equation and b is said to be integrally dependent on A (as opposed to algebraic dependent.)
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Kaplansky, 1.2. Exercise 4.
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ The proof is due to Dedekind (Milne, ANT). Alternatively, one can use symmetric polynomials to show integral elements form a ring. (loc cit.)
- ↑ Chapter 2 of Huneke and Swanson 2006
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ An exercise in Atiyah–MacDonald.
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Proof: Let be a ring homomorphism such that if is homogeneous of degree n. The integral closure of in is , where is the integral closure of A in B. If b in B is integral over A, then is integral over ; i.e., it is in . That is, each coefficient in the polynomial is in A'.
- ↑ Chapter 12 of Huneke and Swanson 2006
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Chapter 4 of Reid.
References
- M. Atiyah, I.G. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison–Wesley, 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5
- Nicolas Bourbaki, Algèbre commutative, 2006.
- Eisenbud, David, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995, ISBN 0-387-94268-8.
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
- Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.
Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.
In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.
Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region
Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.
15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.
To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010
- H. Matsumura Commutative ring theory. Translated from the Japanese by M. Reid. Second edition. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 8.
- J. S. Milne, "Algebraic number theory." available at http://www.jmilne.org/math/
- Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.
Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.
In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.
Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region
Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.
15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.
To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010
- M. Reid, Undergraduate Commutative Algebra, London Mathematical Society, 29, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Further reading
- Irena Swanson, Integral closures of ideals and rings