Cahn–Hilliard equation: Difference between revisions
en>FrescoBot m Bot: link syntax/spacing and minor changes |
en>Yobot m →References: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes - Replaced endash with hyphen in sortkey per WP:MCSTJR using AWB (9100) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the [[knot theory|mathematical theory of knots]], a '''satellite knot''' is a [[knot (mathematics)|knot]] that contains an [[incompressible surface|incompressible]], non-[[boundary parallel]] [[torus]] in its [[knot complement|complement]].<ref>Colin Adams, ''The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots'', (2001), ISBN 0-7167-4219-5</ref> Every knot is either hyperbolic, a torus, or a satellite knot. The class of satellite knots include [[prime knot|composite]] knots, '''cable knots''' and '''Whitehead doubles.''' (''See'' [[#Basic families|Basic families]], below for definitions of the last two classes.) | |||
[[Image:Sum of knots3.svg|thumb|right|Example 1: A connect-sum of a trefoil and figure-8 knot.]] | |||
A satellite knot <math>K</math> can be picturesquely described as follows: start by taking a nontrivial knot <math>K'</math> lying inside an unknotted solid torus <math>V</math>. Here "nontrivial" means that the knot <math>K'</math> is not allowed to sit inside of a 3-ball in <math>V</math> and <math>K'</math> is not allowed to be isotopic to the central core curve of the solid torus. Then tie up the solid torus into a nontrivial knot. [[Image:B sat2.png|thumb|right|Example 2: The Whitehead double of the figure-8.]] | |||
This means there is a non-trivial embedding <math>f:V \to S^3</math> and <math>K=f(K')</math>. The central core curve of the solid torus <math>V</math> is sent to a knot <math>H</math>, which is called the "companion knot" and is thought of as the planet around which the "satellite knot" <math>K</math> orbits.The construction ensures that <math>f(\partial V)</math> is a non-boundary parallel incompressible torus in the complement of <math>K</math>. Composite knots contain a certain kind of incompressible torus called a [[swallow-follow torus]], which can be visualized as swallowing one summand and following another summand. [[Image:B sat3.png|thumb|right|Example 3: A cable of a connect-sum.]] | |||
Since <math>V</math> is an unknotted solid torus, <math>S^3 \setminus V</math> is a tubular neighbourhood of an unknot <math>J</math>. The 2-component link <math>K' \cup J</math> together with the embedding <math>f</math> is called the '''pattern''' associated to the satellite operation. | |||
A convention: people usually demand that the embedding <math>f : V \to S^3</math> is '''untwisted''' in the sense that <math>f</math> must send the standard longitude of <math>V</math> to the standard longitude of <math>f(V)</math>. Said another way, given two disjoint curves <math>c_1,c_2 \subset V</math>, <math>f</math> must preserve their linking numbers i.e.: <math>lk(f(c_1),f(c_2))=lk(c_1,c_2)</math>. | |||
==Basic families== | |||
When <math>K' \subset \partial V</math> is a [[torus knot]], then <math>K</math> is called a ''cable knot.'' Examples 3 and 4 are cable knots. | |||
If <math>K'</math> is a non-trivial knot in <math>S^3</math> and if a compressing disc for <math>V</math> intersects <math>K'</math> in precisely one point, then <math>K</math> is called a ''connect-sum.'' Another way to say this is that the pattern <math>K' \cup J</math> is the connect-sum of a non-trivial knot <math>K'</math> with a Hopf link. | |||
If the link <math>K' \cup J</math> is the [[Whitehead link]], <math>K</math> is called a ''Whitehead double.'' If <math>f</math> is untwisted, <math>K</math> is called an untwisted Whitehead double. | |||
==Examples== | |||
Example 1: The connect-sum of a figure-8 knot and trefoil. | |||
Example 2: Untwisted Whitehead double of a figure-8. | |||
Example 3: Cable of a connect-sum. | |||
Example 4: Cable of trefoil. | |||
Examples 5 and 6 are variants on the same construction. They both have two non-parallel, non-boundary-parallel incompressible tori in their complements, splitting the complement into the union of three manifolds. In Example 5 those manifolds are: the [[Borromean rings]] complement, trefoil complement and figure-8 complement. In Example 6 the figure-8 complement is replaced by another trefoil complement. | |||
[[Image:B sat4.png|thumb|right|Example 4: A cable of a trefoil.]] | |||
[[Image:B sat1.png|thumb|right|Example 5: A knot which is a 2-fold satellite i.e.: it has non-parallel swallow-follow tori.]] | |||
[[Image:Knot with borromean rings in jsj decomp.png|thumb|right|Example 6: A knot which is a 2-fold satellite i.e.: it has non-parallel swallow-follow tori.]] | |||
==Origins== | |||
In 1949 <ref>Schubert, H. Die eindeutige Zerlegbarkeit eines Knotens in Primknoten. S.-B Heidelberger Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 1949 (1949), 57–104.</ref> [[Horst Schubert]] proved that every oriented knot in <math>S^3</math> decomposes as a connect-sum of prime knots in a unique way, up to reordering, making the monoid of oriented isotopy-classes of knots in <math>S^3</math> a free commutative monoid on countably-infinite many generators. Shortly after, he realized he could give a new proof of his theorem by a close analysis of the incompressible tori present in the complement of a connect-sum. This led him to study general incompressible tori in knot complements in his epic work ''Knoten und Vollringe'',<ref>Schubert, H. Knoten und Vollringe. Acta Math. 90 (1953), 131–286.</ref> where he defined satellite and companion knots. | |||
==Follow-up work== | |||
Schubert's demonstration that incompressible tori play a major role in knot theory was one several early insights leading to the unification of 3-manifold theory and knot theory. It attracted Waldhausen's attention, who later used incompressible surfaces to show that a large class of 3-manifolds are homeomorphic if and only if their fundamental groups are isomorphic.<ref>Waldhausen, F. On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large.Ann. of Math. (2) 87 (1968), 56–88.</ref> Waldhausen conjectured what is now the [[JSJ decomposition|Jaco–Shalen–Johannson-decomposition]] of 3-manifolds, which is a decomposition of 3-manifolds along spheres and incompressible tori. This later became a major ingredient in the development of [[Geometrization conjecture|geometrization]], which can be seen as a partial-classification of 3-dimensional manifolds. The ramifications for knot theory were first described in the long-unpublished manuscript of Bonahon and Siebenmann.<ref>F.Bonahon, L.Siebenmann, New Geometric Splittings of Classical Knots, and the Classification and Symmetries of Arborescent Knots, [http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~fbonahon/Research/Preprints/BonSieb.pdf]</ref> | |||
==Uniqueness of satellite decomposition== | |||
In ''Knoten und Vollringe'', Schubert proved that in some cases, there is essentially a unique way to express a knot as a satellite. But there are also many known examples where the decomposition is not unique.<ref>Motegi, K. Knot Types of Satellite Knots and Twisted Knots. Lectures at Knots '96. World Scientific.</ref> With a suitably enhanced notion of satellite operation called splicing, the [[JSJ decomposition]] gives a proper uniqueness theorem for satellite knots.<ref>Eisenbud, D. Neumann, W. Three-dimensional link theory and invariants of plane curve singularities. Ann. of Math. Stud. 110</ref><ref>Budney, R. JSJ-decompositions of knot and link complements in S^3. L'enseignement Mathematique 2e Serie Tome 52 Fasc. 3–4 (2006). arXiv:math.GT/0506523</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
*[[Hyperbolic knot]] | |||
*[[Torus knot]] | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
{{Knot theory|state=collapsed}} | |||
[[Category:Satellite knots and links| ]] |
Latest revision as of 15:06, 20 April 2013
In the mathematical theory of knots, a satellite knot is a knot that contains an incompressible, non-boundary parallel torus in its complement.[1] Every knot is either hyperbolic, a torus, or a satellite knot. The class of satellite knots include composite knots, cable knots and Whitehead doubles. (See Basic families, below for definitions of the last two classes.)
A satellite knot
can be picturesquely described as follows: start by taking a nontrivial knot
lying inside an unknotted solid torus
. Here "nontrivial" means that the knot
is not allowed to sit inside of a 3-ball in
and
is not allowed to be isotopic to the central core curve of the solid torus. Then tie up the solid torus into a nontrivial knot.
This means there is a non-trivial embedding
and
. The central core curve of the solid torus
is sent to a knot
, which is called the "companion knot" and is thought of as the planet around which the "satellite knot"
orbits.The construction ensures that
is a non-boundary parallel incompressible torus in the complement of
. Composite knots contain a certain kind of incompressible torus called a swallow-follow torus, which can be visualized as swallowing one summand and following another summand.
Since is an unknotted solid torus, is a tubular neighbourhood of an unknot . The 2-component link together with the embedding is called the pattern associated to the satellite operation.
A convention: people usually demand that the embedding is untwisted in the sense that must send the standard longitude of to the standard longitude of . Said another way, given two disjoint curves , must preserve their linking numbers i.e.: .
Basic families
When is a torus knot, then is called a cable knot. Examples 3 and 4 are cable knots.
If is a non-trivial knot in and if a compressing disc for intersects in precisely one point, then is called a connect-sum. Another way to say this is that the pattern is the connect-sum of a non-trivial knot with a Hopf link.
If the link is the Whitehead link, is called a Whitehead double. If is untwisted, is called an untwisted Whitehead double.
Examples
Example 1: The connect-sum of a figure-8 knot and trefoil.
Example 2: Untwisted Whitehead double of a figure-8.
Example 3: Cable of a connect-sum.
Example 4: Cable of trefoil.
Examples 5 and 6 are variants on the same construction. They both have two non-parallel, non-boundary-parallel incompressible tori in their complements, splitting the complement into the union of three manifolds. In Example 5 those manifolds are: the Borromean rings complement, trefoil complement and figure-8 complement. In Example 6 the figure-8 complement is replaced by another trefoil complement.
Origins
In 1949 [2] Horst Schubert proved that every oriented knot in decomposes as a connect-sum of prime knots in a unique way, up to reordering, making the monoid of oriented isotopy-classes of knots in a free commutative monoid on countably-infinite many generators. Shortly after, he realized he could give a new proof of his theorem by a close analysis of the incompressible tori present in the complement of a connect-sum. This led him to study general incompressible tori in knot complements in his epic work Knoten und Vollringe,[3] where he defined satellite and companion knots.
Follow-up work
Schubert's demonstration that incompressible tori play a major role in knot theory was one several early insights leading to the unification of 3-manifold theory and knot theory. It attracted Waldhausen's attention, who later used incompressible surfaces to show that a large class of 3-manifolds are homeomorphic if and only if their fundamental groups are isomorphic.[4] Waldhausen conjectured what is now the Jaco–Shalen–Johannson-decomposition of 3-manifolds, which is a decomposition of 3-manifolds along spheres and incompressible tori. This later became a major ingredient in the development of geometrization, which can be seen as a partial-classification of 3-dimensional manifolds. The ramifications for knot theory were first described in the long-unpublished manuscript of Bonahon and Siebenmann.[5]
Uniqueness of satellite decomposition
In Knoten und Vollringe, Schubert proved that in some cases, there is essentially a unique way to express a knot as a satellite. But there are also many known examples where the decomposition is not unique.[6] With a suitably enhanced notion of satellite operation called splicing, the JSJ decomposition gives a proper uniqueness theorem for satellite knots.[7][8]
See also
References
- ↑ Colin Adams, The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots, (2001), ISBN 0-7167-4219-5
- ↑ Schubert, H. Die eindeutige Zerlegbarkeit eines Knotens in Primknoten. S.-B Heidelberger Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 1949 (1949), 57–104.
- ↑ Schubert, H. Knoten und Vollringe. Acta Math. 90 (1953), 131–286.
- ↑ Waldhausen, F. On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large.Ann. of Math. (2) 87 (1968), 56–88.
- ↑ F.Bonahon, L.Siebenmann, New Geometric Splittings of Classical Knots, and the Classification and Symmetries of Arborescent Knots, [1]
- ↑ Motegi, K. Knot Types of Satellite Knots and Twisted Knots. Lectures at Knots '96. World Scientific.
- ↑ Eisenbud, D. Neumann, W. Three-dimensional link theory and invariants of plane curve singularities. Ann. of Math. Stud. 110
- ↑ Budney, R. JSJ-decompositions of knot and link complements in S^3. L'enseignement Mathematique 2e Serie Tome 52 Fasc. 3–4 (2006). arXiv:math.GT/0506523