Generalizations of Pauli matrices

In classical mechanics, Bertrand's theorem states that only two types of central force potentials produce stable, closed orbits: (1) an inverse-square central force such as the gravitational or electrostatic potential

$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{-k}{r},$

and (2) the radial harmonic oscillator potential

$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2}k{r}^2.$

The theorem was discovered by and named for Joseph Bertrand.

General preliminaries

All attractive central forces can produce circular orbits, which are naturally closed orbits. The only requirement is that the central force exactly equals the centripetal force, which determines the required angular velocity for a given circular radius. Non-central forces (i.e., those that depend on the angular variables as well as the radius) are ignored here, since they do not produce circular orbits in general.

The equation of motion for the radius r of a particle of mass m moving in a central potential V(r) is given by Lagrange's equations

$m\frac{d^{2}r}{d{t}^2}-mr{\omega }^2=m\frac{d^{2}r}{d{t}^2}-\frac{L^2}{m{r}^3}=-\frac{dV}{dr}$

where $\omega \equiv \frac{d\theta }{dt}$ and the angular momentum L = mr²ω is conserved. For illustration, the first term on the left-hand side is zero for circular orbits, and the applied inwards force $\frac{dV}{dr}$ equals the centripetal force requirement mrω², as expected.

The definition of angular momentum allows a change of independent variable from t to θ

$\frac{d}{dt}=\frac{L}{m{r}^2}\frac{d}{d\theta }$

giving the new equation of motion that is independent of time

$\frac{L}{r^2}\frac{d}{d\theta }\left(\frac{L}{m{r}^2}\frac{dr}{d\theta }\right)-\frac{L^2}{m{r}^3}=-\frac{dV}{dr}$

This equation becomes quasilinear on making the change of variables $u\equiv \frac{1}{r}$ and multiplying both sides by $\frac{m{r}^2}{L^2}$ (see also Binet equation)

$\frac{d^{2}u}{d{\theta }^2}+u=-\frac{m}{L^2}\frac{d}{du}V(1/u)$

Bertrand's theorem

As noted above, all central forces can produce circular orbits given an appropriate initial velocity. However, if some radial velocity is introduced, these orbits need not be stable (i.e., remain in orbit indefinitely) nor closed (repeatedly returning to exactly the same path). Here we show that stable, exactly closed orbits can be produced only with an inverse-square force or radial harmonic oscillator potential (a necessary condition). In the following sections, we show that those force laws do produce stable, exactly closed orbits (a sufficient condition).

Define J(u) as

$\frac{d^{2}u}{d{\theta }^2}+u=J(u)\equiv -\frac{m}{L^2}\frac{d}{du}V(1/u)=-\frac{m}{L^2{u}^2}f(1/u)$

where f represents the radial force. The criterion for perfectly circular motion at a radius r₀ is that the first term on the left-hand side be zero

where $u_0\equiv 1/r_0$.

The next step is to consider the equation for u under small perturbations $\eta \equiv u-u_0$ from perfectly circular orbits. On the right-hand side, the J function can be expanded in a standard Taylor series

$J(u)\approx J(u_0)+\eta J^{\prime }(u_0)+\frac{1}{2}{\eta }^2{J}^{\prime \prime }(u_0)+\frac{1}{6}{\eta }^3{J}^{\prime \prime \prime }(u_0)+\cdots$

Substituting this expansion into the equation for u and subtracting the constant terms yields

$\frac{d^2\eta }{d{\theta }^2}+\eta =\eta J^{\prime }(u_0)+\frac{1}{2}{\eta }^2{J}^{\prime \prime }(u_0)+\frac{1}{6}{\eta }^3{J}^{\prime \prime \prime }(u_0)+\cdots$

which can be written as

where ${\beta }^2\equiv 1-J^{\prime }(u_0)$ is a constant. β² must be non-negative; otherwise, the radius of the orbit would vary exponentially away from its initial radius. (The solution β = 0 corresponds to a perfectly circular orbit.) If the right-hand side may be neglected (i.e., for small perturbations), the solutions are

$\eta (\theta )=h_1\cos \left(\beta \theta \right)$

where the amplitude h₁ is a constant of integration. For the orbits to be closed, β must be a rational number. What's more, it must be the same rational number for all radii, since β cannot change continuously; the rational numbers are totally disconnected from one another. Using the definition of J along with equation (1),

$J^{\prime }(u_0)=\frac{2}{u_0}[\frac{m}{L^2{u}_0^2}f(1/u_0)]-[\frac{m}{L^2{u}_0^2}f(1/u_0)]\frac{1}{f(1/u_0)}\frac{df}{du}=-2+\frac{u_0}{f(1/u_0)}\frac{df}{du}=1-{\beta }^2$

where $\frac{df}{du}$ is evaluated at $(1/u_0)$. Since this must hold for any value of u₀,

$\frac{df}{dr}=({\beta }^2-3)\frac{f}{r}$

which implies that the force must follow a power law

$f(r)=-\frac{k}{r^{3-{\beta }^2}}$

Hence, J must have the general form

For more general deviations from circularity (i.e., when we cannot neglect the higher order terms in the Taylor expansion of J), η may be expanded in a Fourier series, e.g.,

$\eta (\theta )=h_0+h_1\cos \beta \theta +h_2\cos 2\beta \theta +h_3\cos 3\beta \theta +\cdots$

We substitute this into equation (2) and equate the coefficients belonging to the same frequency, keeping only the lowest order terms. As we show below, h₀ and h₂ are smaller than h₁, being of order $h_1^2$. h₃, and all further coefficients, are at least of order $h_1^3$. This makes sense since $h_0,h_2,h_3,\dots$ must all vanish faster than h₁ as a circular orbit is approached.

$h_0=h_1^2\frac{J^{\prime \prime }(u_0)}{4{\beta }^2}$

$h_2=-h_1^2\frac{J^{\prime \prime }(u_0)}{12{\beta }^2}$

$h_3=-\frac{1}{8{\beta }^2}[h_1{h}_2\frac{J^{\prime \prime }(u_0)}{2}+h_1^3\frac{J^{\prime \prime \prime }(u_0)}{24}]$

From the cos(βθ) term, we get

$0=(2h_1{h}_0+h_1{h}_2)\frac{J^{\prime \prime }(u_0)}{2}+h_1^3\frac{J^{\prime \prime \prime }(u_0)}{8}=\frac{h_1^3}{24{\beta }^2}(3{\beta }^2{J}^{\prime \prime \prime }(u_0)+5J^{\prime \prime }(u_0{)}^2)$

where in the last step we substituted in the values of h₀ and h₂.

Using equations (3) and (1), we can calculate the second and third derivatives of J evaluated at u₀,

$J^{\prime \prime }(u_0)=-\frac{{\beta }^2(1-{\beta }^2)}{u_0}$

$J^{\prime \prime \prime }(u_0)=\frac{{\beta }^2(1-{\beta }^2)(1+{\beta }^2)}{u_0^2}$

Substituting these values into the last equation yields the main result of Bertrand's theorem

${\beta }^2(1-{\beta }^2)(4-{\beta }^2)=0$

Hence, the only potentials that can produce stable, closed, non-circular orbits are the inverse-square force law (β = 1) and the radial harmonic oscillator potential (β = 2). The solution β = 0 corresponds to perfectly circular orbits, as noted above.

Inverse-square force (Kepler problem)

For an inverse-square force law such as the gravitational or electrostatic potential, the potential can be written

$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{-k}{r}=-ku$

The orbit u(θ) can be derived from the general equation

$\frac{d^{2}u}{d{\theta }^2}+u=-\frac{m}{L^2}\frac{d}{du}V(1/u)=\frac{km}{L^2}$

whose solution is the constant $\frac{km}{L^2}$ plus a simple sinusoid

$u\equiv \frac{1}{r}=\frac{km}{L^2}[1+e\cos (\theta -{\theta }_0)]$

where e (the eccentricity) and θ₀ (the phase offset) are constants of integration.

This is the general formula for a conic section that has one focus at the origin; e = 0 corresponds to a circle, e < 1 corresponds to an ellipse, e = 1 corresponds to a parabola, and e > 1 corresponds to a hyperbola. The eccentricity e is related to the total energy E (cf. the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector)

$e=\sqrt{1+\frac{2E{L}^2}{k^{2}m}}$

Comparing these formulae shows that E < 0 corresponds to an ellipse, E = 0 corresponds to a parabola, and E > 0 corresponds to a hyperbola. In particular, $E=-\frac{k^{2}m}{2L^2}$ for perfectly circular orbits.

Radial harmonic oscillator

To solve for the orbit under a radial harmonic oscillator potential, it's easier to work in components r = (x, y, z). The potential energy can be written

$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2}k{r}^2=\frac{1}{2}k(x^2+y^2+z^2)$

The equation of motion for a particle of mass m is given by three independent Lagrange's equations

$\frac{d^{2}x}{d{t}^2}+{\omega }_0^{2}x=0$

$\frac{d^{2}y}{d{t}^2}+{\omega }_0^{2}y=0$

$\frac{d^{2}z}{d{t}^2}+{\omega }_0^{2}z=0$

where the constant ${\omega }_0^2\equiv \frac{k}{m}$ must be positive (i.e., k > 0) to ensure bounded, closed orbits; otherwise, the particle will fly off to infinity. The solutions of these simple harmonic oscillator equations are all similar

$x=A_x\cos ({\omega }_{0}t+{\varphi }_x)$

$y=A_y\cos ({\omega }_{0}t+{\varphi }_y)$

$z=A_z\cos ({\omega }_{0}t+{\varphi }_z)$

where the positive constants A_x, A_y and A_z represent the amplitudes of the oscillations and the angles φ_x, φ_y and φ_z represent their phases. The resulting orbit r(t) = [x(t), y(y), z(t)] is closed because it repeats exactly after a period

$T\equiv \frac{2\pi }{{\omega }_0}$

The system is also stable because small perturbations in the amplitudes and phases cause correspondingly small changes in the overall orbit.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

Further reading

• 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
  
  My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
• Template:Cite web