Boolean domain: Difference between revisions
en>Incnis Mrsi I like Sierpiński space but it is offtopical (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Logic/Archive 2#False (logic), Boolean domain and Truth value). also,{{merge|Two-element Boolean algebra}} |
en>EmausBot m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:Q3269980 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The | In [[category theory]], a '''Kleisli category''' is a [[category (mathematics)|category]] naturally associated to any [[monad (category theory)|monad]] ''T''. It is equivalent to the [[Eilenberg–Moore category|category of free ''T''-algebras]]. The Kleisli category is one of two extremal solutions to the question ''Does every monad arise from an [[Adjunction (category theory)|adjunction]]?'' The other extremal solution is the [[Eilenberg–Moore category]]. Kleisli categories are named for the mathematician [[Heinrich Kleisli]]. | ||
==Formal definition== | |||
Let〈''T'', η, μ〉be a [[monad (category theory)|monad]] over a category ''C''. The '''Kleisli category''' of ''C'' is the category ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> whose objects and morphisms are given by | |||
:<math>\begin{align}\mathrm{Obj}({\mathcal{C}_T}) &= \mathrm{Obj}({\mathcal{C}}), \\ | |||
\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}_T}(X,Y) &= \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(X,TY).\end{align}</math> | |||
That is, every morphism ''f: X → T Y'' in ''C'' (with codomain ''TY'') can also be regarded as a morphism in ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> (but with codomain ''Y''). Composition of morphisms in ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> is given by | |||
:<math>g\circ_T f = \mu_Z \circ Tg \circ f</math> | |||
where ''f: X → T Y'' and ''g: Y → T Z''. The identity morphism is given by the monad unit η: | |||
:<math>\mathrm{id}_X = \eta_X</math>. | |||
An alternative way of writing this, which clarifies the category in which each object lives, is used by Mac Lane.<ref>Mac Lane(1998) p.147</ref> We use very slightly different notation for this presentation. Given the same monad and category <math>C</math> as above, we associate with each object <math>X</math> in <math>C</math> a new object <math>X_T</math>, and for each morphism <math>f:X\to TY</math> in <math>C</math> a morphism <math>f^*:X_T\to Y_T</math>. Together, these objects and morphisms form our category <math>C_T</math>, where we define | |||
:<math>g^*\circ_T f^* = (\mu_Z \circ Tg \circ f)^*.</math> | |||
Then the identity morphism in <math>C_T</math> is | |||
:<math>\mathrm{id}_{X_T} = (\eta_X)^*.</math> | |||
==Extension operators and Kleisli triples== | |||
Composition of Kleisli arrows can be expressed succinctly by means of the ''extension operator'' (-)* : Hom(''X'', ''TY'') → Hom(''TX'', ''TY''). Given a monad 〈''T'', η, μ〉over a category ''C'' and a morphism ''f'' : ''X'' → ''TY'' let | |||
:<math>f^* = \mu_Y\circ Tf.</math> | |||
Composition in the Kleisli category ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> can then be written | |||
:<math>g\circ_T f = g^* \circ f.</math> | |||
The extension operator satisfies the identities: | |||
:<math>\begin{align}\eta_X^* &= \mathrm{id}_{TX}\\ | |||
f^*\circ\eta_X &= f\\ | |||
(g^*\circ f)^* &= g^* \circ f^*\end{align}</math> | |||
where ''f'' : ''X'' → ''TY'' and ''g'' : ''Y'' → ''TZ''. It follows trivially from these properties that Kleisli composition is associative and that η<sub>''X''</sub> is the identity. | |||
In fact, to give a monad is to give a ''Kleisli triple'', i.e. | |||
* A function <math>T:\mathrm{ob}(C)\to \mathrm{ob}(C)</math>; | |||
* For each object <math>A</math> in <math>C</math>, a morphism <math>\eta_A:A\to T(A)</math>; | |||
* For each morphism <math>f:A\to T(B)</math> in <math>C</math>, a morphism <math>f^*:T(A)\to T(B)</math> | |||
such that the above three equations for extension operators are satisfied. | |||
==Kleisli adjunction== | |||
Kleisli categories were originally defined in order to show that every monad arises from an adjunction. That construction is as follows. | |||
Let〈''T'', η, μ〉be a monad over a category ''C'' and let ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> be the associated Kleisli category. Define a functor ''F'' : ''C'' → ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> by | |||
:<math>FX = X\;</math> | |||
:<math>F(f : X \to Y) = \eta_Y \circ f</math> | |||
and a functor ''G'' : ''C''<sub>''T''</sub> → ''C'' by | |||
:<math>GY = TY\;</math> | |||
:<math>G(f : X \to TY) = \mu_Y \circ Tf\;</math> | |||
One can show that ''F'' and ''G'' are indeed functors and that ''F'' is left adjoint to ''G''. The counit of the adjunction is given by | |||
:<math>\varepsilon_Y = \mathrm{id}_{TY}.</math> | |||
Finally, one can show that ''T'' = ''GF'' and μ = ''G''ε''F'' so that 〈''T'', η, μ〉is the monad associated to the adjunction 〈''F'', ''G'', η, ε〉. | |||
==External links== | |||
* {{nlab|id=Kleisli+category|title=Kleisli category}} | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
* {{cite book | last=Mac Lane | first=Saunders | authorlink=Saunders Mac Lane | title=[[Categories for the Working Mathematician]] | edition=2nd | series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]] | volume=5 | location=New York, NY | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=1998 | isbn=0-387-98403-8 | zbl=0906.18001 }} | |||
* {{cite book | editor1-last=Pedicchio | editor1-first=Maria Cristina | editor2-last=Tholen | editor2-first=Walter | title=Categorical foundations. Special topics in order, topology, algebra, and sheaf theory | series=Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications | volume=97 | location=Cambridge | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | year=2004 | isbn=0-521-83414-7 | zbl=1034.18001 }} | |||
[[Category:Adjoint functors]] |
Revision as of 18:54, 17 April 2013
In category theory, a Kleisli category is a category naturally associated to any monad T. It is equivalent to the category of free T-algebras. The Kleisli category is one of two extremal solutions to the question Does every monad arise from an adjunction? The other extremal solution is the Eilenberg–Moore category. Kleisli categories are named for the mathematician Heinrich Kleisli.
Formal definition
Let〈T, η, μ〉be a monad over a category C. The Kleisli category of C is the category CT whose objects and morphisms are given by
That is, every morphism f: X → T Y in C (with codomain TY) can also be regarded as a morphism in CT (but with codomain Y). Composition of morphisms in CT is given by
where f: X → T Y and g: Y → T Z. The identity morphism is given by the monad unit η:
An alternative way of writing this, which clarifies the category in which each object lives, is used by Mac Lane.[1] We use very slightly different notation for this presentation. Given the same monad and category as above, we associate with each object in a new object , and for each morphism in a morphism . Together, these objects and morphisms form our category , where we define
Then the identity morphism in is
Extension operators and Kleisli triples
Composition of Kleisli arrows can be expressed succinctly by means of the extension operator (-)* : Hom(X, TY) → Hom(TX, TY). Given a monad 〈T, η, μ〉over a category C and a morphism f : X → TY let
Composition in the Kleisli category CT can then be written
The extension operator satisfies the identities:
where f : X → TY and g : Y → TZ. It follows trivially from these properties that Kleisli composition is associative and that ηX is the identity.
In fact, to give a monad is to give a Kleisli triple, i.e.
such that the above three equations for extension operators are satisfied.
Kleisli adjunction
Kleisli categories were originally defined in order to show that every monad arises from an adjunction. That construction is as follows.
Let〈T, η, μ〉be a monad over a category C and let CT be the associated Kleisli category. Define a functor F : C → CT by
and a functor G : CT → C by
One can show that F and G are indeed functors and that F is left adjoint to G. The counit of the adjunction is given by
Finally, one can show that T = GF and μ = GεF so that 〈T, η, μ〉is the monad associated to the adjunction 〈F, G, η, ε〉.
External links
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 - 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
- ↑ Mac Lane(1998) p.147