Pulse wave: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Khazar2
m clean up, typos fixed: half-way → halfway using AWB (8097)
 
en>Berean Hunter
Reverted 1 edit by 14.139.217.139 (talk): No need to bold. (TW)
Line 1: Line 1:
Yesterday I woke up and noticed - At the moment I've been single for a while and after much bullying from pals I now locate myself registered for web dating. They promised me that there are plenty of sweet, standard and fun people  [http://www.hotelsedinburgh.org where to buy luke bryan tickets] to fulfill, therefore here goes the message!<br>My friends and household are amazing and spending some time with them at pub gigabytes or dinners is [https://www.Gov.uk/search?q=constantly+imperative constantly imperative]. I have never been into clubs as I discover that one may not have a [http://pinterest.com/search/pins/?q=decent+dialogue decent dialogue] with all the noise. I also have two definitely cheeky and very cunning dogs who are always eager to meet fresh individuals.<br>I make an effort to stay as physically healthy as possible coming to the gym several times a week. I appreciate my sports and make an  [http://lukebryantickets.flicense.com luke bryan vip packages] effort to play or see as several a possible. I am going to frequently at Hawthorn suits being wintertime. Note: I have experienced the   [http://lukebryantickets.iczmpbangladesh.org luke bryan tickets for sale] carnage of wrestling fits at stocktake  [http://minioasis.com luke bryan tour] sales, In case that you would contemplated shopping a sport I really do not mind.<br><br><br><br>Also visit my homepage; [http://www.banburycrossonline.com luke Bryan tour tickets]
The '''Energy Tax Act''' ({{USPL|95|618}}, {{USStat|92|3174}}, enacted November 9, 1978) is a law passed by the [[U.S. Congress]] as part of the [[National Energy Act]]. The objective of this law was shift from oil and gas supply toward energy conservation; thus, to promote [[fuel efficiency]] and [[renewable energy]] through [[tax]]es and [[tax credit]]s.<ref>[http://kuhl.house.gov/UploadedFiles/energy%20tax.pdf Lazzari, Salvatore; "Energy Tax Policy", Congressional Research Service of The Library of Congress, Updated April 22, 2005; page 6]</ref>
 
== Tax credits for conservation ==
 
This law gave an income tax credit to private residents who use [[solar power|solar]], [[wind power|wind]], or [[geothermal power|geothermal]] sources of energy. The credit is equal to 30% of the cost of the equipment up to $2000, as well as 20% of costs greater than $2000, up to a maximum of $10,000. There were also tax credits to businesses for renewable energy equipment, amounting to a maximum of 25% of the cost of the equipment.
 
The renewable energy credits of this law were increased by the [[Crude Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act]] of 1980.
 
== Gas Guzzler Tax ==
 
The Act also created the ''Gas Guzzler Tax''<ref>[http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/info.shtml#guzzler fueleconomy.gov}]</ref> which applies to the sales of vehicles with official EPA-estimated [[gas mileage]] below certain specified levels. In 1980, the tax was $200 for a fuel efficiency of 14 to 15 [[miles per gallon]], and was increased to $1800 in 1985. In 1980, the tax was $550 for fuel efficiencies of 13 mpg and below, and was changed in 1986 to $3,850 for ratings below 12.5 mpg. The Gas Guzzler Tax only applied to cars under {{convert|6000|lb}}, which made the largest [[sport utility vehicle|SUV]]s and other large [[automobile|passenger cars]] exempt from this tax, thus increasing the latter's popularity.  Many argue that the {{convert|6000|lb|adj=on}} limit is actually counter-productive to the purpose of the Gas Guzzler Tax by encouraging the use of large SUVs that avoid the tax due to their high weight.  The tax is collected by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and normally paid by the manufacturer or importer. The following chart shows the tax for various levels of MPG as of 2006.
 
{| class=wikitable
!Unadjusted MPG (combined)
!Tax
|-
|at least 22.5
|No tax
|-
|at least 21.5, but less than 22.5
|$1000
|-
|at least 20.5, but less than 21.5
|$1300
|-
|at least 19.5, but less than 20.5
|$1700
|-
|at least 18.5, but less than 19.5
|$2100
|-
|at least 17.5, but less than 18.5
|$2600
|-
|at least 16.5, but less than 17.5
|$3000
|-
|at least 15.5, but less than 16.5
|$3700
|-
|at least 14.5, but less than 15.5
|$4500
|-
|at least 13.5, but less than 14.5
|$5400
|-
|at least 12.5, but less than 13.5
|$6400
|-
|less than 12.5
|$7700
|}
 
The combined fuel economy MPG value (55% city, 45% highway) is used to determine tax liability. The MPG value is also adjusted slightly to account for differences in test procedures made since the base year, but it is not adjusted for in-use short fall. The unadjusted combined MPG of a vehicle can be approximated from the city and highway values provided in the ''Fuel Economy Guide'' by the following equation{{Citation needed|date=October 2010}}:
 
:<math>\mathrm{Unadjusted MPG (combined)} = \frac{\mathrm{1}}{\mathrm{ \frac{\mathrm{.495}}{\mathrm{City MPG}} + \frac{\mathrm{.351}}{\mathrm{Highway MPG}} }} + .15</math>
 
Since this is an approximate calculation, the actual gas guzzler tax may be off by one tax bracket.
 
We can then find out how much penalty, '''<math>\mathit{p_t}</math>''', the manufacturer has to pay for that particular vehicle by using the following equation. '''<math>\mathit{p_i}</math>''' needs to be looked up on the table above{{huh|date=June 2010}} and '''<math>\mathit{q_i}</math>''' is the numbers of cars that are found to be under the set Gas Guzzler standard,
 
<math>p_{t}=\sum_{i}{p_iq_i}\,</math>
 
=== Economic impact ===
Gas guzzler tax creates incentive to meet the minimum MPG requirement by manufacturer. Due to elimination of vehicles that are below minimum MPG which is 22.5 MPG, vehicle sales have decreased approximately 0.5 percent. However, sales revenues increase by a greater amount due to the added value in vehicles making greater use of fuel economy technology.<ref>{{cite web|title=Feebates, Rebates, and Gas Guzzler Taxes: A study of incentives for increased fuel economy|url=http://www-cta.ornl.gov/cta/Publications/Reports/FeebateEnergyPolicy_FINAL.pdf|publisher=Energy Policy|authors=David Green, Phillip Patterson, Margaret Singh, Jia Li|year=2005}}</ref> Currently, the additional cost of efficient hybrid systems can range from $2,000-$10,000 on the vehicle sticker price.<ref>{{cite web|title=Why a gas-guzzler tax break makes total sense|url=http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2011/08/why-a-gas-guzzler-tax-break-makes-total-sense.html|publisher=ConsumerReports.org|accessdate=7 April 2012|authors=Gordon Hard and Jake Fisher|date=Aug 10, 2011}}</ref>
 
Manufacturers benefit from the increase in price of products. However, the fuel sector may lose revenue if the increase in sales and production of fuel efficient vehicles doesn't just encourage people to drive more.
 
=== Market impact ===
The Gas Guzzler Tax led to the successive downsizing of most major American passenger autos, and the combination of the tax and late-70's/early-80's economic woes effectively killed the American full-size car as it had been known up to that point. Coincidentally, it only took one product cycle before the first modern SUVs were introduced, the [[Jeep Cherokee (XJ)|Cherokee XJ]] and the [[Chevrolet S-10 Blazer|S-10 Blazer]] (in 1984). By the time Ford introduced the [[Ford Explorer|Explorer]], the SUV had become the common man's luxury vehicle and Ford capitalized on this using extensive cross-marketing, most notably with Northwest clothier [[Eddie Bauer]].
 
Critics of the Gas Guzzler Tax contend that the increased fuel economy of the US passenger car fleet observed since 1978 must be considered in the context of the increased market share of mid-size and full-size SUVs. Many consumers' stated reasons for SUV purchase (comfort, interior room, and a perception of safety based on the vehicle's size) also apply to the now-obsolete American full-size car as produced from the 1920s through the 70s; critics contend that the dominance of the modern SUV is a direct result of the Gas Guzzler Tax.
 
==See also==
*[[Energy law#United States]]
*[[Vehicle Efficiency Initiative]]
 
==Notes==
{{Reflist}}
 
==External links==
*[http://www.colby.edu/personal/t/thtieten/ener-west.html Energy tax credits], colby.edu
*[http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/legislation/impact.html Legislation affecting the renewable energy market], doe.gov
*[http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/energy/eng-54.cfm?&CFID=402052&CFTOKEN=79773469 Congressional energy brief], ncseonline.org
* [http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/info.shtml FuelEconomy.gov Frequently Asked Questions]
* [http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/guzzler/420f11033.htm  Gas Guzzler Tax: Program Overview]
* [http://www-cta.ornl.gov/cta/Publications/Reports/FeebateEnergyPolicy_FINAL.pdf Feebates, rebates and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy]
* [http://ddl.me.cmu.edu/ddwiki/images/Gasguzzler.png Gas Guzzler Tax Table]
 
[[Category:1978 in law]]
[[Category:United States federal taxation legislation]]
[[Category:United States federal energy legislation]]
[[Category:95th United States Congress]]
[[Category:Law articles needing an infobox]]
[[Category:Market-based policy instruments]]

Revision as of 21:13, 2 February 2014

The Energy Tax Act (Template:USPL, Template:USStat, enacted November 9, 1978) is a law passed by the U.S. Congress as part of the National Energy Act. The objective of this law was shift from oil and gas supply toward energy conservation; thus, to promote fuel efficiency and renewable energy through taxes and tax credits.[1]

Tax credits for conservation

This law gave an income tax credit to private residents who use solar, wind, or geothermal sources of energy. The credit is equal to 30% of the cost of the equipment up to $2000, as well as 20% of costs greater than $2000, up to a maximum of $10,000. There were also tax credits to businesses for renewable energy equipment, amounting to a maximum of 25% of the cost of the equipment.

The renewable energy credits of this law were increased by the Crude Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act of 1980.

Gas Guzzler Tax

The Act also created the Gas Guzzler Tax[2] which applies to the sales of vehicles with official EPA-estimated gas mileage below certain specified levels. In 1980, the tax was $200 for a fuel efficiency of 14 to 15 miles per gallon, and was increased to $1800 in 1985. In 1980, the tax was $550 for fuel efficiencies of 13 mpg and below, and was changed in 1986 to $3,850 for ratings below 12.5 mpg. The Gas Guzzler Tax only applied to cars under Template:Convert, which made the largest SUVs and other large passenger cars exempt from this tax, thus increasing the latter's popularity. Many argue that the Template:Convert limit is actually counter-productive to the purpose of the Gas Guzzler Tax by encouraging the use of large SUVs that avoid the tax due to their high weight. The tax is collected by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and normally paid by the manufacturer or importer. The following chart shows the tax for various levels of MPG as of 2006.

Unadjusted MPG (combined) Tax
at least 22.5 No tax
at least 21.5, but less than 22.5 $1000
at least 20.5, but less than 21.5 $1300
at least 19.5, but less than 20.5 $1700
at least 18.5, but less than 19.5 $2100
at least 17.5, but less than 18.5 $2600
at least 16.5, but less than 17.5 $3000
at least 15.5, but less than 16.5 $3700
at least 14.5, but less than 15.5 $4500
at least 13.5, but less than 14.5 $5400
at least 12.5, but less than 13.5 $6400
less than 12.5 $7700

The combined fuel economy MPG value (55% city, 45% highway) is used to determine tax liability. The MPG value is also adjusted slightly to account for differences in test procedures made since the base year, but it is not adjusted for in-use short fall. The unadjusted combined MPG of a vehicle can be approximated from the city and highway values provided in the Fuel Economy Guide by the following equationPotter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.:

UnadjustedMPG(combined)=1.495CityMPG+.351HighwayMPG+.15

Since this is an approximate calculation, the actual gas guzzler tax may be off by one tax bracket.

We can then find out how much penalty, pt, the manufacturer has to pay for that particular vehicle by using the following equation. pi needs to be looked up on the table aboveTemplate:Huh and qi is the numbers of cars that are found to be under the set Gas Guzzler standard,

pt=ipiqi

Economic impact

Gas guzzler tax creates incentive to meet the minimum MPG requirement by manufacturer. Due to elimination of vehicles that are below minimum MPG which is 22.5 MPG, vehicle sales have decreased approximately 0.5 percent. However, sales revenues increase by a greater amount due to the added value in vehicles making greater use of fuel economy technology.[3] Currently, the additional cost of efficient hybrid systems can range from $2,000-$10,000 on the vehicle sticker price.[4]

Manufacturers benefit from the increase in price of products. However, the fuel sector may lose revenue if the increase in sales and production of fuel efficient vehicles doesn't just encourage people to drive more.

Market impact

The Gas Guzzler Tax led to the successive downsizing of most major American passenger autos, and the combination of the tax and late-70's/early-80's economic woes effectively killed the American full-size car as it had been known up to that point. Coincidentally, it only took one product cycle before the first modern SUVs were introduced, the Cherokee XJ and the S-10 Blazer (in 1984). By the time Ford introduced the Explorer, the SUV had become the common man's luxury vehicle and Ford capitalized on this using extensive cross-marketing, most notably with Northwest clothier Eddie Bauer.

Critics of the Gas Guzzler Tax contend that the increased fuel economy of the US passenger car fleet observed since 1978 must be considered in the context of the increased market share of mid-size and full-size SUVs. Many consumers' stated reasons for SUV purchase (comfort, interior room, and a perception of safety based on the vehicle's size) also apply to the now-obsolete American full-size car as produced from the 1920s through the 70s; critics contend that the dominance of the modern SUV is a direct result of the Gas Guzzler Tax.

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links