Conjugate gradient method: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Kri
m →‎Description of the method: x_* should be in bold font
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
They contact me Emilia. Years in the past we moved to North Dakota. For many years he's been working as a receptionist. To do aerobics is a factor that I'm totally addicted to.<br><br>Here is my webpage :: healthy food delivery ([http://Tinyurl.com/k7cuceb company website])
An '''activity coefficient''' is a factor used in [[thermodynamics]] to account for deviations from ideal behaviour in a [[mixture]] of [[chemical substance]]s.<ref>{{GoldBookRef|title=Activity coefficient|file=A00116}}</ref> In an [[ideal mixture]], the microscopic interactions between each pair of [[chemical species]] are the same (or macroscopically equivalent, the [[enthalpy change of solution]] and volume variation in mixing is zero) and, as a result, properties of the mixtures can be expressed directly in terms
of simple [[concentration]]s or [[partial pressure]]s of the substances present e.g. [[Raoult's law]]. Deviations from ideality are accommodated by modifying the concentration by an ''activity coefficient''. Analogously, expressions involving gases can be adjusted for non-ideality by scaling [[partial pressure]]s by a [[fugacity]] coefficient.
 
The concept of activity coefficient is closely linked to that of [[activity (chemistry)|activity in chemistry]].
 
== Thermodynamic definition ==
The [[chemical potential]], <math> \mu_B</math>, of a substance B in an [[ideal mixture]] is given by
:<math> \mu_B = \mu_{B}^{\ominus} + RT \ln x_B \,</math>
where <math>\mu_{B}^{\ominus}</math> is the chemical potential in the [[standard state]] and x<sub>B</sub> is the [[mole fraction]] of the substance in the mixture.
 
This is generalised to include non-ideal behavior by writing
:<math> \mu_B = \mu_{B}^{\ominus} + RT \ln a_B \,</math>
when <math>a_B</math> is the activity of the substance in the mixture with
:<math> a_B = x_B \gamma_B</math>
where <math>\gamma_B</math> is the activity coefficient.  As <math>\gamma_B</math> approaches 1, the substance behaves as if it were ideal. For instance, if <math>\gamma_B \approx 1</math>, then [[Raoult's Law]] is accurate. For <math>\gamma_B > 1 </math> and <math>\gamma_B < 1 </math>, substance B shows positive and negative deviation from Raoult's law, respectively. A positive deviation implies that substance B is more volatile.
 
In many cases, as <math>x_B</math> goes to zero, the activity coefficient of substance B approaches a constant; this relationship is Henry's Law for the solvent.  These relationships are related to each other through the [[Gibbs-Duhem]] equation.<ref>R. DeHoff, ''Thermodynamic in Materials Science'', Taylor and Francis, 2006. pp230-1</ref>
Note that in general activity coefficients are dimensionless.
 
Modifying mole fractions or concentrations by activity coefficients gives the ''effective activities'' of the components, and hence allows expressions such as [[Raoult's law]] and [[equilibrium constant]]s constants to be applied to both ideal and non-ideal mixtures.
 
Knowledge of activity coefficients is particularly important in the context of [[electrochemistry]] since the behaviour of [[electrolyte]] solutions is often far from ideal, due to the effects of the [[ionic atmosphere]].  Additionally, they are particularly important in the context of [[soil chemistry]] due to the low volumes of solvent and, consequently, the high concentration of [[electrolytes]].<ref>{{cite book | author= Jorge G. Ibanez| coauthors= Margarita Hernandez-Esparza, Carmen Doria-Serrano, Mono Mohan Singh| title= Environmental Chemistry: Fundamentals| year= 2007| publisher= Springer| isbn= 978-0-387-26061-7}}</ref>
==Dependence on state parameters==
The derivative of the activity coefficient to temperature and respectively pressure are connected to the excess molar properties.
: <math>\bar{V^E}_i= RT \frac{\partial (\ln(\gamma_i))}{\partial P}</math>
 
: <math>\bar{H^E}_i= -RT^2 \frac{\partial (\ln(\gamma_i))}{\partial T}</math>
 
== Application to chemical equilibrium ==
At equilibrium, the sum of the chemical potentials of the reactants is equal to the sum of the chemical potentials of the products. The [[Gibbs free energy]] change for the reactions, <math>\Delta_r G</math>, is equal to the difference between these sums and therefore, at equilibrium, is equal to zero. Thus, for an equilibrium such as
 
:<math> \alpha A + \beta B \rightleftharpoons \sigma S + \tau T</math>
:<math> \Delta_r G =  \sigma \mu_S + \tau \mu_T - (\alpha \mu_A + \beta \mu_B) = 0\,</math>
Substitute in the expressions for the chemical potential of each reactant:
 
:<math> \Delta_r G = \sigma \mu_S^\ominus + \sigma RT \ln a_S + \tau \mu_T^\ominus + \tau RT \ln a_T -(\alpha \mu_A^\ominus + \alpha RT \ln a_A + \beta \mu_B^\ominus + \beta RT \ln a_B)=0</math>
Upon rearrangement this expression becomes
 
:<math> \Delta_r G =\left(\sigma \mu_S^\ominus+\tau \mu_T^\ominus -\alpha \mu_A^\ominus- \beta \mu_B^\ominus \right) + RT \ln \frac{a_S^\sigma a_T^\tau} {a_A^\alpha a_B^\beta} =0</math>
 
The sum <math>\left(\sigma \mu_S^\ominus+\tau \mu_T^\ominus -\alpha \mu_A^\ominus- \beta \mu_B^\ominus \right)</math> is the standard free energy change for the reaction, <math>\Delta_r G^\ominus</math>. Therefore
 
:<math> \Delta_r G^\ominus = -RT \ln K </math>
 
''K'' is the [[equilibrium constant]].  Note that activities and equilibrium constants are dimensionless numbers.
 
This derivation serves two purposes. It shows the relationship between standard free energy change and equilibrium constant. It also shows that an equilibrium constant is defined as a quotient of activities. In practical terms this is inconvenient. When each activity is replaced by the product of a concentration and an activity coefficient, the equilibrium constant is defined as
 
:<math>K= \frac{[S]^\sigma[T]^\tau}{[A]^\alpha[B]^\beta} \times \frac{\gamma_S^\sigma \gamma_T^\tau}{\gamma_A^\alpha \gamma_B^\beta}</math>
where [S] denotes the [[concentration]] of S, etc. In practice equilibrium constants are [[Determination of equilibrium constants|determined]] in a medium such that the quotient of activity coefficient is constant and can be ignored, leading to the usual expression
:<math>K= \frac{[S]^\sigma[T]^\tau}{[A]^\alpha[B]^\beta}</math>
which applies under the conditions that the activity quotient has a particular (constant) value.
 
== Measurement and prediction of activity coefficients ==
[[File:UNIQUACRegressionChloroformMethanol.png|thumb|UNIQUAC [[Regression analysis|Regression]] of Activity Coefficients ([[Chloroform]]/[[Methanol]] Mixture)]]
Activity coefficients may be measured experimentally or calculated theoretically, using the [[Debye-Hückel equation]] or extensions such as [[Davies equation]],<ref>C.W. Davies, ''Ion Association'',Butterworths, 1962</ref> [[Pitzer equations]]<ref name="davies">I. Grenthe and H. Wanner, ''Guidelines for the extrapolation to zero ionic strength'',  http://www.nea.fr/html/dbtdb/guidelines/tdb2.pdf</ref> or TCPC model.<ref>X. Ge, X. Wang, M. Zhang, S. Seetharaman. Correlation and Prediction of Activity and Osmotic Coefficients of Aqueous Electrolytes at 298.15 K by the Modified TCPC Model. J. Chem. Eng. data. 52 (2007) 538-547.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je060451k</ref><ref>X. Ge, M. Zhang, M. Guo, X. Wang, Correlation and Prediction of Thermodynamic Properties of Non-aqueous Electrolytes by the Modified TCPC Model. J. Chem. Eng. data. 53 (2008)149-159.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je700446q</ref><ref>X. Ge, M. Zhang, M. Guo, X. Wang. Correlation and Prediction of thermodynamic properties of Some Complex Aqueous Electrolytes by the Modified Three-Characteristic-Parameter Correlation Model. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 53(2008)950-958.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je7006499</ref><ref>X. Ge, X. Wang. A Simple Two-Parameter Correlation Model for Aqueous Electrolyte across a wide range of temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 54(2009)179-186.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je800483q</ref> [[Specific ion interaction theory]] (SIT)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iupac.org/web/ins/2000-003-1-500 |title=Project: Ionic Strength Corrections for Stability Constants |accessdate=2008-11-15 |publisher=IUPAC | archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20081029193538/http://www.iupac.org/web/ins/2000-003-1-500| archivedate= 29 October 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> may also be used. Alternatively correlative methods such as [[UNIQUAC]], [[Non-Random Two Liquid model|NRTL]], [[MOSCED]] or [[UNIFAC]] may be employed, provided fitted component-specific or model parameters are available.
 
A new alternative for activity coefficients prediction, which is less dependent on model parameters, is the COSMO-RS method. In this methods the required information comes from quantum mechanics calculations specific to each molecule (sigma profiles) combined with a statistical thermodynamics treatment of surface segments.<ref name = Klamt>Andreas Klamt, "COSMO-RS: From Quantum Chemistry to Fluid Phase Thermodynamics and Drug Design", Elsevier, 2005.</ref>
 
For uncharged species, the activity coefficient γ<sub>0</sub> mostly follows a [[salting-out]] model:<ref name = Butler>J.N. Butler, "Ionic Equilibrium", John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1998.</ref>
 
:<math> \log_{10}(\gamma_{0}) = b I</math>
 
This simple model predicts activities of many species (dissolved undissociated gases such as CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, NH<sub>3</sub>, undissociated acids and bases) to high ionic strengths (up to 5&nbsp;mol/kg). The value of the constant b for CO<sub>2</sub> is 0.11 at 10 °C and 0.20 at 330 °C.<ref>A.J. Elis and R.M. Golding, Am. J. Sci, 162, p 47-60, 1963.</ref><ref>S.D.Malinin, Geokhimiya, 3, p. 235-245, 1959.</ref>
 
For water (solvent), the activity a<sub>w</sub> can be calculated using:<ref name = "Butler"/>
 
:<math> \ln(a_{w}) = \frac{-\nu m}{55.51} </math>&phi;
 
where ν is the number of ions produced from the dissociation of one molecule of the dissolved salt, ''m'' is the molality of the salt dissolved in water, φ is the [[osmotic coefficient]] of water, and the constant 55.51 represents the molality of water. In the above equation, the activity of a solvent (here water) is represented as inversely proportional to the number of particles of salt versus that of the solvent.
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Activity Coefficient}}
[[Category:Equilibrium chemistry]]

Revision as of 07:45, 4 February 2014

An activity coefficient is a factor used in thermodynamics to account for deviations from ideal behaviour in a mixture of chemical substances.[1] In an ideal mixture, the microscopic interactions between each pair of chemical species are the same (or macroscopically equivalent, the enthalpy change of solution and volume variation in mixing is zero) and, as a result, properties of the mixtures can be expressed directly in terms of simple concentrations or partial pressures of the substances present e.g. Raoult's law. Deviations from ideality are accommodated by modifying the concentration by an activity coefficient. Analogously, expressions involving gases can be adjusted for non-ideality by scaling partial pressures by a fugacity coefficient.

The concept of activity coefficient is closely linked to that of activity in chemistry.

Thermodynamic definition

The chemical potential, , of a substance B in an ideal mixture is given by

where is the chemical potential in the standard state and xB is the mole fraction of the substance in the mixture.

This is generalised to include non-ideal behavior by writing

when is the activity of the substance in the mixture with

where is the activity coefficient. As approaches 1, the substance behaves as if it were ideal. For instance, if , then Raoult's Law is accurate. For and , substance B shows positive and negative deviation from Raoult's law, respectively. A positive deviation implies that substance B is more volatile.

In many cases, as goes to zero, the activity coefficient of substance B approaches a constant; this relationship is Henry's Law for the solvent. These relationships are related to each other through the Gibbs-Duhem equation.[2] Note that in general activity coefficients are dimensionless.

Modifying mole fractions or concentrations by activity coefficients gives the effective activities of the components, and hence allows expressions such as Raoult's law and equilibrium constants constants to be applied to both ideal and non-ideal mixtures.

Knowledge of activity coefficients is particularly important in the context of electrochemistry since the behaviour of electrolyte solutions is often far from ideal, due to the effects of the ionic atmosphere. Additionally, they are particularly important in the context of soil chemistry due to the low volumes of solvent and, consequently, the high concentration of electrolytes.[3]

Dependence on state parameters

The derivative of the activity coefficient to temperature and respectively pressure are connected to the excess molar properties.

Application to chemical equilibrium

At equilibrium, the sum of the chemical potentials of the reactants is equal to the sum of the chemical potentials of the products. The Gibbs free energy change for the reactions, , is equal to the difference between these sums and therefore, at equilibrium, is equal to zero. Thus, for an equilibrium such as

Substitute in the expressions for the chemical potential of each reactant:

Upon rearrangement this expression becomes

The sum is the standard free energy change for the reaction, . Therefore

K is the equilibrium constant. Note that activities and equilibrium constants are dimensionless numbers.

This derivation serves two purposes. It shows the relationship between standard free energy change and equilibrium constant. It also shows that an equilibrium constant is defined as a quotient of activities. In practical terms this is inconvenient. When each activity is replaced by the product of a concentration and an activity coefficient, the equilibrium constant is defined as

where [S] denotes the concentration of S, etc. In practice equilibrium constants are determined in a medium such that the quotient of activity coefficient is constant and can be ignored, leading to the usual expression

which applies under the conditions that the activity quotient has a particular (constant) value.

Measurement and prediction of activity coefficients

UNIQUAC Regression of Activity Coefficients (Chloroform/Methanol Mixture)

Activity coefficients may be measured experimentally or calculated theoretically, using the Debye-Hückel equation or extensions such as Davies equation,[4] Pitzer equations[5] or TCPC model.[6][7][8][9] Specific ion interaction theory (SIT)[10] may also be used. Alternatively correlative methods such as UNIQUAC, NRTL, MOSCED or UNIFAC may be employed, provided fitted component-specific or model parameters are available.

A new alternative for activity coefficients prediction, which is less dependent on model parameters, is the COSMO-RS method. In this methods the required information comes from quantum mechanics calculations specific to each molecule (sigma profiles) combined with a statistical thermodynamics treatment of surface segments.[11]

For uncharged species, the activity coefficient γ0 mostly follows a salting-out model:[12]

This simple model predicts activities of many species (dissolved undissociated gases such as CO2, H2S, NH3, undissociated acids and bases) to high ionic strengths (up to 5 mol/kg). The value of the constant b for CO2 is 0.11 at 10 °C and 0.20 at 330 °C.[13][14]

For water (solvent), the activity aw can be calculated using:[12]

φ

where ν is the number of ions produced from the dissociation of one molecule of the dissolved salt, m is the molality of the salt dissolved in water, φ is the osmotic coefficient of water, and the constant 55.51 represents the molality of water. In the above equation, the activity of a solvent (here water) is represented as inversely proportional to the number of particles of salt versus that of the solvent.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Template:GoldBookRef
  2. R. DeHoff, Thermodynamic in Materials Science, Taylor and Francis, 2006. pp230-1
  3. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  4. C.W. Davies, Ion Association,Butterworths, 1962
  5. I. Grenthe and H. Wanner, Guidelines for the extrapolation to zero ionic strength, http://www.nea.fr/html/dbtdb/guidelines/tdb2.pdf
  6. X. Ge, X. Wang, M. Zhang, S. Seetharaman. Correlation and Prediction of Activity and Osmotic Coefficients of Aqueous Electrolytes at 298.15 K by the Modified TCPC Model. J. Chem. Eng. data. 52 (2007) 538-547.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je060451k
  7. X. Ge, M. Zhang, M. Guo, X. Wang, Correlation and Prediction of Thermodynamic Properties of Non-aqueous Electrolytes by the Modified TCPC Model. J. Chem. Eng. data. 53 (2008)149-159.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je700446q
  8. X. Ge, M. Zhang, M. Guo, X. Wang. Correlation and Prediction of thermodynamic properties of Some Complex Aqueous Electrolytes by the Modified Three-Characteristic-Parameter Correlation Model. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 53(2008)950-958.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je7006499
  9. X. Ge, X. Wang. A Simple Two-Parameter Correlation Model for Aqueous Electrolyte across a wide range of temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 54(2009)179-186.http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/je800483q
  10. Template:Cite web
  11. Andreas Klamt, "COSMO-RS: From Quantum Chemistry to Fluid Phase Thermodynamics and Drug Design", Elsevier, 2005.
  12. 12.0 12.1 J.N. Butler, "Ionic Equilibrium", John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1998.
  13. A.J. Elis and R.M. Golding, Am. J. Sci, 162, p 47-60, 1963.
  14. S.D.Malinin, Geokhimiya, 3, p. 235-245, 1959.