Classification of Clifford algebras: Difference between revisions
en>Quondum →Notation and conventions: more specific about which direct sum (via link) and that we mean only of identical algebras with this notation |
en>Quondum Being bold: replacing exotic square matrix notation K(n) with more common M_n(K) (and M(n,K) where clumsy) to make meaning more obvious |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In mathematics, the '''Smith normal form''' is a [[Canonical form|normal form]] that can be defined for any matrix (not necessarily square) with entries in a [[principal ideal domain]] (PID). The Smith normal form of a matrix is [[Diagonal matrix|diagonal]], and can be obtained from the original matrix by multiplying on the left and right by [[invertible]] square matrices. In particular, the integers are a PID, so one can always calculate the Smith normal form of an integer matrix. The Smith normal form is very useful for working with finitely generated modules over a PID, and in particular for deducing the structure of a quotient of a [[free module]]. | |||
==Definition== | |||
Let ''A'' be a nonzero ''m''×''n'' matrix over a [[principal ideal domain]] ''R''. There exist invertible <math>m \times m</math> and <math>n \times n</math>-matrices ''S, T'' so that the product ''S A T'' is | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
\alpha_1 & 0 & 0 & & \cdots & & 0 \\ | |||
0 & \alpha_2 & 0 & & \cdots & & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 0 & \ddots & & & & 0\\ | |||
\vdots & & & \alpha_r & & & \vdots \\ | |||
& & & & 0 & & \\ | |||
& & & & & \ddots & \\ | |||
0 & & & \cdots & & & 0 | |||
\end{pmatrix}. | |||
</math> | |||
and the diagonal elements <math>\alpha_i</math> satisfy <math>\alpha_i \mid \alpha_{i+1}\;\forall\;1 \le i < r</math>. This is the Smith normal form of the matrix ''A''. The elements <math>\alpha_i</math> are unique [[up to]] multiplication by a [[Unit (ring theory)|unit]] and are called the ''elementary divisors'', ''invariants'', or ''invariant factors''. They can be computed (up to multiplication by a unit) as | |||
: <math>\alpha_i = \frac{d_i(A)}{d_{i-1}(A)},</math> | |||
where <math>d_i(A)</math> (called ''i''-th ''determinant divisor'') equals the [[greatest common divisor]] of all <math>i\times i</math> [[Minor (linear algebra)|minors]] of the matrix ''A''. | |||
== Algorithm == | |||
Our first goal will be to find invertible square matrices ''S'' and ''T'' such that the product ''S A T'' is diagonal. This is the hardest part of the algorithm and once we have achieved diagonality it becomes relatively easy to put the matrix in Smith normal form. Phrased more abstractly, the goal is to show that, thinking of ''A'' as a map from <math>R^n</math> (the free ''R''-[[Module (mathematics)|module]] of rank ''n'') to <math>R^m</math> (the free ''R''-[[Module (mathematics)|module]] of rank ''m''), there are isomorphisms <math>S:R^m \to R^m</math> and <math>T:R^n \to R^n</math> such that <math>S \cdot A \cdot T</math> has the simple form of a [[diagonal matrix]]. The matrices ''S'' and ''T'' can be found by starting out with identity matrices of the appropriate size, and modifying ''S'' each time a row operation is performed on ''A'' in the algorithm by the same row operation, and similarly modifying ''T'' for each column operation performed. Since row operations are left-multiplications and column operations are right-multiplications, this preserves the invariant <math>A'=S'\cdot A\cdot T'</math> where <math>A',S',T'</math> denote current values and ''A'' denotes the original matrix; eventually the matrices in this invariant become diagonal. Only invertible row and column operations are performed, which ensures that ''S'' and ''T'' remain invertible matrices. | |||
For ''a'' in ''R'' \ {0}, write δ(''a'') for the number of prime factors of ''a'' (these exist and are unique since any PID is also a [[unique factorization domain]]). In particular, ''R'' is also a [[Bézout domain]], so it is a [[gcd domain]] and the gcd of any two elements satisfies a [[Bézout's identity]]. | |||
To put a matrix into Smith normal form, one can repeatedly apply the following, where ''t'' loops from 1 to ''m''. | |||
===Step I: Choosing a pivot=== | |||
Choose ''j''<sub>''t''</sub> to be the smallest column index of ''A'' with a non-zero entry, starting the search at column index ''j''<sub>''t''-1</sub>+1 if ''t'' > 1. | |||
We wish to have <math>a_{t,j_t}\neq0</math>; if this is the case this step is complete, otherwise there is by assumption some ''k'' with <math>a_{k,j_t} \neq 0</math>, and we can exchange rows <math>t</math> and ''k'', thereby obtaining <math>a_{t,j_t}\neq0</math>. | |||
Our chosen pivot is now at position (''t'', ''j''<sub>''t''</sub>). | |||
===Step II: Improving the pivot=== | |||
If there is an entry at position (''k'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) such that <math>a_{t,j_t} \nmid a_{k,j_t}</math>, then, letting <math>\beta =\gcd\left(a_{t,j_t}, a_{k,j_t}\right)</math>, we know by the Bézout property that there exist σ, τ in ''R'' such that | |||
:<math> | |||
a_{t,j_t} \cdot \sigma + a_{k,j_t} \cdot \tau=\beta. | |||
</math> | |||
By left-multiplication with an appropriate invertible matrix ''L'', it can be achieved that row ''t'' of the matrix product is the sum of σ times the original row ''t'' and τ times the original row ''k'', that row ''k'' of the product is another linear combination of those original rows, and that all other rows are unchanged. Explicitly, if σ and τ satisfy the above equation, then for <math>\alpha=a_{t,j_t}/\beta</math> and <math>\gamma=a_{k,j_t}/\beta</math> (which divisions are possible by the definition of β) one has | |||
:<math> | |||
\sigma\cdot \alpha + \tau \cdot \gamma=1, | |||
</math> | |||
so that the matrix | |||
:<math> L_0= | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
\sigma & \tau \\ | |||
-\gamma & \alpha \\ | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
</math> | |||
is invertible, with inverse | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
\alpha & -\tau \\ | |||
\gamma & \sigma \\ | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
.</math> | |||
Now ''L'' can be obtained by fitting <math>L_0</math> into rows and columns ''t'' and ''k'' of the identity matrix. By construction the matrix obtained after left-multiplying by ''L'' has entry β at position (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) (and due to our choice of α and γ it also has an entry 0 at position (''k'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>), which is useful though not essential for the algorithm). This new entry β divides the entry <math>a_{t,j_t}</math> that was there before, and so in particular <math>\delta(\beta) < \delta(a_{t,j_t})</math>; therefore repeating these steps must eventually terminate. One ends up with a matrix having an entry at position (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) that divides all entries in column ''j''<sub>''t''</sub>. | |||
===Step III: Eliminating entries=== | |||
Finally, adding appropriate multiples of row ''t'', it can be achieved that all entries in column ''j''<sub>''t''</sub> except for that at position (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) are zero. This can be achieved by left-multiplication with an appropriate matrix. However, to make the matrix fully diagonal we need to eliminate nonzero entries on the row of position (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) as well. This can be achieved by repeating the steps in Step II for columns instead of rows, and using multiplication on the right. In general this will result in the zero entries from the prior application of Step III becoming nonzero again. | |||
However, notice that the [[ideal (ring theory)|ideals]] generated by the elements at position (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) form an [[ascending chain condition|ascending chain]], because entries from a later step always divide entries from a previous step. Therefore, since ''R'' is a [[Noetherian ring]] (it is a [[principal ideal domain|PID]]), the ideals eventually become stationary and do not change. This means that at some stage after Step II has been applied, the entry at (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) will divide all nonzero row or column entries before applying any more steps in Step II. Then we can eliminate entries in the row or column with nonzero entries while preserving the zeros in the already-zero row or column. At this point, only the block of ''A'' to the lower right of (''t'',''j''<sub>''t''</sub>) needs to be diagonalized, and conceptually the algorithm can be applied recursively, treating this block as a separate matrix. In other words, we can increment ''t'' by one and go back to Step I. | |||
===Final step=== | |||
Applying the steps described above to the remaining non-zero columns of the resulting matrix (if any), we get an <math>m \times n</math>-matrix with column indices <math>j_1 < \ldots < j_r</math> where <math>r \le \min(m,n)</math>. The matrix entries <math>(l,j_l)</math> are non-zero, and every other entry is zero. | |||
Now we can move the null columns of this matrix to the right, so that the nonzero entries are on positions <math>(i,i)</math> for <math>1 \le i\le r</math>. For short, set <math>\alpha_i</math> for the element at position <math>(i,i)</math>. | |||
The condition of divisibility of diagonal entries might not be satisfied. For any index <math>i<r</math> for which <math>\alpha_i\nmid\alpha_{i+1}</math>, one can repair this shortcoming by operations on rows and columns <math>i</math> and <math>i+1</math> only: first add column <math>i+1</math> to column <math>i</math> to get an entry <math>\alpha_{i+1}</math> in column ''i'' without disturbing the entry <math>\alpha_i</math> at position <math>(i,i)</math>, and then apply a row operation to make the entry at position <math>(i,i)</math> equal to <math>\beta=\gcd(\alpha_i,\alpha_{i+1})</math> as in Step II; finally proceed as in Step III to make the matrix diagonal again. Since the new entry at position <math>(i+1,i+1)</math> is a linear combination of the original <math>\alpha_i,\alpha_{i+1}</math>, it is divisible by β. | |||
The value <math>\delta(\alpha_1)+\cdots+\delta(\alpha_r)</math> does not change by the above operation (it is δ of the determinant of the upper <math>r\times r</math> submatrix), whence that operation does diminish (by moving prime factors to the right) the value of | |||
:<math>\sum_{j=1}^r(r-j)\delta(\alpha_j).</math> | |||
So after finitely many applications of this operation no further application is possible, which means that we have obtained <math>\alpha_1\mid\alpha_2\mid\cdots\mid\alpha_r</math> as desired. | |||
Since all row and column manipulations involved in the process are invertible, this shows that there exist invertible <math>m \times m</math> and <math>n \times n</math>-matrices ''S, T'' so that the product ''S A T'' satisfies the definition of a Smith normal form. In particular, this shows that the Smith normal form exists, which was assumed without proof in the definition. | |||
== Applications == | |||
The Smith normal form is useful for computing the [[homology (mathematics)|homology]] of a [[chain complex]] when the chain modules of the chain complex are [[Finitely generated module|finitely generated]]. For instance, in [[topology]], it can be used to compute the homology of a [[simplicial complex]] or [[CW complex]] over the integers, because the boundary maps in such a complex are just integer matrices. It can also be used to prove the well known [[structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain]]. | |||
== Example == | |||
As an example, we will find the Smith normal form of the following matrix over the integers. | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 4 & 4 \\ | |||
-6 & 6 & 12 \\ | |||
10 & -4 & -16 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
</math> | |||
The following matrices are the intermediate steps as the algorithm is applied to the above matrix. | |||
:<math> | |||
\to | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
-6 & 18 & 24 \\ | |||
10 & -24& -36 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
\to | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 18 & 24 \\ | |||
0 & -24& -36 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
</math> | |||
:<math> | |||
\to | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 18 & 24 \\ | |||
0 & -6 & -12 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
\to | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 6 & 12 \\ | |||
0 & 18 & 24 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
</math> | |||
:<math> | |||
\to | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 6 & 12 \\ | |||
0 & 0 & -12 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
\to | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 6 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 0 & 12 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
</math> | |||
So the Smith normal form is | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{pmatrix} | |||
2 & 0 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 6 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & 0 & 12 | |||
\end{pmatrix} | |||
</math> | |||
and the elementary divisors are 2, 6 and 12. | |||
== Similarity == | |||
The Smith normal form can be used to determine whether or not matrices with entries over a common field are [[similar (linear algebra)|similar]]. Specifically two matrices ''A'' and ''B'' are similar if and only if the [[characteristic matrix|characteristic matrices]] <math>xI-A</math> and <math>xI-B</math> have the same Smith normal form. | |||
For example, with | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{align} | |||
A & {} =\begin{bmatrix} | |||
1 & 2 \\ | |||
0 & 1 | |||
\end{bmatrix}, & & \mbox{SNF}(xI-A) =\begin{bmatrix} | |||
1 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & (x-1)^2 | |||
\end{bmatrix} \\ | |||
B & {} =\begin{bmatrix} | |||
3 & -4 \\ | |||
1 & -1 | |||
\end{bmatrix}, & & \mbox{SNF}(xI-B) =\begin{bmatrix} | |||
1 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & (x-1)^2 | |||
\end{bmatrix} \\ | |||
C & {} =\begin{bmatrix} | |||
1 & 0 \\ | |||
1 & 2 | |||
\end{bmatrix}, & & \mbox{SNF}(xI-C) =\begin{bmatrix} | |||
1 & 0 \\ | |||
0 & (x-1)(x-2) | |||
\end{bmatrix}. | |||
\end{align} | |||
</math> | |||
''A'' and ''B'' are similar because the Smith normal form of their characteristic matrices match, but are not similar to ''C'' because the Smith normal form of the characteristic matrices do not match. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Canonical form]] | |||
* [[Elementary divisors]] | |||
* [[Frobenius normal form]] | |||
* [[Hermite normal form]] | |||
* [[Invariant factor]] | |||
* [[Henry John Stephen Smith]] (1826–1883), [[eponym]] of the Smith normal form | |||
* [[Structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain]] | |||
==References== | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Smith |first=Henry J. Stephen |authorlink=Henry John Stephen Smith |year=1861 |title=On systems of linear indeterminate equations and congruences |journal=[[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London|Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.]] |volume=151 |issue=1 |pages=293–326 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/108738 |doi=10.1098/rstl.1861.0016 }} Reprinted (pp. [http://archive.org/stream/collectedmathema01smituoft#page/366/mode/2up 367–409]) in [http://archive.org/details/collectedmathema01smituoft ''The Collected Mathematical Papers of Henry John Stephen Smith'', Vol. I], edited by [[James Whitbread Lee Glaisher|J. W. L. Glaisher]]. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1894), ''xcv''+603 pp. | |||
* {{PlanetMath |urlname=GausssAlgorithmForPrincipalIdealDomains |title=Smith normal form}} | |||
* {{PlanetMath |urlname=ExampleOfSmithNormalForm |title=Example of Smith normal form}} | |||
* K. R. Matthews, [http://www.numbertheory.org/courses/MP274/smith.pdf Smith normal form]. MP274: Linear Algebra, Lecture Notes, University of Queensland, 1991. | |||
[[Category:Matrix theory]] | |||
[[Category:Matrix normal forms]] |
Revision as of 09:15, 10 November 2013
In mathematics, the Smith normal form is a normal form that can be defined for any matrix (not necessarily square) with entries in a principal ideal domain (PID). The Smith normal form of a matrix is diagonal, and can be obtained from the original matrix by multiplying on the left and right by invertible square matrices. In particular, the integers are a PID, so one can always calculate the Smith normal form of an integer matrix. The Smith normal form is very useful for working with finitely generated modules over a PID, and in particular for deducing the structure of a quotient of a free module.
Definition
Let A be a nonzero m×n matrix over a principal ideal domain R. There exist invertible and -matrices S, T so that the product S A T is
and the diagonal elements satisfy . This is the Smith normal form of the matrix A. The elements are unique up to multiplication by a unit and are called the elementary divisors, invariants, or invariant factors. They can be computed (up to multiplication by a unit) as
where (called i-th determinant divisor) equals the greatest common divisor of all minors of the matrix A.
Algorithm
Our first goal will be to find invertible square matrices S and T such that the product S A T is diagonal. This is the hardest part of the algorithm and once we have achieved diagonality it becomes relatively easy to put the matrix in Smith normal form. Phrased more abstractly, the goal is to show that, thinking of A as a map from (the free R-module of rank n) to (the free R-module of rank m), there are isomorphisms and such that has the simple form of a diagonal matrix. The matrices S and T can be found by starting out with identity matrices of the appropriate size, and modifying S each time a row operation is performed on A in the algorithm by the same row operation, and similarly modifying T for each column operation performed. Since row operations are left-multiplications and column operations are right-multiplications, this preserves the invariant where denote current values and A denotes the original matrix; eventually the matrices in this invariant become diagonal. Only invertible row and column operations are performed, which ensures that S and T remain invertible matrices.
For a in R \ {0}, write δ(a) for the number of prime factors of a (these exist and are unique since any PID is also a unique factorization domain). In particular, R is also a Bézout domain, so it is a gcd domain and the gcd of any two elements satisfies a Bézout's identity.
To put a matrix into Smith normal form, one can repeatedly apply the following, where t loops from 1 to m.
Step I: Choosing a pivot
Choose jt to be the smallest column index of A with a non-zero entry, starting the search at column index jt-1+1 if t > 1.
We wish to have ; if this is the case this step is complete, otherwise there is by assumption some k with , and we can exchange rows and k, thereby obtaining .
Our chosen pivot is now at position (t, jt).
Step II: Improving the pivot
If there is an entry at position (k,jt) such that , then, letting , we know by the Bézout property that there exist σ, τ in R such that
By left-multiplication with an appropriate invertible matrix L, it can be achieved that row t of the matrix product is the sum of σ times the original row t and τ times the original row k, that row k of the product is another linear combination of those original rows, and that all other rows are unchanged. Explicitly, if σ and τ satisfy the above equation, then for and (which divisions are possible by the definition of β) one has
so that the matrix
is invertible, with inverse
Now L can be obtained by fitting into rows and columns t and k of the identity matrix. By construction the matrix obtained after left-multiplying by L has entry β at position (t,jt) (and due to our choice of α and γ it also has an entry 0 at position (k,jt), which is useful though not essential for the algorithm). This new entry β divides the entry that was there before, and so in particular ; therefore repeating these steps must eventually terminate. One ends up with a matrix having an entry at position (t,jt) that divides all entries in column jt.
Step III: Eliminating entries
Finally, adding appropriate multiples of row t, it can be achieved that all entries in column jt except for that at position (t,jt) are zero. This can be achieved by left-multiplication with an appropriate matrix. However, to make the matrix fully diagonal we need to eliminate nonzero entries on the row of position (t,jt) as well. This can be achieved by repeating the steps in Step II for columns instead of rows, and using multiplication on the right. In general this will result in the zero entries from the prior application of Step III becoming nonzero again.
However, notice that the ideals generated by the elements at position (t,jt) form an ascending chain, because entries from a later step always divide entries from a previous step. Therefore, since R is a Noetherian ring (it is a PID), the ideals eventually become stationary and do not change. This means that at some stage after Step II has been applied, the entry at (t,jt) will divide all nonzero row or column entries before applying any more steps in Step II. Then we can eliminate entries in the row or column with nonzero entries while preserving the zeros in the already-zero row or column. At this point, only the block of A to the lower right of (t,jt) needs to be diagonalized, and conceptually the algorithm can be applied recursively, treating this block as a separate matrix. In other words, we can increment t by one and go back to Step I.
Final step
Applying the steps described above to the remaining non-zero columns of the resulting matrix (if any), we get an -matrix with column indices where . The matrix entries are non-zero, and every other entry is zero.
Now we can move the null columns of this matrix to the right, so that the nonzero entries are on positions for . For short, set for the element at position .
The condition of divisibility of diagonal entries might not be satisfied. For any index for which , one can repair this shortcoming by operations on rows and columns and only: first add column to column to get an entry in column i without disturbing the entry at position , and then apply a row operation to make the entry at position equal to as in Step II; finally proceed as in Step III to make the matrix diagonal again. Since the new entry at position is a linear combination of the original , it is divisible by β.
The value does not change by the above operation (it is δ of the determinant of the upper submatrix), whence that operation does diminish (by moving prime factors to the right) the value of
So after finitely many applications of this operation no further application is possible, which means that we have obtained as desired.
Since all row and column manipulations involved in the process are invertible, this shows that there exist invertible and -matrices S, T so that the product S A T satisfies the definition of a Smith normal form. In particular, this shows that the Smith normal form exists, which was assumed without proof in the definition.
Applications
The Smith normal form is useful for computing the homology of a chain complex when the chain modules of the chain complex are finitely generated. For instance, in topology, it can be used to compute the homology of a simplicial complex or CW complex over the integers, because the boundary maps in such a complex are just integer matrices. It can also be used to prove the well known structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain.
Example
As an example, we will find the Smith normal form of the following matrix over the integers.
The following matrices are the intermediate steps as the algorithm is applied to the above matrix.
So the Smith normal form is
and the elementary divisors are 2, 6 and 12.
Similarity
The Smith normal form can be used to determine whether or not matrices with entries over a common field are similar. Specifically two matrices A and B are similar if and only if the characteristic matrices and have the same Smith normal form.
For example, with
A and B are similar because the Smith normal form of their characteristic matrices match, but are not similar to C because the Smith normal form of the characteristic matrices do not match.
See also
- Canonical form
- Elementary divisors
- Frobenius normal form
- Hermite normal form
- Invariant factor
- Henry John Stephen Smith (1826–1883), eponym of the Smith normal form
- Structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain
References
- One of the biggest reasons investing in a Singapore new launch is an effective things is as a result of it is doable to be lent massive quantities of money at very low interest rates that you should utilize to purchase it. Then, if property values continue to go up, then you'll get a really high return on funding (ROI). Simply make sure you purchase one of the higher properties, reminiscent of the ones at Fernvale the Riverbank or any Singapore landed property Get Earnings by means of Renting
In its statement, the singapore property listing - website link, government claimed that the majority citizens buying their first residence won't be hurt by the new measures. Some concessions can even be prolonged to chose teams of consumers, similar to married couples with a minimum of one Singaporean partner who are purchasing their second property so long as they intend to promote their first residential property. Lower the LTV limit on housing loans granted by monetary establishments regulated by MAS from 70% to 60% for property purchasers who are individuals with a number of outstanding housing loans on the time of the brand new housing purchase. Singapore Property Measures - 30 August 2010 The most popular seek for the number of bedrooms in Singapore is 4, followed by 2 and three. Lush Acres EC @ Sengkang
Discover out more about real estate funding in the area, together with info on international funding incentives and property possession. Many Singaporeans have been investing in property across the causeway in recent years, attracted by comparatively low prices. However, those who need to exit their investments quickly are likely to face significant challenges when trying to sell their property – and could finally be stuck with a property they can't sell. Career improvement programmes, in-house valuation, auctions and administrative help, venture advertising and marketing, skilled talks and traisning are continuously planned for the sales associates to help them obtain better outcomes for his or her shoppers while at Knight Frank Singapore. No change Present Rules
Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which may be as a lot as $2 million per family, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for lower than the excellent loans), or take part in a foreclosure course of. An extension of theexemption would seem like a common-sense means to assist stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means widespread sense could not win out. Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-cut price talks, in response to communications director Nadeam Elshami. Buying or promoting of blue mild bulbs is unlawful.
A vendor's stamp duty has been launched on industrial property for the primary time, at rates ranging from 5 per cent to 15 per cent. The Authorities might be trying to reassure the market that they aren't in opposition to foreigners and PRs investing in Singapore's property market. They imposed these measures because of extenuating components available in the market." The sale of new dual-key EC models will even be restricted to multi-generational households only. The models have two separate entrances, permitting grandparents, for example, to dwell separately. The vendor's stamp obligation takes effect right this moment and applies to industrial property and plots which might be offered inside three years of the date of buy. JLL named Best Performing Property Brand for second year running
The data offered is for normal info purposes only and isn't supposed to be personalised investment or monetary advice. Motley Fool Singapore contributor Stanley Lim would not personal shares in any corporations talked about. Singapore private home costs increased by 1.eight% within the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 0.6% within the earlier quarter. Resale prices of government-built HDB residences which are usually bought by Singaporeans, elevated by 2.5%, quarter on quarter, the quickest acquire in five quarters. And industrial property, prices are actually double the levels of three years ago. No withholding tax in the event you sell your property. All your local information regarding vital HDB policies, condominium launches, land growth, commercial property and more
There are various methods to go about discovering the precise property. Some local newspapers (together with the Straits Instances ) have categorised property sections and many local property brokers have websites. Now there are some specifics to consider when buying a 'new launch' rental. Intended use of the unit Every sale begins with 10 p.c low cost for finish of season sale; changes to 20 % discount storewide; follows by additional reduction of fiftyand ends with last discount of 70 % or extra. Typically there is even a warehouse sale or transferring out sale with huge mark-down of costs for stock clearance. Deborah Regulation from Expat Realtor shares her property market update, plus prime rental residences and houses at the moment available to lease Esparina EC @ Sengkang Reprinted (pp. 367–409) in The Collected Mathematical Papers of Henry John Stephen Smith, Vol. I, edited by J. W. L. Glaisher. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1894), xcv+603 pp. - Template:PlanetMath
- Template:PlanetMath
- K. R. Matthews, Smith normal form. MP274: Linear Algebra, Lecture Notes, University of Queensland, 1991.