|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:Tether-satellite-NASA.jpg|frame|right|Artist's conception of satellite with a tether]]
| | Hello. Let me introduce the writer. His title is Luis Brixey but it's not the most masucline name out there. Wyoming is exactly where my home is and he doesn't strategy on changing it. To do martial arts is some thing that he's been performing for years. Since he was eighteen he's been operating as an purchase clerk but he ideas on changing it. He's been working on his website for some time now. Verify it out here: http://chloe23b.buzznet.com/user/journal/17647916/tips-find-leading-plastic-surgeon/<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| '''Space tethers''' are [[cable]]s, usually long and very strong, which can be used for propulsion, stabilization, or maintaining the formation of space systems by determining the trajectory of [[spacecraft]] and [[Payload (air and space craft)|payload]]s.<ref name= "handbook">[[NASA]], [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980018321_1998056794.pdf Tethers In Space Handbook], edited by M. L. Cosmo and E. C. Lorenzini, third edition December 1997 (accessed 20 October 2010); see also version of [http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/337451main_Tethers_In_Space_Handbook_Section_1_2.pdf NASA MSFC];
| | Have a look at my web-site: [http://chloe23b.buzznet.com/user/journal/17647916/tips-find-leading-plastic-surgeon/ facial plastic surgeon training] |
| available on [http://www.scribd.com/doc/13841374/Tethers-in-Space-Handbook-3rd-Ed scribd ''www.scribd.com'']</ref> Depending on the mission objectives and altitude, [[spaceflight]] using this form of [[spacecraft propulsion]] may be significantly less expensive than spaceflight using [[rocket engine]]s.
| |
| | |
| Four main techniques for employing space tethers are in development:<ref>{{cite journal|last=Finckenor|first=Miria|coauthors=AIAA Technical Committee|title=Space Tether|journal=Aerospace America|date=December 2005|pages=78}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Bilen|first=Sven|coauthors=AIAA Technical Committee|title=Space Tethers|journal=Aerospace America|date=December 2007|pages=89}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| '''[[Electrodynamic tether]]'''
| |
| :This is a conductive tether that carries a current that can generate [[thrust]] or [[aerodynamic drag|drag]] from a [[planetary magnetic field]], in much the same way as an [[electric motor]].
| |
| '''[[Momentum exchange tether]]'''
| |
| :This is a rotating tether that would grab a spacecraft and then release it at later time. Doing this can transfer momentum and energy from the tether to and from the spacecraft with very little loss; this can be used for [[orbital maneuver]]ing.
| |
| '''[[Tethered formation flying]]'''
| |
| :This is typically a [[insulator (electrical)|non-conductive]] tether that accurately maintains a set distance between space vehicles.
| |
| '''[[Electric Sail|Electric sail]]'''
| |
| :A form of [[solar wind]] sail with electrically charged [[tether]]s that will be pushed by the momentum of solar wind [[ion]]s.
| |
| | |
| Many uses for space tethers have been proposed, including deployment as [[space elevator]]s and for doing propellant-free orbital transfers.
| |
| | |
| == History ==
| |
| | |
| [[Tsiolkovsky]] once proposed a tower so tall that it reached into space, so that it would be held there by the rotation of the [[Earth]]. However, at the time, there was no realistic way to build it.
| |
| | |
| To try to solve the problems in ''[[Komsomolskaya Pravda]]'' (July 31, 1960), another [[Russia]]n, [[Yuri Artsutanov]], wrote in greater detail about the idea of a tensile cable to be deployed from a [[geosynchronous satellite]], downwards towards the ground, and upwards away, keeping the cable balanced. This is the [[space elevator]] idea, a type of synchronous tether that would rotate with the earth. However, given the materials technology of the time, this too was impractical on Earth.
| |
| | |
| In the 1970s, [[Jerome Pearson]] independently conceived the idea of a space elevator, sometimes referred to as a synchronous tether,<ref name="Pearson 2005">{{cite web| url=http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/1032Pearson.pdf| last=Pearson| year=2005| title=Lunar Space Elevators for Cislunar Space Development: Phase I Final Technical Report| first=Jerome| coauthors=Eugene Levin, John Oldson and Harry Wykes| format=PDF}}</ref> and, in particular, analyzed a [[lunar elevator]] that can go through the [[Lagrange point|L1 and L2 points]], and this was found to be possible with materials then existing.
| |
| | |
| In 1977, [[Hans Moravec]]<ref>[http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/project.archive/1976.skyhook/papers/scable.pox The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, v25#4, pp. 307-322, Oct-Dec 1977]</ref> and later [[Robert L. Forward]] investigated the physics of non-synchronous [[Skyhook (structure)|skyhooks]], also known as rotating skyhooks, and performed detailed simulations of tapered rotating tethers that could pick objects off of, and place objects onto, the [[Moon]], [[Mars]] and other [[planets]], with little loss, or even a net gain of energy.<ref name="nonsynch">{{Cite web |first=Hans |last=Moravec |url=http://www.mxertether.com/papers/architectures/nonsynch-skyhook-materials.pdf |title=Orbital Bridges |year=1986 |accessdate=Oct 10, 2010}}{{dead link |date=October 2012}}</ref><ref name= "moravec87">Hans Moravec, [http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/project.archive/general.articles/1987/skyhook.ltx "Non-Synchronous Orbital Skyhooks for the Moon and Mars with Conventional Materials"] (Hans Moravec's thoughts on skyhooks, tethers, rotovators, etc., as of 1987) (accessed 10 October 2010)</ref>
| |
| | |
| In 1979, [[NASA]] examined the feasibility of the idea and gave direction to the study of tethered systems, especially tethered satellites.<ref name= "handbook">{{cite web |editor=Cosmo, M. L.; Lorenzini, E. C. |title=Tethers In Space Handbook |date=December 1998 |publisher=NASA |url=http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980018321_1998056794.pdf |edition=3rd |accessdate=20 October 2010}} See also version of [http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/337451main_Tethers_In_Space_Handbook_Section_1_2.pdf NASA MSFC];
| |
| available on [http://www.scribd.com/doc/13841374/Tethers-in-Space-Handbook-3rd-Ed Scribd].</ref><ref name="carroll">Joseph A. Carroll and John C. Oldson, [http://www.tetherapplications.com/papers/small_satellite.pdf “Tethers for Small Satellite Applications”], presented at the 1995 AIAA / USU Small Satellite Conference in Logan, [[Utah]], [[USA]] (accessed 20 October 2010)</ref> In 2000, NASA and [[Boeing]] considered a [[HASTOL]] concept, where a tether would take payloads from a hypersonic aircraft (at half of orbital velocity) to [[orbit]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch System: Phase I Final Report |date=7 January 2000 |publisher=[[NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts]] |url=http://www.spaceelevator.com/docs/355Bogar.pdf |authors=Thomas J. Bogar, et al. |id=Research Grant No. 07600-018 <!--BOEING-STL 2000P0001-->}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| === Missions ===
| |
| | |
| [[Image:TiPS lg.jpg|right|thumb|right|Graphic of the [[USA|US]] Naval Research Laboratory's TiPS tether satellite. Note that only a small part of the 4 km tether is shown deployed.]]
| |
| | |
| {{main|Space tether missions}}
| |
| | |
| A '''tether satellite''' is a [[satellite]] connected to another by a space tether.
| |
| | |
| Tether satellites can be used for various purposes, including research into [[Momentum exchange tether|tether propulsion]], [[Gravity-gradient stabilization|tidal stabilisation]] and orbital plasma dynamics.
| |
| | |
| A number of tether satellites have been launched, with varying degrees of success.
| |
| | |
| ==Types==
| |
| | |
| There are many different (and overlapping) types of tether.
| |
| | |
| ===Momentum exchange===
| |
| {{main|Momentum exchange tether}}
| |
| | |
| [[Momentum]] exchange tethers are one of many applications for space tethers. This subset represents an entire area of research using a spinning conductive and/or non-conductive tether to throw spacecraft up or down in orbit (like a sling), thereby transferring (or taking) its momentum.
| |
| | |
| The act of spinning a long tether end-for-end creates a controlled acceleration on the end-masses of the system and a tension in the tether. This spin is manipulated by control of the [[angular frequency]]. From this, momentum exchange can occur if an end body is released at the right point during the controlled rotation. The transfer in momentum to the released object will cause the tether system to lose (or gain) [[orbital energy]], and lose (or gain) altitude (and may require reboosting) or change orbital planes; and the opposite to happen to the released mass.
| |
| | |
| When in a magnetic field, such as in [[low Earth orbit]], when using an [[electrodynamic tether]], it is possible to re-boost without the expenditure of consumables. An electrodynamic tether was profiled in the documentary film ''[[Orphans of Apollo]]'' as technology that was to be used to keep the Russian space station ''[[Mir]]'' in orbit.<ref name="Orphans of Apollo" >{{cite web|title=Orphans of Apollo|url=http://orphansofapollo.wordpress.com/|publisher=World Press|accessdate=30 January 2013}}</ref><ref name=Foust>{{cite journal|last=Foust|first=Jeff|title=Preview: Orphans of Apollo|journal=The Space Review|date=July 28, 2008|url=http://thespacereview.com/article/1176/1|accessdate=30 January 2013}}</ref> Other schemes involve balancing the momentum flow (such as catching and releasing payloads at almost the same time) or using conventional rocket propulsion or [[ion drive]]s.
| |
| | |
| ===Electrodynamic===
| |
| | |
| [[Image:STS-75 Tethered Satellite System deployment.jpg|thumb|right|Medium close-up view, captured with a 70 mm camera, shows [[Tethered Satellite System]] deployment.]]
| |
| | |
| {{main|Electrodynamic tether}}
| |
| | |
| '''Electrodynamic tethers''' are long conducting wires, such as one deployed from a [[tether satellite]], which can operate on electromagnetic principles as [[electrical generator|generators]], by converting their [[kinetic energy]] to [[electrical energy]], or as [[electric motor|motors]], converting electrical energy to kinetic energy.<ref name= "handbook">NASA, [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980018321_1998056794.pdf Tethers In Space Handbook], edited by M. L. Cosmo and E. C. Lorenzini, third edition December 1997 (accessed 20 October 2010); see also version of [http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/337451main_Tethers_In_Space_Handbook_Section_1_2.pdf NASA MSFC];
| |
| available on [http://www.scribd.com/doc/13841374/Tethers-in-Space-Handbook-3rd-Ed scribd '''www.scribd.com']</ref> Electric potential is generated across a conductive tether by its motion through the earth's magnetic field. The choice of the metal [[electrical conductor|conductor]] to be used in an electrodynamic tether is determined by a variety of factors. Primary factors usually include high [[electrical conductivity]] and low [[density]]. Secondary factors, depending on the application, include cost, strength, and melting point.
| |
| | |
| ===Formation flying===
| |
| {{main|Tethered formation flying}}
| |
| | |
| This is the use of a (typically) non-conductive tether to connect multiple spacecraft.
| |
| | |
| ==Space environment==
| |
| | |
| ===Gravitational gradient stabilization===
| |
| | |
| [[File:Fig11 Gravitational Gradient.PNG|thumb|right|Description of the forces contributing towards maintaining a gravity gradient alignment in a tether system]]
| |
| | |
| {{main|Gravity-gradient stabilization}}
| |
| | |
| Instead of rotating end for end, tethers can also be kept straight by the slight difference in the strength of gravity over their length.
| |
| | |
| A non-rotating tether system has a stable orientation that is aligned along the local vertical (of the earth or other body). This can be understood by inspection of the figure below where two spacecraft at two different altitudes have been connected by a tether. Normally, each spacecraft would have a balance of gravitational (e.g. F<sub>g1</sub>) and centrifugal (e.g. F<sub>c1</sub>), but when tied together by a tether, these values begin to change with respect to one another. This phenomenon occurs because, without the tether, the higher-altitude mass would travel slower than the lower mass. The system must move at a single speed, so the tether must therefore slow down the lower mass and speed up the upper one. The centrifugal force of the tethered upper body is increased, while that of the lower-altitude body is reduced. This results in the centrifugal force of the upper body and the gravitational force of the lower body being dominant. This difference in forces naturally aligns the system along the local vertical, as seen in the figure.<ref name=ref18>Cosmo, M. L., Lorenzini, E. C., "Tethers in Space Handbook", NASA Marchall Space Flight Center, 1997, pp. 274-1-274 {{clarify|date=September 2012}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ===Atomic oxygen===
| |
| {{details|Atomic oxygen}}
| |
| Objects in low-earth orbit are subjected to noticeable erosion from monomolecular oxygen due to the high [[orbital speed]] with which the molecules strike as well as their high reactivity.
| |
| | |
| ===Micrometeorites and space junk===
| |
| | |
| Simple single-strand tethers are susceptible to [[meteoroid|micrometeoroids]] and [[space junk]]. Several systems have since been proposed and tested to improve debris resistance:
| |
| * The [[USA|US]] [[US Naval Research Laboratory|Naval Research Laboratory]] has successfully flown a long term 6 km long, 2-3mm diameter tether with an outer layer of Spectra 1000 braid and a core of acrylic yarn.<ref>{{Wayback |url=http://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/satellite_missions/list_of_satellites/tipn_general.html |date=20070708055545 |title=TiPS: Missuion Objectives}}</ref> This satellite, the Tether Physics and Survivability Experiment (TiPS), was launched in June 1996 and remained in operation over 10 years, finally breaking in July 2006.<ref>[http://www.satobs.org/noss.html NOSS Launch Data] (see NOSS 2-3, which deployed TiPS)</ref>
| |
| * [[Robert P. Hoyt|Dr. Robert P. Hoyt]] patented an engineered circular net, such that a cut strand's strains would be redistributed automatically around the severed strand. This is called a [[Hoytether]]. Hoytethers have theoretical lifetimes of decades.
| |
| * Researchers with [[JAXA]] have also proposed net-based tethers for their future missions.<ref>{{Cite journal
| |
| | last1 = Ohkawa | first1 = Y.
| |
| | last2 = Kawamoto | first2 = S.
| |
| | last3 = Nishida | first3 = S. I.
| |
| | last4 = Kitamura | first4 = S.
| |
| | title = Research and Development of Electrodynamic Tethers for Space Debris Mitigation
| |
| | doi = 10.2322/tstj.7.Tr_2_5
| |
| | journal = Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Space Technology Japan
| |
| | volume = 7
| |
| | pages = Tr_T2_5 - Tr_2_10
| |
| | year = 2009
| |
| }}</ref>
| |
| * Another proposal is to use a tape or cloth.
| |
| | |
| Large pieces of junk would still cut most tethers, including the improved versions listed hereinbefore, but these are currently tracked on radar and have predictable orbits. A tether could be wiggled to dodge known pieces of junk, or thrusters used to change the orbit, avoiding a collision.
| |
| | |
| == Construction ==
| |
| | |
| ===Properties of useful materials===
| |
| | |
| [[Image:TSS-1R tether composition.png|thumb|right|alt=TSS-1R.|TSS-1R tether composition [NASA].]]
| |
| | |
| Tether properties and materials are dependent on the application. However, there are some common properties. To achieve maximum performance and low cost, tethers need to be made of materials with the combination of high strength or electrical conductivity and low density. All space tethers are susceptible to space debris or micrometeroids. Therefore, mission designers need to decide whether or not a protective coating is needed, including if against [[Ultraviolet|UV]] and [[atomic oxygen]]. Research is being conducted to assess the probability of a collision that would damage the tether [http://pdf.aiaa.org/getfile.cfm?urlX=4%3A7I%276D%26XY%22O%2CRA7KW4%5B%5DV%3A%5B%3D5%3A%28%20%0A&urla=%25%2ARH%23%23P8%20%0A&urlb=%21%2A%20%20%20%0A&urlc=%21%2A0%20%20%0A&urld=%28%2A%22%40%20%23%20%2AJUA%5C%20%0A&urle=%27%28%22X%20%22%20%22%40T0%20%20%0A MAST].
| |
| | |
| For applications that exert high tensile forces on the tether, the materials need to be strong and light. Some current tether designs use crystalline plastics such as [[ultra high molecular weight polyethylene]], [[aramid]] or carbon fiber. A possible future material would be [[carbon nanotube]]s, which have an estimated [[tensile strength]] between 140 and 177 [[Orders of magnitude (pressure)|GPa]] (20.3-25.6 million psi), and a proven tensile strength in the range 50-60 GPa for some individual nanotubes. (A [[monocrystalline whisker|number of other materials obtain 10 to 20 GPa]] in some samples on the nano scale, but translating such strengths to the macro scale has been challenging so far, with, as of 2011, CNT-based ropes being an order of magnitude less strong, not yet stronger than more conventional carbon fiber on that scale).<ref>[http://science-wired.blogspot.com/2010/04/nanotube-fibers.html Nanotube Fibers]</ref><ref>[http://apl.aip.org/resource/1/applab/v74/i21/p3152_s1?isAuthorized=no Tensile tests of ropes of very long aligned multiwall carbon nanotubes]</ref><ref>[https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/mfyu/www/Documents/Publications/PRL1-2000.pdf Tensile Loading of Ropes of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes and their Mechanical Properties]</ref>
| |
| | |
| For some applications, the tensile force on the tether is less than 15 lbs (< 65 N)<ref name= "TSS-1R Failure Investigation">NASA, [http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19970011947 TSS-1R Mission Failure Investigation Board], Final Report, May 31, 1996 (accessed 7 April 2011)</ref> Material selection in this case depends on the purpose of the mission and design constraints. Electrodynamic tethers, such as the one used on TSS-1R, may use thin copper wires for high conductivity (see [[Electrodynamic tether|EDT]]).
| |
| | |
| There are design equations for certain applications that can identify typical quantities that drive material selection.
| |
| | |
| Space elevator equations typically use a "characteristic length", L<sub>c</sub>, which is also known as its "self-support length" and is the length of untapered cable it can support in a constant 1 ''g'' gravity field.
| |
| :<math>L_c = \frac{\sigma}{\rho g}</math>,
| |
| where σ is the stress limit (in pressure units) and ρ is the density of the material.
| |
| | |
| Hypersonic skyhook equations use the material's "specific velocity" which is equal to the maximum tangential velocity a spinning hoop can attain without breaking:
| |
| :<math>V = \sqrt{\frac{\sigma}{\rho}}</math>
| |
| | |
| For rotating tethers (rotovators) the value used is the material’s ‘characteristic velocity’ which is the maximum tip velocity a rotating untapered cable can attain without breaking,
| |
| :<math>V_c = \sqrt{\frac{2\sigma}{\rho}}</math>
| |
| The characteristic velocity equals the specific velocity multiplied by the square root of two.
| |
| | |
| These values are used in equations similar to the [[rocket equation]] and are analogous to specific impulse or exhaust velocity. The higher these values are, the more efficient and lighter the tether can be in relation to the payloads that they can carry. Eventually however, the mass of the tether propulsion system will be limited at the low end by other factors such as momentum storage.
| |
| | |
| ===Practical materials===
| |
| | |
| Materials proposed include [[Kevlar]], [[ultra high molecular weight polyethylene]], [[carbon nanotubes]], [[M5 fiber]], and [[diamond]].
| |
| | |
| One material that has great potential is M5 fiber. This is a synthetic fiber that is lighter than Kevlar or Spectra.<ref>Bacon 2005</ref> According to Pearson, Levin, Oldson, and Wykes in their article "The Lunar Space Elevator", an M5 ribbon 30 mm wide and 0.023 mm thick, would be able to support 2000 kg on the [[Moon|lunar]] surface (2005). It would also be able to hold 100 cargo vehicles, each with a mass of 580 kg, evenly spaced along the length of the elevator.<ref name="Pearson 2005"/> Other materials that could be used are T1000G carbon fiber, Spectra 2000, or Zylon.<ref name="easyrigging">Specifications for commercially available PBO (Zylon) cable: [http://www.easyrigging.com/fibres/pbo-zylon-the-high-performance-fibre/ "PBO (Zylon) The high performance fibre"] (accessed Oct. 20, 2010)</ref> All of these materials have breaking lengths of several hundred kilometers under 1 ''g'' (10 m/s²).<ref name="Pearson 2005"/>
| |
| | |
| {| class="wikitable sortable"
| |
| |+ Potential tether / elevator materials<ref name="Pearson 2005"/>
| |
| |-
| |
| ! Material
| |
| ! Density <br/>ρ <br/>(kg/m³)
| |
| ! Stress limit <br/> σ <br/>(GPa)
| |
| ! Characteristic length <br/>''L<sub>c</sub> = σ/ρg'' <br/>(km)
| |
| ! Specific velocity <br/>''V<sub>s</sub> = √(σ/ρ)'' <br/>(km/s)
| |
| ! Char. velocity <br/>''V<sub>c</sub> = √(2σ/ρ)'' <br/>(km/s)
| |
| |-
| |
| | Single-wall carbon nanotubes (individual nanotubes in lab)
| |
| | 2266
| |
| | 50
| |
| | 2200
| |
| | 4.7
| |
| | 6.6
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[Aramid]], polybenzoxazole (PBO) fiber ("Zylon")<ref name= "easyrigging" />
| |
| | 1340
| |
| | 5.9
| |
| | 450
| |
| | 2.1
| |
| | 3.0
| |
| |-
| |
| | Toray carbon fiber (T1000G)
| |
| | 1810
| |
| | 6.4
| |
| | 360
| |
| | 1.9
| |
| | 2.7
| |
| |-
| |
| | Magellan honeycomb polymer M5 (planned values)
| |
| | 1700
| |
| | 9.5
| |
| | 570
| |
| | 2.4
| |
| | 3.3
| |
| |-
| |
| | Magellan honeycomb polymer M5 (existing)
| |
| | 1700
| |
| | 5.7
| |
| | 340
| |
| | 1.8
| |
| | 2.6
| |
| |-
| |
| | Honeywell extended chain polyethylene fiber ([[Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene#Fiber applications|Spectra]] 2000)
| |
| | 970
| |
| | 3.0
| |
| | 316
| |
| | 1.8
| |
| | 2.5
| |
| |-
| |
| | DuPont Aramid fiber (Kevlar 49)
| |
| | 1440
| |
| | 3.6
| |
| | 255
| |
| | 1.6
| |
| | 2.2
| |
| |-
| |
| | Specialty materials e.g. silicon carbide
| |
| | 3000
| |
| | 5.9
| |
| | 199
| |
| | 1.4
| |
| | 2.0
| |
| |-
| |
| | Piano wire
| |
| | 8000
| |
| | 5
| |
| | 63
| |
| | 0.79
| |
| | 1.1
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[Aluminium]] (6061 T6)
| |
| | 2700
| |
| | 0.276
| |
| | 10
| |
| | 0.32
| |
| | 0.45
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| ===Shape===
| |
| | |
| ====Tapering====
| |
| | |
| For gravity stabilised tethers, to exceed the self-support length the tether material can be tapered so that the cross-sectional area varies with the total load at each point along the length of the cable. In practice this means that the central tether structure needs to be thicker than the tips. Correct tapering ensures that the tensile stress at every point in the cable is exactly the same. For very demanding applications, such as an Earth space elevator, the tapering can result in excessive ratios of cable weight to payload weight.
| |
| | |
| ====Thickness====
| |
| | |
| For rotating tethers not significantly affected by gravity, the thickness also varies, and it can be shown that the area, A, is given as a function of r (the distance from the centre) as follows:<ref name=lunarforward>[http://www.tethers.com/papers/LEO2Lunar%2792.pdf "Tether Transport from LEO to the Lunar Surface", R. L. Forward, AIAA Paper 91-2322, 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, 1991]</ref>
| |
| :<math>A(r) = \frac {M v^2} {T R} \mathrm{e} ^ { \frac {\delta} {T} \frac {v^2} {2} \left( 1-\frac {r^2} {R^2} \right) } </math>
| |
| where R is the radius of tether, v is the velocity with respect to the centre, M is the tip mass, <math>\delta</math> is the material density, and T is the design tensile strength ([[Young's modulus]] divided by safety factor).
| |
| | |
| ====Mass ratio====
| |
| | |
| [[File:Spinning tethers.png|thumb|right|Graph of tether mass to payload ratio versus the tip speed in multiples of the characteristic speed of the material]]
| |
| | |
| Integrating the area to give the volume and multiplying by the density and dividing by the payload mass gives a payload mass / tether mass ratio of:<ref name=lunarforward/>
| |
| :<math>\frac M m = \sqrt { \pi \frac { \delta } T \frac {V^2} {2} } \mathrm{e}^{ \left( \frac { \delta } T \frac {V^2} {2} \right) } \mathrm{erf} \left( \sqrt { \frac { \delta } T \frac { V^2 } {2} } \right)</math>
| |
| where erf is the normal probability [[error function]].
| |
| | |
| Let <math>V_r = V / V_c \,</math>,
| |
| :<math>V_c = \sqrt { \frac {2 T} \delta }</math>
| |
| then:<ref>Non-Synchronous Orbital Skyhooks for the Moon and Mars with Conventional Materials - [[Hans Moravec]]</ref>
| |
| :<math>V_c = \sqrt { \pi } V_r \mathrm{e}^{ {V_r}^2 } \mathrm{erf} ( {V_r} ) </math>
| |
| This equation can be compared with the [[rocket equation]], which is proportional to a simple exponent on a velocity, rather than a velocity squared. This difference effectively limits the delta-v that can be obtained from a single tether.
| |
| | |
| ===Redundancy===
| |
| | |
| In addition the cable shape must be constructed to withstand micrometeorites and [[space junk]]. This can be achieved with the use of redundant cables, such as the [[Hoytether]]; redundancy can ensure that it is very unlikely that multiple redundant cables would be damaged near the same point on the cable, and hence a very large amount of total damage can occur over different parts of the cable before failure occurs.
| |
| | |
| ===Material strength===
| |
| | |
| Beanstalks and rotovators are currently limited by the strengths of available materials. Although ultra-high strength plastic fibers ([[Kevlar]] and [[Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene#Fiber applications|Spectra]]) permit rotovators to pluck masses from the surface of the Moon and Mars, a rotovator from these materials cannot lift from the surface of the Earth. In theory, high flying, [[supersonic]] (or [[hypersonic]]) aircraft could deliver a payload to a rotovator that dipped into Earth's upper atmosphere briefly at predictable locations throughout the tropic (and temperate) zone of Earth.
| |
| | |
| ===Cargo capture===
| |
| | |
| Cargo capture for rotovators is nontrivial, and failure to capture can cause problems. Several systems have been proposed, such as shooting nets at the cargo, but all add weight, complexity, and another failure mode. At least one lab scale demonstration of a working grapple system has been achieved however.<ref>http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/news/releases/2005/05-108.html NASA Engineers, Tennessee College Students Successfully Demonstrate Catch Mechanism for Future Space Tether</ref>
| |
| | |
| ===Life expectancy===
| |
| | |
| Currently, the strongest materials in tension are plastics that require a coating for protection from UV radiation and (depending on the orbit) erosion by atomic oxygen. Disposal of [[waste heat]] is difficult in a [[vacuum]], so [[thermal shock|overheating]] may cause tether failures or damage.
| |
| | |
| ==Control and modelling==
| |
| | |
| ===Pendular motion instability===
| |
| | |
| Electrodynamic tethers deployed along the local vertical ('hanging tethers') may suffer from dynamical instability. Pendular motion causes the tether vibration amplitude to build up under the action of electromagnetic interaction. As the mission time increases, this behavior can compromise the performance of the system. Over a few weeks, electrodynamic tethers in Earth orbit might build up vibrations in many modes, as their orbit interacts with irregularities in magnetic and gravitational fields.
| |
| | |
| One plan to control the vibrations is to actively vary the tether current to counteract the growth of the vibrations. Electrodynamic tethers can be stabilized by reducing their current when it would feed the oscillations, and increasing it when it opposes oscillations. Simulations have demonstrated that this can control tether vibration.{{Citation needed|date=January 2008}} This approach requires sensors to measure tether vibrations, which can either be an [[inertial navigation system]] on one end of the tether, or [[satellite navigation]] systems mounted on the tether, transmitting their positions to a receiver on the end.
| |
| | |
| Another proposed method is to use spinning electrodynamic tethers instead of hanging tethers. The gyroscopic effect provides passive stabilisation, avoiding the instability.
| |
| | |
| ===Surges===
| |
| As mentioned earlier, conductive tethers have failed from unexpected current surges. Unexpected [[electrostatic discharge]]s have cut tethers (e.g. see Tethered Satellite System Reflight (TSS‑1R) on [[STS-75|STS‑75]]), damaged electronics, and welded tether handling machinery. It may be that the Earth's magnetic field is not as homogeneous as some engineers have believed.
| |
| | |
| ===Vibrations===
| |
| | |
| Computer models frequently show tethers can snap due to vibration.
| |
| | |
| Mechanical tether-handling equipment is often surprisingly heavy, with complex controls to damp vibrations. The one ton climber proposed by Dr. Brad Edwards for his Space Elevator may detect and suppress most vibrations by changing speed and direction. The climber can also repair or augment a tether by spinning more strands.
| |
| | |
| The vibration modes that may be a problem include skipping rope, transverse, longitudinal, and pendulum.<ref>[http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/tether/dynamics.html Tether dynamics]</ref>
| |
| | |
| Tethers are nearly always tapered, and this can greatly amplify the movement at the thinnest tip in whip-like ways.
| |
| | |
| ===Other issues===
| |
| | |
| A tether is not a spherical object, and has significant extent. This means that as an extended object, it is not directly modelable as a point source, and this means that the [[center of mass]] and [[center of gravity]] are not usually colocated. Thus the inverse square law does not apply except at large distances, to the overall behaviour of a tether. Hence the orbits are not completely Keplerian, and in some cases they are actually chaotic.<ref>http://www.academia.edu/3453325/Ultra_Long_Orbital_Tethers_Behave_Highly_Non-Keplerian_and_Unstable Ultra Long Orbital WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS: Tethers Behave Highly Non-Keplerian and Unstable- Daniele Mortari</ref>
| |
| | |
| With [[Non-rocket spacelaunch#Bolo|bolus]] designs, rotation of the cable interacting with the non linear gravity fields found in elliptical orbits can cause exchange of orbital angular momentum and rotation angular momentum. This can make prediction and modelling extremely complex.
| |
| | |
| ==In fiction==
| |
| | |
| The mechanics of tether propulsion are critical in resolving the climax of the book ''[[The Descent of Anansi]]'' by [[Steven Barnes]] and [[Larry Niven]].
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| {{Portal|Spaceflight|Science|Science-fiction}}
| |
| * [[Spacecraft propulsion]]
| |
| * [[Non-rocket spacelaunch]]
| |
| * [[Orbital ring]] — a ring around the Earth
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| | |
| ===Text===
| |
| * [http://data.engin.umich.edu/Icarus/proseds_ed.html ProSEDS, a tether-based propulsion experiment]
| |
| * [http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~spgroup/ Special Projects Group]
| |
| * [http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/background/facts/momentum.pdf NASA tether overview]
| |
| * [http://www.tethers.com/ Tethers Unlimited Incorporated]
| |
| * [http://www.tethers.com/papers/TethersInSpace.pdf "Tethers In Space Handbook" M. L. Cosmo and E. C. Lorenzini third edition December 1997]
| |
| * [http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/library/meetings/fellows/nov99/355Bogar.pdf NASA IAC report on orbital systems]
| |
| * [http://spacetethers.com/ SpaceTethers.com, space tether simulator applet]
| |
| * [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9574513 USA National Public Radio - Space Tethers: Slinging Objects in Orbit?]
| |
| * [http://www.esa.int/esaED/SEMVJ1AATME_highereducation_0.html ESA - The YES2 project]
| |
| * [http://www.esa.int/esaHS/SEMG3ZU681F_index_0.html ESA - Students test 'space postal service' during Foton mission]
| |
| * [http://www.thespaceshow.com/detail.asp?q=531 The Space Show #531] [[Robert P. Hoyt]] discusses space tethers on [[the Space Show]]
| |
| * [http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/shuttle/sts-75/tss-1r/tss-1r.html NASA site on TSS-1R]
| |
| * [http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2007/11jun_ff.htm?list877264 NASA Tether Origami]
| |
| * [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7009 New Scientist article]
| |
| * [http://code8100.nrl.navy.mil/programs/tips.htm Tether Physics and Survivability Experiment]
| |
| * [http://www.tethers.com/TUPubs.html Tethers Unlimited • Publications]
| |
| * [http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/spgroup/handbook.html Tethers in Space Handbook (PDF)]
| |
| * [http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3A9d437e58-82c0-4af1-935f-69ba5573c7a2/ Tethers in Space, a propellantless propulsion in-orbit demonstration, ISBN 978-90-8891-282-5]
| |
| | |
| ===Video===
| |
| * [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPx1Nq80jm8 Video animation explaining how a thether might work]
| |
| | |
| {{spacecraft propulsion}}
| |
| | |
| {{Space elevator}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Reusable space launch systems]]
| |
| [[Category:Single-stage-to-orbit]]
| |
| [[Category:Space elevator]]
| |
| [[Category:Spacecraft propulsion]]
| |
| [[Category:Vertical transport devices]]
| |
| [[Category:Satellites]]
| |
| | |
| [[eo:Katenita satelito]]
| |
| [[fr:Satellite captif]]
| |
| [[it:Satellite Tethered]]
| |