|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{about||the scaling of electrical networks|prototype filter#frequency scaling|the power conservation technique|dynamic frequency scaling}}
| | Friends contact him Royal. Delaware is the only location I've been residing in. I am a cashier and I'll be promoted soon. Playing crochet is something that I've carried out for many years.<br><br>Visit my page: extended auto warranty - [http://Sticker-Shocked.com/UserProfile/tabid/43/userId/404/Default.aspx just click the following page] - |
| | |
| In [[computer architecture]], '''frequency scaling''' (also known as '''frequency ramping''') is the technique of ramping a processor's [[frequency]] so as to achieve performance gains. Frequency ramping was the dominant force in commodity processor performance increases from the mid-1980s until roughly the end of 2004.
| |
| | |
| The effect of processor [[frequency]] on computer speed can be seen by looking at the equation for computer program runtime:
| |
| | |
| :<math> \mathrm{Run time} = \frac{\mathrm{Instructions}}{\mathrm{Program}} \times \frac{\mathrm{Cycles}}{\mathrm{Instruction}} \times \frac {\mathrm{Time}}{\mathrm{Cycle}}</math>
| |
| where instructions per program is the total instructions being executed in a given program, cycles per instruction is a program-dependent, architecture-dependent average value, and seconds per cycles is by definition the inverse of frequency.<ref>[[John L. Hennessy]] and [[David A. Patterson (scientist)|David A. Patterson]]. Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach. 3rd edition, 2002. Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN 1-55860-724-2. Page 43.</ref> An increase in frequency thus decreases runtime.
| |
| | |
| However, [[power consumption]] in a chip is given by the equation
| |
| :<math>P = C \times V^2 \times F</math> | |
| where P is power, C is the [[capacitance]] being switched per clock cycle, V is [[voltage]], and F is the processor frequency (cycles per second).<ref>J. M. Rabaey. Digital Integrated Circuits. Prentice Hall, 1996.</ref> Increases in frequency thus increase the amount of power used in a processor. Increasing processor [[power consumption]] led ultimately to [[Intel]]'s May 2004 cancellation of its [[Tejas and Jayhawk]] processors, which is generally cited as the end of frequency scaling as the dominant computer architecture paradigm.<ref>Laurie J. Flynn. [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/08/business/08chip.html?ex=1399348800&en=98cc44ca97b1a562&ei=5007 Intel Halts Development of 2 New Microprocessors]. ''New York Times'', May 8, 2004.</ref>
| |
| | |
| [[Moore's Law]], despite predictions of its demise, is still in effect. Despite power issues, transistor densities are still doubling every 18 to 24 months. With the end of frequency scaling, these new transistors (which are no longer needed to facilitate frequency scaling) can be used to add extra hardware, such as additional cores, to facilitate parallel computing - a technique that is being referred to as [[parallel scaling]].
| |
| | |
| The end of frequency scaling as the dominant cause of processor performance gains has caused an industry-wide shift to [[parallel computing]] in the form of [[Multi-core (computing)|multicore processors]].
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Computer architecture]]
| |
| [[Category:Central processing unit]]
| |
| | |
| [[fr:Fréquence du processeur]]
| |
Friends contact him Royal. Delaware is the only location I've been residing in. I am a cashier and I'll be promoted soon. Playing crochet is something that I've carried out for many years.
Visit my page: extended auto warranty - just click the following page -