Gravitational energy: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>ClueBot NG
m Reverting possible vandalism by 92.96.62.152 to version by DVdm. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1678734) (Bot)
en>Steelpillow
Newtonian mechanics: Negative energy
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{otheruses4|the general mathematical result|the application to time series analysis|Wold's theorem}}
Hi there, I am Alyson Pomerleau and I think it seems fairly great when you say it. Invoicing is my profession. Mississippi is exactly where his house is. My spouse doesn't like it the way I do but what I truly like doing is caving but I don't have the time recently.<br><br>Also visit my web page ... love psychics ([http://Www.Khuplaza.com/dent/14869889 Www.Khuplaza.com])
In [[operator theory]], a discipline within mathematics, the '''Wold decomposition''', named after [[Herman Wold]], or '''Wold–von Neumann decomposition''', after Wold and [[John von Neumann]], is a classification theorem for [[isometry|isometric linear operator]]s on a given [[Hilbert space]]. It states that every isometry is a direct sums of copies of the [[unilateral shift]] and a [[unitary operator]].
 
In [[time series analysis]], the theorem implies that any [[Stationary process|stationary]] discrete-time [[stochastic process]] can be decomposed into a pair of uncorrelated processes, one deterministic, and the other being a [[moving average process]].
 
== Details ==
 
Let ''H'' be a Hilbert space, ''L''(''H'') be the bounded operators on ''H'', and ''V'' ∈ ''L''(''H'') be an isometry. The '''Wold decomposition''' states that every isometry ''V'' takes the form
 
:<math>V = (\oplus_{\alpha \in A} S) \oplus U</math>
 
for some index set ''A'', where ''S'' in the [[unilateral shift]] on a Hilbert space ''H<sub>α</sub>'', and ''U'' is an unitary operator (possible vacuous). The family {''H<sub>α</sub>''} consists of isomorphic Hilbert spaces.
 
A proof can be sketched as follows. Successive applications of ''V'' give a descending sequences of copies of ''H'' isomorphically embedded in itself:
 
:<math>H = H \supset V(H) \supset V^2 (H) \supset \cdots = H_0 \supset H_1 \supset H_2 \supset \cdots, </math>
 
where ''V''(''H'') denotes the range of ''V''. The above defined <math>H_i = V^i(H)</math>. If one defines
 
:<math>M_i = H_i \ominus H_{i+1} = V^i (H \ominus V(H)) \quad \text{for} \quad i \geq 0 \;,</math>
 
then
 
:<math>H = (\oplus_{i \geq 0} M_i) \oplus (\cap_{i \geq 0} H_i) = K_1 \oplus K_2.</math>
 
It is clear that ''K''<sub>1</sub> and ''K''<sub>2</sub> are invariant subspaces of ''V''.
 
So ''V''(''K''<sub>2</sub>) = ''K''<sub>2</sub>. In other words, ''V'' restricted to ''K''<sub>2</sub> is a surjective isometry, i.e. an unitary operator ''U''.
 
Furthermore, each ''M<sub>i</sub>'' is isomorphic to another, with ''V'' being an isomorphism between ''M<sub>i</sub>'' and ''M''<sub>''i''+1</sub>: ''V'' "shifts" ''M<sub>i</sub>'' to ''M''<sub>''i''+1</sub>. Suppose the dimension of each ''M<sub>i</sub>'' is some cardinal number ''α''. We see  that ''K''<sub>1</sub> can be written as a direct sum Hilbert spaces
 
:<math>K_1 = \oplus H_{\alpha}</math>
 
where each ''H<sub>α</sub>'' is an invariant subspaces of ''V'' and ''V'' restricted to each ''H<sub>α</sub>'' is the unilateral shift ''S''. Therefore
 
:<math>V = V \vert_{K_1} \oplus V\vert_{K_2} = (\oplus_{\alpha \in A} S) \oplus U,</math>
 
which is a Wold decomposition of ''V''.
 
=== Remarks ===
 
It is immediate from the Wold decomposition that the [[spectrum (functional analysis)|spectrum]] of any proper, i.e. non-unitary, isometry is the unit disk in the complex plane.
 
An isometry ''V'' is said to be '''pure''' if, in the notation of the above proof, ∩<sub>''i''≥0</sub> ''H''<sub>''i''</sub> = {0}. The '''multiplicity''' of a pure isometry ''V'' is the dimension of the kernel of ''V*'', i.e. the cardinality of the index set ''A'' in the Wold decomposition of ''V''. In other words, a pure isometry of multiplicity ''N'' takes the form
 
:<math>V = \oplus_{1 \le \alpha \le N} S .</math>
 
In this terminology, the Wold decomposition expresses an isometry as a direct sum of a pure isometry and an unitary.
 
A subspace ''M'' is called a [[wandering set|wandering subspace]] of ''V'' if ''V''<sup>''n''</sup>(''M'') ⊥ ''V''<sup>''m''</sup>(''M'') for all ''n'' ≠ ''m''. In particular, each ''M''<sub>''i''</sub> defined above is a wandering subspace of&nbsp;''V''.
 
== A sequence of isometries ==
{{Expand section|date=June 2008}}
The decomposition above can be generalized slightly to a sequence of isometries, indexed by the integers.
 
== The C*-algebra generated by an isometry ==
 
Consider an isometry ''V'' ∈ ''L''(''H''). Denote by ''C*''(''V'') the [[C*-algebra]] generated by ''V'', i.e. ''C*''(''V'') is the norm closure of polynomials in ''V'' and ''V*''. The Wold decomposition can be applied to characterize ''C*''(''V'').
 
Let ''C''('''T''') be the continuous functions on the unit circle '''T'''. We recall that the C*-algebra ''C*''(''S'') generated by the unilateral shift ''S'' takes the following form
 
:''C*''(''S'') = {''T''<sub>''f''</sub> + ''K'' | ''T''<sub>''f''</sub> is a [[Toeplitz operator]] with continuous symbol ''f'' &isin; ''C''('''T''') and ''K'' is a [[compact operator on Hilbert space|compact operator]]}.
 
In this identification, ''S'' = ''T''<sub>''z''</sub> where ''z'' is the identity function in ''C''('''T'''). The algebra ''C*''(''S'') is called the [[Toeplitz algebra]].  
 
'''Theorem (Coburn)''' ''C*''(''V'') is isomorphic to the Toeplitz algebra and ''V'' is the isomorphic image of ''T<sub>z</sub>''.
 
The proof hinges on the connections with ''C''('''T'''), in the description of the Toeplitz algebra and that the spectrum of an unitary operator is contained in the circle '''T'''.
 
The following properties of the Toeplitz algebra will be needed:
 
#<math>T_f + T_g = T_{f+g}.\,</math>
#<math> T_f ^* = T_{{\bar f}} .</math>
#The semicommutator <math>T_fT_g - T_{fg} \,</math> is compact.
 
The Wold decomposition says that ''V'' is the direct sum of copies of ''T''<sub>''z''</sub> and then some unitary ''U'':
 
:<math>V = (\oplus_{\alpha \in A} T_z) \oplus U.</math>
 
So we invoke the [[continuous functional calculus]] ''f'' → ''f''(''U''), and define
 
:<math>
\Phi : C^*(S) \rightarrow C^*(V) \quad \text{by} \quad \Phi(T_f + K) = \oplus_{\alpha \in A} (T_f + K) \oplus f(U).
</math>
 
One can now verify Φ is an isomorphism that maps the unilateral shift to ''V'':
 
By property 1 above, Φ is linear. The map Φ is injective because ''T<sub>f</sub>'' is not compact for any non-zero ''f'' ∈ ''C''('''T''') and thus ''T<sub>f</sub>'' + ''K'' = 0 implies ''f'' = 0. Since the range of Φ is a C*-algebra, Φ is surjective by the minimality of ''C*''(''V''). Property 2 and the continuous functional calculus ensure that Φ preserves the *-operation. Finally, the semicommutator property shows that Φ is multiplicative. Therefore the theorem holds.
 
== References ==
 
*L. Coburn, The C*-algebra of an isometry, ''Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.'' '''73''', 1967, 722&ndash;726.
 
*T. Constantinescu, ''Schur Parameters, Dilation and Factorization Problems'', Birkhauser Verlag, Vol. 82, 1996.
 
*R.G. Douglas, ''Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory'', Academic Press, 1972.
 
*Marvin Rosenblum and James Rovnyak, ''Hardy Classes and Operator Theory'', Oxford University Press, 1985.
 
[[Category:Operator theory]]
[[Category:Invariant subspaces]]
[[Category:Functional analysis]]
[[Category:C*-algebras]]
[[Category:Theorems in functional analysis]]
 
[[de:Shiftoperator#Wold-Zerlegung]]

Latest revision as of 18:07, 5 January 2015

Hi there, I am Alyson Pomerleau and I think it seems fairly great when you say it. Invoicing is my profession. Mississippi is exactly where his house is. My spouse doesn't like it the way I do but what I truly like doing is caving but I don't have the time recently.

Also visit my web page ... love psychics (Www.Khuplaza.com)