Abel's identity: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
en>Yobot
m changes per WP:ORDINAL, replaced: <sup>th</sup> → th (3) using AWB (10080)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[general topology]], the '''pseudo-arc''' is the simplest nondegenerate [[Hereditary property#In topology|hereditarily]] [[indecomposable continuum]]. The pseudo-arc is an arc-like [[Homogeneous space|homogeneous]] continuum. [[R.H. Bing]] proved that, in a certain well-defined sense, most continua in '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>, ''n'' &ge; 2, are homeomorphic to the pseudo-arc.
23 year-old Visual Arts and Crafts Professionals Toney Frogge from Atholville, loves people, ganhando dinheiro na internet and calligraphy. Discovered some lovely places after working 2 days at Angkor.<br><br>Here is my web site - [http://comoganhardinheiropelainternet.comoganhardinheiro101.com como ficar rico]
 
== History ==
 
In 1920, [[Bronisław Knaster]] and [[Kazimierz Kuratowski]] asked whether a nondegenerate homogeneous continuum in the Euclidean plane '''R'''<sup>2</sup> must be a [[Jordan curve]]. In 1921, [[Stefan Mazurkiewicz]] asked whether a nondegenerate continuum in '''R'''<sup>2</sup> that is [[homeomorphic]] to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua must be an arc. In 1922, Knaster descovered the first example of a homogeneous hereditarily indecomposable continuum ''K'', later named the pseudo-arc, giving a negative answer to the Mazurkiewicz question. In 1948, [[R.H. Bing]] proved that Knaster's continuum is homogeneous, i.e., for any two of its points there is a homeomorphism taking one to the other. Yet also in 1948, [[Edwin E. Moise|Edwin Moise]] showed that Knaster's continuum is homeomorphic to each of its non-degenerate subcontinua. Due to its resemblance to the fundamental property of the arc, namely, being homeomorphic to all its nondegenerate subcontinua, Moise called his example ''M'' a '''pseudo-arc'''.<ref>{{harv|George W. Henderson|1960}} later showed that a ''decomposable'' continuum homeomorphic to all its nondenerate subcontinua must be an arc.</ref> Bing's construction is a modification of Moise's construction of ''M'', which he had first heard described in a lecture. In 1951, Bing proved that all hereditarily indecomposable arc-like continua are homeomorphic — this implies that Knaster's ''K'', Moise's ''M'', and Bing's ''B'' are all homeomorphic. Bing also proved that the pseudo-arc is typical among the continua in a Euclidean space of dimension at least 2 or an infinite-dimensional separable [[Hilbert space]].<ref>The history of the discovery of the pseudo-arc is described in {{harv|Nadler|1992}}, pp 228&ndash;229.</ref>
 
== Construction ==
 
The following construction of the pseudo-arc follows {{harv|Wayne Lewis|1999}}.
 
=== Chains ===
At the heart of the definition of the pseudo-arc is the concept of a ''chain'', which is defined as follows:
 
:A '''chain''' is a [[Finite set|finite collection]] of [[open set]]s <math>\mathcal{C}=\{C_1,C_2,\ldots,C_n\}</math> in a [[metric space]] such that <math>C_i\cap C_j\ne\emptyset</math> if and only if <math>|i-j|\le1.</math> The [[Element (mathematics)|elements]] of a chain are called its '''links''', and a chain is called an '''ε-chain''' if each of its links has [[diameter]] less than ε.
 
While being the simplest of the type of spaces listed above, the pseudo-arc is actually very complex.  The concept of a chain being ''crooked'' (defined below) is what endows the pseudo-arc with its complexity.  Informally, it requires a chain to follow a certain [[Recursion|recursive]] zig-zag pattern in another chain.  To 'move' from the ''m''th link of the larger chain to the ''n''th, the smaller chain must first move in a crooked manner from the ''m''th link to the (''n''-1)th link, then in a crooked manner to the (''m''+1)th link, and then finally to the ''n''th link.
 
More formally:
 
:Let <math>\mathcal{C}</math> and <math>\mathcal{D}</math> be chains such that
 
:# each link of <math>\mathcal{D}</math> is a subset of a link of <math>\mathcal{C}</math>, and
:# for any indices ''i'', ''j'', ''m'', and ''n'' with <math>D_i\cap C_m\ne\emptyset</math>, <math>D_j\cap C_n\ne\emptyset</math>, and <math>m<n-2</math>, there exist indices <math>k</math> and <math>\ell</math> with <math>i<k<\ell<j</math> (or <math>i>k>\ell>j</math>) and <math>D_k\subseteq C_{n-1}</math> and <math>D_\ell\subseteq C_{m+1}.</math>
 
:Then <math>\mathcal{D}</math> is '''crooked''' in <math>\mathcal{C}.</math>
 
===Pseudo-arc===
 
For any collection ''C'' of sets, let <math>C^{*}</math> denote the union of all of the elements of ''C''.  That is, let
:<math>C^*=\bigcup_{S\in C}S.</math>
 
The ''pseudo-arc'' is defined as follows:
 
:Let ''p'' and ''q'' be distinct points in the plane and <math>\left\{\mathcal{C}^{i}\right\}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}</math> be a sequence of chains in the plane such that for each ''i'',
 
:#the first link of <math>\mathcal{C}^i</math> contains ''p'' and the last link contains ''q'',
:#the chain <math>\mathcal{C}^i</math> is a <math>1/2^i</math>-chain,
:#the closure of each link of <math>\mathcal{C}^{i+1}</math> is a subset of some link of <math>\mathcal{C}^i</math>, and
:#the chain <math>\mathcal{C}^{i+1}</math> is crooked in <math>\mathcal{C}^i</math>.
 
:Let
::<math>P=\bigcap_{i\in\mathbb{N}}\left(\mathcal{C}^i\right)^{*}.</math>
:Then ''P'' is a '''pseudo-arc'''.
 
== Notes ==
 
<references/>
 
==References==
 
* [[R.H. Bing]], ''A homogeneous indecomposable plane continuum'', Duke Math. J., 15:3 (1948), 729&ndash;742
* R.H. Bing, ''Concerning hereditarily indecomposable continua'', Pacific J. Math., 1 (1951), 43&ndash;51
* George W. Henderson, ''Proof that every compact decomposable continuum which is topologically equivalent to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua is an arc''. Annals of Math., 72 (1960), 421&ndash;428
* [[Bronisław Knaster]], ''Un continu dont tout sous-continu est indécomposable''. Fundamenta math. 3 (1922), 247–286
* Wayne Lewis, ''The Pseudo-Arc'', Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana, 5 (1999), 25&ndash;77
* [[Edwin Moise]], ''An indecomposable plane continuum which is homeomorphic to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua'', Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 63, no. 3 (1948), 581&ndash;594
* Sam B. Nadler, Jr, ''Continuum theory. An introduction''. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker (1992) ISBN 0-8247-8659-9
 
[[Category:Continuum theory]]

Latest revision as of 10:08, 23 April 2014

23 year-old Visual Arts and Crafts Professionals Toney Frogge from Atholville, loves people, ganhando dinheiro na internet and calligraphy. Discovered some lovely places after working 2 days at Angkor.

Here is my web site - como ficar rico