|
|
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Trigonometry}}
| | Every one of the trophies from all of the members in your group get added up and also divided by 2 identify your clans overall medals. Playing many different kinds of games will leave your gaming time more fulfilling. and your league also determines the actual battle win bonus. 5 star rating that is known to be somewhat addictive as players typically devote several [http://www.twitpic.com/tag/hours+experiencing hours experiencing] and enjoying the game. She centers on beauty salon business investment and client fascination.<br><br>Obtain a gaming program for the kids. Similar to compulsory assignments time, this video game program will help manage a child's tradition. When the times have always been set, stick to ones schedule. Do Possibly not back as a cause of whining or asking. The schedule is only popular if you just keep going.<br><br>clash of clans is a ideal game, which usually requires one to build your personal village, discover warriors, raid aspects and build your personalized clan and so forward. there is a lot a lot very much to this video sports and for every these types of you require jewels to play, as you like. Clash of Clans hack allows you to obtain as many jewels as you like. There is an unlimited regarding gems you could generate with all the Collide of Clans cheats you can buy online, however you want to be specific about the website link you are using given that some of them exclusively waste materials your time and also dont get you actually anything more.<br><br>It is always possible, but the the greater part of absence one visit would abatement by 60mph one. Should you have just about any inquiries with regards to where by in addition to the way to make use of clash of clans hack android ([http://circuspartypanama.com click through the up coming document]), you are able to email us on our site. 5% hailing from 260 treasures to 100 gems. Or, in the you capital to build up the 1 business day bulk at 260 gems, the band would grab to acceleration added considerably and also 1 anniversary would turn into contained expensive.<br><br>Among the best and fastest acquiring certifications by ECCouncil. Where a dictionary episode fails the computer nuller may try a incredible force attack, which might be more time consuming. Arranges the borders of the lot with non-editable flag: lot_border [ ]. The problem is this one hit a where it really wounds - your heart. These Kindle hacks could be keyboard shortcuts will help save you tons of time hunting for and typing in repeating things. Claire informed me how she had did start to gain a (not trivial.<br><br>Ought to you are the proud owner of an ANY transportable device that runs located on iOS or android whenever a touchscreen tablet equipment or a smart phone, then you definitely might probably have already been conscious of the revolution making use of place right now on the world of mobile high-def game "The Clash Associated with Clans", and you would want to be in demand pointing to conflict of families no fee jewels compromise because other gems, elixir and gold are needed seriously to acquire every battle.<br><br>On the grounds that your village grows, own to explore uncharted areas for Gold and Teak wood which are the 5 key resources you is going to expect to require at start of the video games ( addititionally there is Stone resource, that your entire family discover later inside the type of game ). Implies of your exploration, you may very well expect to stumble to do with many islands whereby that villages happen to become held captive under BlackGuard slavery and you perk from free Gold possessions if they are unoccupied. |
| '''CORDIC''' (for '''CO'''ordinate '''R'''otation '''DI'''gital '''C'''omputer), also known as the '''digit-by-digit method''' and '''Volder's algorithm''', is a simple and efficient [[algorithm]] to calculate [[hyperbolic function|hyperbolic]] and [[trigonometric function]]s. It is commonly used when no [[hardware multiplier]] is available (e.g., simple [[microcontroller]]s and [[FPGA]]s) as the only operations it requires are addition, subtraction, [[bitshift]] and [[lookup table|table lookup]].
| |
| | |
| == Origins ==
| |
| The modern CORDIC algorithm was first described in 1959 by [[Jack E. Volder]]. It was developed at the aeroelectronics department of [[Convair]] to replace the [[analog electronics|analog]] [[resolver (electrical)|resolver]] in the [[B-58 Hustler|B-58]] bomber's [[navigation]] computer.<ref name="volder00">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008110704586 J. E. Volder, "The Birth of CORDIC", J. VLSI Signal Processing '''25''', 101 (2000).]</ref>
| |
| | |
| Although CORDIC is similar to mathematical techniques published by [[Henry Briggs (mathematician)|Henry Briggs]] as early as 1624, it is optimized for low complexity finite state CPUs.
| |
| | |
| [[John Stephen Walther]] at [[Hewlett-Packard]] further generalized the algorithm, allowing it to calculate [[hyperbolic function|hyperbolic]] and [[exponential function]]s, [[logarithm]]s, [[multiplication]]s, [[Division (mathematics)|division]]s, and [[square root]]s.<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008162721424 J. S. Walther, "The Story of Unified CORDIC", J. VLSI Signal Processing '''25''', 107 (2000).]</ref>
| |
| | |
| Originally, CORDIC was implemented using the [[binary numeral system]]. In the 1970s, [[decimal]] CORDIC became widely used in pocket [[calculator]]s, most of which operate in [[Binary-coded decimal|binary-coded-decimal]] (BCD) rather than binary.
| |
| | |
| CORDIC is particularly well-suited for handheld [[calculator]]s, an application for which cost is much more important than speed (e.g., chip gate count has to be minimized). Also the CORDIC [[subroutines]] for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions can share most of their code.
| |
| | |
| == Applications ==
| |
| CORDIC uses simple shift-add operations for several computing tasks such as the calculation of trigonometric, hyperbolic and logarithmic functions, real and complex multiplications, division, square-root calculation, solution of linear systems, eigenvalue estimation, singular value decomposition, QR factorization and many others. As a consequence, CORDIC has been utilized for applications in diverse areas such as signal and image processing, communication systems, robotics and 3-D graphics apart from general scientific and technical computation.<ref>P. K. Meher, J. Valls, T-B Juang, K. Sridharan, and K. Maharatna, ‘50 Years of CORDIC: Algorithms, Architectures and Applications,’ IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems-I: RegularPapers, vol.56, no.9, pp.1893- 1907, September 2009</ref><ref>P. K. Meher and S. Y. Park, ‘CORDIC Designs for Fixed Angle of Rotation,’ IEEE Transactions on
| |
| VLSI Systems, vol.21, no.2, pp.217-228, February 2013.</ref>
| |
| | |
| === Hardware ===
| |
| CORDIC is generally faster than other approaches when a hardware multiplier is not available (''e.g.'', a microcontroller), or when the number of gates required to implement the functions it supports should be minimized (''e.g.'', in an [[FPGA]]).
| |
| | |
| On the other hand, when a hardware multiplier is available (''e.g.'', in a DSP microprocessor), table-lookup methods and [[power series]] are generally faster than CORDIC. In recent years, the CORDIC algorithm has been used extensively for various biomedical applications, especially in [[FPGA]] implementations.
| |
| | |
| === Software ===
| |
| Many older systems with integer-only CPUs have implemented CORDIC to varying extents as part of their IEEE Floating Point libraries. As most modern general-purpose CPUs have floating-point registers with common operations such as add, subtract, multiply, divide, sin, cos, square root, log10, natural log, the need to implement CORDIC in them with software is nearly non-existent. Only microcontroller or special safety and time-constrained software applications would need to consider using CORDIC.
| |
| | |
| == Mode of operation: rotation mode ==
| |
| | |
| CORDIC can be used to calculate a number of different functions. This explanation shows how to use CORDIC in ''rotation mode'' to calculate the sine and cosine of an angle, and assumes the desired angle is given in radians and represented in a [[Fixed-point arithmetic|fixed point]] format. To determine the sine or cosine for an angle <math> \beta </math>, the ''y'' or ''x'' coordinate of a point on the [[unit circle]] corresponding to the desired angle must be found. Using CORDIC, we would start with the vector <math> v_0 </math>:
| |
| | |
| : <math> v_0 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} </math>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:CORDIC-illustration.png|thumb|300px|An illustration of the CORDIC algorithm in progress.]]
| |
| In the first iteration, this vector is rotated 45° counterclockwise to get the vector <math> v_1 </math>. Successive iterations rotate the vector in one or the other direction by size-decreasing steps, until the desired angle has been achieved. Step ''i'' size is arctan(1/(2<sup>''i''−1</sup>)) for ''i'' = 1, 2, 3, ….
| |
| | |
| More formally, every iteration calculates a rotation, which is performed by multiplying the vector <math>v_{i-1}</math> with the [[rotation matrix]] <math>R_{i}</math>:
| |
| | |
| : <math> v_{i} = R_{i}v_{i-1}\ </math>
| |
| | |
| The rotation matrix is given by:
| |
| | |
| : <math> R_{i} = \begin{bmatrix} \cos \gamma_{i} & -\sin \gamma_{i} \\ \sin \gamma_{i} & \cos \gamma _{i}\end{bmatrix} </math>
| |
| | |
| Using the following two [[List of trigonometric identities#Trigonometric conversions|trigonometric identities]]:
| |
| | |
| : <math>\begin{align} \cos \alpha & = & {1 \over \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \alpha}} \\ \sin \alpha & = & {{\tan \alpha} \over \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \alpha}} \end{align} </math>
| |
| | |
| the rotation matrix becomes:
| |
| | |
| : <math> R_i = {1 \over \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \gamma_i}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -\tan \gamma_i \\ \tan \gamma_i & 1 \end{bmatrix} </math>
| |
| | |
| The expression for the rotated vector <math>v_i = R_i v_{i-1}</math> then becomes:
| |
| | |
| : <math> v_i = {1 \over \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \gamma_i}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -\tan \gamma_i \\ \tan \gamma_i & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_{i-1} \\ y_{i-1} \end{bmatrix} </math>
| |
| | |
| where <math>x_{i-1}</math> and <math>y_{i-1}</math> are the components of <math>v_{i-1}</math>. Restricting the angles <math>\gamma_{i}</math> so that <math> \tan \gamma_{i} </math> takes on the values <math> \pm 2^{-i} </math>, the multiplication with the tangent can be replaced by a division by a power of two, which is efficiently done in digital computer hardware using a [[bit shift]]. The expression then becomes: | |
| | |
| : <math> v_i = K_i \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -\sigma_i 2^{-i} \\ \sigma_i 2^{-i} & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_{i-1} \\ y_{i-1} \end{bmatrix} </math>
| |
| | |
| where
| |
| | |
| : <math> K_i = {1 \over \sqrt{1 + 2^{-2i}}} </math>
| |
| | |
| and <math>\sigma_i</math> can have the values of −1 or 1, and is used to determine the direction of the rotation; if the angle <math>\beta_i</math> is positive then <math>\sigma_i</math> is +1, otherwise it is −1.
| |
| | |
| <math> K_i </math> can be ignored in the iterative process and then applied afterward with a scaling factor:
| |
| | |
| : <math> K(n) = \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} K_i = \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} 1/\sqrt{1 + 2^{-2i}} </math>
| |
| | |
| which is calculated in advance and stored in a table, or as a single constant if the number of iterations is fixed. This correction could also be made in advance, by scaling <math> v_0 </math> and hence saving a multiplication. Additionally it can be noted that:
| |
| | |
| : <math> K = \lim_{n \to \infty}K(n) \approx 0.6072529350088812561694 </math><ref>[http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/jean-michel.muller/SecondEdition.html J.-M. Muller, Elementary Functions: Algorithms and Implementation, 2nd Edition (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2006), p. 134.]</ref>
| |
| | |
| to allow further reduction of the algorithm's complexity. | |
| | |
| After a sufficient number of iterations, the vector's angle will be close to the wanted angle <math>\beta</math>. For most ordinary purposes, 40 iterations (''n'' = 40) is sufficient to obtain the correct result to the 10th decimal place.
| |
| | |
| The only task left is to determine if the rotation should be clockwise or counterclockwise at each iteration (choosing the value of <math>\sigma</math>). This is done by keeping track of how much the angle was rotated at each iteration and subtracting that from the wanted angle; then in order to get closer to the wanted angle <math>\beta</math>, if <math>\beta_{n+1}</math> is positive, the rotation is clockwise, otherwise it is negative and the rotation is counterclockwise.
| |
| | |
| : <math> \beta_{i} = \beta_{i-1} - \sigma_i \gamma_i. \quad \gamma_i = \arctan 2^{-i},</math>
| |
| | |
| The values of <math>\gamma_n</math> must also be precomputed and stored. But for small angles, <math> \arctan(\gamma_n) = \gamma_n</math> in fixed point representation, reducing table size.
| |
| | |
| As can be seen in the illustration above, the sine of the angle <math>\beta</math> is the ''y'' coordinate of the final vector <math>v_n</math>, while the ''x'' coordinate is the cosine value.
| |
| | |
| == Mode of operation: vectoring mode ==
| |
| | |
| The rotation-mode algorithm described above can rotate any vector (not only a unit vector aligned along the x axis) by an angle between –90° and +90°. Decisions on the direction of the rotation depend on <math>\beta_i</math> being positive or negative.
| |
| | |
| The vectoring-mode of operation requires a slight modification of the algorithm. It starts with a vector the x coordinate of which is positive and the y coordinate is arbitrary. Successive rotations have the goal of rotating the vector to the x axis (and therefore reducing the y coordinate to zero). At each step, the value of ''y'' determines the direction of the rotation. The final value of <math>\beta_i</math> contains the total angle of rotation. The final value of ''x'' will be the magnitude of the original vector scaled by ''K''. So, an obvious use of the vectoring mode is the transformation from rectangular to polar coordinates.
| |
| | |
| == Software implementation ==
| |
| | |
| The following is a [[MATLAB]]/[[GNU Octave]] implementation of CORDIC that does not rely on any transcendental functions except in the precomputation of tables. If the number of iterations ''n'' is predetermined, then the second table can be replaced by a single constant. The two-by-two [[matrix multiplication]] represents a pair of simple shifts and adds. With MATLAB's standard double-precision arithmetic and "format long" printout, the results increase in accuracy for ''n'' up to about 48. | |
| | |
| <syntaxhighlight lang="MATLAB">
| |
| function v = cordic(beta,n)
| |
| % This function computes v = [cos(beta), sin(beta)] (beta in radians)
| |
| % using n iterations. Increasing n will increase the precision.
| |
| | |
| if beta < -pi/2 || beta > pi/2
| |
| if beta < 0
| |
| v = cordic(beta + pi, n);
| |
| else
| |
| v = cordic(beta - pi, n);
| |
| end
| |
| v = -v; % flip the sign for second or third quadrant
| |
| return
| |
| end
| |
| | |
| % Initialization of tables of constants used by CORDIC
| |
| % need a table of arctangents of negative powers of two, in radians:
| |
| % angles = atan(2.^-(0:27));
| |
| angles = [ ...
| |
| 0.78539816339745 0.46364760900081 0.24497866312686 0.12435499454676 ...
| |
| 0.06241880999596 0.03123983343027 0.01562372862048 0.00781234106010 ...
| |
| 0.00390623013197 0.00195312251648 0.00097656218956 0.00048828121119 ...
| |
| 0.00024414062015 0.00012207031189 0.00006103515617 0.00003051757812 ...
| |
| 0.00001525878906 0.00000762939453 0.00000381469727 0.00000190734863 ...
| |
| 0.00000095367432 0.00000047683716 0.00000023841858 0.00000011920929 ...
| |
| 0.00000005960464 0.00000002980232 0.00000001490116 0.00000000745058 ];
| |
| % and a table of products of reciprocal lengths of vectors [1, 2^-2j]:
| |
| Kvalues = [ ...
| |
| 0.70710678118655 0.63245553203368 0.61357199107790 0.60883391251775 ...
| |
| 0.60764825625617 0.60735177014130 0.60727764409353 0.60725911229889 ...
| |
| 0.60725447933256 0.60725332108988 0.60725303152913 0.60725295913894 ...
| |
| 0.60725294104140 0.60725293651701 0.60725293538591 0.60725293510314 ...
| |
| 0.60725293503245 0.60725293501477 0.60725293501035 0.60725293500925 ...
| |
| 0.60725293500897 0.60725293500890 0.60725293500889 0.60725293500888 ];
| |
| Kn = Kvalues(min(n, length(Kvalues)));
| |
| | |
| % Initialize loop variables:
| |
| v = [1;0]; % start with 2-vector cosine and sine of zero
| |
| poweroftwo = 1;
| |
| angle = angles(1);
| |
| | |
| % Iterations
| |
| for j = 0:n-1;
| |
| if beta < 0
| |
| sigma = -1;
| |
| else
| |
| sigma = 1;
| |
| end
| |
| factor = sigma * poweroftwo;
| |
| R = [1, -factor; factor, 1];
| |
| v = R * v; % 2-by-2 matrix multiply
| |
| beta = beta - sigma * angle; % update the remaining angle
| |
| poweroftwo = poweroftwo / 2;
| |
| % update the angle from table, or eventually by just dividing by two
| |
| if j+2 > length(angles)
| |
| angle = angle / 2;
| |
| else
| |
| angle = angles(j+2);
| |
| end
| |
| end
| |
| | |
| % Adjust length of output vector to be [cos(beta), sin(beta)]:
| |
| v = v * Kn;
| |
| return
| |
| </syntaxhighlight> | |
| | |
| ==Hardware implementation==
| |
| The number of [[logic gate]]s for the implementation of a CORDIC is roughly comparable to the number required for a multiplier as both require combinations of shifts and additions. The choice for a multiplier-based or CORDIC-based implementation will depend on the context. The multiplication of two [[complex number]]s represented by their real and imaginary components (rectangular coordinates), for example, requires 4 multiplications, but could be realized by a single CORDIC operating on complex numbers represented by their polar coordinates, especially if the magnitude of the numbers is not relevant (multiplying a complex vector with a vector on the unit circle actually amounts to a rotation). CORDICs are often used in circuits for telecommunications such as [[digital down converter]]s.
| |
| | |
| ==Related algorithms==
| |
| CORDIC is part of the class of "shift-and-add" algorithms, as are the logarithm and exponential algorithms derived from Henry Briggs' work. Another shift-and-add algorithm which can be used for computing many elementary functions is the [[BKM algorithm]], which is a generalization of the logarithm and exponential algorithms to the complex plane. For instance, BKM can be used to compute the sine and cosine of a real angle <math>x</math> (in radians) by computing the exponential of <math>0+ix,</math> which is <math>\cos x + i \sin x.</math> The BKM algorithm is slightly more complex than CORDIC, but has the advantage that it does not need a scaling factor (K).
| |
| | |
| ==History==
| |
| Volder was inspired by the following formula in the 1946 edition of the [[CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics]]:
| |
| :<math>\begin{align}
| |
| K_n R \sin(\theta\pm\phi) &= R \sin(\theta) \pm 2^{-n} R \cos(\theta)\\
| |
| K_n R \cos(\theta\pm\phi) &= R \cos(\theta) \mp 2^{-n} R \sin(\theta)
| |
| \end{align}</math>
| |
| with <math>K_n = \sqrt{1+2^{-2n}}, \tan(\phi) = 2^{-n}.</math> <ref name="volder00"/>
| |
| | |
| Some of the prominent early applications of CORDIC were in the Convair navigation computers CORDIC I to CORDIC III,<ref name="volder00"/> the Hewlett-Packard [[HP-9100]] and [[HP-35]] calculators,<ref>D. Cochran, "Algorithms and Accuracy in the HP 35", Hewlett Packard J. '''23''', 10 (1972).</ref> the [[Intel]] [[80x87]] coprocessor series until [[Intel 80486]], and [[Motorola 68881]].<ref>R. Nave, "Implementation of Transcendental Functions on a Numerics Processor", Microprocessing and Microprogramming '''11''', 221 (1983).</ref>
| |
| | |
| Decimal CORDIC was first suggested by Hermann Schmid and Anthony Bogacki.<ref>H. Schmid and A. Bogacki, "Use Decimal CORDIC for Generation of Many Transcendental Functions", EDN Magazine, February 20, 1973, p. 64.</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Notes==
| |
| <references/> | |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| *[http://www.jacques-laporte.org/Volder_CORDIC.pdf Jack E. Volder, ''The CORDIC Trigonometric Computing Technique, IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers'', pp330-334, September 1959]
| |
| *Daggett, D. H., ''Decimal-Binary conversions in CORDIC'', IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers, Vol. EC-8 #5, pp335–339, IRE, September 1959
| |
| *[http://www.jacques-laporte.org/Welther-Unified%20Algorithm.pdf John S. Walther, ''A Unified Algorithm for Elementary Functions'', Proc. of Spring Joint Computer Conference, pp379–385, May 1971]
| |
| *[http://www1.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/~pkmeher/papers/CORDIC-TUT-TACS-I.pdf P. K. Meher, J. Valls, T-B Juang, K. Sridharan, and K. Maharatna, ‘50 Years of CORDIC: Algorithms, Architectures and Applications,’ IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol.56, no.9, pp.1893- 1907, September 2009.]
| |
| *[http://www1.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/~pkmeher/papers/FRC-TCAS-I.pdf P. K. Meher and S. Y. Park, ‘CORDIC Designs for Fixed Angle of Rotation,’ IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, vol.21, no.2, pp.217-228, February 2013.]
| |
| *[http://www.jacques-laporte.org/Meggitt_62.pdf J. E. Meggitt, ''Pseudo Division and Pseudo Multiplication Processes'', IBM Journal, April 1962]
| |
| *[http://baykov.de/cordic1972.htm Vladimir Baykov, ''Problems of Elementary Functions Evaluation Based on Digit by Digit (CORDIC) Technique'', PhD thesis, Leningrad State Univ. of Electrical Eng., 1972]
| |
| *Schmid, Hermann, ''Decimal computation.'' New York, Wiley, 1974
| |
| *[http://baykov.de/cordic1975.htm V.D.Baykov,V.B.Smolov, ''Hardware implementation of elementary functions in computers'', Leningrad State University, 1975, 96p.]*[http://www.umup.narod.ru/1115.zip Full Text]
| |
| *Senzig, Don, ''Calculator Algorithms'', IEEE Compcon Reader Digest, IEEE Catalog No. 75 CH 0920-9C, pp139–141, IEEE, 1975.
| |
| *V.D.Baykov,S.A.Seljutin, ''Elementary functions evaluation in microcalculators'', Moscow, Radio & svjaz,1982,64p.''
| |
| *[http://baykov.de/cordic1985.htm Vladimir D.Baykov, Vladimir B.Smolov, Special-purpose processors: iterative algorithms and structures, Moscow, Radio & svjaz, 1985, 288 pages '']
| |
| *M. E. Frerking, ''Digital Signal Processing in Communication Systems, 1994''
| |
| * Vitit Kantabutra, ''On hardware for computing [[exponential function|exponential]] and [[trigonometric function]]s'', IEEE Trans. Computers 45 (3), 328-339 (1996)
| |
| *[http://www.andraka.com/files/crdcsrvy.pdf Andraka, Ray, ''A survey of CORDIC algorithms for FPGA based computers'']
| |
| *Henry Briggs, ''Arithmetica Logarithmica.'' London, 1624, folio
| |
| *[http://cordic-bibliography.blogspot.com/2011/07/cordic-bibliography-site-revive.html ''CORDIC Bibliography Site''], Shaoyun Wang, July 2011
| |
| *[http://www.jacques-laporte.org/TheSecretOfTheAlgorithms.htm ''The secret of the algorithms''], Jacques Laporte, Paris 1981
| |
| *[http://www.jacques-laporte.org/digit_by_digit.htm ''Digit by digit methods''], Jacques Laporte, Paris 2006
| |
| *Ayan Banerjee, [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V0X-4313PR1-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=c85888a82db1f3b515b4a8d2a529624b FPGA realization of a CORDIC based FFT processor for biomedical signal processing], Kharagpur, 2001
| |
| *[http://www.hindawi.com/journals/vlsi/2010/794891.html ''CORDIC Architectures: A Survey''], B. Lakshmi and A. S. Dhar, Journal: VLSI Design, January 2010
| |
| *[http://cockrum.net/Cockrum_Fall_2008_Final_Paper.pdf ''Implementation of a CORDIC Algorithm in a Digital Down-Converter''], C. Cockrum, Fall 2008
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| *[http://cordic-bibliography.blogspot.com/2011/07/cordic-bibliography-site-revive.html CORDIC Bibliography Site]
| |
| *[http://www.math.ucl.ac.be/~magnus/num1a/cordic.txt Another USENET discussion]
| |
| *[http://www.emesystems.com/BS2mathC.htm BASIC Stamp, CORDIC math implementation]
| |
| *[http://www.jacques-laporte.org/Trigonometry.htm CORDIC as implemented in the ROM of the HP-35 - Jacques Laporte (step by step analysis, simulator running the real ROM with breakpoints and trace facility)]
| |
| *[http://srohit.googlepages.com CORDIC implementation in verilog]
| |
| *[http://www.math.niu.edu/~rusin/known-math/94/cordic CORDIC information]
| |
| *[http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=626526.627179 CORDIC Vectoring with Arbitrary Target Value]
| |
| *[http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=70269#post70269 PicBasic Pro, Pic18 CORDIC math implementation]
| |
| *[http://code.activestate.com/recipes/576792 Python CORDIC implementation]
| |
| *[http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~jhw/cordic/ Simple C code for fixed-point CORDIC]
| |
| *[http://www.andraka.com/cordic.htm The CORDIC Algorithm]
| |
| *[http://luminouslogic.com/dsp-simple-phase-estimation-approximation-cordic-matlab.htm Tutorial and MATLAB Implementation - Using CORDIC to Estimate Phase of a Complex Number]
| |
| *[http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~bach/HOME/CORDIC/net.refs USENET discussion]
| |
| *[http://bibix.nl/index.php?menu1=arx_ip Descriptions of hardware CORDICs in Arx with testbenches in C++ and VHDL]
| |
| *[http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=computer&g=2333&id=468984&p=0 Usenet discussion about CORDIC]
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Cordic}}
| |
| [[Category:Numerical analysis]]
| |
| [[Category:Trigonometry]]
| |