Bochner space: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Yobot
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + general fixes using AWB (7896)
 
en>Noix07
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Friends contact him Royal Seyler. I've always cherished residing in Idaho. The thing she adores most is flower arranging and she is trying to make it a occupation. Interviewing is what she does.<br><br>Also visit my blog: [http://Discordia.Cwsurf.de/index.php?mod=users&action=view&id=61 car warranty]
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2012}}
'''Intrabeam scattering''' (IBS) is an effect in [[accelerator physics]] where collisions between particles couple the [[beam emittance]] in all three dimensions.  This generally causes the beam size to grow.  In proton accelerators, intrabeam scattering causes the beam to grow slowly over a period of several hours.  This limits the [[luminosity]] lifetime.  In circular lepton accelerators, intrabeam scattering is counteracted by [[radiation damping]], resulting in a new equilibrium beam emittance with a relaxation time on the order of milliseconds.  Intrabeam scattering creates an inverse relationship between the smallness of the beam and the number of particles it contains, therefore limiting [[luminosity]].
 
The two principal methods for calculating the effects of intrabeam scattering were done by [[Anton Piwinski]] in 1974 and [[James Bjorken]] and [[Sekazi Mtingwa]] in 1983. The Bjorken-Mtingwa formulation is regarded as being the most general solution.  Both of these methods are computationally intensive.  Several approximations of these methods have been done that are easier to evaluate, but less general.  These approximations are summarized in ''Intrabeam scattering formulas for high energy beams'' by K. Kubo ''et al.''
 
Intrabeam scattering rates have a <math>1/\gamma^{4}</math> dependence.  This means that its effects diminish with increasing beam energy.  Other ways of mitigating IBS effects are the use of [[Wiggler (synchrotron)|wigglers]], and reducing beam intensity.  Transverse intrabeam scattering rates are sensitive to dispersion.
 
Intrabeam scattering is closely related to the [[Touschek effect]].  The Touschek effect is a lifetime based on intrabeam collisions that result in both particles being ejected from the beam.  Intrabeam scattering is a risetime based on intrabeam collisions that result in momentum coupling.
 
==Bjorken–Mtingwa formulation==
The betatron growth rates for intrabeam scattering are defined as,
: <math>\frac{1}{T_{p}} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\  \frac{1}{\sigma_{p}} \frac{d\sigma_{p}}{dt}</math>,
: <math>\frac{1}{T_{h}} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\  \frac{1}{\epsilon_{h}^{1/2}} \frac{d\epsilon_{h}^{1/2}}{dt}</math>,
: <math>\frac{1}{T_{v}} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\  \frac{1}{\epsilon_{v}^{1/2}} \frac{d\epsilon_{v}^{1/2}}{dt}</math>.
The following is general to all bunched beams,
: <math>\frac{1}{T_{i}} = 4\pi A (\operatorname{log}) \left\langle \int_{0}^{\infty} \,d\lambda\ \frac{\lambda^{1/2}}{[\operatorname{det}(L+\lambda I)]^{1/2}}
\left\{\operatorname{Tr}L^{i}\operatorname{Tr}\left(\frac{1}{L+\lambda I}\right) - 3 \operatorname{Tr}\left[L^{i}\left(\frac{1}{L+\lambda I}
\right)\right]\right\}\right\rangle</math>,
where <math>T_{p}</math>, <math>T_{h}</math>, and <math>T_{v}</math> are the momentum spread, horizontal, and vertical are the betatron growth times.
The angle brackets <...> indicate that the integral is averaged around the ring.
: <math>(\operatorname{log}) = \ln \frac{b_{min}}{b_{max}} = \ln \frac{2}{\theta_{min}}</math>
: <math>A = \frac{r_0^2 c N}{64 \pi^2 \beta^3 \gamma^4 \epsilon_h \epsilon_v \sigma_s \sigma_p}</math>
: <math>L = L^{(p)} + L^{(h)} + L^{(v)}\,</math>
: <math>L^{(p)} = \frac{\gamma^2}{\sigma^2_p}\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 1 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}</math>
: <math>L^{(h)} = \frac{\beta_h}{\epsilon_h}\begin{pmatrix}
1 & -\gamma\phi_h & 0\\
-\gamma\phi_h & \frac{\gamma^2 {\mathcal H}_h}{\beta_h} & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}</math>
: <math>L^{(v)} = \frac{\beta_v}{\epsilon_v}\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & \frac{\gamma^2 {\mathcal H}_v}{\beta_v} & -\gamma\phi_v\\
0 & -\gamma\phi_v & 1\end{pmatrix}</math>
:<math>{\mathcal H}_{h,v} = [\eta^2_{h,v} + (\beta_{h,v}\eta'_{h,v} - \frac{1}{2}\beta'_{h,v}\eta_h)^2]/\beta_{h,v}</math>
:<math>\phi_{h,v} = \eta'_{h,v} - \frac{1}{2}\beta'_{h,v}\eta_{h,v}/\beta_{h,v}</math>
Definitions:
:<math>r_0^2</math> is the classical radius of the particle
:<math>c</math> is the speed of light
:<math>N</math> is the number of particles per bunch
:<math>\beta</math> is velocity divided by the speed of light
:<math>\gamma</math> is energy divided by mass
:<math>\beta_{h,v}</math> and <math>\beta'_{h,v}</math> is the betatron function and its derivative, respectively
:<math>\eta_{h,v}</math> and <math>\eta'_{h,v}</math> is the dispersion function and its derivative, respectively
:<math>\epsilon_{h,v}</math> is the emittance
:<math>\sigma_s</math> is the bunch length
:<math>\sigma_p</math> is the momentum spread
:<math>b_{min}</math> and <math>b_{max}</math> are the minimum and maximum impact parameters.  The minimum impact parameter is the closest distance of approach between two particles in a collision.  The maximum impact parameter is the largest distance between two particles such that their trajectories are unaltered by the collision.  The maximum impact parameter should be taken to be the minimum beam size.  See <ref>B. Nash ''et al.'', "A New analysis of intrabeam scattering", Conf.Proc. C030512 (2003) 126, http://inspirehep.net/record/623294</ref><ref>http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-820.html</ref> for some analysis of the Coulomb log and support for this result.
:<math>\theta_{min}</math> is the minimum scattering angle.
 
==Equilibrium and growth rate sum rule==
IBS can be seen as a process in which the different "temperatures" try to equilibrate. The growth rates would be zero in the case that
*<math> \frac{\sigma_\delta}{\gamma} = \sigma_{x'} = \sigma_{y'}</math>
which the factor of <math>\gamma</math> coming from the Lorentz transformation.  From this equation, we see that due to the factor of <math>\gamma</math>, the longitudinal is typically much "colder" than the transverse.  Thus, we typically get growth in the longitudinal, and shrinking in the transverse.
 
One may also the express conservation of energy in IBS in terms of the Piwinski invariant
* <math>\frac{\epsilon_x}{\beta_x} + \frac{\epsilon_y}{\beta_y} + \eta_s \frac{\epsilon_z}{\beta_z } </math>
where <math>\eta_s = \frac{1}{\gamma^2} -\alpha_c</math>.  Above transition, with just IBS, this implies that there is no equilibrium.  However, for the case of radiation damping and diffusion, there is certainly an equilibrium.  The effect of IBS is to cause a change in the equilibrium values of the emittances.
 
== Inclusion of coupling==
In the case of a coupled beam, one must consider the evolution of the coupled eiqenemittances. The growth rates are generalized to
<math>\frac{1}{\tau_{1,2,3}}=\frac{1}{\epsilon_{1,2,3}}\frac{d\epsilon_{1,2,3}}{dt}</math>
 
== Measurement and comparison with Theory ==
Intrabeam scattering is an important effect in the proposed "ultimate storage ring" light sources and lepton damping rings for International Linear Collider (ILC) and Compact Linear Collider (CLIC).
Experimental studies aimed at understanding intrabeam scattering in beams similar to those used in these types of machines have been conducted at KEK,<ref>K. L. F. Bane, H. Hayano, K. Kubo, T. Naito, T. Okugi,
and J. Urakawa, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 084403
(2002).  http://prst-ab.aps.org/abstract/PRSTAB/v5/i8/e084403</ref> CesrTA,<ref>M. P. Ehrlichman, et. al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 104401 (2013). http://prst-ab.aps.org/abstract/PRSTAB/v16/i10/e104401</ref> and elsewhere.
 
==References==
* A. Piwinski, in ''[http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-r-839-c.pdf Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, Stanford, CA, 1974]'' (SLAC, Stanford, 1974), p.&nbsp;405
* J. Bjorken and S. Mtingwa, Part. Accel. '''13''', 115 (1983).
* K. Kubo ''et al.'', Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams '''8''', 081001 (2005).
 
{{Reflist}}
 
[[Category:Accelerator physics]]

Latest revision as of 18:10, 20 January 2014

30 year-old Entertainer or Range Artist Wesley from Drumheller, really loves vehicle, property developers properties for sale in singapore singapore and horse racing. Finds inspiration by traveling to Works of Antoni Gaudí. Intrabeam scattering (IBS) is an effect in accelerator physics where collisions between particles couple the beam emittance in all three dimensions. This generally causes the beam size to grow. In proton accelerators, intrabeam scattering causes the beam to grow slowly over a period of several hours. This limits the luminosity lifetime. In circular lepton accelerators, intrabeam scattering is counteracted by radiation damping, resulting in a new equilibrium beam emittance with a relaxation time on the order of milliseconds. Intrabeam scattering creates an inverse relationship between the smallness of the beam and the number of particles it contains, therefore limiting luminosity.

The two principal methods for calculating the effects of intrabeam scattering were done by Anton Piwinski in 1974 and James Bjorken and Sekazi Mtingwa in 1983. The Bjorken-Mtingwa formulation is regarded as being the most general solution. Both of these methods are computationally intensive. Several approximations of these methods have been done that are easier to evaluate, but less general. These approximations are summarized in Intrabeam scattering formulas for high energy beams by K. Kubo et al.

Intrabeam scattering rates have a 1/γ4 dependence. This means that its effects diminish with increasing beam energy. Other ways of mitigating IBS effects are the use of wigglers, and reducing beam intensity. Transverse intrabeam scattering rates are sensitive to dispersion.

Intrabeam scattering is closely related to the Touschek effect. The Touschek effect is a lifetime based on intrabeam collisions that result in both particles being ejected from the beam. Intrabeam scattering is a risetime based on intrabeam collisions that result in momentum coupling.

Bjorken–Mtingwa formulation

The betatron growth rates for intrabeam scattering are defined as,

1Tp=def1σpdσpdt,
1Th=def1ϵh1/2dϵh1/2dt,
1Tv=def1ϵv1/2dϵv1/2dt.

The following is general to all bunched beams,

1Ti=4πA(log)0dλλ1/2[det(L+λI)]1/2{TrLiTr(1L+λI)3Tr[Li(1L+λI)]},

where Tp, Th, and Tv are the momentum spread, horizontal, and vertical are the betatron growth times. The angle brackets <...> indicate that the integral is averaged around the ring.

(log)=lnbminbmax=ln2θmin
A=r02cN64π2β3γ4ϵhϵvσsσp
L=L(p)+L(h)+L(v)
L(p)=γ2σp2(000010000)
L(h)=βhϵh(1γϕh0γϕhγ2hβh0000)
L(v)=βvϵv(0000γ2vβvγϕv0γϕv1)
h,v=[ηh,v2+(βh,vη'h,v12β'h,vηh)2]/βh,v
ϕh,v=η'h,v12β'h,vηh,v/βh,v

Definitions:

r02 is the classical radius of the particle
c is the speed of light
N is the number of particles per bunch
β is velocity divided by the speed of light
γ is energy divided by mass
βh,v and β'h,v is the betatron function and its derivative, respectively
ηh,v and η'h,v is the dispersion function and its derivative, respectively
ϵh,v is the emittance
σs is the bunch length
σp is the momentum spread
bmin and bmax are the minimum and maximum impact parameters. The minimum impact parameter is the closest distance of approach between two particles in a collision. The maximum impact parameter is the largest distance between two particles such that their trajectories are unaltered by the collision. The maximum impact parameter should be taken to be the minimum beam size. See [1][2] for some analysis of the Coulomb log and support for this result.
θmin is the minimum scattering angle.

Equilibrium and growth rate sum rule

IBS can be seen as a process in which the different "temperatures" try to equilibrate. The growth rates would be zero in the case that

which the factor of γ coming from the Lorentz transformation. From this equation, we see that due to the factor of γ, the longitudinal is typically much "colder" than the transverse. Thus, we typically get growth in the longitudinal, and shrinking in the transverse.

One may also the express conservation of energy in IBS in terms of the Piwinski invariant

where ηs=1γ2αc. Above transition, with just IBS, this implies that there is no equilibrium. However, for the case of radiation damping and diffusion, there is certainly an equilibrium. The effect of IBS is to cause a change in the equilibrium values of the emittances.

Inclusion of coupling

In the case of a coupled beam, one must consider the evolution of the coupled eiqenemittances. The growth rates are generalized to 1τ1,2,3=1ϵ1,2,3dϵ1,2,3dt

Measurement and comparison with Theory

Intrabeam scattering is an important effect in the proposed "ultimate storage ring" light sources and lepton damping rings for International Linear Collider (ILC) and Compact Linear Collider (CLIC). Experimental studies aimed at understanding intrabeam scattering in beams similar to those used in these types of machines have been conducted at KEK,[3] CesrTA,[4] and elsewhere.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. B. Nash et al., "A New analysis of intrabeam scattering", Conf.Proc. C030512 (2003) 126, http://inspirehep.net/record/623294
  2. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-820.html
  3. K. L. F. Bane, H. Hayano, K. Kubo, T. Naito, T. Okugi, and J. Urakawa, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 084403 (2002). http://prst-ab.aps.org/abstract/PRSTAB/v5/i8/e084403
  4. M. P. Ehrlichman, et. al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 104401 (2013). http://prst-ab.aps.org/abstract/PRSTAB/v16/i10/e104401