Real estate bubble - Revision history

en>Bobrayner: Really?

2015-01-08T23:17:21Z

Really?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 9 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The writer is known as Wilber Pegues~~. ~~One of the extremely very best things in the globe for him~~ is ~~doing ballet and he'll be starting something else alongside with~~ it. ~~Kentucky is exactly where~~ I've always ~~been residing~~. He is ~~an order clerk and it~~'~~s something he truly enjoy~~.<br><br>my ~~web blog - free online tarot card readings~~ ([http://~~profirealt~~.com~~.ua~~/~~?q=ru~~/~~content/things-consider-when-starting-fresh-hobby profirealt~~.com~~.ua~~])		Hi there. My title is Sophia Meagher even though it is not the name on my birth certification. I've always cherished living in Kentucky but now I'm considering other options. My day job is a journey agent. I am truly fond of to go to karaoke but I've been using on new issues lately.<br><br>my page love psychics ([http://www.movierush.com/users/LMontemay www.movierush.com])

en>Yobot: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + other fixes using AWB (9930)

2014-02-10T11:30:01Z

WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + other fixes using AWB (9930)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 10 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~In [[semantics\|linguistic semantics]], an expression X~~ is said to have '''cumulative reference''' if and only if the following holds: If X is true of both of ''a'' and ''b'', then it is also true of the combination of ''a'' and ''b''. Example: If two separate entities can be said to be "water", then combining them into one entity will yield more "water". If two separate entities can be said to be "a house", their combination cannot be said to be "a house". Hence, "water" has cumulative reference, while the expression "a house" does not. The [[english plural\|plural]] form "houses", however, ''does'' have cumulative reference. ~~If two (groups~~ of~~) entities are both "houses", then their combination will still be "houses".~~		The writer is known as Wilber Pegues. One of the extremely very best things in the globe for him is doing ballet and he'll be starting something else alongside with it. Kentucky is exactly where I've always been residing. He is an order clerk and it's something he truly enjoy.<br><br>my web blog - free online tarot card readings ([http://profirealt.com.ua/?q=ru/content/things-consider-when-starting-fresh-hobby profirealt.com.ua])

	~~Cumulativity has proven relevant to~~ the ~~linguistic treatment of~~ the ~~[[mass noun\|mass/count]] distinction~~ and ~~for the characterization of grammatical [[telicity]].~~

	~~Formally, a cumulativity predicate ''CUM'~~' ~~can~~ be ~~defined as follows,~~ where ~~capital ''X'~~' is ~~a [[Variable (mathematics)\|variable]] over [[set (mathematics)\|sets]], ''U'' is the [[universe of discourse]], ''p'' is a [[mereology\|mereological]] part [[mathematical structure\|structure]] on ''U'~~'~~, and <math>\oplus_p</math> is the [[mereology\|mereological]] sum operation~~.

	<~~center~~><~~math~~>
	(~~\forall X\subseteq U_p)(CUM(X)\iff \exists x,y(X(x) \wedge X(y) \wedge x\neq y) \wedge \forall x,y(X(x) \wedge X(y) \Rightarrow X(x \oplus_p y)))~~
	</~~math><~~/~~center>~~

	~~In later work, Krifka has generalized the notion to ''n''-ary predicates, based on the phenomenon of ''cumulative quantification''. For example, the two following sentences appear to be equivalent:~~
	~~: John ate an apple and Mary ate a pear~~.
	~~: John and Mary ate an apple and a pear~~.

	~~This shows that the relation "eat" is cumulative. In general, an ''n''-ary predicate ''R'' is ''cumulative'' if and only if the following holds:~~
	~~<center>~~
	~~<math>~~
	~~(\forall x_1,\ldots, x_n, y_1,\ldots, y_n)(R(x_1, \ldots,x_n)\wedge R(y_1, \ldots,y_n)) \rightarrow R(x_1\oplus y_1, \ldots,x_n\oplus y_n)~~
	</~~math>~~
	</~~center>~~

	~~==References==~~

	~~[[Manfred Krifka\|Krifka, Manfred]] (1989). "Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics".~~
	~~In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), ''Semantics and Contextual Expressions'' 75~~-~~115. Dordrecht: [[Foris]].~~

	~~Krifka, Manfred. 1999. "At least some determiners aren’t determiners". In ''The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view'', ed. K. Turner, 257–291. North~~-~~Holland: [[Elsevier]] Science.~~

	~~Scha, Remko. 1981. "Distributive, collective, and cumulative quantification". In ''Formal methods in the study of language'', ed~~. T. ~~Janssen and M. Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam: [[Mathematical Centre Tracts]].~~

	~~[[Category:Grammar]]~~
	~~[[Category:Semantics]~~]

2001:5C0:1000:B:0:0:0:19A1: /* Recent real estate bubbles */

2014-01-30T01:16:56Z

Recent real estate bubbles

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 30 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Hi on that point. My name~~ is ~~Randa. My job~~ is ~~an invoicing officer but~~ the ~~promotion never comes. Ice skating just what love taking part in. For years she~~'~~s been living in Utah~~ and ~~her parents live community~~. Go to ~~his website~~ to ~~out more: http://wiki~~.the~~-planetoid-series~~.~~com~~/~~index~~.~~php?title=User:GertrudWainscot~~<br><br>~~Here~~ is ~~my webpage~~ :: ~~[http~~://~~wiki~~.~~the~~-~~planetoid~~-~~series~~.~~com/index~~.~~php?title=User~~:~~GertrudWainscot sexual positions~~]		In [[semantics\|linguistic semantics]], an expression X is said to have '''cumulative reference''' if and only if the following holds: If X is true of both of ''a'' and ''b'', then it is also true of the combination of ''a'' and ''b''. Example: If two separate entities can be said to be "water", then combining them into one entity will yield more "water". If two separate entities can be said to be "a house", their combination cannot be said to be "a house". Hence, "water" has cumulative reference, while the expression "a house" does not. The [[english plural\|plural]] form "houses", however, ''does'' have cumulative reference. If two (groups of) entities are both "houses", then their combination will still be "houses".

			Cumulativity has proven relevant to the linguistic treatment of the [[mass noun\|mass/count]] distinction and for the characterization of grammatical [[telicity]].

			Formally, a cumulativity predicate ''CUM'' can be defined as follows, where capital ''X'' is a [[Variable (mathematics)\|variable]] over [[set (mathematics)\|sets]], ''U'' is the [[universe of discourse]], ''p'' is a [[mereology\|mereological]] part [[mathematical structure\|structure]] on ''U'', and <math>\oplus_p</math> is the [[mereology\|mereological]] sum operation.

			<center><math>
			(\forall X\subseteq U_p)(CUM(X)\iff \exists x,y(X(x) \wedge X(y) \wedge x\neq y) \wedge \forall x,y(X(x) \wedge X(y) \Rightarrow X(x \oplus_p y)))
			</math></center>

			In later work, Krifka has generalized the notion to ''n''-ary predicates, based on the phenomenon of ''cumulative quantification''. For example, the two following sentences appear to be equivalent:
			: John ate an apple and Mary ate a pear.
			: John and Mary ate an apple and a pear.

			This shows that the relation "eat" is cumulative. In general, an ''n''-ary predicate ''R'' is ''cumulative'' if and only if the following holds:
			<center>
			<math>
			(\forall x_1,\ldots, x_n, y_1,\ldots, y_n)(R(x_1, \ldots,x_n)\wedge R(y_1, \ldots,y_n)) \rightarrow R(x_1\oplus y_1, \ldots,x_n\oplus y_n)
			</math>
			</center>

			==References==

			[[Manfred Krifka\|Krifka, Manfred]] (1989). "Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics".
			In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), ''Semantics and Contextual Expressions'' 75-115. Dordrecht: [[Foris]].

			Krifka, Manfred. 1999. "At least some determiners aren’t determiners". In ''The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view'', ed. K. Turner, 257–291. North-Holland: [[Elsevier]] Science.

			Scha, Remko. 1981. "Distributive, collective, and cumulative quantification". In ''Formal methods in the study of language'', ed. T. Janssen and M. Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam: [[Mathematical Centre Tracts]].

			[[Category:Grammar]]
			[[Category:Semantics]]

188.10.0.85 at 07:21, 30 August 2012

2012-08-30T07:21:05Z

New page

Hi on that point. My name is Randa. My job is an invoicing officer but the promotion never comes. Ice skating just what love taking part in. For years she's been living in Utah and her parents live community. Go to his website to out more: http://wiki.the-planetoid-series.com/index.php?title=User:GertrudWainscot<br><br>Here is my webpage :: [http://wiki.the-planetoid-series.com/index.php?title=User:GertrudWainscot sexual positions]