<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mercer%27s_condition</id>
	<title>Mercer&#039;s condition - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mercer%27s_condition"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Mercer%27s_condition&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-18T03:41:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Mercer%27s_condition&amp;diff=10147&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Qwertyus: merge to|Mercer&#039;s theorem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Mercer%27s_condition&amp;diff=10147&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-07-02T09:43:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;merge to|Mercer&amp;#039;s theorem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{distinguish|Ornstein–Uhlenbeck operator}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{More footnotes|date=January 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In mathematics, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (named after [[Leonard Ornstein]] and [[George Eugene Uhlenbeck]]), is a [[stochastic process]] that, roughly speaking, describes the velocity of a massive [[Brownian motion|Brownian particle]] under the influence of friction.  The process is [[stationary process|stationary]], [[Gaussian process|Gaussian]], and [[Markov process|Markov]]ian, and is the only nontrivial process that satisfies these three conditions, up to allowing linear transformations of the space and time variables.&amp;lt;ref name=Doob&amp;gt;{{harvnb|Doob|1942}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Over time, the process tends to drift towards its long-term mean: such a process is called &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Mean reversion (finance)|mean-reverting]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The process can be considered to be a modification of the [[random walk]] in [[continuous time]], or [[Wiener process]], in which the properties of the process have been changed so that there is a tendency of the walk to move back towards a central location, with a greater attraction when the process is further away from the centre. The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process can also be considered as the [[continuous time|continuous-time]] analogue of the [[discrete time|discrete-time]] [[Autoregressive|AR(1) process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Representation via a stochastic differential equation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, satisfies the following [[stochastic differential equation]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dx_t = \theta (\mu-x_t)\,dt + \sigma\, dW_t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are parameters and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the [[Wiener process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above representation can be taken as the primary definition of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process.&amp;lt;ref name=Doob/&amp;gt;{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Making the long term mean stochastic to another SDE is a simplified version of the [[cointelation]] SDE.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wilmottM.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite journal|authors=Mahdavi Damghani B.|title=The Non-Misleading Value of Inferred Correlation: An Introduction to the Cointelation Model|journal=Wilmott Magazine|year=2013|url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wilm.10252/abstract}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fokker–Planck equation representation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The probability density function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;ƒ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;,&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process satisfies the [[Fokker–Planck equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = \theta \frac{\partial}{\partial x} [(x - \mu) f] + \frac{\sigma^2}{2}  \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Green function of this linear parabolic partial differential equation, taking &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D = \sigma^2/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for simplicity, and the initial condition consisting of a unit point mass at location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{\theta}{2 \pi D (1-e^{-2\theta t})}} \exp\left\{\frac{-\theta}{2D}\left[\frac{(x - y e^{-\theta t})^2}{1-e^{-2\theta t}}\right]\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stationary solution of this equation is the limit for time tending to infinity which is a [[Gaussian distribution]] with mean &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and variance&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma^2/(2\theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f_s(x) = \sqrt{\frac{\theta}{\pi \sigma^2}}\, e^{-\theta (x-\mu)^2/\sigma^2}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Application in physical sciences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is a prototype of a noisy [[Relaxation (physics)|relaxation process]].&lt;br /&gt;
Consider for example a [[Hooke&amp;#039;s law|Hookean spring]] with spring constant &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; whose dynamics is highly overdamped&lt;br /&gt;
with friction coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
In the presence of thermal fluctuations with [[temperature]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
of the spring will fluctuate stochastically around the spring rest length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt;
its stochastic dynamic is described by an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\theta &amp;amp;=k/\gamma, \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mu &amp;amp; =x_0, \\&lt;br /&gt;
\sigma &amp;amp;=\sqrt{2k_B T/\gamma},&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is derived from the [[Stokes–Einstein equation]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\sigma^2/2=k_B T/\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the effective diffusion constant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In physical sciences, the stochastic differential equation of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is rewritten as a [[Langevin equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \gamma\dot{x}(t) = - k( x(t) - x_0 ) + \xi(t) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is [[Gaussian noise|white Gaussian noise]] with&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\langle\xi(t_1)\xi(t_2)\rangle = 2 k_B T\,\gamma\, \delta(t_1-t_2).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At equilibrium, the spring stores an average energy &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \langle E\rangle = k \langle (x-x_0)^2 \rangle /2=k_B T/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in accordance with the [[equipartition theorem]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Application in financial mathematics ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is one of several approaches used to model (with modifications) interest rates, currency exchange rates, and commodity prices stochastically. The parameter &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; represents the equilibrium or mean value supported by fundamentals; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the degree of volatility around it caused by shocks, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the rate by which these shocks dissipate and the variable reverts towards the mean. One application of the process is a trading strategy known as [[pairs trade]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~skiena/691/lectures/lecture23.pdf Advantages of Pair Trading: Market Neutrality]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/publications/RampertshammerStefan.pdf An Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Framework for Pairs Trading]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mathematical properties ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is an example of a [[Gaussian process]] that has a bounded variance and admits a [[stationary process|stationary]] [[probability distribution]], in contrast to the [[Wiener process]]; the difference between the two is in their &amp;quot;drift&amp;quot; term. For the Wiener process the drift term is constant, whereas for the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process it is dependent on the current value of the process: if the current value of the process is less than the (long-term) mean, the drift will be positive; if the current value of the process is greater than the (long-term) mean, the drift will be negative. In other words, the mean acts as an equilibrium  level for the process. This gives the process its informative name, &amp;quot;mean-reverting.&amp;quot;  The stationary (long-term) [[variance]] is given by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\operatorname{var}(x_t)={\sigma ^2 \over 2\theta}. \, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is the [[continuous time|continuous-time]] analogue of the [[discrete time|discrete-time]] [[Autoregressive|AR(1) process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OrnsteinUhlenbeck4.png|thumb|450px|three sample paths of different OU-processes with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;θ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;1, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;μ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;1.2, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;σ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;0.3:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;blue&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;: initial value &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;0 ([[almost surely|a.s.]])&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#6e8b3d;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;green&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;: initial value &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;2 (a.s.)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;red&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;: initial value normally distributed so that the process has invariant measure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This stochastic differential equation is solved by [[variation of parameters]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}}  Apply [[Itō&amp;#039;s lemma]] to the function&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f(x_t, t) = x_t e^{\theta t} \, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
df(x_t,t) &amp;amp; =  \theta x_t e^{\theta t}\, dt + e^{\theta t}\, dx_t \\[6pt]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = e^{\theta t}\theta \mu \, dt + \sigma e^{\theta t}\, dW_t.&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from 0 to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x_t e^{\theta t} = x_0 + \int_0^t e^{\theta s}\theta \mu \, ds + \int_0^t \sigma e^{\theta s}\, dW_s \, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
whereupon we see&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x_t  = x_0 e^{-\theta t} + \mu(1-e^{-\theta t}) + \int_0^t \sigma e^{\theta (s-t)}\, dW_s. \, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Formulas for moments of nonstationary processes ===&lt;br /&gt;
From this representation, the first [[moment (mathematics)|moment]] is given by (assuming that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is a constant)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E(x_t)=x_0 e^{-\theta t}+\mu(1-e^{-\theta t}) \!\ &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Itō isometry]] can be used to calculate the [[covariance function]] by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{cov}(x_s,x_t) &amp;amp; = E[(x_s - E[x_s])(x_t - E[x_t])] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = E \left[ \int_0^s \sigma  e^{\theta (u-s)}\, dW_u \int_0^t \sigma  e^{\theta (v-t)}\, dW_v \right] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sigma^2 e^{-\theta (s+t)}E \left[ \int_0^s  e^{\theta u}\, dW_u \int_0^t  e^{\theta v}\, dW_v \right] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{\sigma^2}{2\theta} \, e^{-\theta (s+t)}(e^{2\theta \min(s,t)}-1).&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus if &amp;#039;&amp;#039;s&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (so that min(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;s&amp;#039;&amp;#039;,&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;s&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), then we have&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \operatorname{cov}(x_s,x_t) = \frac{\sigma^2}{2\theta}\left( e^{-\theta(t-s)} - e^{-\theta(t+s)} \right). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative representation for nonstationary processes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also possible (and often convenient) to represent &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (unconditionally, i.e. as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t\rightarrow\infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as a scaled time-transformed Wiener process {{Citation needed|date=January 2012}}:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x_t=\mu+{\sigma\over\sqrt{2\theta}}e^{-\theta t}W_{e^{2\theta t}} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
or conditionally (given &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x_t=x_0 e^{-\theta t} +\mu (1-e^{-\theta t})+&lt;br /&gt;
{\sigma\over\sqrt{2\theta}}e^{-\theta t}W_{e^{2\theta t}-1}. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The time integral of this process can be used to generate [[pink noise|noise with a 1/&amp;#039;&amp;#039;ƒ&amp;#039;&amp;#039; power spectrum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scaling limit interpretation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process can be interpreted as a [[scaling limit]] of a discrete process, in the same way that [[Brownian motion]] is a scaling limit of [[random walks]]. Consider an urn containing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; blue and yellow balls. At each step a ball is chosen at random and replaced by a ball of the opposite colour (equivalently, a ball chosen uniformly at random changes color). Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;X_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of blue balls in the urn after &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; steps. Then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{X_{[nt]} - n/2}{\sqrt{n}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; converges in law to a Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; tends to infinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Generalizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to extend Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes to processes where the background driving process is a [[Lévy process]].{{clarify|reason=how is this different|date=July 2011}} These processes are widely studied by [[Ole Barndorff-Nielsen]] and [[Neil Shephard]],{{citation needed|date= July 2011}} and others.{{citation needed|date=July 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, in finance, stochastic processes are used the volatility increases for larger&lt;br /&gt;
values of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In particular, the CKLS (Chan–Karolyi–Longstaff–Sanders) process&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chan et al. (1992)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with the volatility term replaced by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma\,x^\gamma\, dW_t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be solved in closed form for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma=1/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or 1, as well as for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which corresponds to the conventional OU process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cointelation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Vasicek model]] of [[interest rates]] is an example of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Short rate model]] – contains more examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |first=E. |last=Bibbona |first2=G. |last2=Panfilo |first3=P. |last3=Tavella |title=The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as a model of a low pass filtered white noise |journal=Metrologia |volume=45 |issue=6 |pages=S117–S126 |year=2008 |doi=10.1088/0026-1394/45/6/S17 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |last=Chan |first=K. C. |last2=Karolyi |first2=G. A. |last3=Longstaff |first3=F. A. |last4=Sanders |first4=A. B. |title=An empirical comparison of alternative models of the short-term interest rate |journal=[[Journal of Finance]] |volume=47 |issue=3 |pages=1209–1227 |year=1992 |doi=10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04011.x }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |first=J. L. |last=Doob |authorlink=Joseph Leo Doob |title=The Brownian movement and stochastic equations |journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] |volume=43 |issue=2 |year=1942 |pages=351–369 |doi= |jstor=1968873 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |first=D. T. |last=Gillespie |title=Exact numerical simulation of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process and its integral |journal=[[Physical Review|Phys. Rev. E]] |volume=54 |issue=2 |pages=2084–2091 |year=1996 |pmid=9965289 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2084 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book |first=H. |last=Risken |title=The Fokker–Planck Equation: Method of Solution and Applications |publisher=Springer-Verlag |location=New York |year=1989 |isbn=0387504982 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |first=G. E. |last=Uhlenbeck |first2=L. S. |last2=Ornstein |title=On the theory of Brownian Motion |journal=Phys. Rev. |volume=36 |issue= |pages=823–841 |year=1930 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.36.823 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1109160 A Stochastic Processes Toolkit for Risk Management], Damiano Brigo, Antonio Dalessandro, Matthias Neugebauer and Fares Triki&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sitmo.com/article/calibrating-the-ornstein-uhlenbeck-model/ Simulating and Calibrating the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process], M.A. van den Berg&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.investmentscience.com/Content/howtoArticles/MLE_for_OR_mean_reverting.pdf Maximum likelihood estimation of mean reverting processes], Jose Carlos Garcia Franco&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Stochastic processes}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stochastic differential equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stochastic processes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Variants of random walks]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Qwertyus</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>