<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=78.146.112.194</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=78.146.112.194"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/78.146.112.194"/>
	<updated>2026-05-12T02:31:35Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Nick_Bostrom&amp;diff=4642</id>
		<title>Nick Bostrom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Nick_Bostrom&amp;diff=4642"/>
		<updated>2013-11-24T21:29:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;78.146.112.194: /* Simulation argument */ deleted two word to make the article make more sense&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;&#039;&#039;omega constant&#039;&#039;&#039; is a [[mathematical constant]] defined by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega\,e^{\Omega}=1.\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is the value of &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039;(1) where &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039; is [[Lambert&#039;s W function]]. The name is derived from the alternate name for Lambert&#039;s &#039;&#039;W&#039;&#039; function, the &#039;&#039;omega function&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value of &amp;amp;Omega; is approximately 0.5671432904097838729999686622... {{OEIS|id=A030178}}. It has properties that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; e^{-\Omega}=\Omega,\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
or equivalently,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ln \Omega = - \Omega.\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can calculate &amp;amp;Omega; [[iterative method|iteratively]], by starting with an initial guess &amp;amp;Omega;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and considering the [[sequence]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Omega_{n+1}=e^{-\Omega_n}.\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This sequence will [[limit of a sequence|converge]] towards &amp;amp;Omega; as &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;rarr;&amp;amp;infin;. This convergence is due to the fact that &amp;amp;Omega; is an [[Fixed point (mathematics)|attractive fixed point]] of the function &#039;&#039;e&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is much more efficient to use the iteration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{n+1} = \frac{1+\Omega_n}{1+e^{\Omega_n}},&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
because the function&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f(x) = \frac{1+x}{1+e^x},&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
has the same fixed point but features a zero derivative at this fixed point, therefore the convergence is quadratic (the number of correct digits is roughly doubled with each iteration).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A beautiful identity due to Victor Adamchik is given by the relationship&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Omega=\frac{1}{\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{\,dt}{(e^t-t)^2+\pi^2}}-1 .&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Irrationality and transcendence==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;Omega; can be proven [[irrational number|irrational]] from the fact that [[e (mathematical constant)|e]] is [[transcendental number|transcendental]]; if &amp;amp;Omega; were rational, then there would exist integers &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039; such that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \frac{p}{q} = \Omega &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 1 = \frac{p e^{\left( \frac{p}{q} \right)}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- extra blank line for legibility; these two displays crowd each other --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; e = \left( \frac{q}{p} \right)^{\left( \frac{q}{p} \right)} = \sqrt[p]{\frac{q^q}{p^q}} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and &#039;&#039;e&#039;&#039; would therefore be [[Algebraic number|algebraic]] of degree &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;. However &#039;&#039;e&#039;&#039; is transcendental, so &amp;amp;Omega; must be irrational.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;Omega; is in fact [[transcendental number|transcendental]] as the direct consequence of [[Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem]]. If &amp;amp;Omega; were algebraic, exp(&amp;amp;Omega;) would be transcendental and so would be exp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;minus;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;amp;Omega;). But this contradicts the assumption that it was algebraic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lambert W function]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* {{MathWorld|urlname=OmegaConstant|title=Omega Constant}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcendental numbers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mathematical constants|Omega]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles containing proofs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>78.146.112.194</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>